Screening for depression in primary care.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Depressive Disorder↗
Biomedical subjects
T L Schwenk
Publications and source records attributed to T L Schwenk.
Model of family medicine and obstetrics-gynecology collaboration in obstetric care at the University of Michigan.
OBJECTIVE: To assess concordance between family physician obstetric privilege delineation and actual care delivered, and describe associated clinical and educational collaborations between family medicine and obstetrics and gynecology. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive retrospective review of the care and complications of 962 consecutive patients admitted to a family medicine obstetric service in a research-intensive academic medical center, and compared the results with a structured obstetric privilege delineation. RESULTS: Of 962 women admitted by family medicine faculty members, 741 (77.9%) were managed exclusively by family physicians, 63 (6.6%) were comanaged by family physicians and obstetricians, and 147 (15.5%) were transferred to obstetricians (data missing for 11 patients). Spontaneous vaginal deliveries were performed in 772 patients (81%), cesarean delivery in 116 patients (12.2%), and assisted delivery by forceps or vacuum in 19 (2%) and 44 (4.6%) patients, respectively. Of 926 intrapartum obstetric complications identified in 604 obstetric deliveries, 615 complications (66.4%) in 418 deliveries were managed exclusively by family physicians consistent with privilege delineation, comanagement occurred in 56 patients with 92 complications (9.9%), and care was transferred in 130 patients with 219 complications (23. 7%). CONCLUSION: A structured method of obstetric privilege delineation for family medicine faculty members and associated guidelines for family physician-obstetrician interactions has led to a successful family medicine obstetric service at a research-intensive, tertiary-care medical center, with a high concordance between privilege delineation and actual care delivered. This success has resulted in incremental clinical and educational collaborations that have improved the quality of women's health care and education.
Family Practice↗
The stigmatisation and denial of mental illness in athletes.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Denial, Psychological↗
Physical activity and mental health: current concepts.
Physical activity may play an important role in the management of mild-to-moderate mental health diseases, especially depression and anxiety. Although people with depression tend to be less physically active than non-depressed individuals, increased aerobic exercise or strength training has been shown to reduce depressive symptoms significantly. However, habitual physical activity has not been shown to prevent the onset of depression. Anxiety symptoms and panic disorder also improve with regular exercise, and beneficial effects appear to equal meditation or relaxation. In general, acute anxiety responds better to exercise than chronic anxiety. Studies of older adults and adolescents with depression or anxiety have been limited, but physical activity appears beneficial to these populations as well. Excessive physical activity may lead to overtraining and generate psychological symptoms that mimic depression. Several differing psychological and physiological mechanisms have been proposed to explain the effect of physical activity on mental health disorders. Well controlled studies are needed to clarify the mental health benefits of exercise among various populations and to address directly processes underlying the benefits of exercise on mental health.
Adolescent↗
Generalist and specialty care.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Depression↗
Cancer and depression.
There is strong evidence that depression can have profound negative effects on the functional status, psychologic outlook, and possibly the medical outcome of cancer patients. Its presence often is taken for granted by both patients and physicians as being either inevitable or easily explained by the grim prognosis and complex treatment regimens experienced by many cancer patients, and thereby less deserving of an aggressive approach to diagnosis and treatment. This view is inappropriate, and hinders an effective approach to the problem. Effective treatment, similar to that provided for any other depressed patient, can enhance the cancer patient's overall approach to life and the disease, irrespective of the eventual medical outcome.
Brain Neoplasms↗
The nature and prevalence of anxiety disorders in primary care.
Primary goals of this study were to 1) establish the prevalence, nature, and correlates of anxiety disorders in primary care, and 2) examine the comorbidity of anxiety disorders with major depressive disorder. A weighted sample of 425 patients drawn from the waiting rooms of primary care physicians was used. Anxiety disorders were highly prevalent, relatively mild, and often comorbid with depression. Anxiety disorders aided physicians in their detection of depression. However, anxiety disorders were also misdiagnosed as depression. Although anxiety disorders are common in primary care, their relative mildness may generally not warrant increased attention by primary care physicians to detection and treatment. Instead, efforts should be focused on the more severe and impairing cases of anxiety disorder.
