Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T Fahey

Publications and source records attributed to T Fahey.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

The impact of patients' preferences on the treatment of atrial fibrillation: observational study of patient based decision analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of patients' preferences for the treatment of atrial fibrillation, by using individualised decision analysis combining probability and utility assessments into a decision tree. DESIGN: Observational study based on interviews with patients. SETTING: Eight general practices in Avon. PARTICIPANTS: 260 randomly selected patients aged 70-85 years with atrial fibrillation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients' treatment preferences regarding anticoagulation treatment (warfarin) after individualised decision analysis; comparison of these preferences with treatment guidelines on the basis of comorbidity and absolute risk and compared with current prescription. RESULTS: Of 195 eligible patients, 97 participated in decision making using decision analysis. Among these 97, the decision analysis indicated that 59 (61%; 95% confidence interval 50% to 71%) would prefer anticoagulation treatment-considerably fewer than those who would be recommended treatment according to guidelines. There was marked disagreement between the decision analysis and guideline recommendations (kappa=0.25 or less). Of 38 patients whose decision analysis indicated a preference for anticoagulation, 17 (45%) were being prescribed warfarin; on the other hand, 28 (47%) of 59 patients were not being prescribed warfarin although the results of their decision analysis suggested they wanted to be. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of shared decision making, individualised decision analysis is valuable in a sizeable proportion of elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. Taking account of patients' preferences would lead to fewer prescriptions for warfarin than under published guideline recommendations. Decision analysis as a shared decision making tool should be evaluated in a randomised controlled trial.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Evaluation of computer based clinical decision support system and risk chart for management of hypertension in primary care: randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of a computer based clinical decision support system and a risk chart on absolute cardiovascular risk, blood pressure, and prescribing of cardiovascular drugs in hypertensive patients. DESIGN: Cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING: 27 general practices in Avon. PARTICIPANTS: 614 patients aged between 60 and 79 years with high blood pressure. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomised to computer based clinical decision support system plus cardiovascular risk chart; cardiovascular risk chart alone; or usual care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of patients in each group with a five year cardiovascular risk >/=10%, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, prescribing of cardiovascular drugs. RESULTS: Patients in the computer based clinical decision support system and chart only groups were no more likely to have cardiovascular risk reduced to below 10% than patients receiving usual care. Patients in the computer based clinical decision support group were more likely to have a cardiovascular risk >/=10% than chart only patients, odds ratio 2.3 (95% confidence interval 1.1 to 4.8). The chart only group had significantly lower systolic blood pressure compared with the usual care group (difference in means -4.6 mm Hg (95% confidence interval -8.4 to -0.8)). Reduction of diastolic blood pressure did not differ between the three groups. The chart only group were twice as likely to be prescribed two classes of cardiovascular drugs and over three times as likely to be prescribed three or more classes of drugs compared with the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: The computer based clinical decision support system did not confer any benefit in absolute risk reduction or blood pressure control and requires further development and evaluation before use in clinical care can be recommended. Use of chart guidelines are associated with a potentially important reduction in systolic blood pressure.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Antibiotics for acute bronchitis.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic treatment of acute bronchitis, which is one of the most common illnesses seen in primary care, is controversial. Most clinicians prescribe antibiotics in spite of expert recommendations against this practice. OBJECTIVES: People with acute bronchitis may show little evidence of bacterial infection. If effective, antibiotics could shorten the course of the disease. However if they are not effective, the risk of antibiotic resistance may be increased. The objective of this review was to assess the effects of antibiotic treatment for patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute bronchitis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched Medline, Embase, reference lists of articles and the authors' personal collections up to 1996, and Scisearch from 1989 to 1996. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing any antibiotic therapy with placebo in acute bronchitis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least two reviewers extracted data and assessed trial quality. MAIN RESULTS: Eight trials involving 750 patients aged eight to over 65 and including smokers and non-smokers were included. The quality of the trials was variable. A variety of outcome measures were assessed. In many cases, only outcomes that showed a statistically significant difference between groups were reported. Overall, patients receiving antibiotics had slightly better outcomes than did those receiving placebo. They were less likely to report feeling unwell at a follow up visit (odds ratio 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 0.82), to show no improvement on physician assessment (odds ratio 0.43; 0.23 to 0.79), or to have abnormal lung findings (odds ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.13 to 0.86), and had a more rapid return to work or usual activities (weighted mean difference 0.7 days earlier, 95% confidence interval 0.2 to 1. 3). Antibiotic-treated patients reported significantly more adverse effects (odds ratio 1.64; 1.05 to 2.57) such as nausea, vomiting, headache, skin rash or vaginitis. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotics appear to have a modest beneficial effect in the treatment of acute bronchitis, with a corresponding small risk of adverse effects. The benefits of antibiotics may be overestimated in this analysis because of the tendency of published reports to include complete data on only the outcomes found to be statistically significant.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2000

