Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T F Pajak

Publications and source records attributed to T F Pajak.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1990

Concomitant cisplatin chemotherapy and radiotherapy in advanced mucosal squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Long-term results of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group study 81-17.

One hundred twenty-four eligible patients with advanced mucosal squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were entered into a pilot study of concomitant cisplatin (100 mg/m2 given every 3 weeks for three doses) and standard irradiation. The initial complete response (CR) was 71% with an additional two cases salvaged by surgery for an overall 73% CR. When no keratin was identified in the histologic specimen (41 patients) the CR was 90%. The nasopharynx showed the best CR (89%) among the sites. At 4 years after treatment, the estimated locoregional tumor control rate was 43% and the survival, 34%. When no keratin was present in the specimen, the estimated locoregional control of tumor was superior (56% versus 38% with keratin identified, P = 0.02) and the estimated survival was also superior (48% versus 26%, P = 0.008). Acute treatment-related toxicities included one death due to renal damage and two patients with life-threatening renal damage. The delivery of radiotherapy was not altered. Late toxicity included necrosis -3%, fibrosis -4%, and one fistula. The results of this study justify a randomized trial for the comparison of this combination of cisplatin and radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in advanced mucosal carcinomas of the head and neck.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗
PubMed1990

Dose-response for local control with hyperfractionated radiation therapy in advanced carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tracts: preliminary report of radiation therapy oncology group protocol 83-13.

A prospective, randomized Phase Ilate/II trial of hyperfractionated radiation therapy was conducted: 1.2 Gy minimum tumor dose was administered twice daily with a minimum interval of 4 hr, 5 days per week. Patients with Stage III and IV carcinomas of the oral cavity, oropharynx, nasopharynx, hypopharynx, and supraglottic larynx were stratified by site, presence or absence of nodal metastases, and performance status. They were assigned to four total doses between 67.2 Gy and 81.6 Gy to all known tumors. The highest dose arm was opened after preliminary assessment indicated acceptable late morbidity rates with the three lower doses. Of 479 patients entered, 260 patients were randomized to the three lower total doses and 237 were analyzed for this preliminary report: 63 were assigned to receive 67.2 Gy, 58 to 72.0 Gy, and 116 to 76.8 Gy. Estimates of grade 4 necrosis at 2 years were 10.0%, 5.1%, and 13.9%, respectively, for patients who received total doses of 67.2 Gy, 72.0 Gy, and 76.8 Gy. There was a suggestion of a trend toward increased local control at 24 months (Kaplan-Meier estimates of 25% for 67.2 Gy, 37% for 72.0 Gy, and 42% for 76.8 Gy) (p = .08). No difference was observed in survival. Assessment of the results using Cox regression models to correct for slight inequalities of pretreatment prognostic variables supported a total dose-tumor control relationship (p = .054). Results for the lowest dose arm were comparable to previous RTOG studies of common fractionation with similar total doses. The higher local control rates with 72.0 and 76.8 Gy using hyperfractionated radiation therapy suggest an improvement in outcome with radiation therapy for advanced carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tracts. These preliminary findings have led to a Phase III comparison of hyperfractionated radiation therapy with 1.2 Gy b.i.d. with standard fractionation.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Chemo-radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a radiation therapy oncology group study.

The results of radiotherapy alone for patients with locally advanced (stage III or IV) nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) are poor in spite of the initial complete clearance. Twenty-seven patients (26 stage IV) were treated with concurrent standard radiotherapy and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 and every 3 weeks for three courses. In 24 (89%) patients, complete response (CR) was achieved. The CR rate was higher for poorly undifferentiated cancer (100%). The major side effects were leukopenia (97%), anemia (54%), nausea and vomiting (81%), stomatitis (92%), and renal impairment (52%). Most of these side effects were either mild or moderate and reversible. All patients finished the radiotherapy dose (greater than 6,450 cGy), 19 (70%) had three courses of cisplatin, and eight had only two courses, six due to drug toxicity. Twenty-six patients with stage IV disease were compared with 78 patients treated with radiotherapy alone by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). The disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival, and the incidence of distant organ metastasis appear to be better in the combined group. It was concluded that the combination of chemo-radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced NPC needs to be evaluated in a phase III randomized trial.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

A randomized phase I/II trial of hyperfractionated radiation therapy with total doses of 60.0 Gy to 79.2 Gy: possible survival benefit with greater than or equal to 69.6 Gy in favorable patients with Radiation Therapy Oncology Group stage III non-small-cell lung carcinoma: report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 83-11.

