Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T Eaton

Publications and source records attributed to T Eaton.

25 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

An arginine to histidine mutation in codon 311 of the C-erbA beta gene results in a mutant thyroid hormone receptor that does not mediate a dominant negative phenotype.

We have examined the c-erbA beta thyroid hormone receptor gene in a kindred, G.H., with a member, patient G.H., who had a severe form of selective pituitary resistance to thyroid hormones (PRTH). This patient manifested inappropriately normal thyrotropin-stimulating hormone, markedly elevated serum free thyroxine (T4) and total triiodothyronine (T3), and clinical hyperthyroidism. The complete c-erbA beta 1 coding sequence was examined by a combination of genomic and cDNA cloning for patient G.H. and her unaffected father. A single mutation, a guanine to adenine transition at nucleotide 1,232, was found in one allele of both these members, altering codon 311 from arginine to histidine. In addition, a half-sister of patient G.H. also harbored this mutant allele and, like the father, was clinically normal. The G.H. receptor, synthesized with reticulocyte lysate, had significantly defective T3-binding activity with a Ka of approximately 5 x 10(8) M-1. RNA phenotyping using leukocytes and fibroblasts demonstrated an equal level of expression of wild-type and mutant alleles in patient G.H. and her unaffected father. Finally, the G.H. receptor had no detectable dominant negative activity in a transfection assay. Thus, in contrast to the many other beta-receptor mutants responsible for the generalized form of thyroid hormone resistance, the G.H. receptor appeared unable to antagonize normal receptor function. These results suggest that the arginine at codon 311 in c-erbA beta is crucial for the structural integrity required for dominant negative function. The ARG-311-HIS mutation may contribute to PRTH in patient G.H. by inactivating a beta-receptor allele, but it cannot be the sole cause of the disease.

Adolescent↗

Criteria for the accurate interpretation of changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and cardiac volumes as assessed by rest and exercise gated radionuclide angiography.

Although serial left ventricular ejection fraction and volumetric measurements using gated radionuclide angiography are commonly used to evaluate clinical changes and therapeutic outcomes in individual patients, criteria are not available for accurately interpreting whether a change in any of these hemodynamic measurements is clinically meaningful. Accordingly, the magnitude of inherent variability among sequential measurements of hemodynamic variables assessed by gated radionuclide angiography was investigated in a double-blind placebo-controlled fashion in 39 patients during two placebo periods separated by 6 weeks. All patients analyzed had remained clinically stable during the study period. Although the mean values for all hemodynamic variables between the two placebo periods were minimally changed, the differences in individual patients were striking. Criteria were developed to allow meaningful interpretation of changes in hemodynamic variables by estimating the likelihood that an observed change is due to variability alone. On the basis of this analysis of placebo radionuclide angiographic data, variation due to chance alone is unlikely to account for all variability if a change observed between the two rest gated studies in a patient is greater than or equal to 7% units for left ventricular ejection fraction, greater than or equal to 45 ml/m2 for end-diastolic volume index, greater than or equal to 35 ml/m2 for end-systolic volume index, greater than or equal to 20 ml/m2 for stroke volume index and greater than or equal to 1.25 liters/min per m2 for cardiac index. An observed 4% unit change in left ventricular ejection fraction (increase or decrease) after a medical intervention in an individual patient occurs by random variation greater than 25% of the time.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cardiac Volume↗

The inverse relationship between baseline left ventricular ejection fraction and outcome of antiarrhythmic therapy: a dangerous imbalance in the risk-benefit ratio.

Each year, millions of prescriptions are written for antiarrhythmic drug suppression of ventricular arrhythmias. A large portion of these prescriptions are written for patients with asymptomatic, complex ventricular arrhythmias and organic heart disease, termed "potentially malignant" or "potentially lethal." Since arrhythmia suppression in this population is of unproven benefit, we performed the following study: A total of 246 patients (42% with significant left ventricular dysfunction) had complex ventricular arrhythmias, and were treated with one of eight antiarrhythmic drugs (Vaughan Williams classes IA, IB, IC, II, and III). The extent of arrhythmia suppression and the development of serious complications resulting from therapy after 2 weeks was of primary interest. A total of 82 of 246 (33%) maintained adequate (protocol definition) suppression of both ventricular premature beats (VPBs) as well as nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) for 2 weeks, mostly in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) greater than or equal to 40% (p = 0.04 versus LVEF less than 40%). Life-threatening complications of antiarrhythmic therapy occurred most frequently in the 61 patients with an LVEF less than 30% compared to the 185 patients with LVEF greater than or equal to 30% (15% versus 2.1%, p = 0.0005). Suppression of VT was achieved nearly twice as commonly in patients with an LVEF greater than or equal to 30% than in those with an LVEF less than 30% (67% versus 36%; p = 0.0008). Life-threatening complications occurred seven times as frequently in patients presenting with nonsustained VT and an LVEF less than 30% (18% versus 2.3%; p = 0.003).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗

A clinic's perspective on screening, recruitment and data collection.

This paper summarizes the approach of one university cardiology section with over a decade of experience in conducting National Institutes of Health and pharmaceutical cardiovascular trials. Many of the organizational and personnel issues discussed can be directly applied to most university cardiovascular clinical research settings. Other aspects reflect a very specialized approach but key features can be modified or adapted to smaller individual research clinics. In terms of organizational features, our multi-hospital recruitment effort is co-ordinated by a weekly clinical research conference which is attended by all nurse coordinators and cardiology fellows. Centralization of all clinic facilities and non-invasive laboratories, the central computer facility, and the availability of clinical research inpatient hospital beds facilitate our clinical research effort. An expanded role of the nurse co-ordinator is considered pivotal to trial performance. Suggestions are made as to the identification and recruitment of ideal nurse co-ordinators, maximizing their productivity, and retaining them. The key feature is the physicians' acceptance of the nurse co-ordinator as a colleague. The roles of the principal investigator and clinical cardiology fellows are delineated, and suggestions made for data entry and computer technical expertise to optimize nurse co-ordinator efficiency, allowing total focus on recruitment and follow-up.

Data Collection↗