Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T G Lowe

Publications and source records attributed to T G Lowe.

18 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis.

BACKGROUND: The lack of a reliable, universally acceptable system for classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis has made comparisons between various types of operative treatment an impossible task. Furthermore, long-term outcomes cannot be determined because of the great variations in the description of study groups. METHODS: We developed a new classification system with three components: curve type (1 through 6), a lumbar spine modifier (A, B, or C), and a sagittal thoracic modifier (-, N, or +). The six curve types have specific characteristics, on coronal and sagittal radiographs, that differentiate structural and nonstructural curves in the proximal thoracic, main thoracic, and thoracolumbar/lumbar regions. The lumbar spine modifier is based on the relationship of the center sacral vertical line to the apex of the lumbar curve, and the sagittal thoracic modifier is based on the sagittal curve measurement from the fifth to the twelfth thoracic level. A minus sign represents a curve of less than +10 degrees, N represents a curve of 10 degrees to 40 degrees, and a plus sign represents a curve of more than +40 degrees. Five surgeons, members of the Scoliosis Research Society who had developed the new system and who had previously tested the reliability of the King classification on radiographs of twenty-seven patients, measured the same radiographs (standing coronal and lateral as well as supine side-bending views) to test the reliability of the new classification. A randomly chosen independent group of seven surgeons, also members of the Scoliosis Research Society, tested the reliability and validity of the classification as well. RESULTS: The interobserver and intraobserver kappa values for the curve type were, respectively, 0.92 and 0.83 for the five developers of the system and 0.740 and 0.893 for the independent group of seven scoliosis surgeons. In the independent group, the mean interobserver and intraobserver kappa values were 0.800 and 0.840 for the lumbar modifier and 0.938 and 0.970 for the sagittal thoracic modifier. These kappa values were all in the good-to-excellent range (>0.75), except for the interobserver reliability of the independent group for the curve type (kappa = 0.74), which fell just below this level. CONCLUSIONS: This new two-dimensional classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, as tested by two groups of surgeons, was shown to be much more reliable than the King system. Additional studies are necessary to determine the versatility, reliability, and accuracy of the classification for defining the vertebrae to be included in an arthrodesis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Pedicle morphology in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is pedicle fixation an anatomically viable technique?