Adolescent↗
Strangers in a strange land: primary care physicians in academic medical centers.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Academic Medical Centers↗
Depression in the family physician's office: what the psychiatrist needs to know: the Michigan Depression Project.
A rapidly growing body of research suggests that depression in primary care may differ from that in psychiatry in its nature, severity, comorbidity, and responsiveness to treatment. The Michigan Depression Project is a long-term series of studies designed to explore the twin assumptions that depressed primary care patients are similar to depressed psychiatric patients and that identical treatment will benefit both groups. Major findings are (1) criterion-based diagnosis of major depressive disorder in primary care includes many patients with mild depression and little to no impairment; (2) the onset of depression among family practice patients-but not psychiatric patients-is usually preceded by a severe life event; (3) in primary care, outcome for patients with undetected depression appears to be comparable to that for those with detected depression; and (4) family physicians appear to employ historical cues in assigning the diagnosis of depression to distressed and impaired patients. The results of the Michigan Depression Project and the recent work of other researchers suggest that the challenges facing primary care physicians in the diagnosis and treatment of depressed patients are daunting. These challenges lead to a set of consultative skills and behaviors on the part of psychiatrists that may be different than generally expected. One-time, stand-alone psychiatric consultations are often needed, because neither the primary care physician nor the patient desires the psychiatric care to be "carved out" from the continuing care of a set of chronic problems. Future intervention studies should compare subgroups of patients who appear most in need of treatment (on the basis of functional impact) with those who are mildly depressed and barely meet diagnostic criteria. These studies will help primary care physicians focus their energies and therapies where they will have the most benefit in treating what is clearly a common and important, but still poorly understood, problem in primary care medical practice.
Adolescent↗
Short-term outcomes of detected and undetected depressed primary care patients and depressed psychiatric patients.
The aims of this study were to determine whether detection of major depression in primary care was associated with improved outcome, and to compare the 4.5 month outcomes of detected and undetected depressed primary care patients and depressed psychiatric patients. Primary care patients with major depression were recruited from the practices of 50 family physicians in Southeastern Michigan using a two-stage selection procedure employing the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID); clinician detection of depression was ascertained by response to a direct query on a rating form. Depressed patients seeking treatment in an outpatient psychiatric setting also received the CES-D and the SCID. Data on patient demographics and clinical characteristics were obtained for both primary care and psychiatric patients. Initial and 4.5 month scores on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) were obtained for 34 undetected and 25 detected depressed primary care and 55 depressed psychiatric patients. Improvement in depression over time was assessed by the change in HAM-D scores over the 4.5 months. The three groups did not differ in initial severity. Both psychiatric and undetected primary care patients showed significant improvement at 4.5 months, whereas detected primary care patients did not improve. At 4.5 months there were no differences in mean HAM-D scores between undetected, depressed primary care patients and depressed psychiatric outpatients. This result did not change after controlling for age and severity of depression at initial presentation, nor did it change after exclusion of cases of mild depression to control for a possible "floor effect." However, differences among groups in the stage of depressive episodes may have affected this comparison. These findings suggest that an exclusive focus on increasing detection of depression in primary care patients is unlikely to improve outcomes, and that undetected depression among primary care patients does not necessarily represent poor quality of care. Although depressed psychiatric patients in this study had better outcomes than detected depressed primary care patients, the presence of unmeasured differences among groups in the stage of the depressive episode makes it impossible to determine whether treatment of depression by psychiatrists is superior to that provided by primary care physicians. These findings should stimulate efforts to examine a more comprehensive model for detection and treatment of depression in primary care.
Adult↗
The relationship of distress to mood disturbance in primary care and psychiatric populations.
