Extended-release intramuscular naltrexone in alcohol dependence in adults: profile report.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adult↗
Biomedical subjects
Susan J Keam
Publications and source records attributed to Susan J Keam.
Travoprost/timolol.
Travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination (travoprost/timolol) is a once-daily eyedrops solution comprising the prostaglandin F(2alpha) analogue travoprost and the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist timolol. It is indicated for the treatment of patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who are insufficiently responsive to topical beta-adrenoceptor antagonists or prostaglandin analogues. Once-daily travoprost/timolol had generally similar efficacy to travoprost plus timolol and was more effective than travoprost or timolol monotherapy in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension in randomised, well designed studies. Both travoprost/timolol and latanoprost plus timolol maintained IOP control, and travoprost/timolol was shown to be noninferior to latanoprost/timolol in randomised, well designed studies. Travoprost/timolol was generally well tolerated, with a tolerability profile similar to those of travoprost plus timolol, travoprost or timolol monotherapy and latanoprost plus timolol. The majority of adverse events, such as ocular hyperaemia, were mild and resolved with or without treatment.
Cloprostenol↗
Letrozole : in postmenopausal hormone-responsive early-stage breast cancer.
Letrozole is a highly selective, nonsteroidal, third-generation aromatase inhibitor approved for first-line and extended adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive, early-stage breast cancer. Binding of letrozole to the haeme component of the cytochrome P450 subunit of aromatase inhibits estrogen biosynthesis throughout the body. As first-line adjuvant therapy in approximate, equals 8000 postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive, early-stage breast cancer, once-daily letrozole 2.5mg significantly prolonged disease-free survival (DFS; primary endpoint) and reduced the risk of relapse at distant sites relative to once-daily tamoxifen 20mg in the ongoing Breast International Group 1-98, double-blind, multinational trial. The median duration of follow-up for this primary core analysis was 25.8 months. Extended adjuvant therapy with once-daily letrozole 2.5mg significantly prolonged DFS relative to placebo treatment at a median follow-up of 30 months (primary endpoint) in the MA-17 trial in approximate, equals 5000 postmenopausal women who were disease free after 4.5-6 years of tamoxifen therapy for hormone-responsive, early-stage breast cancer. Letrozole treatment for up to 5 years was generally well tolerated in this clinical setting. As first-line treatment, relative to tamoxifen, letrozole was associated with a significantly lower incidence of venous thromboembolitic events, vaginal bleeding, hot flushes and night sweating, whereas the incidence of cardiac failure, bone fractures and arthralgia was higher in letrozole recipients.
Adult↗
Trastuzumab: a review of its use in the management of HER2-positive metastatic and early-stage breast cancer.
Trastuzumab (Herceptin) is a humanised monoclonal antibody used in the treatment of breast cancer that overexpresses human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), which is associated with clinically aggressive disease and a poor prognosis. The addition of intravenous trastuzumab to first-line chemotherapy improved the time to disease progression, objective response rate, duration of response, and overall survival in randomised, multicentre trials in women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. As such, trastuzumab has become the standard of care in this setting, despite its high acquisition cost and potential for cardiac events, and is licensed for use in combination with paclitaxel (Europe and the US) or docetaxel (Europe). In addition, trastuzumab monotherapy is approved for use in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who have previously received chemotherapy for their metastatic disease. Recent data from large phase III trials with trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting revealed significant improvements in disease-free and overall survival. Thus, trastuzumab is also rapidly becoming a standard component of adjuvant therapy for patients with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer.
Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
Ranolazine: a review of its use in chronic stable angina pectoris.