STUDY DESIGN: A radiographic study of thoracic pedicle anatomy in a group of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the anatomic constraints of the thoracic pedicles and determine whether the local anatomy would routinely allow pedicle screw insertion at every level. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In spite of the clinical successes reported with limited thoracic pedicle screw-rod constructs for thoracic AIS, controversy exists as to the safety of this technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with right thoracic AIS underwent preoperative thoracic CT scans and plain radiographs. Anatomic parameters were measured from T1 to T12. RESULTS: Information on 512 pedicles was obtained. The transverse width of the pedicles from T1 through T12 ranged from 4.6-8.25 mm. The medial pedicle to lateral rib wall transverse width from T1 through T2 ranged from 12.6 to 17.9 mm. Measured dimensions from the CT scans showed the actual pedicle width to be 1-2 mm larger than would have been predicted from the plain radiographs. Age, Risser grade, curve magnitude, and the amount of segmental axial rotation did not correlate with the morphology or size of the thoracic pedicles investigated. In no case would pedicle morphology have precluded the passage of a pedicle screw. CONCLUSION: Based on the data identified in this group of adolescent patients, it is reasonable to consider pedicle screw insertion at most levels and pedicle-rib fixation at all levels of the thoracic spine during the treatment of thoracic AIS.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Prospective pulmonary function evaluation following open thoracotomy for anterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. OBJECTIVES: To prospectively evaluate sequential pulmonary function tests (PFTs) at a minimum 2-year follow-up after an open anterior spinal fusion (ASF) with instrumentation for thoracic AIS. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Anterior spinal fusion with instrumentation is currently undergoing evaluation as an alternative to posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, the effect of an open thoracotomy on pulmonary function in these patients is unknown. METHODS: Fifty-one patients with thoracic AIS with an average age of 15+0 (range 11+2 to 20+5) had PFTs consisting of volume (FVC), flow (FEV-1), and total lung capacity (TLC). Parameters were obtained preoperatively, and at 3 months, 1 year, and a minimum 2-year follow-up. All patients had a single or double open thoracotomy with the diaphragm kept intact. Fusion levels ranged from T4 (most proximal) to L1 (most distal). The average preoperative thoracic coronal Cobb measurement was 53 degrees (range 38 degrees to 80 degrees ), and the average postoperative coronal measurement was 24 degrees (range 7 degrees to 49 degrees ). The average preoperative thoracic sagittal kyphosis (T5-T12) averaged 22 degrees (range 10 degrees to 58 degrees ), and the average postoperative sagittal kyphosis measured 29 degrees (range 7 degrees to 67 degrees ). RESULTS: There was a significant decline (P< or =0.05) in PFT absolute values (L) of 19%-FVC, 15%-FEV-1, and 11%-TLC at 3 months postoperatively with subsequent improvement and no statistical difference between preoperative and 2-year postoperative values. When evaluating percent predicted values, there was a statistical decline (P< or =0.05) at 3 months postoperatively averaging 19% FVC, 14% FEV-1, and 12% TLC. These values returned to within 94% to 96% of baseline by the 2-year follow-up visit, but were still statistically less than the preoperative values (P</=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary function following thoracotomy with ASF with instrumentation demonstrated a significant decline of 3-month postoperative PFT values, but returned to preoperative baseline absolute values (L) by the 2-year follow-up visit. The percent predicted values returned to within 95% of baseline 2 years postoperatively. Scoliosis surgeons should be aware of these findings when deciding upon the approach (anterior versus posterior) utilized for thoracic AIS.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Parents' and patients' preferences and concerns in idiopathic adolescent scoliosis: a cross-sectional preoperative analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter cross-sectional study of parents' and patient's concerns and preferences regarding surgery for idiopathic scoliosis. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to analyze independently both the parents' and patients' assessments of upcoming surgery for idiopathic scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No group has recently reported querying patients and their parents regarding expectations, preferences, reasons, and concerns about and for surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. METHODS: Ninety-one sets of parents and patients were separately asked to complete questionnaires regarding the patients' upcoming idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Patients' ages ranged from 9 to 18 years, and data were collected from four centers and seven surgeons (all active members of the Scoliosis Research Society) from April through December 1998. Thirty-nine questions covered concerns (n = 6), reasons for surgery (n = 14), expectations (n = 9), assessment of life as is (n = 5), and scar preference (n = 5). RESULTS: The greatest concern about the surgery expressed by both parents and patients was neurologic deficit. The least concern for both was location and appearance of the scar. The highest expectation and main reason for having the surgery was to reduce future pain and disability as an adult. Families would be either somewhat or very dissatisfied to spend the rest of life "as is." CONCLUSION: Although parents and patients had similar ratings and concerns, the parents' concerns were higher, and expectations were greater than the patients'.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Do radiographic parameters correlate with clinical outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

STUDY DESIGN: A radiographic assessment has been developed to include coronal, sagittal, and axial parameters. OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlation of postoperative radiographic results and percentage postoperative radiographic improvement with patient clinical self-assessment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: With the increasing interest in outcome studies, the authors wanted to determine whether Scoliosis Research Society clinical questionnaire results would correlate with objective radiographic improvement. METHODS INCLUSION CRITERIA: adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with anterior or posterior instrumentation, a solid fusion, minimum 2-year follow-up, and a completed postoperative Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire. Seventy-eight patients met the criteria. Measurements included in the radiographic score: Cobb angles of the coronal curve, C7 to the center sacral vertical line, apical translation, apical vertebral rotation, T1 rib angle, end-instrumented vertebrae angulation, angulation of the disc below the end-instrumented vertebra, and curve type. Sagittal measurements included T2-T12, T5-T12, T2-T5, T12-L2, and L1-S1. RESULTS: The preoperative radiographic score of these 78 patients was mean 60.1 +/- 9.7 (range 41-88, maximum radiographic score, 100). The 2-year postoperative radiographic score was mean 83.8 +/- 8.8 (range, 65-100). The median Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire score was 98 +/- 12.3 (range, 58-116, maximum score, 125, showing that the patient is highly satisfied and asymptomatic). The postoperative radiographic score versus the questionnaire score showed a Spearman rank correlation of 0.04 (P = 0.68, little or no correlation throughout). Percentage improvement of the radiographic score versus the questionnaire score showed a Spearman rank correlation of 0.1 (P = 0.38, little or no correlation throughout). CONCLUSION: In this initial group of patients, the radiographic assessment shows a significant improvement between preoperative and 2-year postoperative scores. However, little correlation between the radiographic assessment and the questionnaire scores was found in this adolescent population, suggesting that separate analyses of radiographic and clinical outcome data are required when evaluating results of postoperative scoliosis surgery.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

