Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T P Malan

Publications and source records attributed to T P Malan.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

Pronociceptive effects of spinal dynorphin promote cannabinoid-induced pain and antinociceptive tolerance.

Recent studies indicate that sustained opioid administration produces increased expression of spinal dynorphin, which promotes enhanced sensitivity to non-noxious and noxious stimuli. Such increased "pain" may manifest behaviorally as a decrease in spinal antinociceptive potency. Here, the possibility of similar mechanisms in the antinociception of spinal cannabinoids was explored. Response thresholds to non-noxious mechanical and noxious thermal stimuli were assessed. Antinociception was determined using the 52 degrees C tail-flick test. Mice received repeated WIN 55,212-2, its inactive enantiomer, WIN 55,212-3 or vehicle (i.th., bid, 5 days). WIN 55,212-2, but not WIN 55,212-3 or vehicle, produced a time-related increased sensitivity to non-noxious and noxious stimuli. WIN 55,212-2, but not WIN 55,212-3 or vehicle, elicited a significant increase in lumbar spinal dynorphin content at treatment day 5. Increased sensitivity to mechanical and thermal stimuli produced by WIN 55,212-2 was reversed to baseline levels by i.th. MK-801 or dynorphin antiserum; control serum had no effect. WIN 55,212-2, but not WIN 55,212-3 or vehicle, produced dose-related antinociception and repeated administration resulted in antinociceptive tolerance. While MK-801 and dynorphin antiserum did not alter acute antinociception produced by WIN 55,212-2, these substances significantly blocked antinociceptive tolerance when given immediately prior to WIN 55,212-2 challenge on day 5. Daily MK-801 pretreatments, prior to WIN 55,212-2 injection, also produced a significant block of antinociceptive tolerance. These data suggest that like opioids, repeated spinal administration of a cannabinoid CB1 agonist elicits abnormal pain, which results in increased expression of spinal dynorphin. Manipulations that block cannabinoid-induced pain also block the behavioral manifestation of cannabinoid tolerance.

Analgesics↗
PubMed2001

Inhibition of neuropathic pain by selective ablation of brainstem medullary cells expressing the mu-opioid receptor.

Neurons in the rostroventromedial medulla (RVM) project to spinal loci where the neurons inhibit or facilitate pain transmission. Abnormal activity of facilitatory processes may thus represent a mechanism of chronic pain. This possibility and the phenotype of RVM cells that might underlie experimental neuropathic pain were investigated. Cells expressing mu-opioid receptors were targeted with a single microinjection of saporin conjugated to the mu-opioid agonist dermorphin; unconjugated saporin and dermorphin were used as controls. RVM dermorphin-saporin, but not dermorphin or saporin, significantly decreased cells expressing mu-opioid receptor transcript. RVM dermorphin, saporin, or dermorphin-saporin did not change baseline hindpaw sensitivity to non-noxious or noxious stimuli. Spinal nerve ligation (SNL) injury in rats pretreated with RVM dermorphin-saporin failed to elicit the expected increase in sensitivity to non-noxious mechanical or noxious thermal stimuli applied to the paw. RVM dermorphin or saporin did not alter SNL-induced experimental pain, and no pretreatment affected the responses of sham-operated groups. This protective effect of dermorphin-saporin against SNL-induced pain was blocked by beta-funaltrexamine, a selective mu-opioid receptor antagonist, indicating specific interaction of dermorphin-saporin with the mu-opioid receptor. RVM microinjection of dermorphin-saporin, but not of dermorphin or saporin, in animals previously undergoing SNL showed a time-related reversal of the SNL-induced experimental pain to preinjury baseline levels. Thus, loss of RVM mu receptor-expressing cells both prevents and reverses experimental neuropathic pain. The data support the hypothesis that inappropriate tonic-descending facilitation may underlie some chronic pain states and offer new possibilities for the design of therapeutic strategies.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Pronociceptive actions of dynorphin maintain chronic neuropathic pain.

