Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T A Zwolan

Publications and source records attributed to T A Zwolan.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Tinnitus suppression following cochlear implantation. A multifactorial investigation.

The effects of cochlear implant on loudness, annoyance, daily duration, location, and residual inhibition of tinnitus were evaluated by a closed-ended, quantifiable questionnaire in 33 postlingually deafened patients who had received implants at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, between 1986 and 1990. Preoperative tinnitus was present in 85% of patients. A statistical comparison of preoperative vs postoperative loudness and annoyance indicated a significant reduction in both of these complaints postoperatively. Loudness and annoyance were significantly correlated, both preoperatively and postoperatively. Fifteen patients (54%) with preoperative tinnitus demonstrated a loudness decrease of 30% or more; 43% demonstrated an annoyance decrease of 30% or more; and 48% demonstrated a decrease of 30% or more in daily tinnitus duration. Patients who experienced a loudness or annoyance decrease of 30% or more after implantation demonstrated significantly higher preoperative levels of these complaints, suggesting that degree of tinnitus reduction after implantation may be related to preoperative loudness and annoyance levels. Contralateral tinnitus suppression was reported by 42% of patients. Residual inhibition ranging from 60 seconds to several hours was reported by 50% of patients, predominantly in the ear with the implant. Age, gender, cause of hearing loss, duration of tinnitus, cochlear implant usage, and time after implantation were not predictive of tinnitus suppression. Overall, the majority of the patients (74%) thought that their cochlear implant was helpful in tinnitus suppression, especially in the ear with the implant. Contralateral residual inhibition and tinnitus suppression suggest a central mechanism contributing to these phenomena.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

A comparison of round-window and transtympanic promontory electric stimulation in cochlear implant candidates.

We compared within-subjects electrical thresholds and dynamic ranges obtained with direct round-window and transtympanic promontory stimulation carried out preoperatively in 12 patients who were candidates for a cochlear implant. Square waves with frequencies of 50, 100, 200, and 400 Hz were delivered in a 50% duty cycle to both sites in each patient. With the exception of threshold at 50 Hz (promontory thresholds were lower than round-window thresholds), there were no statistically significant differences for either thresholds or dynamic ranges between the two sites of stimulation. There was a general trend for round-window thresholds to be lower and dynamic ranges larger, especially for the higher frequencies of stimulation. Mean threshold slopes for the two sites of stimulation were nearly identical.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Effects of channel number and place of stimulation on performance with the Cochlear Corporation multichannel implant.

The effects of active channel number and place of stimulation on auditory-only performance with the Cochlear Corporation multichannel cochlear implant were investigated in seven subjects. A balanced crossover design was employed; subjects were initially programmed with either 10 basal or the full complement of 20 to 21 active electrodes. Following a 6-month period with the initial coding strategy, subjects were programmed with the alternate configuration, which they used for an additional 6 months. Auditory-only performance on suprasegmental, phoneme (vowel and consonant) open- and closed-set speech recognition was compared between the two electrode configurations. Additionally, performance with the first configuration and performance with the second configuration 3 days following programming were also compared. While a trend for increased scores was noted with 20 electrodes, especially with open-set speech recognition tasks, none of the differences between the two configurations reached statistical significance, as indicated by a Wilcoxon test. A comparison of performance at the end of the first 6-month period and 3 days following programming with the second configuration revealed a trend for reduced scores, especially on vowel tests. Overall, our results indicate that the feature extraction coding strategy associated with the Cochlear Corporation device allows patients to function well with only 10 basal electrodes and that speech recognition is only mildly affected initially when patients are programmed with a different encoding strategy.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1987

Far-advanced otosclerosis. Cochlear implantation vs stapedectomy.

In 1981, our group, as part of a Food and Drug Administration investigator team directed by William House, performed Illinois' first cochlear implantation. We have since performed cochlear implantations in ten other persons. Since May 1980, approximately 35 severely to profoundly deaf persons per year have been referred to our clinic for evaluation. A small number of these patients had far-advanced otosclerosis. In these cases, exploratory tympanotomy and stapedectomy followed by rehabilitation with a hearing aid was a more appropriate management than cochlear implantation. Case histories and a temporal bone study of far-advanced otosclerosis are presented.

Aged↗