Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T Berghmans

Publications and source records attributed to T Berghmans.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Thyroid transcription factor 1--a new prognostic factor in lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic role for survival of thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) in lung cancer. METHODS: Studies evaluating survival and TTF-1 in lung cancer patients, published until August 2005, were assessed with a methodological scoring system. The required data for estimation of individual hazard ratios (HRs) for survival were extracted from the publications and a combined HR was calculated. RESULTS: We identified 10 eligible papers, all dealing with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Eight were meta-analysed (evaluable studies). Seven studies included patients with local and/or locoregional diseases and three dealt only with adenocarcinoma. Median methodological quality score was 65.9% (range = 31.8%-70.5%). TTF-1 positivity was associated with statistically significant reduced or improved survival in one and four studies, respectively. Combined HR for the eight evaluable studies was 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.41-1.00]. In the subgroup of adenocarcinoma, the combined HR was 0.53 (95% CI = 0.29-0.95). CONCLUSION: TTF-1 is a good prognostic factor for survival in NSCLC. Its effect appears also significant when the analysis is restricted to patients with adenocarcinoma. This study supports the fact that TTF-1 could be included in further prospective trials studying prognostic factors in NSCLC.

Humans↗
PubMed2006

[Adjuvant treatments of non-small cell lung cancer].

If surgery remains the cornerstone for the curative treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, failures are common especially for stage III disease and adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy or radiotherapy) may be justified. After the two meta-analyses, new trials have showed a moderate but significant benefit from cisplatin based chemotherapy. The role of radiotherapy is still controversial but from some clinical observations, a new trial using the modern radiation technology should address the question.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2006

Has Cox-2 a prognostic role in non-small-cell lung cancer? A systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis of the survival results.

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is overexpressed in lung cancer, especially in adenocarcinoma (ADC). Our aim was to determine the prognostic value of COX-2 on survival in patients with lung cancer. Studies evaluating the survival impact of COX-2 in lung cancer, published until December 2005, were selected. Data for estimation of individual hazard ratios (HR) for survival were extracted from the publications and combined in a pooled HR. Among 14 eligible papers, all dealing with non-small-cell lung cancer, 10 provided results for meta-analysis of survival data (evaluable studies). Cyclooxygenase-2 positivity was associated with reduced survival, improved survival or no statistically significant impact in six, one and seven studies, respectively. Combined HR for the 10 evaluable studies (1236 patients) was 1.39 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.97-1.99). In stage I lung cancer (six evaluable studies, 554 patients), it was 1.64 (95% CI: 1.21-2.24). No significant impact was shown in ADC. A slight detrimental effect on survival in patients with lung cancer is associated with COX-2 expression, but the statistical significance is not reached. This effect is statistically significant in stage I, suggesting that COX-2 expression could be useful at early stages to distinguish those with a worse prognosis.

Humans↗
PubMed2006

Prognostic role of thyroid transcription factor-1 in stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

UNLABELLED: Stage III NSCLC represents a heterogeneous group and the ISS remains unsatisfactory in term of prognosis prediction. The aim of the present study was to determine the role of TTF-1 as prognostic factor in stage III NSCLC in addition to other known clinical factors. All stage III NSCLC patients treated in our hospital were retrieved and searched for biopsy specimens. TTF-1 was assessed by immunohistochemistry (Novocastra SPT24). Between 01/1987 and 07/2003, 108 assessable stage III NSCLC patients were included in the study. Their principal characteristics were: median age 64 years (range 37-83), male/female 81/27, squamous/non squamous 52/56, IIIA/IIIB 44/64, median Karnofsky PS 80 (range 20-100). Forty-four patients were positive for TTF-1 (squamous 25.0% versus non-squamous 55.4%). In multivariate analysis, only three factors were statistically significantly associated with better survival: good PS, surgery and creatinine level. CONCLUSION: In stage III NSCLC patients, good PS, resectability and low creatinine level but not TTF-1 are prognostic factors for survival.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

[Ovarian metastasis and lung adenocarcinoma: a case report].

