Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T H Stanley

Publications and source records attributed to T H Stanley.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1994

A new method to evaluate cardiovascular response in anesthetized rats. Hypertension after variable intensity, brief electrical stimuli.

To establish and standardize a nociceptive response in anesthetized rats, the hypertensive responses to defined electrical and mechanical stimuli were studied. Rats (n = 7) were given etomidate, 3.8 mg/kg/hr intravenously (i.v.) 2 hr following carotid artery and jugular vein cannulation. At 15 min after beginning the infusion, four types of noxious stimuli were administered sequentially at 1-min intervals (14 stimuli total): Type 1: Square electrical waves, 125 cps, 1.6 msec, 2-sec train duration, varying current from 0.4 to 12 mA (11 stimuli); Type 2: A single 10-mA electrical stimulus, 5-sec train duration; Type 3: Tail clamping; and, Type 4: Skin incision. After each stimulus, maximum change in systolic blood pressure (delta SBP) was measured. delta SBP after the most intense stimuli was as follows: Type 1 (12 mA, 2 sec), 32.1 +/- 2.14 mmHg; Type 2 (10 mA 5 sec), 42.9 +/- 2.4 mmHg; Type 3 (tail-clamping), 34.3 +/- 3.3 mmHg; Type 4 (skin incision), 14.2 +/- 2.8 mmHg. For the multiple Type-2 stimuli, a relationship between current and delta SBP was present. The authors believe that characterized graded electrical stimulation will allow a more quantitative evaluation of the hypertensive response to noxious stimuli in etomidate anesthetized rats, as compared to observing a single response to a single stimulus. The characterization of the electrical stimulation by amplitude, frequency, and wave form makes research work on nociception under anesthesia easily reproducible.

Anesthesia↗
PubMed1994

Identification of a sorbitol permease in human erythrocytes.

Sorbitol, a polyol derived from glucose by the enzyme, aldose reductase, is a common organic solute in many cells. It plays a role in the osmotic regulation of epithelial cells and in the pathology of uncontrolled diabetes. To learn more about sorbitol transport, we measured D-[14C]sorbitol influx in human erythrocytes. Sorbitol influx at 37 degrees C was a linear function of sorbitol concentration over the range of 0.05-100 mM. The activation energy for sorbitol influx was 10.0 kcal/mol, and the Q10 over the range 10-50 degrees C was 1.8, higher than predicted for diffusion through an aqueous pore. Glucose transport inhibitors either had no effect (1 mM phloridzin) or minimally inhibited (approximately 35% inhibition by 10 microM cytochalasin B or 250 microM phloretin) sorbitol influx. Influx was stimulated twofold by 0.5 mM p-chloromercuribenzoic acid, an inhibitor of glucose transport, and this was reversed by 2 mM dithiothreitol. Sorbitol influx was neither Na dependent nor sensitive to changes in cell volume. Glucose, fructose, mannitol, myo-inositol, and gluconate, at four- to fivefold molar excesses over sorbitol, did not inhibit its influx. We conclude that there is a specific sorbitol transport pathway in human erythrocytes similar to the sorbitol permease in renal epithelial cells.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Oral transmucosal back permeation of alfentanil in dogs--a novel method to determine blood alfentanil concentration.

This study explores a novel noninvasive method for monitoring blood alfentanil concentrations using a dog model. Alfentanil which "back" permeated across the oral mucosa from the systemic circulation was collected from the oral mucosal surface and quantitated. The levels of the "back" permeated alfentanil were found to closely reflect real time serum alfentanil concentrations. With further work, this finding may lead to a novel noninvasive method for monitoring real time serum alfentanil concentrations in its clinical applications.

Alfentanil↗
PubMed1993

Fentanyl-induced rigidity and unconsciousness in human volunteers. Incidence, duration, and plasma concentrations.

