Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T Pincus

Publications and source records attributed to T Pincus.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Cognitive-processing bias in chronic pain: a review and integration.

Do patients with chronic pain selectively process pain- and illness-related stimuli? The evidence with regard to attention, interpretation, and recall biases is critically reviewed. A model is proposed to account for the findings in which it is suggested that biases in information processing in chronic pain are the result of overlap between 3 schemas: pain, illness, and self. With frequent repeated or continued experience of pain, the pain schema becomes enmeshed with illness and self-schemas. The extent of the enmeshment and the salient content of the schema determine the bias. A fundamental assumption is that all patients with pain selectively process sensory-intensity information. A clinical implication of the results is that processing biases that extend beyond this healthy and adaptive process to enmesh the self-schema with pain and illness schemas could maintain and exacerbate distress and illness behavior in patients with chronic pain.

Anxiety↗
PubMed2001

How can the risk of long-term consequences of rheumatoid arthritis be reduced?

The long-term natural history of rheumatoid arthritis includes early radiographic damage and progression, severe functional declines, work disability and increased mortality rates. Emerging evidence suggests that this natural history may be favourably affected by disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), which slow the radiographic progression and functional decline. It is necessary to document both the efficacy of these drugs in randomized controlled clinical trials and their long-term effectiveness in clinical observational studies. Although a 20% improvement in inflammatory measures in the American College of Rheumatology Core Data Set (ACR20) distinguishes DMARDs from placebo in clinical trials, it is not clear that a control of inflammation at this level, or even at 50%, is sufficient to prevent long-term damage. There is limited financial support for long-term observational studies, which depend on data from the clinical experience of rheumatologists. Quantitative databases from clinical care, can be developed to document long-term outcomes in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis to include additional physical, radiographic, laboratory and patient questionnaire quantitative data. Patient self-report questionnaires appear to provide the least expensive and most effective measures toward this goal.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMed2001

Educational program for physicians to reduce use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs among community-dwelling elderly persons: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most frequently prescribed drugs for patients 65 years of age or older, primarily for musculoskeletal symptoms of osteoarthritis. Because NSAIDs frequently cause serious gastrointestinal (GI) and other complications among elderly patients, expert guidelines for osteoarthritis recommend acetaminophen-based regimens, which are safer and often as effective as NSAIDs. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate a physician education program that communicated guidelines for management of osteoarthritis in elderly patients that emphasized avoidance of NSAIDs when possible. The program reviewed NSAID risks and benefits and recommended: re-evaluating continuous NSAID users, considering substitution of up to 4 g/d of acetaminophen for the NSAID, and trying topical agents and nonpharmacologic measures. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized controlled trial among community-dwelling Tennessee Medicaid enrollees. SUBJECTS: Study physicians had 5 or more patients who: were community-dwelling Medicaid enrollees 65 years of age or older; had used NSAIDs regularly for at least 180 days; had had no medical care encounters during this period suggesting an indication other than osteoarthritis; and had 1 year of baseline and follow-up data. The study thus included 209 physicians (103 intervention/106 control) with 1,566 qualifying regular NSAID users (768/798). INTERVENTIONS: Face-to-face visit to study physicians by another physician, and reminder placements in the charts of patients eligible to have NSAID use reevaluated. OUTCOMES: Change between baseline and follow-up years in: days of prescribed NSAIDs, acetaminophen, other drugs for musculoskeletal disorders, and GI drugs; outpatient visits and inpatient days of stay; SF36 measures of general health, physical function, and bodily pain (from 40% random patient sample); and over-the-counter NSAIDs (from the sample). RESULTS: Intervention-attributable reduction of 7% (95% CI, 3% to 11%) in days of prescribed NSAIDs use with concomitant increase in acetaminophen use. No significant changes in other study endpoints. The intervention effect was greater among 75 physicians with a completed study visit, whose 564 patients had a 10% (95% CI, 6% to 14%) attributable reduction in NSAID use. CONCLUSIONS: The educational program modestly reduced NSAID exposure in community-dwelling elderly patients without undesirable substitution of other medications or detectable worsening of musculoskeletal symptoms.

