Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T A Bickle

Publications and source records attributed to T A Bickle.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Type III restriction endonucleases translocate DNA in a reaction driven by recognition site-specific ATP hydrolysis.

Type III restriction/modification systems recognize short non-palindromic sequences, only one strand of which can be methylated. Replication of type III-modified DNA produces completely unmethylated recognition sites which, according to classical mechanisms of restriction, should be signals for restriction. We have shown previously that suicidal restriction by the type III enzyme EcoP15I is prevented if all the unmodified sites are in the same orientation: restriction by EcoP15I requires a pair of unmethylated, inversely oriented recognition sites. We have now addressed the molecular mechanism of site orientation-specific DNA restriction. EcoP15I is demonstrated to possess an intrinsic ATPase activity, the potential driving force of DNA translocation. The ATPase activity is uniquely recognition site-specific, but EcoP15I-modified sites also support the reaction. EcoP15I DNA restriction patterns are shown to be predetermined by the enzyme-to-site ratio, in that site-saturating enzyme levels elicit cleavage exclusively between the closest pair of head-to-head oriented sites. DNA restriction is blocked by Lac repressor bound in the intervening sequence between the two EcoP15I sites. These results rule out DNA looping and strongly suggest that cleavage is triggered by the close proximity of two convergently tracking EcoP15I-DNA complexes.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed1994

The Escherichia coli prr region encodes a functional type IC DNA restriction system closely integrated with an anticodon nuclease gene.

The prr locus was originally described as coding a ribonuclease that is activated after phage T4 infection to cut within the anticodon of a specific tRNA, inactivating protein synthesis and thus blocking phage development. Wild-type T4 phage has two genes coding the enzymes polynucleotide kinase and RNA ligase, whose only function seems to be to repair the damage done by the anticodon nuclease. As the only apparent function of the prr ribonuclease is to combat phage infection, it can be considered as an RNA-based restriction enzyme. In non-infected cells, the prr enzyme is kept inactive in a complex with three other proteins which were predicted on the basis of DNA homologies to be the subunits of a type IC DNA restriction and modification system. Unlike other type IC systems so far characterized, prr is chromosomally rather than plasmid coded. However, sequences upstream from prr also have homology with sequences from the plasmid R124 and the prophage P1. We have now investigated the prr system and shown that it is indeed a bona fide type IC system which we call EcoprrI, and which is active both in vivo and in vitro. The system is fully functional even in the absence of the anticodon nuclease and seems to be a typical type I enzyme. EcoprrI recognizes the sequence CCA(N7)RTGC. One peculiarity is that, with low efficiency, EcoprrI will recognize and methylate variants of its recognition sequence such as CCT(N7)ATGC, which is methylated in one strand of the DNA only.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1993

Macroevolution by transposition: drastic modification of DNA recognition by a type I restriction enzyme following Tn5 transposition.

We have characterized a novel mutant of EcoDXXI, a type IC DNA restriction and modification (R-M) system, in which the specificity has been altered due to a Tn5 insertion into the middle of hsdS, the gene which encodes the polypeptide that confers DNA sequence specificity to both the restriction and the modification reactions. Like other type I enzymes, the wild type EcoDXXI recognizes a sequence composed of two asymmetrical half sites separated by a spacer region: TCA(N7)RTTC. Purification of the EcoDXXI mutant methylase and subsequent in vitro DNA methylation assays identified the mutant recognition sequence as an interrupted palindrome, TCA(N8)TGA, in which the 5' half site of the wild type site is repeated in inverse orientation. The additional base pair in the non-specific spacer of the mutant recognition sequence maintains the proper spacing between the two methylatable adenine groups. Sequencing of both the wild type and mutant EcoDXXI hsdS genes showed that the Tn5 insertion occurred at nucleotide 673 of the 1221 bp gene. This effectively deletes the entire carboxyl-terminal DNA binding domain which recognizes the 3' half of the EcoDXXI binding site. The truncated hsdS gene still encodes both the amino-terminal DNA binding domain and the conserved repeated sequence that defines the length of the recognition site spacer region. We propose that the EcoDXXI mutant methylase utilizes two truncated hsdS subunits to recognize its binding site. The implications of this finding in terms of subunit interactions and the malleability of the type I R-M systems will be discussed.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1993

nif gene expression studies in Rhodobacter capsulatus: ntrC-independent repression by high ammonium concentrations.