BACKGROUND: Muscle rigidity frequently accompanies induction of anesthesia with opioids. The authors sought to determine whether unconsciousness and amnesia occur when humans develop rigidity and apnea after intravenous fentanyl (without other concomitant anesthetics). METHODS: The incidence and duration of rigidity and level of consciousness were evaluated and associated plasma concentrations of fentanyl were measured in 12 healthy adult male volunteers given only intravenous fentanyl. Fentanyl was infused at a rate of 150 micrograms/min until a total of 15 micrograms/kg had been administered. Arterial blood samples for fentanyl assay were drawn and responsiveness, heart rate (HR), and systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressures were determined at frequent intervals during and after infusion. If rigidity was accompanied by an Spo2 < 90%, positive pressure ventilation with 100% O2 with a mask was instituted until spontaneous ventilation resumed. RESULTS: The incidence of muscular rigidity was 50% (6/12). All subjects who developed rigidity were apneic, unresponsive, and had no recall of commands to breathe or of positive pressure ventilation. Subjects not developing rigidity remained awake and responsive. No subject developing rigidity required neuromuscular blockade to allow positive pressure ventilation and adequate oxygenation (Spo2 > 90%). When rigidity occurred, it started 3 +/- 0.9 (range 1-4) min after the peak plasma fentanyl concentration and lasted for 11.5 +/- 5.8 (range 7-23) min. Rigidity started at a plasma fentanyl concentration of 21.5 +/- 4.4 (range 16-28) ng/ml and ended at 6.9 +/- 1.5 (range 5.2-8.7) ng/ml. Baseline HR was less in the subjects who subsequently developed rigidity (56.7 +/- 7.8 vs. 67.2 +/- 7.8 P = 0.04). No differences in fentanyl plasma concentrations or predicted effect site concentrations for rigidity were detected between subjects who developed rigidity and those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the hypothesis that unconsciousness occurs in the unstimulated subject during fentanyl-induced apnea and rigidity.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Dose-response pharmacology of intrathecal morphine in human volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Intrathecal morphine sulfate (ITMS) administration was introduced into clinical practice in 1979. Inadequate information exists delineating ITMS respiratory effects in the dosage range most frequently employed today. This study evaluated 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 mg ITMS in male volunteers. METHODS: Twenty healthy, young, adult male volunteers received 0.0, 0.2, 0.4, or 0.6 mg preservative-free ITMS in an isobaric solution administered at the L3-L4 interspace in a double-blind randomized fashion. Respiratory function was assessed by finger pulse oximetry (SpO2), respiratory rate, and arterial blood gas analysis via an indwelling arterial catheter and the slope of the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide (VE/CO2). Analgesia was assessed by the effect of ITMS on moderate pain produced by pressure algometry at the tibia. The need for supplemental oxygen, 2 L/min via nasal cannulae, was determined by the failure of verbal and tactile prompts to maintain subjects' SpO2 > or = 85% on more than two occasions. Heart rate, arterial blood pressure, sedation level, pupil size, and the incidence of adverse effects also were documented. All the above measurements were made before and 30 min after ITMS, hourly for 11 h, and then every 2 h for 12 more h. RESULTS: ITMS produced significant dose-related decreases in SpO2. Mild desaturations (SpO2 > or = 85 and < 90%) occurred in 2 of 5, 3 of 5, and 4 of 5 subjects receiving 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 mg ITMS, respectively. Moderate to severe desaturations (SpO2 < 85%) occurred in 0 of 5, 2 of 5, and 4 of 5 subjects receiving 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 mg ITMS, respectively. The need for supplemental oxygen also was significantly related to ITMS dose, with 0 of 5, 1 of 5, and 4 of 5 subjects requiring oxygen after 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 mg ITMS, respectively. Nasal oxygen administration consistently alleviated hypoxemia. Increases in arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) and decreases in pH were significantly related to ITMS dose. Peak mean PaCO2s were 42.4, 44.9, and 50.7 mmHg in the 0.2-, 0.4-, and 0.6-mg groups, respectively. These peaks occurred 6.5-7.5 h after ITMS injection. ITMS produced significant dose-related depression of VE/CO2. Maximum mean depressions of VE/CO2 were to 61%, 63%, and 32% of baseline in the 0.2-, 0.4-, and 0.6-mg groups, respectively. These nadirs occurred 3.5-7.5 h after ITMS injection. Some subjects receiving 0.6 mg ITMS experienced profound (< 20% of baseline) and prolonged (< 50% of baseline for up to 20 h) VE/CO2 depression. Magnitude and duration of analgesia after ITMS were dose-related. Changes in heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and respiratory rate were not significantly related to ITMS dose. Hypoxemia was not related to respiratory rate. Although ITMS produced statistically significant dose-related increases in sedation and decreases in pupil size, these changes were small and did not coincide with hypoxemia. ITMS caused dose-related increases in emesis, but the severity of pruritus and urinary retention was unrelated to dose. CONCLUSION: ITMS produced dose-related analgesia and respiratory depression in nonsurgical healthy, young, adult male volunteers. Respiratory depression was significant after 0.2 or 0.4 mg and profound and prolonged after 0.6 mg. No clinical signs or symptoms, including respiratory rate, reliably indicated hypoxemia. Pulse oximetry reliably detected hypoxemia after ITMS, and supplemental nasal oxygen (2 L/min) effectively corrected this hypoxemia.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