Acetaminophen↗
PubMed2001

Recall bias, pain, depression and cost in back pain patients.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between recall bias for pain stimuli in chronic low back pain patients and the cost of managing their back pain in primary care. DESIGN: A retrospective cross-sectional investigation. METHOD: A sample of 63 low back pain patients were interviewed in a primary care setting. Information was gathered on their pain intensity, disability ratings, depression, anxiety, and duration of pain. They were also presented with a surprise recall test for pain descriptors. The cost of each patient's treatment specifically for back pain in the previous 12 months was calculated. The relationship between the cost of back pain treatment and the scores from the interview were calculated first for total cost, and then for the breakdown of individual cost items. RESULTS: Results indicated that recall bias for pain stimuli were significantly related to total cost (R2 = 8%). A detailed analysis revealed that pain intensity was related to the number of appointments with the general practitioners; depression scores related to the number of appointments with the in-house osteopaths; and recall bias for pain stimuli related to referrals to external experts (out-patients). A minority of patients high on recall bias was found to account for a disproportionate amount of the cost. CONCLUSION: Although no causal path can be deduced from the findings, the study provides a novel approach to measuring psychological factors in back pain in reference to health care utilization. It is limited by its retrospective design, and should be followed by prospective studies to understand fully the relationship between cognitive bias and utilization of health services.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Evaluating severity and status in rheumatoid arthritis.

There is general agreement regarding the most appropriate examinations and methods to use to evaluate change in status in randomized controlled trials (RCT). However, no guidelines exist to aid in determining and evaluating actual status rather than change in status, particularly when applied to individual patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In addition, methods appropriate for clinical trials may not be useful in evaluating individual patients because of time constraints. This report reviews current methods of evaluation and develops modified methods, based on data bank research that will be useful in clinical practice and in the evaluation of RCT and observational studies. Using data from longitudinal observational data banks, further reduction in the number of joints examined is evaluated to reconcile the time constraints of clinical practice with the need to maintain reliability and validity. Percentile methods to determine severity status are applied to the variables used in RCT and extended further to observational studies and routine clinical practice. Shortened joint counts, based on modifications of the Ritchie method, are identified that allow for examination of groups of 18 (clinical-18) and 16 (clinical-16) joints, the clinical-16 omitting the metatarsophalangeal joints. Using percentile charts, actual severity valuations are given to the variables evaluated in the clinic as well as in RCT. Disease activity status of clinic patients can be determined quantitatively thus allowing clinicians further insight into the status and prognosis of their patients. By quantifying disease activity severity, clinicians and 3rd party payers can better evaluate the appropriateness of and response to disease modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic therapies. Further, RCT can be evaluated as to severity status of patients participating, and the generalizability of RCT can be better evaluated.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗
PubMed2001

Evaluation and documentation of rheumatoid arthritis disease status in the clinic: which variables best predict change in therapy.

To determine in clinical practice which rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical status variables are most associated with a change in disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy, we studied 26,240 observations from 1905 RA patients occurring over 25 years. Variables included tender joint count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), grip strength, visual analog scale for pain, global severity, fatigue and sleep, Health Assessment Question functional disability scale (HAQ), anxiety, depression and morning stiffness. Only the tender joint count required a physician. Observations at which a change in DMARD therapy occurred were compared to those where a change did not occur using generalized estimating equations (GEE) and classification and regression tree analysis (CART). Tender joint count, pain, global severity, and ESR were the 4 variables most strongly predictive of DMARD change. CART modeling indicated a special role for fatigue and sleep disturbance in some patients. These data add support in clinical practice for the ACR core set and the DAS set of variables. In addition, they validate the use of these variables in a practice setting. We suggest a minimum set of evaluations comprising: joint count, ESR or CRP, measures of pain and/or severity, a fatigue scale (fatigue being a surrogate for sleep disturbance), and a measure of function such as the HAQ or modified HAQ. Because only joint count requires physician participation, these evaluations are practical for the clinic, and allow quantitative measurement of RA status. With the use of quantile charts, the comparative status of RA and the change in RA status can be determined easily.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Markers for work disability in rheumatoid arthritis.

Work disability is common in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and accounts for a large fraction of its costs. People with RA who are work disabled have more joint involvement, radiographic damage, and/or laboratory abnormalities than people who are working. However, analysis of predictive and associative markers in 15 studies of work disability indicate that the demographic variables, such as age, occupation, level of education, and duration of disease, as well as functional status in activities of daily living (ADL) identified on a patient questionnaire, appear to identify work status more than physiological variables. Work disability results from complex interactions of a medical disease, demographic variables, social conditions, and government policies. Some patients with RA are work disabled before they see a rheumatologist. Improved work disability outcomes in RA will require attention to social, economic, and political issues, and wider physician and public education concerning RA, in addition to improved medical management of disease.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2001

Quantitative target values of predictors of mortality in rheumatoid arthritis as possible goals for therapeutic interventions: an alternative approach to remission or ACR20 responses?