Whereas tissue injury increases spinal dynorphin expression, the functional relevance of this upregulation to persistent pain is unknown. Here, mice lacking the prodynorphin gene were studied for sensitivity to non-noxious and noxious stimuli, before and after induction of experimental neuropathic pain. Prodynorphin knock-out (KO) mice had normal responses to acute non-noxious stimuli and a mild increased sensitivity to some noxious stimuli. After spinal nerve ligation (SNL), both wild-type (WT) and KO mice demonstrated decreased thresholds to innocuous mechanical and to noxious thermal stimuli, indicating that dynorphin is not required for initiation of neuropathic pain. However, whereas neuropathic pain was sustained in WT mice, KO mice showed a return to baselines by post-SNL day 10. In WT mice, SNL upregulated lumbar dynorphin content on day 10, but not day 2, after injury. Intrathecal dynorphin antiserum reversed neuropathic pain in WT mice at post-SNL day 10 (when dynorphin was upregulated) but not on post-SNL day 2; intrathecal MK-801 reversed SNL-pain at both times. Opioid (mu, delta, and kappa) receptor density and G-protein activation were not different between WT and KO mice and were unchanged by SNL injury. The observations suggest (1) an early, dynorphin-independent phase of neuropathic pain and a later dynorphin-dependent stage, (2) that upregulated spinal dynorphin is pronociceptive and required for the maintenance of persistent neuropathic pain, and (3) that processes required for the initiation and the maintenance of the neuropathic pain state are distinct. Identification of mechanisms that maintain neuropathic pain appears important for strategies to treat neuropathic pain.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Nerve injury-induced tactile allodynia is mediated via ascending spinal dorsal column projections.

Peripheral nerve injury produces signs of neuropathic pain including tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia, sensory modalities which may be associated with different neuronal pathways. Studies of spinally-transected, nerve-injured rats have led to suggestions that thermal hyperalgesia may be mediated predominately through local spinal circuitry whereas ascending input to supraspinal sites is critical to the manifestation of tactile allodynia. Here, the nature of ascending spinal input mediating tactile allodynia was explored using selective spinal lesions. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received L(5)/L(6) spinal nerve ligation (SNL) and ipsilateral or contralateral (relative to the SNL side) lesions including spinal hemisections and bilateral and unilateral dorsal column lesions. The rats were maintained in a sling and monitored for tactile allodynia by measuring withdrawal thresholds to probing with von Frey filaments 24 h after the hemisection. Rats receiving dorsal column lesions demonstrated no motor deficits while rats receiving spinal hemisection showed paralysis of the paw which nevertheless responded to strong noxious stimulation. Spinal hemisection ipsilateral, but not contralateral, to SNL completely abolished tactile allodynia while maintaining spinal nocifensive reflexes to noxious pinch. Bilateral and ipsilateral dorsal column lesions blocked tactile allodynia while contralateral dorsal column lesions did not. Administration of lidocaine into the nucleus gracilis ipsilateral to SNL also blocked tactile allodynia, but did not alter thermal hyperalgesia in SNL rats or increase thermal nociceptive responses in sham-operated rats. Lidocaine microinjected into the contralateral nucleus gracilis produced no changes in responses to tactile or thermal stimuli in either group. These results indicate that tactile allodynia after peripheral nerve injury is dependent upon inputs to supraspinal sites. Furthermore, it is apparent that afferent signals interpreted as tactile allodynia course through the ipsilateral dorsal columns and are relayed through the nucleus gracilis. This neuronal pathway is consistent with the interpretation that tactile allodynia pursuant to peripheral nerve injury is transmitted to the central nervous system by means of large diameter, myelinated fibers.

Anesthetics, Local↗
PubMed2001

Tonic descending facilitation from the rostral ventromedial medulla mediates opioid-induced abnormal pain and antinociceptive tolerance.