A new model to evaluate the hypertensive response to noxious stimuli in the anesthetized, spontaneously hypertensive rat.

We have developed a method to evaluate the hypertensive response after noxious stimuli in anesthetized rats. Anesthetic level, stimuli, and responses were standardized by using an etomidate infusion, a series of stimuli of increasing intensity applied to the tail, and measuring maximal changes in systolic blood pressure (delta SBP) after each stimulus. Normotensive Sprague Dawley rats (SD) (n = 7) were studied using an etomidate infusion of 4.2 mg.kg-1 x h-1. This method was then applied to spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) anesthetized with three rats of etomidate infusion: Group 1 (n = 8), 7.0 mg.kg-1 x h-1; Group 2 (n = 8), 5.6 mg.kg-1 x h-1; and Group 3 (n = 11), 4.2 mg.kg-1 x h-1. Under anesthesia, three types of noxious stimuli were applied to the tail at 1-min intervals (13 total): (a) Type 1:11 2-s electrical stimuli of increasing intensity (0.4-12 mA, to produce threshold to maximal responses); (b) Type 2: one intense, prolonged electrical stimulus (10 mA, 5 s); and (c) Type 3: tail-clamping. After each stimulus, delta SBP was measured. In the SHR, comparing single delta SBP responses to single noxious stimuli after each of the three most intense stimuli showed no statistically significant differences among the three anesthetic groups. In contrast, comparison of dose-response curves of multiple delta SBP responses to multiple Type 1 (2-s) stimuli demonstrated a significant difference among the three anesthetic groups of SHR.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Anesthesia↗
PubMed1993

The initial clinical experience of 1819 physicians in maintaining anesthesia with propofol: characteristics associated with prolonged time to awakening.

In October 1989, propofol underwent Phase IV Food and Drug Administration testing that involved 25,981 patients, 1722 institutions, and 1819 anesthesiologists. Participants were 18-80 yr of age and ASA physical status I-III; they could not have a continuing pregnancy or prior adverse anesthetic experience. Anesthesiologists completed detailed forms to describe their use of propofol in this three-step study: propofol for induction only (Step 1), for induction and then maintenance by intermittent bolus injection (Step 2), or for continuous infusion (Step 3). In early 1992, our group of anesthesiologists and epidemiologists analyzed the resulting data base. We evaluated data from 14,882 patients (8095 given bolus injections and 6787 given continuous infusion) to determine factors predicting prolonged time (> 15 min after cessation of all anesthesia) to awakening, one measure of recovery from anesthesia. The incidence of prolonged awakening was 6.8% (1016 patients); the median and mean (+/- SD) times to awakening were, respectively, 5 min and 7.2 +/- 7.3 min. The following variables were associated (P < 0.05) with prolonged awakening from propofol maintenance anesthesia: a total dose of propofol > 8 mg/kg, male gender, endotracheal intubation, age > 65 yr, abdominal surgery, continuous infusion of propofol, and concomitant use of isoflurane or benzodiazepines. These results support the clinical impression that recovery from propofol anesthesia is remarkably rapid; although the vast majority of physicians participating in this study were using propofol for maintenance for the first time, only 6.8% of patients had awakening times exceeding 15 min.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Effects on recovery when isoflurane is used to supplement propofol-nitrous oxide anesthesia.