Predictors of longterm mortality in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) include patient questionnaire measures, grip strength, walk time, physician and patient assessment of global status, joint examination abnormalities, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and morning stiffness. In the rheumatology literature, these measures have been analyzed primarily according to mean values in groups or regression analyses, which are valuable to recognize that mortality in RA is predicted by more severe disease, but do not provide the clinician with specific goals of therapy. Goals for therapeutic intervention are often expressed either as complete remission or as statistically significant differences versus a placebo, as in a 20% or even 50% response of a measure such as the American College of Rheumatology Core Data Set. Remission may be too stringent, while statistically significant efficacy of a drug compared to placebo may not necessarily indicate effectiveness to control longterm damage. An alternative approach might be to identify possible target values for therapeutic efficacy that markers of a poor prognosis be "near normal" rather than necessarily at normal or remission levels, as has been explored in management of hypertension and diabetes. However, it remains uncertain whether the goal of therapy should be a "near normal" or entirely normal values for a clinical marker. Better control of quantitative markers that predict early mortality could provide a valuable approach to improving outcomes in RA.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗
PubMed2001

The level of inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis is determined early and remains stable over the longterm course of the illness.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the level of inflammatory activity, determined by the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), changes over the longitudinal course of rheumatoid arthritis (RA); whether the level of inflammatory activity identified early in RA predicts longterm inflammatory status; and whether RA "bums out" after many years of inflammatory activity. METHODS: A total of 21,866 consecutive ESR determinations from 1,897 patients with RA were analyzed to determine the association of inflammatory activity, as estimated by ESR, with duration of disease. Data were modeled by generalized estimating equations and random selection fractional polynomial regression models, controlling for age, sex, and calendar date. RESULTS: In a nonlinear fashion, ESR decreased by 4 mm/h over the first 10 years of disease, remained stable over the next 25 years, and increased slightly thereafter. Patients treated more recently had lower ESR values. Patients with recent onset of RA, when stratified in quartiles of ESR, maintained their position over time. CONCLUSION: Although ESR decreases by 4 mm/h over the first 10 years of disease, it remains stable or rises thereafter. The course of RA, as modeled by the ESR, appears to be "set" early in the disease and good and bad prognosis groups can be identified within the first 2 years. There is no evidence of general "burned out" RA or a lessening of disease activity with long duration of disease. Our findings tend to suggest that the ("usually treated") natural history of RA prior to introduction of antitumor necrosis factor agents is toward some degree of improvement in the early years. If the newer and combination therapies are indeed substantially better than what has been available, they must show a shifting of the curve downward, not just in the early years where it has occurred historically, but over the entire course of the illness.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Gastrointestinal toxicity with celecoxib vs nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: the CLASS study: A randomized controlled trial. Celecoxib Long-term Arthritis Safety Study.

CONTEXT: Conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are associated with a spectrum of toxic effects, notably gastrointestinal (GI) effects, because of inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX)-1. Whether COX-2-specific inhibitors are associated with fewer clinical GI toxic effects is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether celecoxib, a COX-2-specific inhibitor, is associated with a lower incidence of significant upper GI toxic effects and other adverse effects compared with conventional NSAIDs. DESIGN: The Celecoxib Long-term Arthritis Safety Study (CLASS), a double-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted from September 1998 to March 2000. SETTING: Three hundred eighty-six clinical sites in the United States and Canada. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 8059 patients (>/=18 years old) with osteoarthritis (OA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were enrolled in the study, and 7968 received at least 1 dose of study drug. A total of 4573 patients (57%) received treatment for 6 months. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive celecoxib, 400 mg twice per day (2 and 4 times the maximum RA and OA dosages, respectively; n = 3987); ibuprofen, 800 mg 3 times per day (n = 1985); or diclofenac, 75 mg twice per day (n = 1996). Aspirin use for cardiovascular prophylaxis (</=325 mg/d) was permitted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of prospectively defined symptomatic upper GI ulcers and ulcer complications (bleeding, perforation, and obstruction) and other adverse effects during the 6-month treatment period. RESULTS: For all patients, the annualized incidence rates of upper GI ulcer complications alone and combined with symptomatic ulcers for celecoxib vs NSAIDs were 0.76% vs 1.45% (P =.09) and 2. 08% vs 3.54% (P =.02), respectively. For patients not taking aspirin, the annualized incidence rates of upper GI ulcer complications alone and combined with symptomatic ulcers for celecoxib vs NSAIDs were 0.44% vs 1.27% (P =.04) and 1.40% vs 2.91% (P =.02). For patients taking aspirin, the annualized incidence rates of upper GI ulcer complications alone and combined with symptomatic ulcers for celecoxib vs NSAIDs were 2.01% vs 2.12% (P =.92) and 4.70% vs 6.00% (P =.49). Fewer celecoxib-treated patients than NSAID-treated patients experienced chronic GI blood loss, GI intolerance, hepatotoxicity, or renal toxicity. No difference was noted in the incidence of cardiovascular events between celecoxib and NSAIDs, irrespective of aspirin use. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, celecoxib, at dosages greater than those indicated clinically, was associated with a lower incidence of symptomatic ulcers and ulcer complications combined, as well as other clinically important toxic effects, compared with NSAIDs at standard dosages. The decrease in upper GI toxicity was strongest among patients not taking aspirin concomitantly. JAMA. 2000;284:1247-1255