Many clinical case reports have suggested that sustained opioid exposure can elicit unexpected, paradoxical pain. Here, we explore the possibility that (1) opioid-induced pain results from tonic activation of descending pain facilitation arising in the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) and (2) the presence of such pain manifests behaviorally as antinociceptive tolerance. Rats implanted subcutaneously with pellets or osmotic minipumps delivering morphine displayed time-related tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia (i. e., opioid-induced "pain"); placebo pellets or saline minipumps did not change thresholds. Opioid-induced pain was observed while morphine delivery continued and while the rats were not in withdrawal. RVM lidocaine, or bilateral lesions of the dorsolateral funiculus (DLF), did not change response thresholds in placebo-pelleted rats but blocked opioid-induced pain. The intrathecal morphine antinociceptive dose-response curve (DRC) in morphine-pelleted rats was displaced to the right of that in placebo-pelleted rats, indicating antinociceptive "tolerance." RVM lidocaine or bilateral DLF lesion did not alter the intrathecal morphine DRC in placebo-pelleted rats but blocked the rightward displacement seen in morphine-pelleted animals. The subcutaneous morphine antinociceptive DRC in morphine-pelleted rats was displaced to the right of that in placebo-pelleted rats; this right shift was blocked by RVM lidocaine. The data show that (1) opioids elicit pain through tonic activation of bulbospinal facilitation from the RVM, (2) increased pain decreases spinal opioid antinociceptive potency, and (3) blockade of pain restores antinociceptive potency, revealing no change in antinociceptive signal transduction. These studies offer a mechanism for paradoxical opioid-induced pain and allow the development of approaches by which the loss of analgesic activity of opioids might be inhibited.

Analgesics↗
PubMed2001

The cannabinoid agonist WIN55,212-2 suppresses opioid-induced emesis in ferrets.

BACKGROUND: Cannabinoid receptor agonists reverse nausea and vomiting produced by chemotherapy and radiation therapy in animals and humans but have not been tested against opioid-induced emesis. This study tests the hypothesis that cannabinoid receptor agonists will prevent opioid-induced vomiting. METHODS: Twelve male ferrets were used. They weighed 1.2-1.6 kg at the beginning and 1.8-2.3 kg at the end of the experiments. All drugs were injected subcutaneously. WIN55,212-2, a mixed CB1-CB2 cannabinoid receptor agonist, was administered 25 min before morphine. Retches and vomits were counted at 5-min intervals for 30 min after morphine injection. RESULTS: Retching and vomiting responses increased with increasing morphine doses up to 1.0 mg/kg, above which the responses decreased. Previous administration of naloxone prevented morphine-induced retching and vomiting. WIN55,212-2 dose-dependently reduced retching and vomiting. The ED50 was 0.05 mg/kg for retches and 0.03 mg/kg for vomits. At 0.13 mg/kg, retching decreased by 76% and vomiting by 92%. AM251, a CB1 receptor-selective antagonist, blocked the antiemetic actions of WIN55,212-2, but AM630, a CB2 receptor-selective antagonist, did not. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that WIN55,212-2 prevents opioid-induced vomiting and suggest that the antiemetic activity of WIN55,212-2 occurs at CB1 receptors. This is consistent with findings that CB1 receptors are the predominant cannabinoid receptors in the central nervous system and that antiemetic effects of cannabinoids appear to be centrally mediated.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMed2001

Renal toxicity with sevoflurane: a storm in a teacup?