Ranolazine (Ranexa), a piperazine derivative, is a new antianginal agent approved for the treatment of chronic stable angina pectoris for use as combination therapy when angina is not adequately controlled with other antianginal agents. While the exact mechanism of action of ranolazine is not known, its antianginal and anti-ischaemic effects do not appear to depend upon changes in blood pressure or heart rate. An extended-release (ER) oral formulation of ranolazine has been developed to facilitate twice-daily administration whilst maintaining therapeutically effective plasma concentrations. In patients with chronic stable angina, ranolazine ER monotherapy was shown to improve exercise duration at trough plasma drug concentration in a dose-dependent manner compared with placebo. The drug was effective as adjunctive therapy in patients with chronic stable angina whose condition was not controlled adequately with conventional antianginal therapy. In randomised clinical trials, ranolazine ER was well tolerated, with no overt effects on cardiovascular haemodynamics or conduction, apart from a modest increase in corrected QT (QTc) interval (but no torsades de pointes). Importantly, the efficacy and tolerability of ranolazine ER were not affected by comorbid conditions, including old age, heart failure (HF) or diabetes mellitus. Comparative trials of ranolazine ER with other antianginal agents and trials examining its effects on long-term morbidity and mortality in patients with ischaemic heart disease are required to determine with greater certainty the place of the drug in current antianginal therapy. Nevertheless, ranolazine ER may well prove to be a useful alternative and adjunct to conventional haemodynamic antianginal therapy in the treatment of chronic stable angina.
Acetanilides↗
Bicalutamide 150mg: a review of its use in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer.
Bicalutamide (Casodex) is a competitive androgen receptor antagonist that inactivates androgen-regulated prostate cell growth and function, leading to cell apoptosis and inhibition of prostate cancer growth. It is administered orally as a once-daily dose. In the EU and a number of other countries, bicalutamide 150 mg/day is approved in men with locally advanced nonmetastatic prostate cancer as immediate therapy either as an adjuvant to active treatment or as monotherapy as an alternative to surgical or medical castration. Combined analysis of the three trials that comprise the bicalutamide Early Prostate Cancer (EPC) programme showed that bicalutamide administered in conjunction with standard care in men with locally advanced prostate cancer offers disease-free survival benefits over standard care alone and is generally well tolerated. Overall survival was improved to a greater extent in the subgroup of patients who received bicalutamide plus radiation therapy compared with radiation therapy alone. Men with localised prostate cancer do not benefit from the addition of bicalutamide to standard care. Combined analysis of two other studies in men with locally advanced prostate cancer show that bicalutamide monotherapy offers better tolerability and higher health-related quality-of-life (HR-QOL) scores for sexual interest and physical capacity compared with surgical or medical castration, while achieving disease-free and overall survival durations that were not significantly different. Thus, when treatment options are being evaluated, bicalutamide as adjuvant therapy or monotherapy should be considered as an alternative to other available hormonal therapies in men with locally advanced prostate cancer, especially in those who wish to maintain an active lifestyle.
Aged↗
Extended-release intramuscular naltrexone.
An extended-release intramuscular formulation of naltrexone that provides sustained release of the drug over a 28-day period has been developed with the aim of improving treatment adherence in patients treated with naltrexone for alcohol dependence. Biodegradable polylactide-co-glycolide polymer microspheres containing 34% w/w naltrexone are reconstituted in an aqueous suspension just prior to intramuscular administration. Extended-release intramuscular naltrexone 380 mg administered once every 4 weeks, in combination with psychosocial therapy, demonstrated superior efficacy to placebo plus psychosocial therapy in reducing the heavy drinking event rate (primary endpoint) in adult patients with alcohol dependence in a 6-month well controlled trial. Among the subset of patients who abstained completely from drinking during the 7 days prior to the first dose of medication (n = 53; 8% of the total study population), those treated with extended-release intramuscular naltrexone 380 mg had greater reductions in the number of drinking days and the number of heavy drinking days compared with placebo recipients. Treatment with extended-release intramuscular naltrexone 380 mg once every 4 weeks for up to 18 months was generally well tolerated, with infrequent treatment-related serious adverse events. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were nausea, injection site reaction and headache. The proportion of patients with clinically significant plasma transaminase elevations was not different between patients receiving extended-release intramuscular naltrexone and those receiving placebo.
Adult↗
Vildagliptin.