The expression of nif genes in Rhodobacter capsulatus depends on the two regulatory genes, rpoN and nifA, encoding a nif-specific alternative sigma factor of RNA polymerase and a nif-specific transcriptional activator, respectively. The expression of the rpoN gene itself is also RPON/NIFA dependent. In order to better characterize the regulation of nif gene induction, chromosomal nifH-, rpoN-, nifA1- and nifA2- lacZ fusions were constructed and the expression of these different nif-lacZ fusions was determined under photoheterotrophic conditions at different starting ammonium concentrations. The two nifA genes were found to be induced first, followed by nifH and finally by rpoN upon weak, medium and strong nitrogen starvation, respectively. This induction profile and the correlation between the expression of the different nif genes suggested that nifA1 expression is the limiting factor for nif gene induction. This hypothesis was tested by construction of different nifA1 overexpressing mutants. Contrary to the current model of nif gene expression in R. capsulatus, which predicted constitutive nif gene expression in such mutants, a strong repression of nifH and rpoN was found at high ammonium concentration. The low nifH expression under these conditions is unaffected by nifA2 and is not increased in a ntrC mutant, ruling out any role of NTRC as a mediator of this repression. This finding implies an additional, so far unidentified, regulation by fixed nitrogen in R. capsulatus. Changing the expression level of rpoN indicated that low levels of RPON are already sufficient for full nifH induction. The nifA1 and rpoN expression mutants were also tested for diazotrophic growth. Similar generation times were determined for the mutants and for the wild type, but diazotrophic growth of the nifA1 over-expressing ntrC mutant RCM14 did not start until after a prolonged lag phase of two to three days.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1993

Biology of DNA restriction.

Our understanding of the evolution of DNA restriction and modification systems, the control of the expression of the structural genes for the enzymes, and the importance of DNA restriction in the cellular economy has advanced by leaps and bounds in recent years. This review documents these advances for the three major classes of classical restriction and modification systems, describes the discovery of a new class of restriction systems that specifically cut DNA carrying the modification signature of foreign cells, and deals with the mechanisms developed by phages to avoid the restriction systems of their hosts.

Bacteria↗
PubMed1992

Type III restriction enzymes need two inversely oriented recognition sites for DNA cleavage.

Type III restriction/modification enzyme recognize short, non-palindromic sequences that can be methylated on only one strand, with the paradoxical consequence that during replication of what is in effect hemimethylated DNA totally unmodified sites arise. Why the unmodified sites are not subject to suicidal restriction was not clear. Here we show that restriction requires two unmodified recognition sites that can be separated by different distances but which must be in inverse orientation. All of the unmodified sites in newly replicated DNA are of course in the same orientation, which explains why they are not restricted. This result may be of relevance to other manifestations of anisotropy in double-stranded DNA, such as genetic imprinting.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1992

Recombination of constant and variable modules alters DNA sequence recognition by type IC restriction-modification enzymes.

EcoR124 and EcoDXXI are allelic type I restriction-modification (R-M) systems whose specificity genes consist of common structural elements: two variable regions are separated by a constant, homologous region containing a number of repetitive sequence elements. In vitro recombination of variable and constant elements has led to fully active, hybrid R-M systems exhibiting new and predictable target site specificities. Methylation of synthetic DNA sequences with purified, hybrid modification methylases was used to confirm the proposed recognition sequences. The results clearly demonstrate the correlation between protein domains and target site specificity. Our data suggest that a bacterial population may switch the recognition sequences of its type I R-M system by single recombination events and thus is able to maintain a prokaryotic analogue of the immune system of variable specificity.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1992

Mapping and characterization of the promoter elements of the regulatory nif genes rpoN, nifA1 and nifA2 in Rhodobacter capsulatus.

