Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T A Baker

Publications and source records attributed to T A Baker.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1995

Assembly of phage Mu transpososomes: cooperative transitions assisted by protein and DNA scaffolds.

Transposition of phage Mu takes place within higher order protein-DNA complexes called transpososomes. These complexes contain the two Mu genome ends synapsed by a tetramer of Mu transposase (MuA). Transpososome assembly is tightly controlled by multiple protein and DNA sequence cofactors. We find that assembly can occur through two distinct pathways. One previously described pathway depends on an enhancer-like sequence element, the internal activation sequence (IAS). The second pathway depends on a MuB protein-target DNA complex. For both pathways, all four MuA monomers in the tetramer need to interact with an assembly-assisting element, either the IAS or MuB. However, once assembled, not all MuA monomers within the transpososome need to interact with MuB to capture MuB-bound target DNA. The multiple layers of control likely are used in vivo to ensure efficient rounds of DNA replication when needed, while minimizing unwanted transposition products.

Bacteriophage mu↗
PubMed1995

Disassembly of the Mu transposase tetramer by the ClpX chaperone.

Mu transposition is promoted by an extremely stable complex containing a tetramer of the transposase (MuA) bound to the recombining DNA. Here we purify the Escherichia coli ClpX protein, a member of a family of multimeric ATPases present in prokaryotes and eukaryotes (the Clp family), on the basis of its ability to remove the transposase from the DNA after recombination. Previously, ClpX has been shown to function with the ClpP peptidase in protein turnover. However, neither ClpP nor any other protease is required for disassembly of the transposase. The released MuA is not modified extensively, degraded, or irreversibly denatured, and is able to perform another round of recombination in vitro. We conclude that ClpX catalyzes the ATP-dependent release of MuA by promoting a transient conformational change in the protein and, therefore, can be considered a molecular chaperone. ClpX is important at the transition between the recombination and DNA replication steps of transposition in vitro; this function probably corresponds to the essential contribution of ClpX for Mu growth. Deletion analysis reveals that the sequence at the carboxyl terminus of MuA is important for disassembly by ClpX and can target MuA for degradation by ClpXP in vitro. These data contribute to the emerging picture that members of the Clp family are chaperones specifically suited for disaggregating proteins and are able to function with or without a collaborating protease.

ATPases Associated with Diverse Cellular Activitie↗
PubMed1995

Replication arrest.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1994

Complete transposition requires four active monomers in the mu transposase tetramer.

A tetramer of Mu transposase (MuA) cleaves and joins multiple DNA strands to promote transposition. Derivatives of MuA altered at two acidic residues that are conserved among transposases and retroviral integrases form tetramers but are defective in both cleavage and joining. These mutant proteins were used to analyze the contribution of individual monomers to the activity of the tetramer. The performance of different protein combinations demonstrates that not all monomers need to be catalytically competent for the complex to promote an individual cleavage or joining reaction. Furthermore, the results indicate that each pair of essential residues is probably donated to the active complex by a single monomer. Although stable, tetramers composed of a mixture of mutant and wild-type MuA generate products cleaved at only one end and with only one end joined to the target DNA. The abundance of these abortive products and the ratios of the two proteins in complexes stalled at different steps indicate that the complete reaction requires the activity of all four monomers. Thus, each subunit of MuA appears to use the conserved acidic amino acids to promote one DNA cleavage or one DNA joining reaction.

Bacteriophage mu↗
PubMed1994

Identification of residues in the Mu transposase essential for catalysis.

A tetramer of Mu transposase (MuA) cleaves the phage Mu DNA and joins these ends to a target DNA to catalyze transposition. Substitution mutations at Asp-269 or Glu-392 within MuA destroy both the DNA cleavage and joining activities without blocking tetramer assembly, indicating that the mutations specifically affect catalysis. Although inactive under standard reaction conditions (10 mM Mg2+), the mutant proteins are partially resuscitated by 10-20 mM Mn2+, concentrations 5- to 10-fold higher than optimal for wild-type MuA. Amino acid sequence alignment and the similar effects of mutations suggests that Asp-269 and Glu-392 of MuA may be analogs of the first Asp and final Glu of a conserved triad of acidic amino acids present in many transposases and the retroviral integrases (the D-D-35-E motif). The higher Mn2+ optima observed with MuA derivatives altered at these positions supports a role for the conserved acidic amino acids in coordinating divalent metal ions in the active sites of transposases.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1994

HIV/AIDS.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1993

Division of labor among monomers within the Mu transposase tetramer.

A single tetramer of Mu transposase (MuA) pairs the recombination sites, cleaves the donor DNA, and joins these ends to a target DNA by strand transfer. Analysis of C-terminal deletion derivatives of MuA reveals that a 30 amino acid region between residues 575 and 605 is critical for these three steps. Although inactive on its own, a deletion protein lacking this region assembles with the wild-type protein. These mixed tetramers carry out donor cleavage but do not promote strand transfer, even when the donor cleavage stage is bypassed. These data suggest that the active center of the transposase is composed of the C-terminus of four MuA monomers; one dimer carries out donor cleavage while all four monomers contribute to strand transfer.