Disagreement remains as how to interpret elevated scores on measures of self-reported distress. This study compared elevated scores on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) in 2 samples to mood disturbance as assessed in an interview. In a primary medical care sample, most distressed patients did not have a mood disturbance, and distress without mood disturbance was associated with little impairment. Primary care patients with elevated scores on the CES-D were less distressed and less likely to have mood disturbance, major depression, or impairment than distressed psychiatric patients. Few patients with mood disturbance in either sample failed to meet criteria for major depression. Implications are discussed for research on depression using self-report measures, for generalizations across clinical and nonclinical populations, and for screening for preventive interventions.
Adolescent↗
Depression in primary care--more like asthma than appendicitis: the Michigan Depression Project.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationships between detection, treatment, and outcome of depression in the primary care setting, based upon results from the Michigan Depression Project (MDP). METHODS: A weighted sample of 425 adult family practice patients completed a comprehensive battery of questionnaires exploring stress, social support, overall health, health care utilization, treatment attitudes, self-rated levels of stress and depression, along with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III (SCID), which served as the criterion standard for diagnosis. A comparison sample of 123 depressed psychiatric outpatients received the same assessment battery. Family practice patients received repeated assessment of depressive symptoms, stress, social support, and health care utilization over a period of up to 60 months of longitudinal follow-up. RESULTS: The central MDP findings confirm that significant differences in past history, severity, and impairment exist between depressed psychiatric and family practice patients, that detection rates are significantly higher for severely depressed primary care patients, and that clinicians use clinical cues such as past history, distress, and severity of symptoms to "detect" depression in patients at intermediate and mild levels of severity. As well, there is a lack of association between detection and improved outcome in primary care patients. CONCLUSION: These results call into question the assumption that "depression is depression" irrespective of the setting and physician, and they are consistent with a model of depressive disorder as a subacute or chronic condition characterized by clinical parameters of severity, staging, and comorbidity, similar to asthma. This new model can guide further investigation into the epidemiology and management of mood disorders in the primary care setting.
Adolescent↗
Community-based teaching and academic medical centers: a fragile and uneasy alliance.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Academic Medical Centers↗
Screening for depression in primary care. A disease in search of a test.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Depressive Disorder↗
Differences between detected and undetected patients in primary care and depressed psychiatric patients.
The aim of this study was to explore differences between primary care and tertiary psychiatry patients meeting DSM-III-R criteria for depressive disorders in terms of a wide range of demographic and clinical variables including psychiatric comorbidity. A weighted sample of 153 depressed primary care patients was obtained from the waiting rooms of family physicians using a two-stage selection and assessment procedure including the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-III-R (SCID). A measure of physician detection was also obtained. The 123 depressed psychiatric patients were seeking evaluation and treatment at a university-based depression program, and DSM-III-R diagnoses were also obtained using the SCID. Overall, fewer depressed primary care patients met criteria for major depressive disorder, and more of those who did were only midly depressed. Depressed primary care patients were more likely to be women, older, and had less education, less past treatment, and greater lifetime comorbidity. Clinical differences were greatest for the depressed patients who had gone undetected by their physicians: they were higher functioning, less distressed, and more mildly depressed. Findings are discussed in terms of the validity and acceptability of practice guidelines for depression in primary care.
Adult↗
Evaluation of amenorrhea.
Pregnancy is the most common cause of amenorrhea and must be ruled out before proceeding with diagnostic evaluation. A careful history and physical examination may reveal evidence of androgen excess, estrogen deficiency or other endocrinopathies. Serum prolactin and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels should be checked in all women who are not pregnant. Galactorrhea by history or on examination and/or an elevated prolactin level should be investigated with an imaging study to rule out a pituitary adenoma. If serum prolactin and TSH levels are normal, a progesterone challenge test should be performed to determine outflow tract patency and estrogen status. In women with hypoestrogenic amenorrhea, indicated by a negative challenge test and a competent outflow tract, serum gonadotropin, follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone levels may be measured to determine whether amenorrhea represents ovarian failure or pituitary or hypothalamic dysfunction. Hypothalamic amenorrhea is common in women with a history of weight loss, stress or vigorous exercise. Amenorrheic women with adequate estrogen levels should receive cyclic progesterone. Hormonal therapy and calcium supplementation in hypoestrogenic amenorrhea.
Adult↗