The promoter elements responsible for the expression of the regulatory nif genes rpoN, nifA1 and nifA2 of Rhodobacter capsulatus were mapped by exonuclease-III-mediated deletions and by primer extension analysis. The rpoN promoter maps 600 bp upstream of rpoN and has the characteristic features of a -24/-12 promoter. The upstream activator sequence (UAS) displays two mismatches with the NIFA consensus sequence and is located 37 bp upstream of a perfect -24/-12 promoter element. The spacing and/or the helical phasing of these two promotor elements was found to be important for promoter function. In addition, an UAS half-site may contribute to optimal promoter function. The rpoN UAS can partially substitute for the UAS of the nifE promoter. An open reading frame with homology to Klebsiella pneumoniae NIFU was identified between the rpoN promoter and rpoN and termed nifU2 since another nifU-like gene (nifU1) is located in a conventional nifUSVW operon in nif region A. Thus, rpoN, encoding an alternative sigma factor for RNA polymerase, is cotranscribed with a nifU analogous gene from an rpoN-dependent promoter. Mapping of the promoter elements involved in the expression of nifA copy 1 and copy 2 identified a novel promoter type. A conserved distal promoter element is likely to represent the binding site of NTRC in R. capsulatus. The DNA region preceding the mapped 5' ends of the nifA transcripts displays much less homology. The distance between the distal and proximal elements is about 100 bp.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1991

Increased protein flexibility leads to promiscuous protein--DNA interactions in type IC restriction-modification systems.

We have investigated the role of a four amino acid element that is repeated twice and three times, respectively, in the specificity polypeptides of the two allelic restriction-modification systems EcoR124 and EcoR124/3. We had earlier shown that this difference in amino acid sequence between the two systems is solely responsible for the different DNA sequence specificities of the two systems. The effect of single amino acid substitutions and small insertion and deletion mutations on restriction activity and modification specificity was determined in vivo by phage infection assays and in vitro by methylation of DNA with purified modification methylases. Mutant restriction-modification systems with changes in the number and the length of the central amino acid repeats exhibited decreased restriction activity and in some cases relaxed substrate specificity. Our data strongly support the idea that the repetitive amino acid motif in the specificity polypeptides forms part of a flexible interdomain linker. It may be responsible for positioning on the DNA the two major specificity polypeptide domains which are thought to contact independently the half sites of the split recognition sequences typical for all type I restriction-modification systems.

Alleles↗
PubMed1991

Expression of regulatory nif genes in Rhodobacter capsulatus.

Translational fusions of the Escherichia coli lacZ gene to Rhodobacter capsulatus nif genes were constructed in order to determine the regulatory circuit of nif gene expression in R. capsulatus, a free-living photosynthetic diazotroph. The expression of nifH, nifA (copies I and II), and nifR4 was measured in different regulatory mutant strains under different physiological conditions. The expression of nifH and nifR4 (the analog of ntrA in Klebsiella pneumoniae) depends on the NIFR1/R2 system (the analog of the ntr system in K. pneumoniae), on NIFA, and on NIFR4. The expression of both copies of nifA is regulated by the NIFR1/R2 system and is modulated by the N source of the medium under anaerobic photosynthetic growth conditions. In the presence of ammonia or oxygen, moderate expression of nifA was detectable, whereas nifH and nifR4 were not expressed under these conditions. The implications for the regulatory circuit of nif gene expression in R. capsulatus are discussed and compared with the situation in K. pneumoniae, another free-living diazotroph.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1989

Cloning, over-expression and the catalytic properties of the EcoP15 modification methylase from Escherichia coli.