Ovarian metastasis as first dissemination site of a lung adenocarcinoma has not been described in the literature. We report the case of a 61-year-old woman who had a pneumectomy for a centrally located lung adenocarcinoma, which was discovered on a routine chest X-Ray. During the follow-up, a Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-Scan showed a hypercaptation in the pelvic region. Abdominal CT-scan confirmed the presence of a mass which was compatible with a primary ovarian tumor. The patient underwent a hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Pathology reported an adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemical staining revealed cells expression for Thyroid Transcription Factor 1 (TTF-1), cytokeratin 7 (CK-7) and focally cytokeratin 20 (CK-20). Clinical course, pathological and immunohistochemical data concluded to the diagnosis of ovarian metastasis of the lung adenocarcinoma. In conclusion, in the differential diagnosis of an ovarian metastasis, clinicians should not forget the lung as primary site since epidemiologic data of lung cancer in women show progressive incidence.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

The role of RAS oncogene in survival of patients with lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis.

The proto-oncogene RAS, coding for a 21 kDa protein (p21), is mutated in 20% of lung cancer. However, the literature remains controversial on its prognostic significance for survival in lung cancer. We performed a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis to assess its possible prognostic value on survival. Published studies on lung cancer assessing prognostic value of RAS mutation or p21 overexpression on survival were identified by an electronic search. After a methodological assessment, we estimated individual hazard ratios (HR) estimating RAS protein alteration or RAS mutation effect on survival and combined them using meta-analytic methods. In total, 53 studies were found eligible, with 10 concerning the same cohorts of patients. Among the 43 remaining studies, the revelation method was immunohistochemistry (IHC) in nine and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 34. Results in terms of survival were significantly pejorative, significantly favourable, not significant and not conclusive in 9, 1, 31, 2, respectively. In total, 29 studies were evaluable for meta-analysis but we aggregated only the 28 dealing with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and not the only one dealing with small-cell-lung cancer (SCLC). The quality scores were not statistically significantly different between studies with or without significant results in terms of survival, allowing us to perform a quantitative aggregation. The combined HR was 1.35 (95% CI: 1.16-1.56), showing a worse survival for NSCLC with KRAS2 mutations or p21 overexpression and, particularly, in adenocarcinomas (ADC) (HR 1.59; 95% CI 1.26-2.02) and in studies using PCR (HR 1.40; 95% CI 1.18-1.65) but not in studies using IHC (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.86-1.34). RAS appears to be a pejorative prognostic factor in terms of survival in NSCLC globally, in ADC and when it is studied by PCR.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗
PubMed2005

Survival improvement in resectable non-small cell lung cancer with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy: results of a meta-analysis of the literature.

The recent publication of many randomised trials about (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has prompted our group to update a prior meta-analysis of the literature. Randomised studies published in French and English between 1965 and June 2004 were included in this analysis. A qualitative assessment of each trial was first performed using the European lung cancer working party (ELCWP) and the Chalmers' scales. In absence of statistically significant quality difference between positive and negative trials, a quantitative aggregation (meta-analysis) of the individual results was performed. Two trials for which data were available on ASCO virtual meeting website were also included in the meta-analysis. Twenty-five studies eligible for this analysis assessed chemotherapy as induction (n = 6) or adjuvant to surgery (n = 19). No quality difference was detected between positive and negative trials according to the two scores, whatever all trials were combined or only adjuvant chemotherapy studies were considered. The overall meta-analysis showed that the hazard ratio (HR) of the combined results was 0.66 (95% CI 0.48-0.93) in favour of the addition of induction chemotherapy to a standard surgical procedure and 0.84 (95% CI 0.78-0.89) in favour of adjuvant chemotherapy. The effect was significant for adjuvant chemotherapy in stages I and II with a HR of 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.94). It was not statistically significant in stage III although the trend was in favour of chemotherapy whatever adjuvant (HR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.69-1.04) or (neo)adjuvant (HR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.41-1.04) chemotherapy was tested. In conclusion, our meta-analysis shows the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in stages I and II resected NSCLC. More data are needed to confirm such a role for induction chemotherapy. Further trials should separate stage III disease from earlier stages.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2005

