Protein mobility within the nucleus--what are the right moves?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to T Pederson.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The advent of jellyfish green fluorescent protein and its spectral variants, together with promising new fluorescent proteins from other classes of the Cnidarian phylum (coral and anemones), has greatly enhanced and promises to further boost the detection and localization of proteins in cell biology. It has been less widely appreciated that highly sensitive methods have also recently been developed for detecting the movement and localization in living cells of the very molecules that precede proteins in the gene expression pathway, i.e. RNAs. These approaches include the microinjection of fluorescent RNAs into living cells, the in vivo hybridization of fluorescent oligonucleotides to endogenous RNAs and the expression in cells of fluorescent RNA-binding proteins. This new field of 'fluorescent RNA cytochemistry' is summarized in this article, with emphasis on the biological insights it has already provided. These new techniques are likely to soon collaborate with other emerging approaches to advance the investigation of RNA birth, RNA-protein assembly and ribonucleoprotein particle transport in systems such as oocytes, embryos, neurons and other somatic cells, and may even permit the observation of viral replication and transcription pathways as they proceed in living cells, ushering in a new era of nucleic acids research in vivo.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
In the present study we have examined the proteins involved in the insulin signaling cascade during and after differentiation of human adipocyte precursor cells and their correlation with glucose uptake. The differentiation of human adipocytes was characterized by a two- to threefold stimulation of glucose transport in response to insulin and a marked increase protein expression for the insulin receptor, IRS-1, GLUT-4, PI 3-kinase, and PKB, with respect to undifferentiated cells. In contrast, there were small changes in the protein expression of IRS-2, and no changes in PKC zeta and MAP kinases, although basal MAP kinase activity and GLUT-1 protein were reduced during differentiation. In conclusion, there are quantitative differences in the regulation of IRS-1 and other proteins during differentiation which may contribute to more efficient insulin signaling leading to glucose uptake in mature fat cells. Alterations in this pattern may reflect or contribute to an insulin-resistant state.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The signal recognition particle (SRP) is a ribonucleoprotein composed of an Alu domain and an S domain. The S domain contains unique sequence SRP RNA and four SRP proteins: SRP19, SRP54, SRP68, and SRP72. SRP interacts with ribosomes to bring translating membrane and secreted proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) for proper processing. Additionally, SRP RNA is a member of a family of small nonribosomal RNAs found recently in the nucleolus, suggesting that the nucleolus is more plurifunctional than previously realized. It was therefore of interest to determine whether other SRP components localize to this intranuclear site. In transfected rat fibroblasts, green fluorescent protein fusions of SRP19, SRP68, and SRP72 localized to the nucleolus, as well as to the cytoplasm, as expected. SRP68 also accumulated in the ER, consistent with its affinity for the ER-bound SRP receptor. SRP54 was detected in the cytoplasm as a green fluorescent protein fusion and in immunofluorescence studies, but was not detected in the nucleolus. In situ hybridization experiments also revealed endogenous SRP RNA in the nucleolus. These results demonstrate that SRP RNA and three SRP proteins visit the nucleolus, suggesting that partial SRP assembly, or another unidentified activity of the SRP components, occurs at the nucleolus. SRP54 apparently interacts with nascent SRP beyond the nucleolus, consistent with in vitro reconstitution experiments showing that SRP19 must bind to SRP RNA before SRP54 binds. Our findings support the notion that the nucleolus is the site of assembly and/or interaction between the family of ribonucleoproteins involved in protein synthesis, in addition to ribosomes themselves.