Vildagliptin is a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor that is being evaluated in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. It improves glycaemic control by inhibiting DPP-4 from inactivating the incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, prolonging incretin activity in response to ingestion of nutrients. This allows for increased insulin sensitivity, decreased glucagon secretion and improved beta-cell function in a glucose-dependent manner. Glycaemic control with vildagliptin 50 or 100 mg/day, measured by a change from baseline in mean glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) at study endpoint, was improved relative to placebo in several well designed clinical trials of vildagliptin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. In randomised active comparator studies, noninferiority of vildagliptin in reducing HbA(1c) levels from baseline was established to rosiglitazone, but not to metformin. Vildagliptin also showed efficacy in reducing HbA(1c) levels in patients with type 2 diabetes when used in combination with metformin, pioglitazone or insulin. Vildagliptin was generally well tolerated when administered alone or in combination with additional antidiabetic treatment. Gastrointestinal adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity, and occurred less frequently than with metformin. Hypoglycaemic events were rare and occurred at a similar incidence to that with placebo.
Adamantane↗
Tramadol extended-release tablets.
Tramadol is a synthetic, centrally acting opioid analgesic. An extended-release tablet formulation of tramadol (tramadol ER) allows gradual release of the active drug, permitting once-daily administration. Tramadol ER administered once daily is equivalent in bioavailability to immediate-release tramadol administered four times daily, with prolonged absorption and lower peak plasma concentrations. Tramadol ER was significantly more effective than placebo in the treatment of moderate to moderately severe chronic pain in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and/or hip in randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. In a flexible-dose trial in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee, the mean reduction from baseline in pain intensity scores over 12 weeks was significantly greater in recipients of tramadol ER than in placebo recipients. In a fixed-dose trial in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and/or hip, the mean improvements from baseline in the pain and physical function subscale scores of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index over 12 weeks were significantly greater in tramadol ER than placebo recipients. Common adverse events reported in patients with moderate to moderately severe chronic pain treated with tramadol ER 100-300 mg once daily were dizziness (excluding vertigo), nausea, constipation, somnolence and flushing.
Analgesics, Opioid↗
Bimatoprost: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Bimatoprost (Lumigan) is a prostamide analogue used for the reduction of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. In comparative clinical trials of up to 1 year in duration, administration of 0.03% bimatoprost ophthalmic solution once daily was more effective than 0.5% timolol twice daily and at least as effective as the prostaglandin analogues 0.005% latanoprost and 0.004% travoprost once daily in terms of reducing IOP and/or achieving target IOP levels. Bimatoprost was also more effective than twice-daily administration of 0.5%/2% timolol/dorzolamide in patients refractory to topical timolol therapy. Although generally well tolerated, bimatoprost is associated with a higher incidence of conjunctival hyperaemia than latanoprost, timolol or the combination of timolol and dorzolamide. Three fully published modelled cost-effectiveness analyses of bimatoprost evaluating cost per treatment success in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension have been conducted in the US. The analyses incorporated results of randomised, multicentre clinical trials and used a 1-year time horizon. In the treatment algorithm used in the models, patients not achieving target IOP levels with bimatoprost or comparator required additional medical visits and adjunctive therapy. Bimatoprost was associated with lower costs per treatment success than latanoprost, timolol or timolol/dorzolamide across a range of clinically relevant target IOPs. Results were sensitive to changes in treatment success rates and/or drug acquisition costs. Along with the inherent limitations of economic models, other possible criticisms of the analyses are the use of selected IOP data, and the lack of inclusion of costs associated with conjunctival hyperaemia or other adverse effects of therapy. Various other cost-effectiveness analyses of bimatoprost are available, primarily as abstracts and/or posters. In general, most of these studies have also been favourable for bimatoprost, despite having been conducted in different countries and/or from different perspectives. In conclusion, in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension, bimatoprost is an effective and generally well tolerated therapeutic option, albeit with a relatively high incidence of conjunctival hyperaemia. Although results of modelled cost-effectiveness analyses should be interpreted with due consideration of the limitations of the studies, available pharmacoeconomic data generally support the use of bimatoprost as a cost-effective treatment in this patient population.
Amides↗
Letrozole: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.
