If you're so smart, doctor, why aren't you rich?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Budgets↗
Biomedical subjects
T J Stanley
Publications and source records attributed to T J Stanley.
Pharmacological prophylaxis against postoperative graft occlusion after peripheral vascular surgery: a world-wide survey.
OBJECTIVES: To define current practice regarding the use of pharmacological prophylaxis to prevent postoperative graft occlusion. DESIGN: Prospective open questionnaire. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaires regarding this subject were sent to vascular surgeons throughout the world to analyse current practice. RESULTS: 651 questionnaires were returned with a response rate of 62% and form the basis for this report. Data from 100,334 vascular reconstructions were reported in this survey. Prophylaxis against postoperative graft occlusions was common. Treatment periods were usually greater than 1 year. Among carotid surgery patients, 82% received prophylaxis, consisting mainly of low-dose acetysalicylic acid (ASA). In Mid-Europe the use of oral anticoagulation was more common than in other regions (p < 0.001). Among aneurysm surgery patients, 38% received prophylaxis. For infrainguinal bypass, ASA in low dose was the most commonly used agent worldwide. However, oral anticoagulation was more frequent in Mid-Europe, in contrast to South America where the combination of ASA and dipyridamole was most common. Considerable geographical differences regarding patient selection, the frequency of specific procedures and operative techniques existed. CONCLUSIONS: Important world-wide differences exist regarding prophylaxis for postoperative graft occlusion.
Anticoagulants↗
Heparin and protamine use in peripheral vascular surgery: a comparison between surgeons of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the European Society for Vascular Surgery.
It was the intent of this study to document, in general, the patterns and complications of heparin and protamine usage during carotid endarterectomy, aortic and femoral-popliteal-tibial reconstructions for occlusive disease, elective and emergent abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy, thromboembolectomy, and dialysis arteriovenous (AV) fistula placement by surgeons from North America and Europe. All vascular surgeons from the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) and the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) were surveyed by a voluntary, self-reported questionnaire. Six hundred and forty-six completed questionnaires (284 from SVS and 362 from ESVS), representing a 62% response rate, were returned for evaluation. Systemic and regional administration of heparin was common during vascular procedures performed by both SVS and ESVS surgeons. Use of protamine to reverse heparin anticoagulation varied among SVS and ESVS surgeons, respectively, during: carotid endarterectomy (54% vs. 26%, p < 0.01), elective aortic reconstruction for occlusive disease (58% vs. 23%, p < 0.001), elective aortic reconstruction for abdominal aortic aneurysm (63% vs. 27%, p < 0.001), and femoral-popliteal-tibial reconstruction (44% vs. 15%, p < 0.001). Adverse reactions to protamine among the 25,219 and 12,902 cases reported from SVS and ESVS surgeons, respectively, included: hypotension (1209 and 495 cases), pulmonary artery hypertension (65 and eight cases), anaphylaxis (52 and 10 cases), and death (seven and two cases). These adverse responses accounted for 5.3% and 4.0% of the SVS and ESVS cases, respectively. Although this study is subject to the known limitations of a retrospective survey, it is clear that heparin use is common. Protamine reversal of heparin anticoagulation is more common in North America.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Data Collection↗
Liquid-liquid extractive membrane reactors.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biotechnology↗
Characterizing hospital inpatients: the importance of demographics and attitudes.
To compete effectively, hospital administrators must understand inpatients who are involved in hospital-choice decisions more clearly. To this end, a methodology is presented to measure and assess the importance of inpatients' personal attributes in predicting hospital selection. Empirical results show that demographic characteristics are poor--but attitudes are useful--segmentation variables that delineate differences between two particular hospitals' inpatients. More generally, the survey method and statistical procedures outlined are applicable (with slight modification) to markets with a greater number of competitors.
Decision Making↗