Pre-mRNA is transcribed primarily from genes located at the interface between chromatin domains and the interchromatin space. After partial or complete processing and complexing with nuclear proteins, the transcripts leave their site of synthesis and travel through the interchromatin space to the nuclear pores for export to the cytoplasm. It is unclear whether transcripts are tethered within the interchromatin space and move toward the nuclear pores using a metabolic energy-requiring, directed mechanism or, alternatively, move randomly by a diffusion-based process. We discuss here recent progress in understanding this step of gene expression, including our experiments tracking the movement of intranuclear poly(A) RNA in living cells. Our results and those of others are most consistent with a model in which newly synthesized mRNAs diffuse throughout the interchromatin space until they randomly encounter and are captured by the export machinery. Because the export machinery appears to preferentially bind transport-competent mRNAs (complexed with the correct complement of nuclear proteins), this diffusion-based model for intranuclear RNA movement potentially allows for a significant level of posttranscriptional control of gene expression.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A cell fraction that would today be termed "the nuclear matrix" was first described and patented in 1948 by Russian investigators. In 1974 this fraction was rediscovered and promoted as a fundamental organizing principle of eukaryotic gene expression. Yet, convincing evidence for this functional role of the nuclear matrix has been elusive and has recently been further challenged. What do we really know about the nonchromatin elements (if any) of internal nuclear structure? Are there objective reasons (as opposed to thinly veiled disdain) to question experiments that use harsh nuclear extraction steps and precipitation-prone conditions? Are the known biophysical properties of the nucleoplasm in vivo consistent with the existence of an extensive network of anastomosing filaments coursing dendritically throughout the interchromatin space? To what extent may the genome itself contribute information for its own quarternary structure in the interphase nucleus? These questions and recent work that bears on the mystique of the nuclear matrix are addressed in this essay. The degree to which gene expression literally depends on nonchromatin nuclear structure as a facilitating organizational format remains an intriguing but unsolved issue in eukaryotic cell biology, and considerable skepticism continues to surround the nuclear matrix fraction as an accurate representation of the in vivo situation.
BACKGROUND: Messenger RNA (mRNA) is transcribed and processed in the nucleus of eucaryotic cells and then exported to the cytoplasm through nuclear pores. It is not known whether the movement of mRNA from its site of synthesis to the nuclear pore is directed or random. Directed movement would suggest that there is an energy-requiring step in addition to the step required for active transport through the pore, whereas random movement would indicate that mRNAs can make their way to the nuclear envelope by diffusion. RESULTS: We devised a method to visualize movement of endogenous polymerase II transcripts in the nuclei of living cells. Oligo(dT) labeled with chemically masked (caged) fluorescein was allowed to penetrate cells and hybridize to nuclear poly(A) RNA. Laser spot photolysis then uncaged the oligo(dT) at a given intranuclear site and the resultant fluorescent, hybridized oligo(dT) was tracked using high-speed imaging microscopy. Poly(A) RNA moved away from the uncaging spot in all directions with a mean square displacement that varied linearly with time, and the same apparent diffusion coefficient was measured for the movement at both 37 degrees C and 23 degrees C. These properties are characteristic of a random diffusive process. High resolution three-dimensional imaging of live cells containing both Hoechst-labeled chromosomes and uncaged oligo(dT) showed that, excluding nucleoli, the poly(A) RNA could access most, if not all, of the non-chromosomal space in the nucleus. CONCLUSIONS: Poly(A) RNA can move freely throughout the interchromatin space of the nucleus with properties characteristic of diffusion.
The biosynthesis of U1, U2, U4 and U5 spliceosomal small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) involves the nuclear export of precursor molecules extended at their 3' ends, followed by a cytoplasmic phase during which the pre-snRNAs assemble into ribonucleoprotein particles and undergo hypermethylation of their 5' caps and 3' end processing prior to nuclear import. Previous studies have demonstrated that the assembly of pre-snRNAs into ribonucleoprotein particles containing the Sm core proteins is essential for nuclear import in mammalian cells but that 5' cap hypermethylation is not. In the present investigation we have asked whether or not 3' end processing is required for nuclear import of U2 RNA. We designed human pre-U2 RNAs that carried modified 3' tails, and identified one that was stalled (or greatly slowed) in 3' end processing, leading to its accumulation in the cytoplasm of human cells. Nonetheless, this 3' processing arrested pre-U2 RNA molecule was found to undergo cytoplasmic assembly into Sm protein-containing complexes to the same extent as normal pre-U2 RNA. The Sm protein-associated, unprocessed mutant pre-U2 RNA was not observed in the nuclear fraction. Using an assay based on suppression of a genetically blocked SV40 pre-mRNA splicing pathway, we found that the 3' processing deficient U2 RNA was significantly reduced in its ability to rescue splicing, consistent with its impaired nuclear import.