The inhaled anaesthetic sevoflurane is metabolised into two products that have the potential to produce renal injury. Fluoride ions are produced by oxidative defluorination of sevoflurane by the cytochrome P450 system in the liver. Until recently, inorganic fluoride has been thought to be the aetiological agent responsible for fluorinated anaesthetic nephrotoxicity, with a toxic concentration threshold of 50 micromol/L in serum. However, studies of sevoflurane administration in animals and humans have not shown evidence of fluoride-induced nephrotoxicity, despite serum fluoride concentrations in this range. Compound A (fluoromethyl-2,2-difluoro-1-[trifluoromethyl] vinyl ether) is a breakdown product of sevoflurane produced by its interaction with carbon dioxide absorbents in the anaesthesia machine. The patient then inhales compound A. Compound A produces evidence of transient renal injury in rats. The mechanism of compound A renal toxicity is controversial, with the debate focused on the role of the renal cysteine conjugate beta-lyase pathway in the biotransformation of compound A. The significance of this debate centres on the fact that the beta-lyase pathway is 10- to 30-fold less active in humans than in rats. Therefore, if biotransformation by this pathway is responsible for the production of nephrotoxic metabolites of compound A, humans may be less susceptible to compound A renal toxicity than are rats. In three studies in human volunteers and one in surgical patients, prolonged (8-hour) sevoflurane exposures and low fresh gas flow rates resulted in significant exposures to compound A. Transient abnormalities were found in biochemical markers of renal injury measured in urine. These studies suggested that sevoflurane can result in renal toxicity, mediated by compound A, under specific circumstances. However, other studies using prolonged sevoflurane administration at low flow rates did not find evidence of renal injury. Finally, there are substantial data to document the safety of sevoflurane administered for shorter durations or at higher fresh gas flow rates. Therefore, the United States Food and Drug Administration recommends the use of sevoflurane with fresh gas flow rates at least 1 L/min for exposures up to 1 hour and at least 2 L/min for exposures greater than 1 hour. We believe this is a rational, cautious approach based on available data. However, it is important to note that other countries have not recommended such limitations on the clinical use of sevoflurane and problems have not been noted.

Air Movements↗
PubMed2000

Peripheral and spinal antihyperalgesic activity of SIB-1757, a metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGLUR(5)) antagonist, in experimental neuropathic pain in rats.

Recent studies suggest a role of Group 1 metabotropic glutamate receptors in mediating the development of spinal hypersensitivity in some pain states. Here, the possible role of mGluR(5) receptors in experimental neuropathic pain elicited by ligation of spinal nerves (L(5)/L(6) spinal nerve ligation, SNL) was explored with SIB-1757, a selective mGluR(5) antagonist. SNL-induced tactile allodynia was detected by decreased paw withdrawal thresholds to probing with von Frey filaments and thermal hyperalgesia by decreased paw withdrawal latencies to radiant heat applied to the plantar aspect of the hindpaw. SIB-1757 was given by either intrathecal (i.th.), subcutaneous (s.c.) or intraplantar (i.pl.) injection. In SNL rats, i.th. SIB-1757 produced a partial reversal of tactile allodynia with a shallow dose-response curve ranging over three-orders of magnitude; SIB-1757 was inactive against allodynia when given systemically. SIB-1757 produced full reversal of thermal hyperalgesia in SNL rats following administration either spinally or locally to the injured paw; administration to the contralateral paw had no effect. SIB-1757 did not produce antinociception in either the SNL or sham-operated rats by any route. These data suggest a significant modulation of thermal hyperalgesia by mGluR(5) antagonists, consistent with reports that this receptor may be associated with afferent C-fibers. The less impressive effect seen on tactile allodynia, likely to be mediated by large fiber input, suggests that the observed modulation may be related to blockade of mGluR(5)-mediated spinal sensitization. These results do not support the involvement of these receptors in modulation of acute nociception but suggest the possibility of a role for Group I mGluRs in the mediation of aspects of neuropathic pain which may be associated with C-fiber inputs.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Dynorphin promotes abnormal pain and spinal opioid antinociceptive tolerance.