The effect of continued posterior spinal growth on sagittal contour in patients treated by anterior instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of radiographs on a prospective cohort of patients undergoing anterior instrumentation for thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the change in sagittal profile after growth. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The authors previously reported some advantages of anterior instrumentation for treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. However, postsurgery hyperkyphosis has resulted in some patients, especially those who were skeletally immature at the time of surgery. METHODS: Inclusion criteria required that participants have thoracic idiopathic scoliosis treated with anterior instrumentation and a confirmed solid fusion, no rod breakage, and a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. The 47 patients meeting the criteria were divided into a study group of 10 patients who were Risser 0 at the time of surgery and a control group of 37 patients who were Risser 1 to 5. Progressive sagittal kyphosis was defined as an increase of 10 degrees or more (T5-T12) after surgery. RESULTS: Sagittal progression greater than 10 degrees (average, 15 degrees ) occurred in 6 of 10 patients (60%) in the study group (Risser 0). Five patients progressed from 10 degrees to 19 degrees, and one patient from 20 degrees to 30 degrees. In contrast, sagittal progression occurred in only 10 of 37 patients (27%) in the control group (Risser 1 to 5). CONCLUSIONS: Some patients with thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with anterior instrumentation may be at risk for progressive sagittal kyphosis secondary to growth. Skeletal immaturity (Risser 0) appears to be a risk factor. In these immature patients, preserving the sagittal profile with intervertebral spacers, rigid rods, and bone graft (allowing for an average 15 degrees increase of kyphosis with growth) may be appropriate.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Etiology of idiopathic scoliosis: current trends in research.

Current population studies characterize idiopathic scoliosis as a single-gene disorder that follows the patterns of mendelian genetics, including variable penetrance and heterogeneity. The role of melatonin and calmodulin in the development of idiopathic scoliosis is likely secondary, with indirect effects on growth mechanisms. Reported abnormalities of connective tissue, skeletal muscle, platelets, the spinal column, and the rib cage are all thought to be secondary to the deformity itself. Although no consistent neurological abnormalities have been identified in patients with idiopathic scoliosis, it is possible that a defect in processing by the central nervous system affects the growing spine. The true etiology of idiopathic scoliosis remains unknown; however, it appears to be multifactorial.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗
PubMed1999

Spontaneous lumbar curve coronal correction after selective anterior or posterior thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of anterior and posterior fusions for treatment of adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate both the instrumented thoracic and the spontaneous lumbar curve corrections after treatment of the primary thoracic scoliosis by either anterior or posterior fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recent reports of thoracic scoliosis fusions have concentrated on the thoracic correction obtained by posterior segmental instrumentation systems. Coronal decompensation occurring because of curve progression with imbalance of the unfused lumbar spine has also been investigated. No report comparing spontaneous lumbar curve response after selective anterior versus posterior thoracic scoliosis fusions are available. METHODS: One hundred twenty-three cases of primary thoracic-compensatory lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were treated by selective thoracic instrumentation and fusion with either an anterior (n = 70) or posterior (n = 53) single approach. Thoracic and lumbar Cobb measurements and lumbar apical translation parameters were assessed before surgery, 1 week after surgery, and 2 years after surgery on upright coronal radiographs. All patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: At 2-year follow-up, the percentage of thoracic curve correction was superior for the anterior (58%) versus the posterior (38%) group (P < 0.05), whereas the spontaneous lumbar curve correction was also superior for the anterior (56%) group versus the posterior (37%) group for all curve types investigated (P < 0.05). Both treatment groups consistently improved lumbar apical positioning after the thoracic fusion procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Spontaneous lumbar curve correction occurs consistently after both selective anterior and posterior thoracic fusion implying intrinsic ability of the lumbar spine to follow thoracic spine correction. In the current study, using multisegmented hook-rod systems posteriorly with intentional limitation of posterior thoracic correction to avoid decompensation, instrumented thoracic and spontaneous lumbar curve correction was statistically better after anterior thoracic instrumentation and fusion, with the results most dramatic for lumbar curve Type C (true King II curves).

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A multicenter study of 244 patients.