Letrozole (Femara), an aromatase inhibitor that blocks estrogen synthesis by inhibiting the final step of the estrogen biosynthetic pathway, is approved for use in a wide range of breast cancer settings. Randomised clinical trials in postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive early-stage breast cancer have demonstrated that, as adjuvant therapy, letrozole has greater efficacy than tamoxifen. It is also more effective than placebo as extended adjuvant therapy after completion of tamoxifen therapy in these patients. In women with hormone-responsive advanced breast cancer, letrozole is superior to tamoxifen in prolonging the time to disease progression and time to treatment failure in a first-line setting, and is at least as effective as anastrozole and more effective than megestrol for some endpoints (in one of two trials) in a second-line setting. Letrozole is generally well tolerated, and in a health-related quality-of-life analysis from a large clinical trial, patient well-being with letrozole as extended adjuvant therapy did not differ from that with placebo. Modelled analyses from the UK and the US suggest that, in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer, letrozole is likely to be a cost-effective alternative to tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy; moreover, using letrozole as extended adjuvant therapy after tamoxifen, rather than no further treatment, is also a cost-effective treatment strategy. Sensitivity analyses have shown these results to be robust. In terms of direct healthcare costs, pharmacoeconomic models suggest that letrozole is a cost-effective alternative to tamoxifen as first-line therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive advanced breast cancer from the perspectives of the UK NHS, the Canadian and Italian public healthcare systems and the Japanese national health insurance system. Incremental costs per QALY or progression-free year gained over tamoxifen were well within the recommended limits for acceptability of new agents that are more effective and more expensive than existing therapies in the UK, Japan and Canada. Modelled analyses from the UK and Canada have also suggested that letrozole is cost effective as second-line therapy for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women who have disease progression following anti-estrogen therapy. In conclusion, letrozole is an effective and well tolerated treatment for postmenopausal women with early-stage or advanced hormone-responsive breast cancer. Pharmacoeconomic analyses from UK and North American perspectives support the use of letrozole in hormone-responsive early-stage breast cancer in both the adjuvant and extended adjuvant settings. In addition, other modelled analyses conducted in a variety of healthcare systems across different countries consistently suggest that letrozole is cost effective in advanced treatment settings.
Antineoplastic Agents↗
Candesartan cilexetil: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in chronic heart failure and hypertension.
The addition of candesartan cilexetil (Atacand, Amias, Blopress, Kenzen, Ratacand) to standard therapy for chronic heart failure (CHF) provided important clinical benefits at little or no additional cost in France, Germany and the UK, according to a detailed economic analysis focusing on major cardiovascular events and prospectively collected resource-use data from the CHARM-Added and CHARM-Alternative trials in patients with CHF and left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. Results of a corresponding cost-effectiveness analysis showed that candesartan cilexetil was either dominant over placebo or was associated with small incremental costs per life-year gained, depending on the country and whether individual trial or pooled data were used. Preliminary data from a US cost-effectiveness analysis based on CHARM data also showed favourable results for candesartan cilexetil. Two cost-effectiveness analyses of candesartan cilexetil in hypertension have been published, both conducted in Sweden. Data from the SCOPE trial in elderly patients with hypertension, which showed a significant reduction in nonfatal stroke with candesartan cilexetil-based therapy versus non-candesartan cilexetil-based treatment, were incorporated into a Markov model and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of euro12 824 per QALY gained was calculated (2001 value). Another modelled cost-effectiveness analysis of candesartan cilexetil was based on the ALPINE trial, in which the incidence of new-onset diabetes was significantly lower in patients with newly diagnosed hypertension who were randomised to candesartan cilexetil (with or without felodipine) than among those who received hydrochlorothiazide (with or without atenolol). Although candesartan cilexetil was dominant over hydrochlorothiazide, the ALPINE cost-effectiveness analysis relied on a small number of clinical events and did not evaluate the incremental cost of candesartan cilexetil per life-year or QALY gained. In conclusion, despite some inherent limitations, economic analyses incorporating CHARM data and conducted primarily in Europe have shown that candesartan cilexetil appears to be cost effective when added to standard CHF treatment in patients with CHF and compromised LV systolic function. The use of candesartan cilexetil as part of antihypertensive therapy in elderly patients with elevated blood pressure was also deemed to be cost effective in a Swedish analysis, primarily resulting from a reduced risk of nonfatal stroke (as shown in the SCOPE study); however, the generalisability of results to other contexts has not been established. Cost-effectiveness analyses comparing candesartan cilexetil with ACE inhibitors or other angiotensin receptor blockers in CHF or hypertension are lacking, and results reported for candesartan cilexetil in a Swedish economic analysis of ALPINE data focusing on outcomes for diabetes require confirmation and extension.