A phase II study evaluating the cisplatin and epirubicin combination in patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Few chemotherapeutic agents have demonstrated their efficacy in malignant mesothelioma. The cisplatin plus doxorubicin combination has one of the highest response rates. Epirubicin is an anthracyclin, analogous to doxorubicin, with a different toxicologic pattern. As there are no data on the activity of the combination cisplatin plus epirubicin in malignant mesothelioma, the European Lung Cancer Working Party (ELCWP) designed a phase II study with response rate as primary objective. Sixty-nine eligible patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma were centrally registered. The majority of the patients were male (n=59), had a Karnofsky performance status of 80 or more (n=62) and presented with an epithelial histologic subtype (n=43). Median age was 62 years. In nine patients, metastases were documented at the initial work-up, mainly in bone, lung and skin. Three hundred and twenty-four cycles of chemotherapy were administered. The main toxicities were nausea and vomiting, neutropenia and alopecia. Among 63 assessable patients, response rate was 19.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 9-29%). Median survival was 13.3 months. In multivariate analysis, poor prognostic factors for survival were neutrophil count and CALGB groups 4-6. In conclusion, cisplatin plus epirubicin appears as an effective regimen in malignant mesothelioma, with a favourable toxicity profile. However, it does not demonstrate superior activity to other active regimens in this disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Prognostic role of epidermal growth factor receptor in stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer.

New biological factors have not been extensively studied in stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of the present retrospective study was to determine the role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) as a prognostic factor in stage III NSCLC, in addition to the stage and other known clinical factors. Clinical characteristics were retrieved from the patients' charts. Membrane immunostaining for EGF-R was evaluated by three independent observers. The Cox multivariate model, including all variables with a p-value of <0.2 in univariate analysis, was used to assess the impact of clinical and biological factors on patients survival. Between January 1987 and July 2002, 99 assessable stage III NSCLC patients were included in the study. A total of 23 patients were positive for EGF-R (squamous 39.6% versus nonsquamous 7.8%). In multivariate analysis, only three factors were statistically significantly associated with survival: performance status, surgery and creatinine. In conclusion, good performance status, surgical resection and creatinine were found to be independent favourable prognostic factors for survival in a retrospective analysis of stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer, while epidermal growth factor receptor was not even in the univariate analysis.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Mitomycin, ifosfamide, cisplatin for non-small cell lung cancer: an implementation study.

BACKGROUND: The MIP regimen (mitomycin, ifosfamide, cisplatin) demonstrated its effectiveness as first-line chemotherapy in phase II and III trials in NSCLC. We aimed to determine whether these results could be confirmed in a hospital population. METHODS: Between 1987 and 2004, 204 patients with NSCLC received MIP in our institution. Patients treated in and off trials received the same combination of cisplatin (50 mg/m2), ifosfamide (3 g/m2) and mitomycin C (6 mg/m2) every three weeks and were staged and followed in a similar way. RESULTS: Response rates for patients treated in or outside trials were 36.8% and 40.7%, respectively. After multiple logistic regressions, the only statistically significant factor predicting objective response was stage. The median survival time was 54.6 and 43.7 weeks respectively for patients treated in and outside trials. In multivariate analysis, four factors were statistically significantly associated with better survival: good performance status (p = 0.003), normal LDH value (p < 0.001), early stage (p = 0.01) and active smoking (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Participation in a clinical trial was not associated with a significant difference in efficacy. This implementation study thus confirms the activity of the MIP regimen when used in the routine management of patients with NSCLC.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Ki-67 expression and patients survival in lung cancer: systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis.

Among new biological markers that could become useful prognostic factors for lung carcinoma, Ki-67 is a nuclear protein involved in cell proliferation regulation. Some studies have suggested an association between Ki-67 and poor survival in lung cancer patients. In order to clarify this point, we have performed a systematic review of the literature, using the methodology already described by our Group, the European Lung Cancer Working Party. In total, 37 studies, including 3983 patients, were found to be eligible. In total, 49% of the patients were considered as having a tumour positive for the expression of Ki-67 according to the authors cutoff. In all, 29 of the studies dealt with non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), one with small-cell carcinoma (SCLC), two with carcinoid tumours and five with any histology. In terms of survival results, Ki-67 was a bad prognosis factor for survival in 15 studies while it was not in 22. As there was no statistical difference in quality scores between the significant and nonsignificant studies evaluable for the meta-analysis, we were allowed to aggregate the survival results. The combined hazard ratio for NSCLC, calculated using a random-effects model was 1.56 (95% CI: 1.30-1.87), showing a worse survival when Ki-67 expression is increased. In conclusion, our meta-analysis shows that the expression of Ki-67 is a factor of poor prognosis for survival in NSCLC.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗
PubMed2004