The movement of various RNAs from their sites of chromosomal synthesis to their functional locations in the cell is an important step in eukaryotic gene readout, though one less well understood than the transcription, RNA processing, and various functions of RNA. The segregation of the many classes of RNA out into to their appropriate sites in the cell is, from a physical chemical point of view, a remarkable phenomenon. This paper summarizes investigations my colleagues and I have undertaken over the past 7 years to describe the intracellular traffic and localization of RNA in living cells. One approach we have developed is to glass-needle microinject approximately 0.01 pl of fluorescent RNA solutions into the nucleus or cytoplasm of cultured mammalian cells. This 'fluorescent RNA cytochemistry' approach has resolved intranuclear sites ('speCkles') for which premessenger RNAs (pre-mRNA) have high affinity and has revealed very rapid movements of certain other RNAs from their nucleoplasmic injection sites to the nucleoli. One of these rapidly trafficking nucleolar RNAs is the signal recognition particle (SRP) RNA, and further results indicate that the nucleolus is a site of SRP RNA processing or ribonucleoprotein assembly prior to export to the cytoplasm. In these fluorescent RNA microinjection studies, we have also used mutant RNA molecules to identify specific nucleotide sequences that function as targeting elements for the localization of RNAs at their respective intranuclear sites. In a second approach, we have used fluorescent correlation spectroscopy (FCS), a classical biophysical method for measuring molecular motion in vitro, coupled with confocal fluorescence microscopy to measure the movement of poly(A) RNA in the nucleus, with the interesting finding that these RNAs appear to move about inside the nucleus at rates comparable to diffusion in aqueous solution. Parallel experiments using the method of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) revealed a diffusion coefficient for intranuclear poly(A) RNA close to that measured by FCS. These results bear on the structure of the nucleoplasmic ground substance-an extremely controversial and unsolved problem in cell biology (29). The methods we have developed and these initial results represent the first major step toward a comprehensive understanding of RNA traffic in the cell nucleus.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The nucleolus of eukaryotic cells was first described in the early 19th century and was discovered in the 1960s to be the seat of ribosome synthesis. Although rRNA transcription, rRNA processing and ribosome assembly have been clearly established as major functions of the nucleolus, recent studies suggest that the nucleolus participates in many other aspects of gene expression as well. Thus, the nucleolus has been implicated in the processing or nuclear export of certain mRNAs. In addition, new results indicate that biosyntheses of signal recognition particle RNA and telomerase RNA involve a nucleolar stage and that the nucleolus is also involved in processing of U6 RNA, one of the spliceosomal small nuclear RNAs. Interestingly, these three nucleolus-associated small nuclear RNAs (signal recognition particle RNA, telomerase RNA and U6 RNA) are components of catalytic ribonucleoprotein machines. Finally, recent work has also suggested that some transfer RNA precursors are processed in the nucleolus. The nucleolus may have evolutionarily descended from a proto-eukaryotic minimal genome that was spatially linked to vicinal RNA processing and ribonucleoprotein assembly events involved in gene read-out. The nucleolus of today's eukaryotes, now surrounded by the chromatin of over 2 billion years of genome expansion, may still perform these ancient functions, in addition to ribosome biosynthesis. The plurifunctional nucleolus concept has a strong footing in contemporary data and adds a new perspective to our current picture of the spatial-functional design of the cell nucleus.
The signal recognition particle (SRP) of eukaryotic cells is a cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein machine that arrests the translational elongation of nascent secretory and membrane proteins and facilitates their transport into the endoplasmic reticulum. The spatial pathway of SRP RNA processing and ribonucleoprotein assembly in the cell is not known. In the present investigation, microinjection of fluorescently tagged SRP RNA into the nucleus of mammalian cells was used to examine its intranuclear sites of localization. Microinjection of SRP RNA into the nuclei of normal rat kidney (NRK) epithelial cells maintained at 37 degreesC on the microscope stage resulted in a very rapid initial localization in nucleoli, followed by a progressive decline of nucleolar signal and an increase of fluorescence at discrete sites in the cytoplasm. Nuclear microinjection of a molecule corresponding to a major portion of the Alu domain of SRP RNA revealed a pattern of rapid nucleolar localization followed by cytoplasmic appearance of signal that was similar to the results obtained with full-length SRP RNA. In contrast, a molecule corresponding to the S domain of SRP RNA did not display nucleolar localization to the extent observed with full-length SRP RNA. An SRP RNA molecule lacking helix 6 of the S domain displayed normal nucleolar localization, whereas one lacking helix 8 of the S domain did not. These results, obtained by direct, real-time observation of fluorescent RNA molecules inside the nucleus of living mammalian cells, suggest that the processing of SRP RNA or its ribonucleoprotein assembly into the SRP involves a nucleolar phase.