A phase Ilate/II trial of hyperfractionated (HFX) radiation therapy for non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung (NSCCL) was conducted by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) between 1983 and 1987. Fractions of 1.2 Gy were administered twice daily with greater than or equal to 4 hours between fractions. Patients were randomized to receive minimum total doses of 60.0, 64.8, and 69.6 Gy. After acceptable risks of acute and late effects were found, 74.4 Gy and 79.2 Gy arms were added, and the lowest total dose arms were closed. No significant differences in the risks of acute or late effects in normal tissues were found among the 848 patients analyzed in the five arms; risks of severe or life-threatening pneumonitis were 2.6% for 60.0 to 64.8 Gy, 5.7% for 69.6 to 74.4 Gy, and 8.1% for 79.2 Gy. Among 350 patients who had the same criteria as Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) protocol 84-33 (American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging [AJCCS], 1984, stage III; Karnofsky performance status [KPS] 70 to 100; less than 6% weight loss), there was a dose response for survival: survival with 69.6 Gy (median, 13.0 months; 2 years, 29%) was significantly (P = .02) better than the lower total doses. There were no differences in survival among the three highest total-dose arms. Comparisons with results in similar patients treated with 60 Gy in 30 fractions of 2.0 Gy 5 days per week for 6 weeks suggest benefit from HFX radiation therapy with 69.6 Gy. Improvement in survival with HFX radiation therapy at 69.6 Gy total dose without increase in normal tissue effects, justifies phase III comparison with standard fractionation alone and combined with systemic chemotherapy in this common presentation of NSCCL.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Combined therapy for resectable head and neck cancer. A phase 3 intergroup study.

This Head and Neck Intergroup (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Southwest Oncology Group, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Cancer and Leukemia Group B, Northern California Oncology Group, and Southeastern Cancer Study Group) phase 3 randomized prospective trial was opened for registration January 1985. It is an evaluation of the role of chemotherapy for previously untreated advanced stage resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. As of March 1, 1988, there has been a total of 535 patients registered. There are 266 patients analyzable with 133 in each treatment group. The surgical, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy toxic reactions are in the tolerable range with the worst toxic reactions reported in those patients receiving both surgery and radiation therapy. Compliance continues to be a major challenge to patient accrual. The most common cause for cases not being randomized involves positive margins of surgical resection. Patient refusal or surgical complications are other common reasons.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1989

Surgical quality control in head and neck cancer. Study 73-03 of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

The measurement of quality of medical care has always been a topic of concern to physicians and other health care professionals. During an age of increasing competitiveness in the health care environment, the ability to assess accurately the quality of the care delivered has become increasingly important. The head and neck surgeons within the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group have examined this problem and have developed an evaluation tool that was then applied retrospectively in an attempt to evaluate the quality of surgery performed in a randomized study. The analysis of the results suggested that the retrospective approach to surgical quality control is fraught with hazards and is unlikely to fulfill the goals set for it.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1989

Impact of initial quality control review on study outcome in lung and head/neck cancer studies--review of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group experience.

The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) initiated cooperative clinical trials in 1971. In 1978, RTOG developed a formalized program of Quality Control (QC) divided into initial and final phases. The initial review process consisted of two steps. The first phase of review is an evaluation performed by a radiation oncologist to verify treatment plan and field borders. The second portion of the initial review process originally consisted of dosimetry calculation verification based on machine data provided by the regional Radiological Physics Center and treatment planning data provided by the accessioning institution. Between 1978 and December 31, 1987, a total of 11,343 cases in 96 RTOG protocols, excluding particle studies, underwent initial review. Of this number, 2227 patients were entered in lung cancer studies and 1341 patients were entered in head/neck cancer studies. Initial review was carried out in 2089 (93.8%) of the lung cancer cases. Missing or delayed data accounted for 138 (6.2%) cases not reviewed initially. In head/neck cancer trials, 1251 (93.2%) received initial review and 90 (6.8%) did not. Our findings suggest that there are sharply defined but long lasting learning experiences involved in clinical trial participation. Consideration may be given to modifying the initial review process to use random sampling of cases accessioned by experienced investigators in ongoing clinical trials and to continuing the total case evaluation on all new studies and cases entered by inexperienced investigators or investigators/institutions with unsatisfactory performance. Recommendations regarding initial review of other sites will await evaluation of the impact of initial review on those sites.