Continuous venovenous haemofiltration in cancer patients with renal failure: a single-centre experience.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) in cancer patients with acute renal failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of all patients with acute renal failure requiring dialysis and treated with CVVHDF in a medical intensive care unit (ICU) from a cancer hospital. RESULTS: From January 1997 until December 2002, 32 cancer patients were treated with CVVHDF for acute renal failure. Their characteristics were: male/female 23/9, median age 61 years, haematological/solid tumours 16/16, and median APACHE II and IGS II scores 31/67. The number of organ failures was 1/2/3/4 in respectively 10/6/13/2 patients. Complete, partial or absence of resolution of acute renal failure was noted in 13, 8 and 11 patients. Sixteen patients (50%) died in the ICU and 15 (47%) were discharged alive from the hospital. In univariate analysis, variables statistically significantly adversely associated with hospital mortality were renal failure of renal origin, bone marrow transplant, increasing number of organ failures, reduced lymphocyte count, elevated bilirubin and lower creatinine levels, increased thromboplastin time, younger age, increased APACHE II and IGS II, ARDS and mechanical ventilation. In multivariate analysis, two models were used including either APACHE II or IGS II. The number of organ failures was found as the only significant prognostic factor in both models ( p=0.01). Elevated phosphate level was a poor prognostic factor for hospital mortality ( p=0.04) in the model including APACHE II. CONCLUSIONS: In the experience of a single centre, CVVHDF is effective in the treatment of acute renal failure in cancer patients. The increasing number of organ failures was the single independent poor predictive factor for hospital mortality. Cancer characteristics and general gravity scores were not predictive factors.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Is a specific oncological scoring system better at predicting the prognosis of cancer patients admitted for an acute medical complication in an intensive care unit than general gravity scores?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a specific oncologic scoring system-the ICU Cancer Mortality model (ICM)-in predicting hospital mortality in comparison to two general severity scores-the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) and the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All 247 patients admitted for a medical acute complication over an 18-month period in an oncological medical intensive care unit were prospectively registered. Their data, including type of complication, vital status at discharge and cancer characteristics as well as other variables necessary to calculate the three scoring systems were retrospectively assessed. RESULTS: Observed in-hospital mortality was 34%. The predicted in-hospital mortality rate for APACHE II was 32%; SAPS II, 24%; and ICM, 28%. The goodness of fit was inadequate except for the ICM score. Comparison of the area under the ROC curves revealed a better fit for ICM (area 0.79). The maximum correct classification rate was 72% for APACHE II, 74% for SAPS II and 77% for ICM. APACHE II and SAPS II were better at predicting outcome for survivors to hospital discharge, although ICM was better for non-survivors. Two variables were independently predicting the risk of death during hospitalisation: ICM (OR=2.31) and SAPS II (OR=1.05). CONCLUSIONS: Gravity scores were the single independent predictors for hospital mortality, and ICM was equivalent to APACHE II and SAPS II.

APACHE↗
PubMed2004

Survival is better predicted with a new classification of stage III unresectable non-small cell lung carcinoma treated by chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

UNLABELLED: The 1997 International staging system (ISS) classification separated stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) into stages IIIA and IIIB. In a previous study including unresectable NSCLC initially treated with chemotherapy, we analysed survival according to tumour (T) and node (N) stages and derived a classification into stages IIIbeta (T3-4N3) and IIIalpha (other TN stage III) that had a better discrimination on survival distribution. The aim of this study was to validate these results in a further set of patients. Patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC included in a phase III trial assessing the role of increased dose chemotherapy (SuperMIP: mitomycin 6 mg/m2, ifosfamide 4.5 g/m2, cisplatin 60 mg/m2, carboplatin 200 mg/m2) in comparison to standard chemotherapy MIP (mitomycin 6 mg/m2, ifosfamide 3 g/m2, cisplatin 50 mg/m2), before thoracic irradiation (60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks) were the subject of this study. Survival distributions were assessed by the method of Kaplan-Meier. Survival comparisons were made by the log-rank test. Multivariate analyses using Cox regression models, included all potential prognostic factors for survival with a P-value <0.2 in univariate analysis. According to the 1997 International staging system classification, 328 eligible patients were included in the study. There was no imbalance between the two arms. Five parameters were significantly associated (P < or = 0.05) with survival in univariate analysis: European lung cancer working party (ELCWP) staging (IIIalpha[n = 294 pts] versus IIIbeta [n = 46]), Karnofsky index, weight loss, platelet count and haemoglobin level. These variables as well as the 1997 ISS staging, white blood cell (WBC) count, LDH and sodium levels were included in a multivariate analysis. Two models were constructed, including either the ELCWP or the 1997 ISS. In model 1 (ISS included), Karnofsky index (HR 0.69; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-1.00; P = 0.05) and haemoglobin (HR 1.49; 95% CI 1.11-1.99; P = 0.007) were found significant. In model 2, including ELCWP staging, two variables were associated with survival: ELCWP staging (HR 1.68; 95% CI 1.20-2.35; P = 0.002) and haemoglobin (HR 1.54; 95% CI 1.15-2.07; P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: In initially unresectable stage III NSCLC treated by chemotherapy and radiotherapy, we validated the results of our previous study. The classification into stages IIIbeta (T3-4N3M0) and IIIalpha (other TN stage III) better discriminates the patients in term of survival than the 1997 ISS classification.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