Factors affecting recurrence following incisional herniorrhaphy.

The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of chronic illness, obesity, and type of repair on the likelihood of recurrence following incisional herniorrhaphy. The medical records of 77 patients who underwent elective repair of a midline incisional hernia at the Dallas Veterans Affairs Medical Center between 1991 and 1995 were reviewed. Demographic data, presence of chronic illnesses, type of repair, and presence of recurrence were noted. Ninety-six percent of the patients were men, with an average age of 59 years. More than 50% of the patients had chronic lung or cardiac diseases and more than 40% weighed > or = 120% of their ideal body weight and had a body mass index (BMI) > or = 30. Sixty-two percent of the patients underwent primary reapproximation of the fascia (tissue repair), whereas 38% underwent repair with prosthetic material (prosthetic repair). The overall recurrence rate was 45%, with a median follow-up of 45 months (range 6-73). Seventy-four percent of the recurrences presented within 3 years of repair. The recurrence rate for those patients undergoing a tissue repair was 54%, whereas the recurrence rate following prosthetic repair was 29%. The incidence of recurrence for patients with pulmonary or cardiac disease or diabetes mellitus was similar to that of patients without these illnesses. The percent ideal body weight and BMI of patients who developed a recurrent hernia, particularly following a prosthetic repair, were significantly greater than those of patients whose repairs remained intact. These data strongly support the use of prosthetic repairs for incisional hernias, particularly in patients who are overweight.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Management of menorrhagia in primary care-impact on referral and hysterectomy: data from the Somerset Morbidity Project.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the management of menorrhagia in primary care and its impact on referral and hysterectomy rates. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: 11 general practices from the Somerset Morbidity Project. SUBJECTS: 885 women consulting their general practitioner with menorrhagia over four years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportions of these women investigated and treated with drugs in primary care, referred to a gynaecologist and undergoing operative procedures. The relation between investigation and prescribing in primary care and referral to and surgery in secondary care. RESULTS: Less than half of women had a vaginal examination (42%, 95% CI 39% to 45%), or a full blood count (39%, 95% CI 36% to 43%). Almost a quarter of women, 23% (95% CI 20% to 26%), received no drugs and 37% (95% CI 34% to 40%) received norethisterone. Over a third, 38% (95% CI 34% to 40%), of women were referred, and once referred 43% (95% CI 38% to 48%) of women were operated on. Women referred to a gynaecologist were significantly more likely to have received tranexamic acid and/or mefenamic acid in primary care (chi(2)=16.4, df=1, p<0.001). There were substantial between practice variations in management, for example in prescribing of tranexamic acid and/or mefenamic acid (range 16% to 72%) and referral to gynaecology (range 24% to 52%). There was a significant association between high referral and high operative rates (Spearman's correlation coefficient=0.86, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Substantial differences in management exist between practices when investigating and prescribing for menorrhagia in primary care. Rates of prescribing of effective medical treatment remain low. The decision to refer a woman impacts markedly on her chances of subsequently being operated on. Effective management in primary care may not reduce referral or hysterectomy rates.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Estimation of cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients in primary care.