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers↗
Spotlight on escitalopram in the management of major depressive disorder.
Escitalopram (Cipralex), Lexapro), the active S-enantiomer of the racemic SSRI citalopram (RS-citalopram), is a highly selective inhibitor of the serotonin transporter protein. It possesses a rapid onset of antidepressant activity, and is an effective and generally well tolerated treatment for moderate-to-severe major depressive disorder (MDD). Pooled analyses from an extensive clinical trial database suggest that escitalopram is consistently more effective than citalopram in moderate-to-severe MDD. Preliminary studies suggest that escitalopram is as effective as other SSRIs and the extended-release (XR) formulation of the serotonin/noradrenaline (norepinephrine) reuptake inhibitor venlafaxine, and may have cost-effectiveness and cost-utility advantages. However, additional longer-term, comparative studies evaluating specific efficacy, tolerability, health-related quality of life and economic indices would be helpful in definitively positioning escitalopram relative to these other agents in the treatment of MDD. Nevertheless, available clinical and pharmacoeconomic data indicate that escitalopram is an effective first-line option in the management of patients with MDD.
Citalopram↗
Abatacept.
Abatacept (Orencia) is the first in a new class of biologics known as selective costimulation modulators. It inhibits full activation of T cells and interacts with other cell types to affect additional mediators of the inflammatory cascade. The clinical efficacy of abatacept in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis, despite prior treatment with methotrexate or anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNFalpha) therapies, has been investigated in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase III trials of 6 or 12 months' duration. In these trials, patients received intravenous abatacept (fixed-dose regimen based on bodyweight) or placebo in addition to background disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) other than anti-TNFalpha therapies. Relative to placebo, abatacept significantly improved signs and symptoms of disease assessed using American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, 50, and 70 criteria and specific improvement in physical function as measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index at 6 months and significantly slowed structural damage progression in joints at 12 months. Improvements in ACR 20, 50, and 70 response rates were maintained at the final assessment in the 12-month trial. Abatacept infusions were generally well tolerated. Acute infusion-related reactions occurred in 9% of abatacept and 6% of placebo recipients in phase III trials. Integrated safety data from five clinical trials showed that serious adverse events were reported in 13.6% of abatacept and 12.3% of placebo recipients and the incidence of serious infections was 3.0% and 1.9%. Abatacept administered with background biologic DMARDs appears to be less well tolerated than abatacept plus background nonbiologic DMARDs.
Abatacept↗
Spotlight on Trastuzumab in the management of HER2-positive metastatic and early-stage breast cancer.
Trastuzumab (Herceptin) is a humanized monoclonal antibody used in the treatment of breast cancer that overexpresses human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), which is associated with clinically aggressive disease and a poor prognosis. The addition of intravenous trastuzumab to first-line chemotherapy improved the time to disease progression, objective response rate, duration of response, and overall survival in randomized, multicenter trials in women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. As such, trastuzumab has become the standard of care in this setting, despite its high acquisition cost and potential for cardiac events, and is licensed for use in combination with paclitaxel (Europe and the US) or docetaxel (Europe). In addition, trastuzumab monotherapy is approved for use in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who have previously received chemotherapy for their metastatic disease. Recent data from large phase III trials with trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting revealed significant improvements in disease-free and overall survival. Thus, trastuzumab is also rapidly becoming a standard component of adjuvant therapy for patients with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer.
Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
Spotlight on ranolazine in chronic stable angina pectoris.