Head and Neck Neoplasms↗
PubMed1989

Second malignancies in patients who have head and neck cancer: incidence, effect on survival and implications based on the RTOG experience.

The development of second malignant tumors (SMTs), in patients who have had their first tumor treated successfully, represents a serious limitation of current therapeutic strategies for head and neck cancers. To improve our understanding of the current magnitude of the problem and the various factors that might influence its importance, we reviewed the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group's (RTOG) prospectively collected registry of all head and neck patients seen in participating member institutions between February 1977 and April 1980. A total of 928 patients were identified who had squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck region, no prior or coincident history of another malignant tumor, and whose planned treatment consisted of radiation therapy only. A total of 110 second, independent, malignant tumors occurred in these patients. Overall, the estimated risk of developing a second tumor within 3 years of radiotherapy was 10%, within 5 years 15%, and within 8 years 23%. Minor differences in frequency were observed for different primary sites. These SMTs unquestionably influenced subsequent survival adversely. Analysis of the database also revealed that the extent of the primary tumor influenced the risk of a second; most occurred in patients who presented with the smallest primary tumors because of their better survival. Our data indicate that preventive medicine should have its greatest impact in those patients who are treated for an early stage primary tumor.

Carcinoma, Bronchogenic↗
PubMed1989

Mixed neutron/photon irradiation of unresectable squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck: the final report of a randomized cooperative trial.

Three hundred and twenty-seven patients with inoperable squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck were entered on a randomized study comparing a mixture of neutron and photon ("mixed beam") radiation therapy with photon/electron radiation therapy. Neutron treatment was delivered with fixed-beam, physics-laboratory-based equipment. Patients with histologically proven tumors of T-stage T2, T3, or T4 and any N-stage were eligible for randomization. Primary tumor sites were limited to cancers originating in the oral cavity, oropharynx, supraglottic larynx, or hypopharynx. Patients entered on this study now have a minimum at-risk follow-up period of 6 years. Study results reveal no significant differences in overall loco-regional tumor control rates or survival. Subgroup analysis reveals significant differences based on whether or not patients presented with positive lymph nodes. Loco-regional tumor control rates for patients presenting with positive lymph nodes were 30% for mixed-beam-treated patients versus 18% for photon-treated patients (p = 0.05). Loco-regional tumor control rates for patients presenting without positive lymph nodes were 64% for photon-treated patients and 33% for mixed-beam-treated patients (p = 0.004). Control of tumor located in the nodal sites favored mixed beam over photons by a margin of 45% (49/109) to 26% (23/87) with a significance of p = 0.004. Possible explanations for these contradictory findings are discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

A phase I/II study of the hypoxic cell sensitizer misonidazole as an adjunct to high fractional dose radiotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a RTOG randomized study (#79-04).