During propofol-nitrous oxide (N2O) anesthesia, volatile anesthetics are frequently administered to treat signs of inadequate anesthesia and to decrease the possibility of intraoperative awareness. Because the clinical effects of this combination have not been examined rigorously, we used data from the 1989-90 Phase IV clinical trial with propofol to evaluate recovery from propofol-N2O anesthesia with and without supplementation with isoflurane. In this study involving 15,806 patients at 1722 institutions, propofol was administered for induction and maintenance of anesthesia with N2O for procedures lasting less than 60 min. At the discretion of the anesthesiologist, volatile anesthetics were administered as needed during maintenance of anesthesia (the incidence of use of inhaled anesthetics was 14.7% for isoflurane, 2.2% for enflurane, and 0.2% for halothane). Other intraoperative medications included opioid analgesics, muscle relaxants, and anticholinergic drugs. The present study concerns the subset of 7796 patients given propofol-N2O maintenance anesthesia (intermittent bolus or continuous infusion) with or without isoflurane supplementation for procedures lasting less than 60 min. Isoflurane was used more frequently for procedures lasting 30-60 min than for those less than 30 min. Nevertheless, the maintenance dose of propofol was significantly (P < 0.05) less with isoflurane (178 vs 235 mg). Adjunctive use of isoflurane prolonged the time to awakening and to becoming oriented, but discharge times were similar for the two groups. The incidence of postoperative nausea, vomiting, recall, and excitement did not differ between the two groups. We conclude that the addition of isoflurane to a propofol-N2O anesthetic does not alter recovery from anesthesia.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Hemodynamic effects of propofol: data from over 25,000 patients.

To investigate clinically important hypotension and bradycardia after induction of anesthesia with propofol, we analyzed data from a Phase IV stepwise study involving 25,981 patients, 1722 institutions, and 1819 anesthesiologists. In Step 1, propofol was used for induction only. In Step 2, propofol was used for induction and then maintenance by intermittent injection. In Step 3, an induction dose was followed by a maintenance infusion. Participants were to be 18-80 yr of age and ASA physical status I-III; they could not have a continuing pregnancy or prior adverse anesthetic experience. Detailed data on demographic, perioperative, and outcome variables were recorded on data collection forms. The overall incidence of hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg) was 15.7%; 77% of the episodes were recorded within 10 min of induction of anesthesia with propofol. Bradycardia (heart rate < 50 beats/min) occurred in 4.8% of patients, with 42% of the episodes in the first 10 min. Only 1.3% of patients had both hypotension and bradycardia. The incidence of hypotension was significantly higher for the elderly, females, Caucasians, those undergoing abdominal and integumentary procedures, and those given propofol with opioids, benzodiazepines, or propranolol. Bradycardia was significantly more common when propofol was combined with opioids or chronically taken beta-adrenergic receptor-blocking drugs. Bradycardia and hypotension were not commonly associated. Giving this new drug by protocol, even inexperienced anesthesiologists incurred few adverse hemodynamic changes. Hemodynamic changes were transient and rarely (< 0.2%) required drug therapy. Cardiovascular changes and drug interactions were predictable and manageable based on knowledge of the pharmacology of propofol.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Adverse events in a multicenter phase IV study of propofol: evaluation by anesthesiologists and postanesthesia care unit nurses.

Phase II and III studies are tightly controlled trials investigating adverse effects before government approval of a new drug. However, because postapproval Phase IV studies involve a much larger and more complex population, the true nature of adverse effects can be seen. We analyzed Phase IV data for the new drug propofol with regard to the incidence of adverse events, and evaluations of such events by anesthesiologists versus postanesthesia care unit (PACU) nurses. Data pertained to 25,981 patients, 1722 institutions, and 1819 anesthesiologists giving propofol in three anesthetic regimens. Inclusion criteria were liberal: age, 18-80 yr; ASA physical status I-III; no continuing pregnancy; and no prior adverse anesthetic experience. Anesthesiologists and PACU nurses used data collection forms to record demographic, perioperative, and outcome variables; to evaluate recovery (excellent, good, or poor); and to describe adverse events. Adverse events were reported for 2813 patients (10.8%); the most common events were pain on injection (5.2%), hypotension (1.1%), nausea/vomiting (1.9%), and excitement (1.3%). The incidences of pain on injection and nausea/vomiting were approximately one-half and one-fifth, respectively, the values reported in earlier studies. Six hundred thirty-three patients (2.4%) had a "poor" recovery according to one or both of the evaluators (the anesthesiologist or PACU nurse). The PACU nurse was more influenced by nausea, vomiting, or postoperative pain; and the anesthesiologist was more influenced by postoperative confusion or delayed emergence from anesthesia. For only 0.6% of patients did both evaluators rate recovery as poor. Anesthesiologists gave more weight to intraoperative adverse events, and nurses to postoperative events.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

How do anesthesiologists select patients when introducing a new drug into practice?