Bacteriophage phi X 174↗
PubMed1993

Protein-DNA assemblies controlling lytic development of bacteriophage Mu.

Recent analysis of the mechanism and regulation of transposition by bacteriophage Mu has emphasized the importance of controlled assembly of specific protein-DNA complexes. Both the Mu transposase and the Mu repressor engage in multiple protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions that modulate the outcome of a phage infection.

Bacteriolysis↗
PubMed1993

Family practice and internal medicine office fees: an analysis of charge differences.

BACKGROUND: This study applies the concept of economic efficiency to primary health care physicians. Comparisons of charges made by family physicians and general internists would provide evidence of "optimal" health care delivery of primary care services. METHODS: A list of all active licensed primary care physicians was obtained from the office of the Oregon State Board of Medical Examiners. Two thousand eight hundred forty-three questionnaires were sent to Oregon primary care physicians. Of the 1365 responses, 484 were family physicians and 341 were general internists. RESULTS: The study found that family physicians had significantly lower mean office visit fees than general internists, while both groups had essentially similar patient mixes. This difference in fees could not be explained by patient case mix. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study and the body of literature available support the concept that family practice physicians provide economically efficient primary health care. If two similarly trained physicians provide a comparable level of medical care, with the same or similar outcome (or output), the physician who provides the care for the lowest cost should be used.

Diagnosis-Related Groups↗
PubMed1992

Assembly of the active form of the transposase-Mu DNA complex: a critical control point in Mu transposition.

Discovery and characterization of a new intermediate in Mu DNA transposition allowed assembly of the transposition machinery to be separated from the chemical steps of recombination. This stable intermediate, which accumulates in the presence of Ca2+, consists of the two ends of the Mu DNA synapsed by a tetramer of the Mu transposase. Within this stable synaptic complex (SSC), the recombination sites are engaged but not yet cleaved. Thus, the SSC is structurally related to both the cleaved donor and strand transfer complexes, but precedes them on the transposition pathway. Once the active protein-DNA complex is constructed, it is conserved throughout transposition. The participation of internal sequence elements and accessory factors exclusively during SSC assembly allows recombination to be controlled prior to the irreversible chemical steps.

Bacteriophage mu↗
PubMed1992

DNA-promoted assembly of the active tetramer of the Mu transposase.

A stable tetramer of the Mu transposase (MuA) bound to the ends of the Mu DNA promotes recombination. Assembly of this active protein-DNA complex from monomers of MuA requires an intricate array of MuA protein-binding sites on supercoiled DNA, divalent metal ions, and the Escherichia coli HU protein. Under altered reaction conditions, many of these factors stimulate assembly of the MuA tetramer but are not essential, allowing their role in formation of the complex to be analyzed. End-type MuA-binding sites and divalent metal ions are most critical and probably promote a conformational change in MuA that is necessary for multimerization. Multiple MuA-binding sites on the DNA contribute synergistically to tetramer formation. DNA superhelicity assists cooperativity between the sites on the two Mu DNA ends if they are properly oriented. HU specifically promotes assembly involving the left end of the Mu DNA. In addition to dissecting the assembly pathway, these data demonstrate that the tetrameric conformation is intrinsic to MuA and constitutes the form of the protein active in catalysis.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1991

DNase protection analysis of the stable synaptic complexes involved in Mu transposition.

Several critical steps in phage Mu transposition involve specialized protein-DNA complexes. Cleavage of Mu donor DNA by MuA protein leads to the formation of the stable cleaved donor complex (CDC), in which the two Mu DNA ends are held together by MuA. In the subsequent strand-transfer reaction the CDC attacks a target DNA to generate the strand-transfer complex, in which the donor and the target DNAs are covalently joined. We have carried out DNase I protection experiments on these protein-DNA complexes and found that only three MuA binding sites (L1, R1, and R2 of the six total) at the two Mu ends are stably bound by MuA to maintain the paired Mu end structure. The protection extends beyond the ends of the Mu sequence for different lengths (7-20 nucleotides) depending on the strand and the type of complex. After formation of the CDC, the other MuA binding sites (L2, L3, and R3) and internal activation sequence become dispensable for the subsequent strand-transfer reaction.

Bacteriophage mu↗
PubMed1991

MuB protein allosterically activates strand transfer by the transposase of phage Mu.

The MuA and MuB proteins collaborate to mediate efficient transposition of the phage Mu genome into many DNA target sites. MuA (the transposase) carries out all the DNA cleavage and joining steps. MuB stimulates strand transfer by activating the MuA-donor DNA complex through direct protein-protein contact. The C-terminal domain of MuA is required for this MuA-MuB interaction. Activation of strand transfer occurs irrespective of whether MuB is bound to target DNA. When high levels of MuA generate a pool of free MuB (not bound to DNA) or when chemical modification of MuB impairs its ability to bind DNA, MuB still stimulates strand transfer. However, under these conditions, intramolecular target sites are used exclusively because of their close proximity to the MuA-MuB-donor DNA complex.

Allosteric Regulation↗