Assessment of absolute cardiovascular risk is a rational method of managing hypertension. General practitioners and practice nurses were asked to estimate absolute risk in a group of elderly hypertensive patients during clinical practice. Risk was correctly estimated in 21% of patients, underestimated in 63% of patients, and overestimated in 16% of patients. Unless primary health care professionals use cardiovascular risk charts or tables, treatment decisions in primary care may not be made against realistic estimates of patients' susceptibility to cardiovascular disease.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Risk stratification in the management of atrial fibrillation in the community.

This study assessed whether risk stratification in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in the community had a bearing on the likelihood of receiving aspirin or warfarin therapy. Seven hundred and fifty patients were identified from 14 practices by means of diagnostic READ codes or repeat prescriptions for digoxin from practice computers. The study demonstrates that general practitioners appreciate the importance of antithrombotic therapy in patients who have suffered stroke, but take poor account of increasing age and other independent risk factors. A more proactive approach to risk identification and treatment seems justified.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

How accurately do primary health care professionals use cardiovascular risk tables in the management of hypertension?

It has been suggested that use of cardiovascular risk tables in hypertensive patients might improve clinical management. As part of a randomised controlled trial, we evaluated the accuracy of health professionals' use of the New Zealand risk tables in primary care consultations. Chance-corrected agreement between health professionals' assessments of absolute risk was only moderate (weighted kappa = 0.56 at the 12-month follow-up). Inaccurate use of cardiovascular risk tables may be a barrier to effective implementation of research evidence in the management of hypertension.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗
PubMed1998

Quantitative systematic review of randomised controlled trials comparing antibiotic with placebo for acute cough in adults.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether antibiotic treatment for acute cough is effective and to measure the side effects of such treatment. DESIGN: Quantitative systematic review of randomised placebo controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: Nine trials (8 published, 1 unpublished) retrieved from a systematic search (electronic databases, contact with authors, contact with drug manufacturers, reference lists); no restriction on language. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of subjects with productive cough at follow up (7-11 days after consultation with general practitioner); proportion of subjects who had not improved clinically at follow up; proportion of subjects who reported side effects from taking antibiotic or placebo. RESULTS: Eight trials contributed to the meta-analysis. Resolution of cough was not affected by antibiotic treatment (relative risk 0.85 (95% confidence interval 0.73 to 1.00)), neither was clinical improvement at re-examination (relative risk 0.62 (0.36 to 1.09)). The side effects of antibiotic were more common in the antibiotic group when compared to placebo (relative risk 1.51 (0.86 to 2.64)). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with antibiotic does not affect the resolution of cough or alter the course of illness. The benefits of antibiotic treatment are marginal for most patients with acute cough and may be outweighed by the side effects of treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Reconciling different measures of risk in the treatment of hypertension: a community-based study.

BACKGROUND: There is disagreement as to how cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients should be measured. In particular, whether absolute risk measurement alone is a realistic index on which to base treatment goals. METHOD: A cross-sectional study on 895 treated hypertensive patients in 18 general practices in the UK. Reporting on the distribution and magnitude of age-specific absolute risk. The percentage of individuals with controlled hypertension whose absolute risk exceeds their age/sex absolute risk standard and the percentage of individuals with uncontrolled hypertension whose risk is less than their age/sex absolute risk standard. RESULTS: Overall, 62.8% (95% CI 59.6-66%) individuals had an absolute risk that exceeded 20% over 10 years. The magnitude of absolute risk was considerable (range 3.5-87.8%) and increasing absolute risk was significantly associated with age. Of those individuals with controlled hypertension 50.5% (95% CI 45.1-55.8%) had an absolute risk which exceeded their age/sex absolute risk standard. Conversely, 30.4% (95% CI 26.6-34.2%) of those with uncontrolled hypertension had an absolute risk that was less than their age/sex absolute risk standard. CONCLUSIONS: The distribution and magnitude of absolute risk is significantly associated with age. Appreciation of such a relationship is needed when setting realistic treatment goals according to an absolute risk standard, particularly in the elderly. In addition, the use an age/sex absolute risk standard is likely to further modify treatment goals in individuals at high and low absolute risk of cardiovascular disease.

Age Factors↗