The nonopioid actions of spinal dynorphin may promote aspects of abnormal pain after nerve injury. Mechanistic similarities have been suggested between opioid tolerance and neuropathic pain. Here, the hypothesis that spinal dynorphin might mediate effects of sustained spinal opioids was explored. Possible abnormal pain and spinal antinociceptive tolerance were evaluated after intrathecal administration of [D-Ala(2), N-Me-Phe(4), Gly-ol(5)]enkephalin (DAMGO), an opioid mu agonist. Rats infused with DAMGO, but not saline, demonstrated tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia of the hindpaws (during the DAMGO infusion) and a decrease in antinociceptive potency and efficacy of spinal opioids (tolerance), signs also characteristic of nerve injury. Spinal DAMGO elicited an increase in lumbar dynorphin content and a decrease in the mu receptor immunoreactivity in the spinal dorsal horn, signs also seen in the postnerve-injury state. Intrathecal administration of dynorphin A(1-17) antiserum blocked tactile allodynia and reversed thermal hyperalgesia to above baseline levels (i.e., antinociception). Spinal dynorphin antiserum, but not control serum, also reestablished the antinociceptive potency and efficacy of spinal morphine. Neither dynorphin antiserum nor control serum administration altered baseline non-noxious or noxious thresholds or affected the intrathecal morphine antinociceptive response in saline-infused rats. These data suggest that spinal dynorphin promotes abnormal pain and acts to reduce the antinociceptive efficacy of spinal opioids (i.e., tolerance). The data also identify a possible mechanism for previously unexplained clinical observations and offer a novel approach for the development of strategies that could improve the long-term use of opioids for pain.

Analgesics↗
PubMed2000

Extraterritorial neuropathic pain correlates with multisegmental elevation of spinal dynorphin in nerve-injured rats.

Neuropathic pain is often associated with the appearance of pain in regions not related to the injured nerve. One mechanism that may underlie neuropathic pain is abnormal, spontaneous afferent drive which may contribute to NMDA-mediated central sensitization by the actions of glutamate and by the non-opioid actions of spinal dynorphin. In the present study, injuries to lumbar or sacral spinal nerves elicited elevation in spinal dynorphin content which correlated temporally and spatially with signs of neuropathic pain. The increase in spinal dynorphin content was coincident with the onset of tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia. Injury to the lumbar (L(5)/L(6)) spinal nerves produced elevated spinal dynorphin content in the ipsilateral dorsal spinal quadrant at the L(5) and L(6) spinal segments and in the segments immediately adjacent. Lumbar nerve injury elicited ipsilateral tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia of the hindpaw. In contrast, S(2) spinal nerve ligation elicited elevated dynorphin content in sacral spinal segments and bilaterally in the caudal lumbar spinal cord. The behavioral consequences of S(2) spinal nerve ligation were also bilateral, with tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia seen in both hindpaws. Application of lidocaine to the site of S(2) ligation blocked thermal hyperalgesia and tactile allodynia of the hindpaws suggesting that afferent drive was critical to maintenance of the pain state. Spinal injection of antiserum to dynorphin A((1-17)) and of MK-801 both blocked thermal hyperalgesia, but not tactile allodynia, of the hindpaw after S(2) ligation. These data suggest that the elevated spinal dynorphin content consequent to peripheral nerve injury may drive sensitization of the spinal cord, in part through dynorphin acting directly or indirectly on the NMDA receptor complex. Furthermore, extrasegmental increases in spinal dynorphin content may partly underlie the development of extraterritorial neuropathic pain.

Anesthetics, Local↗
PubMed2000

Supraspinal cholecystokinin may drive tonic descending facilitation mechanisms to maintain neuropathic pain in the rat.

