Biomedical subjects

Stuart Austin

Publications and source records attributed to Stuart Austin.

14 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Progressive segregation of the Escherichia coli chromosome.

We have followed the fate of 14 different loci around the Escherichia coli chromosome in living cells at slow growth rate using a highly efficient labelling system and automated measurements. Loci are segregated as they are replicated, but with a marked delay. Most markers segregate in a smooth temporal progression from origin to terminus. Thus, the overall pattern is one of continuous segregation during replication and is not consistent with recently published models invoking extensive sister chromosome cohesion followed by simultaneous segregation of the bulk of the chromosome. The terminus, and a region immediately clockwise from the origin, are exceptions to the overall pattern and are subjected to a more extensive delay prior to segregation. The origin region and nearby loci are replicated and segregated from the cell centre, later markers from the various positions where they lie in the nucleoid, and the terminus region from the cell centre. Segregation appears to leave one copy of each locus in place, and rapidly transport the other to the other side of the cell centre.

Cell Cycle↗

PubMed2005

Crystal structure of a SeqA-N filament: implications for DNA replication and chromosome organization.

Escherichia coli SeqA binds clusters of transiently hemimethylated GATC sequences and sequesters the origin of replication, oriC, from methylation and premature reinitiation. Besides oriC, SeqA binds and organizes newly synthesized DNA at replication forks. Binding to multiple GATC sites is crucial for the formation of stable SeqA-DNA complexes. Here we report the crystal structure of the oligomerization domain of SeqA (SeqA-N). The structural unit of SeqA-N is a dimer, which oligomerizes to form a filament. Mutations that disrupt filament formation lead to asynchronous DNA replication, but the resulting SeqA dimer can still bind two GATC sites separated from 5 to 34 base pairs. Truncation of the linker between the oligomerization and DNA-binding domains restricts SeqA to bind two GATC sites separated by one or two full turns. We propose a model of a SeqA filament interacting with multiple GATC sites that accounts for both origin sequestration and chromosome organization.

Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins↗

PubMed2005

Hda inactivation of DnaA is the predominant mechanism preventing hyperinitiation of Escherichia coli DNA replication.

Initiation of DNA replication from the Escherichia coli chromosomal origin is highly regulated, assuring that replication occurs precisely once per cell cycle. Three mechanisms for regulation of replication initiation have been proposed: titration of free DnaA initiator protein by the datA locus, sequestration of newly replicated origins by SeqA protein and regulatory inactivation of DnaA (RIDA), in which active ATP-DnaA is converted to the inactive ADP-bound form. DNA microarray analyses showed that the level of initiation in rapidly growing cells that lack datA was indistinguishable from that in wild-type cells, and that the absence of SeqA protein caused only a modest increase in initiation, in agreement with flow-cytometry data. In contrast, cells lacking Hda overinitiated replication twofold, implicating RIDA as the predominant mechanism preventing extra initiation events in a cell cycle.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

PubMed2005

Plasmid partition system of the P1par family from the pWR100 virulence plasmid of Shigella flexneri.

P1par family members promote the active segregation of a variety of plasmids and plasmid prophages in gram-negative bacteria. Each has genes for ParA and ParB proteins, followed by a parS partition site. The large virulence plasmid pWR100 of Shigella flexneri contains a new P1par family member: pWR100par. Although typical parA and parB genes are present, the putative pWR100parS site is atypical in sequence and organization. However, pWR100parS promoted accurate plasmid partition in Escherichia coli when the pWR100 Par proteins were supplied. Unique BoxB hexamer motifs within parS define species specificities among previously described family members. Although substantially different from P1parS from the P1 plasmid prophage of E. coli, pWR100parS has the same BoxB sequence. As predicted, the species specificity of the two types proved identical. They also shared partition-mediated incompatibility, consistent with the proposed mechanistic link between incompatibility and species specificity. Among several informative sequence differences between pWR100parS and P1parS is the presence of a 21-bp insert at the center of the pWR100parS site. Deletion of this insert left much of the parS activity intact. Tolerance of central inserts with integral numbers of helical DNA turns reflects the critical topology of these sites, which are bent by binding the host IHF protein.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2005

Species and incompatibility determination within the P1par family of plasmid partition elements.

The P1par family of active plasmid partition systems consists of at least six members, broadly distributed in a variety of plasmid types and bacterial genera. Each encodes two Par proteins and contains a cis-acting parS site. Individual par systems can show distinct species specificities; the proteins from one type cannot function with the parS site of another. P1par-versus-P7par specificity resides within two hexamer BoxB repeats encoded by parS that contact the ParB protein near the carboxy terminus. Here, we examine the species specificity differences between Yersinia pestis pMT1parS and Escherichia coli P1 and P7parS. pMT1parS site specificity could be altered to that of either P1 or P7 by point mutation changes in the BoxB repeats. Just one base change in a single BoxB repeat sometimes sufficed. The BoxB sequence appears to be able to adopt a number of forms that define exclusive interactions with different ParB species. The looped parS structure may facilitate this repertoire of interaction specificities. Different P1par family members have different partition-mediated incompatibility specificities. This property defines whether two related plasmids can coexist in the same cell and is important in promoting the evolution of new plasmid species. BoxB sequence changes that switch species specificity between P1, P7, and pMT1 species switched partition-mediated plasmid incompatibility in concert. Thus, there is a direct mechanistic link between species specificity and partition-mediated incompatibility, and the BoxB-ParB interaction can be regarded as a special mechanism for facilitating plasmid evolution.