Fluorescein-labeled oligodeoxynucleotides (oligos) were introduced into cultured rat myoblasts, and their molecular movements inside the nucleus were studied by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP). FCS revealed that a large fraction of both intranuclear oligo(dT) (43%) and oligo(dA) (77%) moves rapidly with a diffusion coefficient of 4 x 10(-7) cm2/s. Interestingly, this rate of intranuclear oligo movement is similar to their diffusion rates measured in aqueous solution. In addition, we detected a large fraction (45%) of the intranuclear oligo(dT), but not oligo(dA), diffusing at slower rates (</=1 x 10(-7) cm2/s). The amount of this slower-moving oligo(dT) was greatly reduced if the oligo(dT) was prehybridized in solution with (unlabeled) oligo(dA) prior to introduction to cells, presumably because the oligo(dT) was then unavailable for subsequent hybridization to endogenous poly(A) RNA. The FCS-measured diffusion rate for much of the slower oligo(dT) population approximated the diffusion rate in aqueous solution of oligo(dT) hybridized to a large polyadenylated RNA (1.0 x 10(-7) cm2/s). Moreover, this intranuclear movement rate falls within the range of calculated diffusion rates for an average-sized heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle in aqueous solution. A subfraction of oligo(dT) (15%) moved over 10-fold more slowly, suggesting it was bound to very large macromolecular complexes. Average diffusion coefficients obtained from FRAP experiments were in agreement with the FCS data. These results demonstrate that oligos can move about within the nucleus at rates comparable to those in aqueous solution and further suggest that this is true for large ribonucleoprotein complexes as well.
The possible existence in eukaryotic cells of an internal, non-chromatin nuclear structural framework that facilitates gene readout as a set of spatially concerted reactions has become a popular but controversial theater of investigation. This article endeavors to present a circumspect review of the nuclear matrix concept as we presently know it, framed around two contrasting hypotheses: (1) that an internal nuclear framework actively enhances gene expression (in much the same way the cytoskeleton mediates cell locomotion, mitosis and intracellular vesicular traffic) versus (2) that the interphase chromosomes have fixed, inherited positions and that the DNA replication, transcripton and RNA processing machinery diffusionally arrives at sites of gene readout, with some aspects of nuclear structure thus being more a result than a cause of gene expression. On balance, the available information suggests that interactions among various gene expression machines may contribute to isolated nuclear matrix preparations. Some components of isolated nuclear matrix preparations may also reflect induced or reconfigured protein-protein associations. The protein characterization and ultrastructural analysis of the isolated nuclear matrix has advanced significantly in recent years, although controversies remain. Important new clues are now coming in from promising contemporary lines of research that report on nuclear structure in living cells.
U3 and U8 small nucleolar RNAs (snRNAs) participate in pre-rRNA processing. Like the U1, U2, U4 and U5 major spliceosomal snRNAs, U3 and U8 RNAs are transcribed by RNA polymerase II and their initial 7-methylguanosine (m7G) 5' cap structures subsequently become converted to 2,2,7-trimethylguanosine. However, unlike the polymerase II transcribed spliceosomal snRNAs, which are exported to the cytoplasm for cap hypermethylation, U3 and U8 RNAs undergo cap hypermethylation within the nucleus. Human U3 and U8 RNAs with various cap structures were generated by in vitro transcription, fluorescently labeled and microinjected into nuclei of normal rat kidney (NRK) epithelial cells. When U3 and U8 RNAs containing a m7G cap were microinjected they became extensively localized in nucleoli. U3 and U8 RNAs containing alternative cap structures did not localize in nucleoli nor did U3 or U8 RNAs containing triphosphate 5'-termini. The nucleolar localization of m7G-capped U3 RNA was competed by co-microinjection into the nucleus of a 100-fold molar excess of dinucleotide m7GpppG but not by a 100-fold excess of ApppG dinucleotide. Although it was obviously not possible to assess formation of di- and trimethylguanosine caps on the microinjected U3 and U8 RNAs in these single cell experiments, these results indicate that the initial presence of a m7G cap on U3 and U8 RNAs, most likely together with internal sequence elements, commits these transcripts to the nucleolar localization pathway and point to diverse roles of the m7G cap in the intracellular traffic of various RNAs transcribed by RNA polymerase II.