Complete or partial spinal section at T(8) has been shown to block tactile allodynia but not thermal hyperalgesia following L(5)/L(6) spinal nerve ligation (SNL), suggesting the supraspinal integration of allodynia in neuropathic pain. In the present study, the possibility of mediation of nerve injury-associated pain through tonic activity of descending nociceptive facilitation arising from the rostroventromedial medulla (RVM) was investigated. Specifically, the actions of brainstem cholecystokinin and the possible importance of sustained afferent input from injured nerve fibers were determined using pharmacological and physiological approaches in rats with SNL. Lidocaine given bilaterally into the RVM blocked tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia in SNL rats and was inactive in sham-operated rats. Bilateral injection of L365,260 (CCK(B) receptor antagonist) into the RVM also reversed both tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia. Microinjection of CCK-8 (s) into the RVM of naive rats produced a robust tactile allodynic effect and a more modest hyperalgesia. CCK immunoreactivity was not significantly different between SNL and sham-operated rats. The anti-nociceptive effect of morphine given into the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray region (PAG) was substantially reduced by SNL. The injection of L365,260 into the RVM or of bupivacaine at the site of nerve injury restored the potency and efficacy of PAG morphine in SNL rats. These results suggest that changes in supraspinal processing are likely to contribute to the observed poor efficacy of opioids in clinical states of neuropathic pain. These data also indicate that the activation of descending nociceptive facilitatory pathways is important in the maintenance of neuropathic pain, appears to be dependent on CCK release, and may be driven from sustained afferent input from injured nerves to brainstem sites. Collectively, these data support the hypothesis that abnormal tonic activity of descending facilitation mechanisms may underlie chronic pain from peripheral nerve injury.

Anesthetics, Local↗
PubMed2000

Spinal and supraspinal mechanisms of neuropathic pain.

Neuropathic pain is associated with abnormal tactile and thermal responses that may be extraterritorial to the injured nerve. Importantly, tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia may involve separate pathways, since complete and partial spinal cord lesions have blocked allodynia, but not hyperalgesia, after spinal nerve ligation (SNL). Furthermore, lesions of the dorsal column, and lidocaine microinjected into dorsal column nuclei block only tactile allodynia. Conversely, thermal hyperalgesia, but not tactile allodynia was blocked by desensitization of C-fibers with resiniferotoxin. Therefore, it seems that tactile allodynia is likely to be mediated by large diameter A beta fibers, and not susceptible to modulation by spinal opioids, whereas hyperalgesia is mediated by unmyelinated C-fibers, and is sensitive to blockade by spinal opioids. Additionally, abnormal, spontaneous afferent drive in neuropathic pain may contribute to NMDA-mediated central sensitization by glutamate and by non-opioid actions of spinal dynorphin. Correspondingly, SNL elicited elevation in spinal dynorphin content in spinal segments at and adjacent to the zone of entry of the injured nerve along with signs of neuropathic pain. Antiserum to dynorphin A(1-17) or MK-801 given spinally blocked thermal hyperalgesia, but not tactile allodynia, after SNL, and also restored diminished morphine antinociception. Finally, afferent drive may induce descending facilitation from the rostroventromedial medulla (RVM). Blocking afferent drive with bupivicaine also restored lost potency of PAG morphine, as did CCK antagonists in the RVM. This observation is consistent with afferent drive activating descending facilitation from the RVM, and thus diminishing opioid activity, and may underlie the clinical observation of limited responsiveness of neuropathic pain to opioids.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Loss of antiallodynic and antinociceptive spinal/supraspinal morphine synergy in nerve-injured rats: restoration by MK-801 or dynorphin antiserum.

The co-administration of morphine at spinal (i.th.) and supraspinal (i.c.v.) sites to the same rat produces antinociceptive synergy, a phenomenon which may underlie the clinical analgesic utility of this drug. In animals with peripheral nerve injury, however, the antinociceptive potency and efficacy of i.th. morphine is significantly decreased. Here, the possible loss of spinal/supraspinal morphine antinociceptive synergy and relationship to elevation of spinal dynorphin content was studied. Ligation of lumbar spinal nerves resulted in elevated dynorphin in the ipsilateral lumbar and sacral spinal cord. In sham-operated rats supraspinal/spinal co-administration of morphine produced synergistic antinociception which was unaffected by i.th. MK-801 or dynorphin A((1-17)) antiserum. In nerve-injured rats, i.th. morphine was inactive against tactile allodynia and showed diminished in potency against acute nociception without supraspinal/spinal antinociceptive synergy. Antiserum to dynorphin A((1-17)) or the non-competitive NMDA antagonist MK-801 increased the antinociceptive potency of i.th. morphine, restored supraspinal/spinal morphine antinociceptive synergy and elicited a dose-related i.th. morphine antiallodynic action. These agents did not demonstrate antinociceptive or antiallodynic activity alone and did not alter morphine actions in sham-operated animals. The loss of spinal/supraspinal antinociceptive synergy and lack of antiallodynic activity of spinal morphine appear to be due to the elevation across multiple spinal segments of dynorphin following nerve injury. Pathological actions of elevated dynorphin may directly or indirectly modulate the NMDA receptor, result in a loss of supraspinal/spinal morphine synergy and may thus account for the decreased clinical analgesic efficacy of morphine in peripheral neuropathies.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMed1999