STUDY DESIGN: An outcome questionnaire was constructed to evaluate patient satisfaction and performance and to discriminate among patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. OBJECTIVES: To determine reliability and validity in a new quality-of-life instrument for measuring progress among scoliosis patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Meta-analysis of the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis determined that a uniform assessment of outcome did not exist. In addition, patient measures of well-being as opposed to process measures (e.g., radiographs) were not consistently reported. This established the need for a standardized questionnaire to assess patient measures in conjunction with process measures. METHODS: The instrument consists of 24 questions divided into seven equally weighted domains as determined by factor analysis: pain, general self-image, postoperative self-image, general function, overall level of activity, postoperative function, and satisfaction. The questionnaire takes approximately 5 minutes to complete and is taken at predetermined time intervals. A total of 244 of patients from three different sites responded to the questionnaire. RESULTS: The reliability based on internal consistency was confirmed with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient greater than 0.6 for each domain. In addition, acceptable correlation coefficient values greater than 0.68 were obtained for each domain by the test-retest method on normal controls. Similarly; to establish validity of the questionnaire, responses of normal high school students were compared with that of the patients. Consistent differences were noted in the domains between the two groups with P < 0.003. The largest differences were in pain (control, 29.96 +/- 0.20; patient, 13.23 +/- 5.55) and general level of activity (control, 14.96 +/- 0.20; patient, 12.16 +/- 3.23). Examination of the relationship between the domains and patient satisfaction showed that pain correlates with satisfaction to the greatest degree (Pearson's correlation co-efficient, r = -0.511; P < 0.001), followed by self-image (r = 0.412; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This questionnaire addresses patient measures for evaluation of outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery by examining several domains. It also allows for dynamic monitoring of scoliosis patients as they become adults. This is a validated instrument with good reliability measures.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective study of two cohort groups of patients (one group receiving anterior instrumentation and the other posterior instrumentation) receiving treatment for thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. OBJECTIVE: To present the 2-year postoperative results of a prospective multicenter study comparing the use of anterior instrumentation with that of posterior multisegmented hook instrumentation for the correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Despite reports of satisfactory results, problems have been reported with posterior systems, including worsening of the lumbar curve after surgery and failure to correct hypokyphosis. Theoretically, the advantages of anterior instrumentation include prevention of lumbar curve decompensation by shortening the convexity of the thoracic curve. In addition, by removing the disc, better correction of thoracic hypokyphosis could be obtained. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients who underwent an anterior spinal fusion using flexible threaded rods and nuts (Harms-MOSS instrumentation, De Puy-Motech-Acromed, Cleveland, OH) were analyzed and compared with 100 patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion with multisegmented hook systems. Parameters of comparison included coronal and sagittal correction, balance, distal lumbar fusion levels, and complication. All patients had idiopathic thoracic curves of King Types II to V. The average age at surgery was 14 years in each group, the average preoperative curve 57 degrees, and the minimum duration of follow-up for all patients 24 months. All data were collected prospectively and analyzed via Epl into statistical analysis (Centers of Disease Control, Atlanta, GA). RESULTS: Average coronal correction of the main thoracic curve was 58% in the anterior group and 59% in the posterior group (P = 0.92). Analysis of sagittal contour showed that the posterior systems failed to correct a preoperative hypokyphosis (sagittal T5 to T12 less than 20 degrees) in 60% of cases, whereas 81% were normal postoperatively in the anterior group. However, hyperkyphosis (sagittal T5 to T12 greater than 40 degrees) occurred after surgery in 40% of the anterior group when the preoperative kyphosis was greater than 20 degrees. Postoperative coronal balance was equal in both groups. An average of 2.5 (range, 0-6) distal fusion levels were saved using the anterior spinal instrumentation according to the criteria used for determining posterior fusion levels in this study. Selective fusion of the thoracic curve (distal fusion level T11, T12, L1) was performed in 76 of 78 patients (97%) in the anterior group as compared with only 18 of 100 (18%) in the posterior group. Surgically confirmed pseudarthrosis occurred in 4 of 78 patients (5%) in the anterior group and in 1 of 100 patients (1%) in the posterior group (P = 0.10). Loss of correction greater than 10 degrees occurred in 18 of 78 patients (23%) in the anterior group and in 12 of 100 patients (12%) in the posterior group (P = 0.01). Implant breakage occurred in 24 patients (31%) of the anterior group and in only 1 patient (1%) of the posterior group. CONCLUSIONS: 1) Coronal correction and balance were equal in both the anterior and posterior groups, even though the anterior group had the majority of curves (97%) fused short or to L1, whereas only 18% were fused short or to L1 in the posterior group. 2) In the anterior group there was a better correction of sagittal profile in those with a preoperative hypokyphosis less than 20 degrees. However, hyperkyphosis (with a mean of 54 degrees) occurred in 40% of those in the anterior group with a preoperative kyphosis of more than 20 degrees. 3) An average of 2.5 lumbar levels can be saved with anterior fusion and instrumentation according to the criteria used for choosing posterior fusion levels in this study. 4) Using the 3.2-mm flexible rod in this study, loss of correction, pseudarthrosis, and rod breakage were unacceptably highe

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Scheuermann's disease.

