Airborne occupational allergic contact dermatitis due to trimethylolpropane triacrylate (TMPTA) used in the manufacture of printed circuit boards.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to T Estlander.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis from mushrooms has only seldom been reported. OBJECTIVES: We report on a mushroom picker who developed skin symptoms from occupational exposure to the mushroom champignon. METHODS: Conventional patch testing and prick testings were performed. RESULTS: Erythema and vesicular edemic dermatitis appeared around the eyes, on the cheeks, around the nose, and around the lips of a 31-year-old woman who had been involved in the commercial production of champignons for 5 years. Prick testing to champignon was negative, but patch testing with raw champignon provoked a 2+ allergic reaction and was negative in the controls. CONCLUSION: Our patient had been occupationally sensitized from exposure to champignon. The allergen is not known but may be a low-molecularweight chemical or a protein present in the champignon.
Several chemicals are capable of inducing contact leukoderma. Here we report on a dental nurse who had been investigated elsewhere at a dermatology clinic 2.8 years earlier because of suspected occupational fingertip dermatitis. She had been patch tested on her upper arm with dental acrylic resins "as is." These strong concentrations of patch test substances caused a severe allergic reaction in the upper arm, and the patch test sites have remained vitiliginous for 2.8 years. Active sensitization did not take place because the patient had been sensitized earlier as shown by the allergic 2-day readings with acrylics during the first patch test session. It is assumed that acrylates induced contact vitiligo, but the dental acrylics may have also contained other chemicals (eg, hydroquinone or phenolic substances) capable of causing vitiligo. The main point to be learned from the present results is that dental acrylics should never be patch tested "as is." We also discourage the practice of use tests, open tests, or repeated open patch tests with undiluted dental acrylics because of the risk of active sensitization from single exposure.
In this study, the association between natural rubber latex (NRL) sensitization and work ability index (WAI) among health care workers was investigated. Furthermore, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of a postal questionnaire as a screening device of NRL allergy was evaluated. The study population consisted of 32 female health care workers with an occupational latex allergy, and 51 control subjects who were individually matched for age and occupation. A self-administered two-part questionnaire, including seven items of a work ability index (WAI), as well as questions on glove-related symptoms, was mailed to the subjects. The median age for NRL allergic subjects was 40 years (range 23-62), and the diagnosis of occupational latex allergy had been made six years (range 2-16) before the present study. The WAI scores were on average lower among the sensitized subjects as compared with their nonsensitized controls. Even after removing the contribution of the presence of allergic eczema, diagnosed by a physician, from the original WAI score, the proportion of NRL allergic subjects and the control subjects in the good work ability category were 34% and 53%, respectively. Ten health care workers (31%) had changed occupation and one early retirement had occurred after sensitization to NRL. The sensitivity and specificity of the present self-administered questionnaire as an indicator for latex allergy was 84% and 98%, respectively. In conclusion, there is a clear association between NRL allergy and a decrease in the WAI among health care workers, which cannot be explained by age, gender, profession, or history of atopy.
Koilonychia is a nail disorder well known to accompany certain systemic diseases, but it can also be caused by external factors. We report two cases of occupational koilonychia in hairdressers caused by the toxic effect of chemicals used in permanent wave. Hairdresser's koilonychia has been seldom reported, but may be common.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
2,3-epoxypropyl trimethyl ammonium chloride (EPTMAC) is used in the production of cationic starch (CS) for the paper industry. It has been shown to be a sensitizer in guinea pigs, but cases of human sensitization are few. 4 workers were previously sensitized to the substance in a Finnish plant. This report describes 3 process men from another plant examined because of recurring dermatitis. 18 workers were involved in production, and had free access to all work sites. 3 process men, whose work involved drying the CS, had dermatitis, although they had only occasional contact with the cationizing chemical. 2 were already verified to be allergic to EPTMAC and had had variable dermatitis for 8-12 years. One had had dermatitis on his face for 1 year. Patch testing with a dilution series (1%, 0.5%, 0.2%, 0.1% pet.) confirmed their allergy to the cationizing chemical containing EPTMAC, but tests with CS were negative. In addition, 2 had contact allergy to Cl+ Me-isothiazolinone from contact with Kathon LX used as a slimicide in the process. In long-standing (years) recurrent dermatitis, re-examination of patients with verified exposure history and skin test is necessary. In line with our previous study, sampling the process materials, maintenance work and contamination of work sites and gloves caused sensitization. The results also confirm that EPTMAC is a strong human contact sensitizer. 0.2%-0.5% pure EPTMAC in pet. seems to be the optimal patch test concentration.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A worksite survey was conducted in all 38 Finnish electroplating plants. All workers (n = 163) who worked with nickel plating (bath workers, hangers and solution makers) were interviewed with a questionnaire about symptoms of nickel dermatitis, hand dermatitis, and about protective measures, atopy, etc. Patch testing with nickel sulfate was done with the TRUE TestTM method. All the workers, 94 men and 69 women, answered the questionnaire. The mean age of women was 41.1 years, and of men 43.1 years, respectively. Men had longer occupational exposure to nickel (14 years) than women (10 years). Most workers used protective gloves. 35% of women and 30% of men reported present or past hand dermatosis. 19% reported a history of atopic dermatitis. 15% of women (n = 8) and 4% (n = 2) of men had an allergic patch test reaction to nickel sulfate. 70% of those with an allergic patch test reaction to nickel reported past or present hand eczema. The prevalence of nickel allergy among the electroplaters was similar to that of patients in patch test clinics in Finland. An allergic patch test reaction to nickel sulfate does not necessarily oblige an electroplater to change jobs.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.