Lack of involvement of capsaicin-sensitive primary afferents in nerve-ligation injury induced tactile allodynia in rats.

Tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia, two robust signs of neuropathic pain associated with experimental nerve injury, have been hypothesized to be mechanistically distinguished based on (a) fiber types which may be involved in the afferent input, (b) participation of spinal and supraspinal circuitry in these responses, and (c) sensitivity of these endpoints to pharmacological agents. Here, the possibility that nerve-injury induced tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia may be mediated via different afferent fiber input was tested by evaluating these responses in sham-operated or nerve-injured (L5/L6) rats before or after a single systemic injection of resiniferatoxin (RTX), an ultrapotent analogue of the C-fiber specific neurotoxin, capsaicin. Tactile allodynia, and three measures of thermal nociception, tail-flick, paw-flick and hot-plate responses, were determined before and at various intervals for at least 40 days after RTX injection. Nerve-injured, but not sham-operated, rats showed a long-lasting tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia (paw-flick) within 2-3 days after surgery; responses to other noxious thermal stimuli (i.e., tail-flick and hot-plate tests) did not distinguish the two groups at the stimulus intensities employed. RTX treatment resulted in a significant and long-lasting (i.e. essentially irreversible) decrease in sensitivity to thermal noxious stimuli in both sham-operated and nerve-injured rats; thermal hyperalgesia was abolished and antinociception produced by RTX. In contrast, RTX treatment did not affect the tactile allodynia seen in the same nerve-injured rats. These data support the concept that thermal hyperalgesia seen after nerve ligation, as well as noxious thermal stimuli, are likely to be mediated by capsaicin-sensitive C-fiber afferents. In contrast, nerve-injury related tactile allodynia is insensitive to RTX treatment which clearly desensitizes C-fibers and, therefore such responses are not likely to be mediated through C-fiber afferents. The hypothesis that tactile allodynia may be due to inputs from large (i.e. A beta) afferents offers a mechanistic basis for the observed insensitivity of this endpoint to intrathecal morphine in this nerve-injury model. Further, these data suggest that clinical treatment of neuropathic pains with C-fiber specific agents such as capsaicin are unlikely to offer significant therapeutic benefit against mechanical allodynia.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Tactile allodynia, but not thermal hyperalgesia, of the hindlimbs is blocked by spinal transection in rats with nerve injury.

Spinal nerve ligation produces signs of neuropathic pain in rats. Different neuronal pathways may underlie the abnormal sensory responses to thermal and tactile stimuli. Here, the possibility that local circuitry in the spinal cord and/or spinal-supraspinal loops might be involved in tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia of the hindpaws was investigated by transecting the spinal cord of sham-operated or L5/L6 nerve ligated rats. Spinal transection completely abolished tactile allodynia in ligated rats. Thermal nocifensive responses were present after transection in ligated and sham-operated rats. Thermal hyperalgesia of the hindpaws was not evident in spinal transected, ligated rats. Tail-withdrawal responses to tactile probing were very robust after spinal transection in both groups, demonstrating loss of descending inhibition. These observations suggest that thermal hyperalgesia of the paw seen after nerve injury involves both spinal and supraspinal circuits, while tactile allodynia depends on a supraspinal loop. This difference may reflect afferent inputs associated with different fiber types.

Animals↗