A randomized prospective trial was performed to study the toxicity and efficacy of the hypoxic cell sensitizer, misonidazole (MISO), used as an adjunct to high fractional dose radiotherapy in the management of unresectable Stage III and IV squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity, oropharynx and hypopharynx. From June 1979 to February 1983, 42 patients were randomized with 40 patients available for analysis. In the radiotherapy (RT) only group, 19 patients received a short course of high fractional dose radiotherapy with 400 rad per day, 5 days per week, to a total of 4400 to 5200 rad. In the radiotherapy plus misonidazole group (RT + MISO) 21 patients received the same radiotherapy plus 1.5 gm/m2 of misonidazole 3 times a week for a total of 7 doses. The observed side effects associated with misonidazole were: persistent numbness and paresthesia (1 patient), transient peripheral nerve paresis and persistent paresthesia (1 patient), and nausea and vomiting (2 patients). The treatment related morbidities were similar in both groups. Acute mucositis was seen in 4 of 19 patients in the RT group and 3 of 21 patients in the RT + MISO group. Acute airway obstruction requiring tracheotomy was seen in 2 patients with massive tumor in the base of tongue (1 in each group). Severe dysphagia requiring NG tube feeding was seen in 3 patients in the RT + MISO group and 3 patients in the RT group. The initial complete response rate in the RT group was 53%, versus 48% in the RT + MISO group. The estimated 2-year loco-regional control rates were 10% for RT alone and 17% for RT + MISO (no significancy). These results indicate that the addition of misonidazole does not improve the efficacy of high fractional dose radiotherapy for management of unresectable head and neck carcinomas. However, high fractional dose radiotherapy can be administered for the management of advanced head and neck carcinomas with acceptable morbidity and thus, is a useful regimen for future clinical trials of hyperbaric oxygen or new hypoxic cell sensitizers.

Aged↗
PubMed1989

Chemotherapy following surgery for head and neck cancer. A Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study.

The feasibility of chemotherapy of three courses of cis-platin and 120-h 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion after definitive surgery, followed by standard radiotherapy, in patients with resectable locally advanced head and neck cancer was carried out in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). Seventy-nine percent of the patients had stage IV cancer, 65% of the tumors were moderately differentiated, and primary sites were 38% oropharynx and 28% larynx. Toxicity to chemotherapy was acceptable, with no life-threatening side effects. Nausea and vomiting were the most common side effects (78%) and were severe in 26%; 30% of patients experienced had leukopenia, 22% had anemia, 13% had thrombocytopenia, and 9% had renal impairment--all of which were mild and reversible. In six patients, chemotherapy was not given for medical conditions or because of patient refusal. Of 23 patients started on cis-platin and 5-FU postsurgery, 18 (78%) completed all three courses. Ninety-six percent of the patients finished adequate radiotherapy according to the protocol. With minimum follow-up of 24 months, 62% of the patients were alive. Of the expired patients, 5 died from other causes, without evidence of recurrence at the time of their death. It is our conclusion that chemotherapy with cis-platin and 5-FU infusion following definitive surgery is feasible on the group level, and a Phase III trial comparing this combined modality therapy to standard treatment of surgery and post-operative radiotherapy is underway by the Head and Neck Cancer Intergroup.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1989

Fast neutron radiation for inoperable and recurrent salivary gland cancers.

The current standard treatment of salivary gland cancers consists of surgical resection, with or without postoperative low linear energy transfer (LET) radiation, resulting in high locoregional control rates. However, tumor control prognosis is poor when conventional radiation is used alone for advanced, inoperable cases. An extensive review of the world's literature on fast neutron irradiation for inoperable, unresectable, or recurrent malignant salivary gland neoplasms is presented and compared with the experience using conventional low LET radiotherapy. The pooled data indicate a locoregional control rate of 67% for fast neutrons versus 25% for photons and/or electrons in the treatment of such advanced disease. The radiobiological rationale supporting this observed increase in tumor control is discussed. The overall significant late complication rate is 19%, but several suboptimal treatment factors were present that contributed substantially to the reported toxicity. With the modern machines and treatment techniques now available, the evidence overwhelmingly supports the role of fast neutron radiation as the treatment of choice for inoperable and recurrent salivary gland cancers.

Energy Transfer↗
PubMed1988

Neutron vs photon irradiation of inoperable salivary gland tumors: results of an RTOG-MRC Cooperative Randomized Study.