Ranolazine (Ranexa), a piperazine derivative, is a new antianginal agent approved for the treatment of chronic stable angina pectoris for use as combination therapy when angina is not adequately controlled with other antianginal agents. While the exact mechanism of action of ranolazine is not known, its antianginal and anti-ischemic effects do not appear to depend upon changes in BP or heart rate. An extended-release (ER) oral formulation of ranolazine has been developed to facilitate twice-daily administration whilst maintaining therapeutically effective plasma concentrations. In patients with chronic stable angina, ranolazine ER monotherapy was shown to improve exercise duration at trough plasma drug concentration in a dose-dependent manner compared with placebo. The drug was effective as adjunctive therapy in patients with chronic stable angina whose condition was not controlled adequately with conventional antianginal therapy. In randomized clinical trials, ranolazine ER was well tolerated, with no overt effects on cardiovascular hemodynamics or conduction, apart from a modest increase in corrected QT interval (but no torsades de pointes). Importantly, the efficacy and tolerability of ranolazine ER were not affected by old age and co-morbid conditions (heart failure or diabetes mellitus). Comparative trials of ranolazine ER with other antianginal agents and trials examining its effects on long-term morbidity and mortality in patients with ischemic heart disease are required to determine with greater certainty the place of the drug in current antianginal therapy. Nevertheless, ranolazine ER may well prove to be a useful alternative and adjunct to conventional hemodynamic antianginal therapy in the treatment of chronic stable angina.
Acetanilides↗
Reduced-antigen, combined diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine, adsorbed (Boostrix) US formulation): use as a single-dose booster immunization in adolescents aged 10-18 years.
black triangle Boostrix US formulation (hereafter referred to as Tdap) is a formulation of reduced-antigen, combined diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine, adsorbed onto aluminium approved in the US for use as a single-dose booster immunization in adolescents aged 10-18 years. The diphtheria and tetanus toxoid components of Tdap elicited serologic immune responses comparable to those induced by an approved diphtheria-tetanus (Td) booster vaccine in a large (n = 4114), randomized, observer-blind, multicenter, pivotal trial in US adolescents aged 10-18 years. In addition, antibody levels against pertussis antigens (pertussis toxoid, filamentous hemagglutinin, and pertactin) induced by Tdap were non-inferior to, and numerically higher than, those induced in infants who completed a three-dose primary immunization course with combined diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine (Infanrix), which conferred 89% protection against pertussis. Tdap had a similar reactogenicity profile, including solicited local reactions and general symptoms, to that of the approved Td vaccine in the pivotal US study. In particular, Tdap was similar (non-inferior) to Td with respect to the primary safety endpoint, namely the incidence of grade 3 pain at the injection site within the 15-day post-vaccination period. No serious adverse events of potential autoimmune origin or of a new-onset, chronic nature were reported during the 6-month post-vaccination period in the pivotal US study and a smaller (n = 319) German-based trial that also evaluated Tdap.
Adolescent↗
Oxaliplatin: in operable colorectal cancer.
Oxaliplatin is available in numerous countries for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (in conjunction with fluoropyrimidine therapy). The activity of oxaliplatin in advanced disease has led to investigation of its potential in operable disease. The addition of oxaliplatin to adjuvant therapy with fluorouracil and folinic acid (FOLFOX4 regimen) is associated with a significantly greater disease-free survival at 3 years (78% vs 73%; p = 0.002), according to results of the MOSAIC (Multicenter International Study of Oxaliplatin/5FU/Leucovorin [folinic acid] in the Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer) trial, a study in 2246 patients with stage II or III colon cancer. In addition, a 23% reduction in the risk of disease recurrence after surgery was seen with FOLFOX4 compared with fluorouracil/folinic acid in the MOSAIC trial. Results from several phase I/II studies suggest that the addition of oxaliplatin to preoperative radiochemotherapy may be of benefit in patients with locally advanced lower rectal cancer in terms of disease downstaging and sphincter preservation. Oxaliplatin was generally well tolerated in the MOSAIC trial and neuro- and myelotoxicity with FOLFOX4 were manageable.
Antineoplastic Agents↗