Scheuermann's disease is the most common cause of structural kyphosis in adolescence. The mode of inheritance is likely autosomal dominant and the etiology remains largely unknown. Indications for treatment remain controversial because the true natural history of the disease has not been clearly defined. Brace treatment appears to be very effective if the diagnosis is made early. Surgical treatment is rarely indicated for severe kyphosis (> 75 degrees ) with curve progression, refractory pain, or neurologic deficit.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the classification of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

The system described by King et al. is the standard method for the classification of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Although it is widely used and referenced, its reliability and reproducibility among scoliosis surgeons are unknown. We used a scoliosis case-presentation format to examine the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the classification of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with the system of King et al. Eight active, current members of the Scoliosis Research Society reviewed twenty-seven full-length radiographs that had been made before operative correction of the scoliotic deformity. On the basis of these images, which included posteroanterior and lateral radiographs made with the patient standing as well as right and left forced-side-bending radiographs made with the patient supine, the reviewers assigned a type to each curve according to the classification system of King et al. Kappa coefficients were used to test statistical reliability. The mean interobserver reliability of the classification was only 64 per cent (range, 54 to 77 per cent) when the responses of seven of the reviewers were compared with those of one of the originators of the classification. The mean kappa coefficient was 0.49 (range, 0.27 to 0.73), which indicates poor reliability. When each reviewer's responses were compared with those of the other reviewers, the reliability was similarly poor (interobserver reliability, 55 per cent [range, 33 to 81 per cent] and mean kappa coefficient, 0.40 [range, 0.21 to 0.63]). Intraobserver reliability was evaluated in a trial in which five reviewers in a group setting were shown the same radiographs in a different order at two different viewings. Comparison of the results at the two viewings revealed a mean intraobserver reliability of 69 per cent (range, 56 to 85 per cent) and a mean kappa coefficient of 0.62 (range, 0.34 to 0.95), which indicates fair reliability. The current method of classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis does not appear to have sufficient intraobserver or interobserver reliability among scoliosis surgeons to portray curve types accurately. Thus, it may not help to guide treatment with use of modern spinal fixation methods.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

The use of intrathecal morphine for analgesia after posterolateral lumbar fusion: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia after posterolateral lumbar fusion. OBJECTIVES: To compare the early postoperative analgesia in patients who receive a single dose of intrathecal morphine intraoperatively with that of patients using a patient-controlled analgesia pump only. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Although intrathecal morphine is used as an analgesic in a variety of medical and surgical conditions, very little has been published on its use after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Because the thecal sac is readily available during these procedures, the addition of a single injection of morphine before wound closure can be done with technical ease. If its efficacy and safety can be verified, then it could serve as a useful adjuvant to the postoperative analgesia regimen. METHODS: Sixty-eight consecutive patients undergoing posterolateral lumbar fusion were randomly assigned to two groups. The experimental group was injected intrathecally with morphine 30 minutes before wound closure, and the control group was similarly injected with a placebo of normal saline solution. All patients were connected to an on-demand patient-controlled analgesia pump to provide any additional necessary analgesia. Their use of the patient-controlled analgesia pump was tabulated by counting the number of demands and the actual amount of morphine delivered. Additionally, a visual analog scale was used to assess pain levels at pre-established regular intervals. RESULTS: The visual analog scale measurements were significantly lower for the intrathecal morphine group initially, but they surpassed those of the control group after 24 hours. Likewise, the number of patient-controlled analgesia pump demands and the amount of narcotic delivered initially were significantly lower in the experimental patients, but again reversed after the first postoperative day. The late rebound in pain and patient-controlled analgesia pump use did not reach statistical significance. There were no significant complications related to the analgesia. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal morphine can be safe and efficacious as an early postoperative analgesic after lumbar fusion when respiratory monitoring is used.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

A prospective analysis of autograft versus allograft in posterolateral lumbar fusion in the same patient. A minimum of 1-year follow-up in 144 patients.