A total of 32 patients with inoperable, recurrent or unresectable malignant salivary gland tumors were entered on a randomized RTOG/MRC study comparing fast neutron radiotherapy with conventional photon radiotherapy. Twenty-five patients were entered from the United States and 7 patients were entered from Scotland. Seventeen patients were randomized to receive neutrons and 15 patients were randomized to receive photons. Sixty-one percent of the neutron-treated patients and 75% of the photon-treated patients presented with inoperable or unresectable tumors, while 39% of the neutron-treated and 25% of the photon-treated patients had recurrent disease. Twenty-five patients were study-eligible and analyzable. The minimum follow-up time is 2 years. The complete tumor clearance rates at the primary site were 85% (11/13) for neutrons and 33% (4/12) for photons following protocol treatment (p = 0.01). The complete tumor clearance rates in the cervical lymph nodes were 86% (6/7) for neutrons and 25% (1/4) for photons. The overall loco/regional complete tumor response rates were 85% and 33% for neutrons and photons respectively. The loco/regional control rates at 2 years for the 2 groups are 67% for neutrons and 17% for photons (p less than 0.005). The 2-year survival rates are 62% and 25% for neutrons and photons respectively (p = 0.10). These findings are consistent with previously published uncontrolled series.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1988

Vincristine and prednisone prolong the survival of patients receiving intravenous or oral melphalan for multiple myeloma: Cancer and Leukemia Group B experience.

A total of 589 patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma were randomized to receive daily oral melphalan, pulse-dose intravenous (IV) melphalan, carmustine (BCNU), or lomustine (CCNU). All patients received an initial tapering course of prednisone (Pred). During week 22 (day 154), patients were randomized to receive or not to receive additional therapy with vincristine (VCR) (1 mg/m2) and prednisone (0.6 mg/kg/d for seven days) at 8-week intervals. The influence of VCR/Pred was determined in 302 patients who remained on study beyond 22 weeks after initial therapy. VCR/Pred converted a significant percentage of nonresponders to responders in patients treated with melphalan (55% v 19%, P = .002), but not in patients treated with a nitrosourea (48% v 23%, P = .06). Survival beyond week 22 was significantly longer following the addition of VCR/Pred in patients receiving melphalan (median, 35.3 months v 27.0 months; P = .003) but not in patients receiving BCNU or CCNU (median, 28.1 months v 26.2 months; P = .91). These differences were seen both for oral and IV melphalan. A trend for beneficial effect of VCR/Pred was definitely seen in the good-risk patients (P = .03) but only suggestive for poor-risk patients (P = .12). Following adjustment for VCR/Pred effects, there were no differences in the survival of patients receiving any of the four initial treatments.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1988

Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) studies in head and neck cancer.

Since its foundation in 1971, the RTOG has conducted a successful clinical research program in head and neck mucosal squamous cell carcinoma with 22 treatment protocols and one registry study which combined have accumulated data on over 5,500 patients. The RTOG was the first multicenter group to evaluate neoadjuvant chemotherapy before definitive radiation with its methotrexate study. Although the study was negative, RTOG has since conducted five pilot or phase II studies of neoinduction or concurrent chemotherapy with radiation therapy in patients with inoperable tumors. The last study showed that radiation concurrent with cisplatinum was tolerable with a suggestion of increased antitumor effect. In patients with potentially resectable tumors, RTOG has completed a pilot study of combination chemotherapy administered either before or after the surgery with radiotherapy. Based upon its findings, the treatment sequence, surgery-chemotherapy-radiotherapy, was chosen as the experimental arm for a new phase III study. This study was subsequently adopted by the head and neck intergroup mechanism as its study (INT 0034/RTOG 8503). RTOG has investigated the optimal timing of radiotherapy with surgery. The 7303 study established that postoperative radiotherapy achieved significantly better locoregional control but not improved absolute survival. Approximately 30% of the patients on each arm failed to complete both modalities. Even when comparison is restricted to patients who completed both modalities, postoperative radiotherapy still produced the better locoregional control. Efforts to overcome the limitations imposed by tumor hypoxia through use of carbogen (95% O2 and 5% CO2) breathing or the radiosensitizer misonidazole during radiotherapy have been unsuccessful. In a phase I study, RTOG showed that 15 to 18 sessions of sensitized radiation can be safely delivered with the new radiosensitizer SR 2508 in contrast to only six such sessions with misonidazole. This promising radiosensitizer is now being tested in a phase III trial. RTOG has also investigated variations in fraction size, fraction number, and total radiation dose. In the 7102 study, split-course irradiation achieved equivalent antitumor results as compared to continuous daily irradiation but with less social alteration and cost to the patient. In the hyperfraction pilot study 7703, twice a day irradiation with 120 cGys up to 6,000 cGys proved to be tolerable.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Aged↗