Biomedical subjects

T Allison

Publications and source records attributed to T Allison.

93 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

PubMedDate not supplied

Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: Response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex.

In the previous paper the locations and basic response properties of N200 and other face-specific event-related potentials (ERPs) were described. In this paper responsiveness of N200 and related ERPs to the perceptual features of faces and other images was assessed. N200 amplitude did not vary substantially, whether evoked by colored or grayscale faces; normal, blurred or line-drawing faces; or by faces of different sizes. Human hands evoked small N200s at face-specific sites, but evoked hand-specific ERPs at other sites. Cat and dog faces evoked N200s that were 73% as large as to human faces. Hemifield stimulation demonstrated that the right hemisphere is better at processing information about upright faces and transferring it to the left hemisphere, whereas the left hemisphere is better at processing information about inverted faces and transferring it to the right hemisphere. N200 amplitude was largest to full faces and decreased progressively to eyes, face contours, lips and noses viewed in isolation. A region just lateral to face-specific N200 sites was more responsive to internal face parts than to faces, and some sites in ventral occipitotemporal cortex were face-part-specific. Faces with eyes averted or closed evoked larger N200s than those evoked by faces with eyes forward. N200 amplitude and latency were affected by the joint effects of eye and head position in the right but not in the left hemisphere. Full and three-quarter views of faces evoked larger N200s than did profile views. The results are discussed in relation to behavioral studies in humans and single-cell recordings in monkeys.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. III: Effects of top-down processing on face-specific potentials.

This is the last in a series of papers dealing with intracranial event-related potential (ERP) correlates of face perception. Here we describe the results of manipulations that may exert top-down influences on face recognition and face-specific ERPs, and the effects of cortical stimulation at face-specific sites. Ventral face-specific N200 was not evoked by affective stimuli; showed little or no habituation; was not affected by the familiarity or unfamiliarity of faces; showed no semantic priming; and was not affected by face-name learning or identification. P290 and N700 were affected by semantic priming and by face-name learning and identification. The early fraction of N700 and face-specific P350 exhibited significant habituation. About half of the AP350 sites exhibited semantic priming, whereas the VP350 and LP350 sites did not. Cortical stimulation evoked a transient inability to name familiar faces or evoked face-related hallucinations at two-thirds of face-specific N200 sites. These results are discussed in relation to human behavioral studies and monkey single-cell recordings. Discussion of results of all three papers concludes that: face-specific N200 reflects the operation of a module specialized for the perception of human faces; ventral and lateral occipitotemporal cortex are composed of a complex mosaic of functionally discrete patches of cortex of variable number, size and location; in ventral cortex there is a posterior-to-anterior trend in the location of patches in the order letter-strings, form, hands, objects, faces and face parts; P290 and N700 at face-specific N200 sites, and face-specific P350, are subject to top-down influences.

Arousal↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Localization of sensorimotor cortex in neurosurgery by recording of somatosensory evoked potentials.

The current method of localizing somatosensory and motor cortex during neurosurgical removal of abnormal tissue is Penfield's method of cortical stimulation. While useful, this method has drawbacks, in particular the need to operate under local anesthesia. Another method of localization, described here, involves intra-operative recording of short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials to stimulation of the contralateral median nerve, from electrodes placed directly on central cortex. Proper localization involves identification of potentials which invert in polarity across the central sulcus, identification of other potentials which are largest in the medial portion of the hand area of somatosensory cortex and do not polarity invert, and determination of the region of maximal potential amplitude. This method of localization works equally well whether the patient is under local or general anesthesia, but it occasionally fails in patients with tumors abutting or invading the hand area of sensorimotor cortex.

Anesthesia↗