Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T E Weaver

Publications and source records attributed to T E Weaver.

75 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

The development and psychometric evaluation of the Pulmonary Functional Status Scale: an instrument to assess functional status in pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: This article describes the development and psychometric evaluation of the Pulmonary Functional Status Scale (PFSS). The PFSS was developed to address the need for a self-administered, disease-specific, functional status outcome measure that was conceptually based, relatively short, and comprehensively assessed the psychosocial domains affected by chronic pulmonary disease. METHODS: Content validity of the PFSS was established by a panel of experts. Construct validity was determined by principal components factor analysis using data from 365 subjects derived from several studies that used the PFSS. The sample was predominantly white (80%), married (36%), and male (56%) with a mean age of 68.1 years, mean forced expiratory volume in one second of 1.18 L and mean forced vital capacity of 2.31 L. Test-retest reliability was evaluated in 17 outpatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Concurrent validity was assessed by correlating responses on the total PFSS with the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) score (n = 39), and the 12-minute walk test (n = 104). RESULTS: The factor structure solution used 35 of the 50 submitted items, explained 48.7% of the variance, and yielded three factors: Daily Activities/Social Functioning, Psychological Functioning, and Sexual Functioning. Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the total PFSS was 0.93 and the test-retest correlation coefficient was rho = 0.75 (P = 0.001). The correlation between the total PFSS score and the SIP and 12-minute walk test were r = -0.54 (P < 0.001) and r = 0.62 (P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: The PFSS has solid psychometric properties that make it acceptable for use in clinical practice as well as research.

Aged↗

Physiological and psychological variables related to functional status in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

The relationship of selected physiological and psychological variables to functional status in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was investigated in this study. There has been limited exploration of the relative contribution of these variables to the performance of activities of daily living in this population. A convenience sample of 104 outpatients with COPD participated in the study. The independent variables were causal attributions, depressed mood, self-esteem, pulmonary function, and exercise capacity, and the dependent variable was functional status. There was a significant difference in functional status between those who did and those who did not ask the question, "Why me?" (p = .03). In addition, the remaining psychological variables and both physiological variables were significantly correlated with functional status (p less than or equal to .01). To identify the combination of study variables most predictive of functional status a multiple regression analysis was performed. The combined variables of exercise capacity and depression best predicted functional status (p less than .0001). It is concluded that both physiological and psychological factors are important in understanding functional status in this population.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Physiologic status, coping, and hardiness as predictors of outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship of physiologic status, coping, and hardiness to exercise ability and functional status in 96 adult patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Exercise ability was measured by the distance walked in 12 minutes (12MD) and functional status by the Pulmonary Functional Status Scale (PFSS). The mean FEV1 and FVC were 1.61 +/- .81 and 3.08 +/- .95 L, respectively. The commitment (r = -.18) and challenge (r = -.21) components of hardiness were significantly correlated with the 12MD. The commitment component of hardiness was significantly correlated with functional status (r = -.17). Control was not a significant variable. Physiological status, problem-solving coping, and challenge were the best predictors of exercise ability (R2 = .26). Physiological status and commitment were the best predictors of functional status (R2 = .149).

Adaptation, Psychological↗