STUDY DESIGN: One hundred forty four patients who underwent lumbar spine fusions had autografts placed on one side as a control and on the opposite side one of the following types of graft material was placed: iliac autograft, demineralized cancellous chips, demineralized cortical powder, demineralized cortical powder mixed with autograft, or mineralized cancellous chips. Alar anteroposterior and lateral postoperative radiographs were reviewed by three independent observers and graded for quality of fusion mass bilaterally. The follow-up was 14 to 27 months. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the efficacy of various types of ethylene oxide-sterilized allograft bone used for spine fusions and compared them with autograft iliac bone in the same patient. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies comparing autograft with allograft showed poorer fusion rates with allograft with posterior fusions. Most of the previous studies included smaller numbers of patients. No previous studies compared ethylene oxide-treated allograft with autograft. RESULTS: An analysis of the radiographs at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively revealed significantly lower values when allograft alone or in combination with autograft was used in comparison to autograft alone. CONCLUSIONS: Ethylene oxide-treated allograft is inferior to autograft and should not be used for posterior lumbar fusions.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

An analysis of sagittal curves and balance after Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for kyphosis secondary to Scheuermann's disease. A review of 32 patients.

STUDY DESIGN: This study compared preoperative and postoperative saggittal curves and spinal balance in patients undergoing spinal fusion with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for severe kyphosis secondary to Scheuermann's disease. Also determined was patient satisfaction regarding relief of pain and correction of the deformity. Thirty two patients with kyphosis > 75 degrees underwent spinal fusion with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the initial and long-term correction of the primary kyphosis and changes in lumbar lordosis and sagittal balance, and to determine the incidence and etiology of junctional sagittal deformities. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The average preoperative kyphosis was 85 degrees (range, 75 degrees to 105 degrees) with an average correction at final follow-up of 43 degrees (range, 26 degrees to 65 degrees). Preoperative lumbar lordosis averaged 75 degrees (range, 58 degrees to 100 degrees) and at final follow-up averaged 55 degrees (range, 23 degrees to 74 degrees). Most of the patients demonstrated negative sagittal balance and became slightly more negatively balanced postoperatively. RESULTS: Maintenance of correction postoperatively was excellent, with only a 4 degree average loss of correction. There was spontaneous reduction in lumbar lordosis of varying degrees. Proximal junctional kyphosis was associated with over-correction (> 50%) of the kyphotic deformity or a fusion starting short of the proximal vertebra in the measured kyphosis. Distal junctional kyphosis developed in patients whose fusion ended short of the first lordotic segment. CONCLUSIONS: This procedure appeared to yield good results when proper levels of fusion were selected and correction > 50% was not attempted.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Anterior spinal fusion with Zielke instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis. A frontal and sagittal curve analysis in 36 patients.

The authors have reviewed the records of 36 patients with idiopathic scoliosis who underwent a single-stage anterior spinal fusion with Zielke instrumentation to determine if any adverse frontal or secondary sagittal deformities or changes in balance resulted from the surgery. Spontaneous correction of uninstrumented thoracic curves was noted in five patients with double-major curves, and frontal balance was maintained or improved after operation in all but four patients. Kyphosis was increased in the instrumented segments in all patients. In the uninstrumented segments, however, thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis were decreased in all but five patients after operation, whereas overall sagittal balance was not adversely affected by the surgery in any patient.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1987

Double L-rod instrumentation in the treatment of severe kyphosis secondary to Scheuermann's disease.

Patients with untreated kyphosis secondary to Scheuermann's disease occasionally develop significant deformities associated with pain in adult life. When these painful deformities do not respond to conservative measures, surgery may be indicated. This report describes a two-stage surgical technique for correction of the deformity. First, an anterior spinal release and fusion is performed and is followed 7-10 days later by a posterior spinal fusion with double L-rod instrumentation. L-rod instrumentation has the advantage that no postoperative immobilization is necessary, which allows the patient to return to a relatively normal life-style in the immediate postoperative period. Excellent maintenance of correction of the deformity in these patients has occurred with no serious complication to date in 24 patients followed from 19 months to 4 years although "transient hyperesthesia" occurred in 16% of patients. A longer follow-up will be necessary to evaluate fully possible late pseudarthrosis and instrumentation failure in this group of patients.

Adolescent↗