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Patients' satisfaction with osteopathic and GP management of low back pain in the same surgery.

Chronic low back patients reported their satisfaction with the treatment they received for back pain from GPs and osteopaths practising in the same surgery. Although levels of satisfaction were high for all treatments, patients reported significantly higher scores for satisfaction with the osteopathic treatment. The difference was stronger for aspects of care/communication and competence, and weaker for satisfaction with efficacy. These findings are discussed in reference to patients' expectations, novelty, time spent with patients, number of visits, and patients' age.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Preference for nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs versus acetaminophen and concomitant use of both types of drugs in patients with osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze results of treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) with acetaminophen and the nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) through a patient survey. METHODS: A 15 minute telephone survey was conducted with 300 patients, including 172 with confirmed OA. RESULTS: Twenty-four percent of patients who took acetaminophen rated it as "very helpful," compared to 31% for ibuprofen, 30% for naproxen, and 56% for diclofenac. Drug continuation beyond 24 months was reported by 33% of patients for acetaminophen, 21% for ibuprofen, 17% for naproxen, and 19% for diclofenac. Acetaminophen was significantly less likely to be discontinued because of toxicity than NSAID. Patients who indicated that they would not take a drug again, and therefore be unlikely to participate in a clinical trial involving this drug, were 26% for acetaminophen, 40% for ibuprofen, 38% for naproxen, and 28% for diclofenac. About 30% of patients who took acetaminophen reported concurrent use of ibuprofen, naproxen, or diclofenac. Among the 67% of patients who identified a drug as "most helpful," 80% named an NSAID, compared to 20% who named acetaminophen or another analgesic as the "most helpful" drug. CONCLUSION: Patients take many different drugs for OA, most of which are not continued beyond 2 years. Many patients take both acetaminophen and an NSAID. Most patients who identified a drug as "most helpful" named an NSAID rather than acetaminophen or an analgesic drug. These findings may be of value in further development of management strategies and guidelines for OA.

Acetaminophen↗
PubMed2000

Analysis of the discordance between radiographic changes and knee pain in osteoarthritis of the knee.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze cross sectional data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES I) concerning 3 indicators of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee: radiographic evidence of structural damage, self-reported knee pain, and self-report of a diagnosis of arthritis at any joint by a physician. METHODS: Analysis of NHANES I data for 6880 persons ages 25-74 in the United States. RESULTS: Radiographic stage 2-4 knee OA was found in 319 subjects (3.7%); only 47% of these individuals reported knee pain, and only 61% reported that a physician had told them that they had arthritis. Knee pain was reported by 1004 subjects (14.6%), only 15% of whom had radiographic stage 2-4 changes of OA, and 59% of whom reported having a diagnosis of arthritis by a physician. A report of arthritis diagnosed by a physician was given by 1762 subjects (25.6%), of whom only 11% had stage 2-4 radiographic knee OA and 34% reported knee pain. CONCLUSION: Substantial discordance exists in this population based study between radiographic OA of the knee versus knee pain, versus a diagnosis of arthritis by a physician. These phenomena may be important in the design of clinical research studies, as well as in criteria for OA.

Adult↗