A phase III randomised study comparing two different dose-intensity regimens as induction chemotherapy followed by thoracic irradiation in patients with advanced locoregional non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the role of chemotherapy dose intensity in patients with initially unresectable non-metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with survival as primary end point, by testing two different regimens as induction chemotherapy followed by thoracic irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients had pathologically proven NSCLC, an initially unresectable non-metastatic tumour without homolateral malignant pleural effusion, no prior history of malignancy and had received no prior therapy. Treatment was randomised for chemotherapy between three courses of MIP (mitomycin C 6 mg/m2; ifosfamide 3 g/m2; cisplatin 50 mg/m2) or SuperMIP (mitomycin C 6 mg/m2; ifosfamide 4.5 g/m2; cisplatin 60 mg/m2, carboplatine 200 mg/m2), followed by chest irradiation (60 Gy; five times per week, for 6 weeks). If the tumour became resectable after chemotherapy, surgery was performed, followed by mediastinal irradiation. RESULTS: A total of 351 patients were eligible: 176 in the MIP arm and 175 in the SuperMIP arm, with 43% and 51% stages IIIA and IIIB, respectively. There was a significantly higher objective response rate with SuperMIP (46%) compared with MIP (35%) (P=0.03) [95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference between the response rates, 1% to 22%]. After induction chemotherapy, surgery was performed in 54 (15%) patients (27 per arm) and chest irradiation in 203 (57%) patients (102 in the MIP arm and 101 in the SuperMIP). In terms of survival, there was no statistically significant difference between the two study arms (P=0.16), with median survival times of, for MIP and SuperMIP, respectively, 12.5 (95% CI 10.1-14.9) and 11.2 (95% CI 9.7-12.8) months. Haematological toxicity and dosage reductions were higher with SuperMIP, which was nevertheless associated with a significantly increased absolute dose intensity. CONCLUSIONS: High dose-intensity induction chemotherapy does not improve survival in initially unresectable non metastatic NSCLC.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

The role of HER-2/neu expression on the survival of patients with lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

C-erbB-2 prognostic value for survival in patients with lung cancer remains controversial. We performed a systematic review of the literature to clarify its impact. Studies were identified by an electronic search in order to aggregate the survival results, after a methodological assessment using the scale of the European Lung Cancer Working Party. To be eligible, a study had to deal with c-erbB-2 assessment in lung cancer patients and to analyse survival according to c-erbB-2 expression. In total, 30 studies were eligible: 24 studies dealt with non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), five with adenocarcinoma and one study dealt with small-cell carcinoma. In all, 31% of the patients were positive for c-erbB-2. According to c-erbB-2 expression, 13 studies were 'negative' (significant detrimental effect on survival), one 'positive' (significant survival improvement) and 16 not significant. Significant studies had a better subscore relative to analysis and results report than nonsignificant studies. In total, 86% of the significant studies and only 56% of the nonsignificant studies were evaluable for the meta-analysis. This suggests a possible bias in our aggregated results. For NSCLC, the hazard ratio was 1.55 (95% CI: 1.29-1.86) in favour of tumours that do not express c-erbB-2. In conclusion, the overexpression of c-erbB-2 might be a factor of poor prognosis for survival in NSCLC, but there is a potential bias in favour of the significant studies with an overestimation risk of the magnitude of the true effect of c-erbB-2 overexpression.

Adenocarcinoma↗