The EcoP15 modification methylase gene from the p15B plasmid of Escherichia coli 15T-has been cloned and expressed at high levels in a plasmid vector system. We have purified the enzyme to near homogeneity in large amounts and have studied some of its enzymatic properties. Initial rates of methyl transfer are first order in methylase concentration and, with pUC19 DNA as substrate, the reaction proceeds by a random mechanism in which either DNA or S-adenosylmethionine can bind to the free enzyme. After methyltransfer to DNA, the methylated DNA and S-adenosylhomocysteine appear to dissociate in random order. As expected in such a mechanism, S-adenosylhomocysteine is a non-competitive inhibitor by S-adenosylmethionine at concentrations not much above its KM suggests that release of methylated DNA may be the rate-limiting step. This suggestion is strengthened by the fact that a mutant of the closely related EcoP1 does not show such substrate inhibition.

Binding, Competitive↗
PubMed1989

Basis for changes in DNA recognition by the EcoR124 and EcoR124/3 type I DNA restriction and modification enzymes.

EcoR124 and EcoR124/3 are type I DNA restriction and modification systems. The EcoR124/3 system arose from the EcoR124 system some 15 years ago and at the electron microscopic DNA heteroduplex level the genes for both systems are still apparently identical. We have shown that the DNA sequences recognized by the two systems are GAA(N6)RTCG for EcoR124 and GAA(N7)RTCG for EcoR124/3. The sequences thus differ only in the length of the non-specific spacer. This difference nevertheless places the two specific domains of the EcoR124/3 recognition sequence 0.34 nm further apart and rotates them 36 degrees with respect to those of EcoR124, which implies major structural differences in the proteins recognizing these sequences. We have now determined the nucleotide sequences of the hsdS and hsdM genes of both systems and of the hsdR gene of EcoR124/3. The hsdS gene products provide DNA sequence specificity in both restriction and modification, the hsdM gene products are necessary for modification and all three hsd gene products are required for restriction. The only difference that we have detected between the two systems is that a 12 base-pair sequence towards the middle of the hsdS gene is repeated twice in the EcoR124 gene and three times in the EcoR124/3 gene. We have deleted one of the repeats in the EcoR124/3 gene and shown that this changes the specificity to that of EcoR124. Thus, the extra four amino acids in the middle of the EcoR124/3 hsdS gene product, which in an alpha-helical configuration would extend 0.6 nm, are sufficient to explain the differences in sequence recognition. We suggest that the EcoR124/3 system was generated by an unequal crossing over and argue that this kind of specificity change should not be rare in Nature.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1989

A mutational analysis of the bacteriophage P1 cin recombinase gene: intragenic complementation.

Bacteriophage P1 encodes a site-specific recombinase, Cin, which regulates the alternate expression of tail fibre genes by inverting a DNA segment. To define regions of Cin important for the recombination process, we have isolated and characterised 24 different mutations of the cin gene. Most of these mutations affected amino acids that are highly conserved in other related recombinases. Some of these mutants complement each other in vivo. This intragenic complementation could be due to the assembly of heteromers containing both mutant proteins, suggesting that the active enzyme is at least a dimer.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1989

Characterization of mutations of the bacteriophage P1 mod gene encoding the recognition subunit of the EcoP1 restriction and modification system.

This study characterized several mutations of the bacteriophage P1 mod gene. This gene codes for the subunit of the EcoP1 restriction enzyme that is responsible for DNA sequence recognition and for modification methylation. We cloned the mutant mod genes into expression vectors and purified the mutant proteins to near homogeneity. Two of the mutant mod genes studied were the c2 clear-plaque mutants described by Scott (Virology 41:66-71, 1970). These mutant proteins can recognize EcoP1 sites in DNA and direct restriction but are unable to modify DNA. Methylation assays as well as S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) binding studies showed that the c2 mutants are methylation deficient because they do not bind SAM, and we conclude that the mutations destroy the SAM-binding site. Both of the c2 mutations lie within a region of the EcoP1 mod gene that is not conserved when compared with the mod gene of the related EcoP15 system. EcoP15 and EcoP1 recognize different DNA sequences, and we believe that this region of the protein may code for the DNA-binding site of the enzyme. The other mutants characterized were made by site-directed mutagenesis at codon 240. Evidence is presented that one of them, Ser-240----Pro, simultaneously lost the capacity to bind SAM and may also have changed its DNA sequence specificity.

Amino Acid Sequence↗