As part of the marketing strategy for the anesthetic drug propofol (Diprivan), Stuart Pharmaceuticals began a Phase IV postmarketing study soon after the drug received Food and Drug Administration approval in 1989. We used data from this study to test the hypothesis that anesthesiologists would initially use propofol for young, relatively healthy patients and then, with experience, for older, sicker patients. The Phase IV study involved 1722 institutions, 1819 anesthesiologists, and 25,981 patients. The study incorporated three sequential steps, each to be tested in five patients. In Step 1, propofol was used for induction only; in Step 2, for induction and maintenance of anesthesia by intermittent injection; and, in Step 3, for induction and maintenance by continuous infusion. Inclusion criteria were age 18-80 yr and ASA physical status I-III. Exclusion criteria were continuing pregnancy and a previous adverse anesthetic experience. Physicians used standardized data collection forms to voluntarily compile detailed demographic, perioperative, and outcome variables for patients. Data were then evaluated by an independent, multicenter team of seven anesthesiologists and three epidemiologists to determine whether the first two patients selected to participate in each step (Patients 1 and 2, 6 and 7, and 11 and 12) were less sick, younger, or undergoing less invasive or shorter procedures than patients enrolled later in the same steps (Patients 4 and 5, 9 and 10, and 14 and 15). Physicians gave propofol first to patients with fewer concurrent diseases than are found in the general population (10% were hypertensive versus 16%; 3% were diabetic versus 10%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Phase IV study of propofol: validation of the data set.

In 1989-1990, Stuart Pharmaceuticals conducted a Phase IV study of propofol on over 26,000 patients, later making the large data base available to a team of epidemiologists and anesthesiologists for analysis. We now describe the process of verifying the data to provide a sound basis for further analyses. Original data were collected by 1819 physicians at 1761 hospitals. In that study, anesthesia was induced by bolus injection of propofol and was maintained by inhaled drug and N2O-O2 (Step 1), or by propofol (either intermittent bolus injection [Step 2] or continuous infusion [Step 3]) and N2O-O2. Forty-six recorded variables described history, physical examination, course and quality of anesthesia and recovery, and adverse events. Data were scrutinized for inaccuracy or bias regarding adverse events, completeness of data, data entry, and violations of the study protocol. The initial data set pertained to 26,841 patients (10,698, Step 1; 8886, Step 2; and 7257, Step 3). Because we excluded data if 25% of the items were missing from the data set, 3.2% of the case reports were eliminated: the final data set used for subsequent analyses contained 25,981 patients (10,184, Step 1; 8672, Step 2; and 7125, Step 3). Inaccuracy of data entry was not excessive, and violations of study protocol were less frequent than in similar studies. The nature and frequency of adverse events were similar to those reported in Phase II and III clinical trials of propofol. Analysis showed that missing data occurred randomly and did not introduce obvious bias. We conclude that the data set was valid and most likely represents perioperative events occurring in similar patients; that Phase IV studies can be valuable because of the range of patients studied and the ability to detect even rare events; and that future Phase IV studies could be improved by more efficient design of data collection forms for both hypotheses to be tested and the entry of data onto forms.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

The role of pharmacoepidemiology research in postmarketing surveillance and anesthesia practice/critical care medicine.

Despite tremendous efforts to ensure the safety and effectiveness of newly marketed medications, a number of these have had significant problems after introduction of the drug to the market. Such problems highlight the practical limitations of clinical trials performed to obtain FDA approval for marketing. Pharmacoepidemiology research methodologies provide a powerful mechanism for exploring the determinants of drug safety and effectiveness in broad-based populations and can serve as a scientific foundation for outcome research. Using these methodologies, largescale postmarketing surveillance studies similar to the type described in the accompanying articles would constitute an important way of confirming and identifying the determinants of drug safety and effectiveness in large, diverse patient populations.

Anesthesia↗
PubMed1993

Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) for the treatment of postoperative pain.

Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) has been used in a variety of clinical situations. This study was designed to determine if OTFC could provide analgesia to patients with acute pain after major surgery. Following written informed consent, 38 ASA Physical Status I-III patients undergoing either a total hip replacement or total knee arthroplasty were studied prospectively. The patients were randomly allocated to receive either OTFC (7-10 micrograms/kg) or a placebo identical in appearance to an OTFC unit. General anesthesia was administered for surgery, and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine was initiated in all patients. The PCA interval dose was adjusted to provide adequate analgesia as determined by the patient and physician; the PCA lock-out time was not changed. On the morning after surgery, the most recent 12 h of PCA data (milligrams per hour of morphine and PCA attempts per hour) were recorded. OTFC or placebo units were administered at times 0, 4, and 8 h during a 12-h study, resulting in three identical units being completely consumed. PCA data, as well as incidence and severity of any adverse side effects, were recorded during the study and for the next 12 h. Treatment groups were compared for similarity, and study variables were analyzed. Twenty-eight patients completed the study, 13 in the control group and 15 in the OTFC group. There were no significant differences between the study groups as to patients' age, gender, ASA classification, or surgical procedure. In addition, there were no differences between the groups in the number of PCA attempts or delivered dose of morphine during the prestudy or poststudy periods.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1992

The history and development of the fentanyl series.

In the last two decades, opioid analgesics have assumed an important place in general anesthetic practice in the United States. Part of the reason for this has been the introduction of the potent new agonists fentanyl, sufentanil, and alfentanil. Because of problems with morphine-oxygen anesthesia (incomplete amnesia, occasional histamine-related reaction, marked increases in intra- and postoperative respiratory depression), a suitable alternative was sought but not found among existing opioids. A breakthrough came in 1960, when fentanyl was synthesized, laying the foundation for a better understanding of the structure-activity relationships of narcotic analgesics and stimulating interest in developing compounds with even greater potency and safety margins. Investigators interested in opioid anesthesia began to study fentanyl in animals and then in humans. Fentanyl (50-100 micrograms/kg) with oxygen (100%) was evaluated as an anesthetic in patients undergoing mitral valve and coronary artery surgery. Changes in cardiovascular dynamics with induction doses ranging from 8 to 30 micrograms/kg consisted of small decreases in heart rate and arterial blood pressure. All other cardiovascular variables studied, including cardiac output, remained unchanged, even with additional doses up to 100 micrograms/kg. It was determined that fentanyl had use as a narcotic anesthetic, despite its potential for cardiovascular depression and stimulation, respiratory depression, muscle rigidity, and, occasionally, incomplete anesthesia. Since the introduction of fentanyl, two other potent synthetic opioids have been introduced into clinical practice--sufentanil and alfentanil.

Combined Modality Therapy↗
PubMed1992

The antiemetic effect of lorazepam after outpatient strabismus surgery in children.

The high incidence of postoperative emesis after strabismus surgery in pediatric outpatients can be reduced by the prophylactic administration of droperidol 75 micrograms/kg intravenously. However, this may be associated with profound sedation, delayed discharge, dysphoria, agitation, and extrapyramidal symptoms in this population. Because lorazepam used as an antiemetic in children during chemotherapy decreased the incidence of nausea and vomiting, we compared the antiemetic effects of lorazepam and droperidol in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 129 healthy children undergoing surgical correction of strabismus. The children, aged 1-13 yr, were randomly allocated into three groups. The children in group 1 received droperidol 75 micrograms/kg intravenously; those in group 2 received lorazepam 10 micrograms/kg intravenously; and those in group 3 received placebo. Anesthesia consisted of halothane, nitrous oxide in oxygen, and atracurium. Study drugs were administered intravenously after induction of anesthesia but before surgery. In children 3-13 yr old, administration of either lorazepam or droperidol was associated with a lower (P < 0.024) incidence of postoperative vomiting. There was no difference between the antiemetic effect of lorazepam and that of droperidol. The incidence of postoperative agitation was greater in the droperidol group (P < 0.001) than in the lorazepam and placebo groups. Postdischarge vomiting was less (P < 0.009) in children younger than 3 yr of age. Lorazepam, similar to droperidol, has an antiemetic effect in outpatient children 3-13 yr old undergoing strabismus correction, but it is associated with less postoperative agitation than is droperidol.

Adolescent↗