Bacterial Proteins↗

PubMed2005

Surprising dependence on postsegregational killing of host cells for maintenance of the large virulence plasmid of Shigella flexneri.

Low-copy-number plasmids all encode multiple systems to ensure their propagation, including replication, partition (active segregation), and postsegregational killing (PSK) systems. PSK systems kill those rare cells that lose the plasmid due to replication or segregation errors. PSK systems should not be used as the principle means of maintaining the plasmid. The metabolic cost of killing the many cured cells that would arise from random plasmid segregation is far too high. Here we describe an interesting exception to this rule. Maintenance of the large virulence plasmid of Shigella flexneri is highly dependent on one of its PSK systems, mvp, at 37 degrees C, the temperature experienced during pathogenesis. At 37 degrees C, the plasmid is very unstable and mvp efficiently kills the resulting cured bacterial cells. This imposes a major growth disadvantage on the virulent bacterial population. The systems that normally ensure accurate plasmid replication and segregation are attenuated or overridden at 37 degrees C. At 30 degrees C, a temperature encountered by Shigella in the outside environment, the maintenance systems function normally and the plasmid is no longer dependent on mvp. We discuss why the virulent pathogen tolerates this self-destructive method of propagation at the temperature of infection.

Cell Division↗

PubMed2004

The role of Par proteins in the active segregation of the P1 plasmid.

The parS centromere-like site promotes active P1 plasmid segregation in the presence of P1 ParA and ParB proteins. At the modest growth rate used here, time-lapse and still photomicroscopy shows that the plasmid copies are clustered as a focus at the Escherichia coli cell centre. Just before cell division, the focus is actively divided and ejects bidirectionally into opposite halves of the dividing cell. In the absence of the wild-type parS binding protein ParB, a focus was formed, but generally did not go to the cell centre. The randomly placed focus did not divide and was inherited by one daughter cell only. In the absence of ParA, foci formed and frequently fixed to the cell centre. However, they failed to divide or eject and were left at the new cell pole of one cell at division. Thus, ParB appears to be required for recognition of the plasmid and its attachment to the cell centre, and ParA is required for focus division and energetic ejection from the cell centre. The ATPase active site mutation, parAK122E, blocked ejection. Mutant parAM314I ejected weakly, and the daughter foci took two generations to reach a new cell centre. This explains the novel alternation of segregation and missegregation in successive generations seen in time-lapse images of this mutant.

Bacterial Proteins↗

PubMed2004

Interplay between plasmid partition and postsegregational killing systems.

Active partition systems and postsegregational killing (PSK) systems are present together in naturally occurring low-copy-number plasmids. Theory suggests that PSK may act as the ultimate determinant of plasmid retention, whereas the partition system may minimize the growth penalty to the host, resulting in a near-ideal symbiosis when the systems combine. Here, we prove the validity of this principle for a specific case involving the P1par system and the mvp PSK system.

Cell Division↗

PubMed2003

Segregation of the Escherichia coli chromosome terminus.

We studied the segregation of the replication terminus of the Escherichia coli chromosome by time-lapse and still photomicroscopy. The replicated termini lie together at the cell centre. They rapidly segregate away from each other immediately before cell division. At fast growth rate, the copies move progressively and quickly toward the centres of the new-born cells. At slow growth rate, the termini usually remain near the inner cell pole and migrate to the cell centre in the middle of the cell cycle. A terminus domain of about 160kb, roughly centred on the dif recombination site, segregated as a unit at cell division. Sequences outside this domain segregated before division, giving two separate foci in predivision cells. Resolution of chromosome dimers via the terminus dif site requires the XerC recombinase and an activity of the FtsK protein that is thought to align the dif sequences at the cell centre. We found that anchoring of the termini at the cell centre and proper segregation at cell division occurred normally in the absence of recombination via the XerC recombinase. Anchoring and proper segregation were, however, frequently disrupted when the C-terminal domain of FtsK was truncated.

Base Sequence↗

PubMed2002

E.coli cell-cycle regulation by bacteriophage lambda.

We re-examined the old but surprising claim of Kourilsky and Knapp that transient expression of genes located downstream of the p(L) promoter of bacteriophage lambda can induce cell-cycle synchrony in a population of Escherichia coli cells. Although we were unable to reproduce a lasting synchrony, a cessation of division, followed by one or two fairly synchronous cell divisions was observed. This line up of the cell cycle was found to be due to two genetically separable events: a temporary block of cell division and, at the same time, a block to the initiation of new rounds of DNA replication. These blocks then release after about one mass doubling so that chromosome replication and cell division occur during a short time interval in all the cells in the population. The cell division block is a result of the transient expression of the lambda kil gene. The block to initiation of DNA replication requires a region that we term bin (blocks initiation) immediately upstream of the xis gene. The region consists of ea22 and ea8.5 and two small open reading frames (ORFs) that flank them. Deletion-substitution mutagenesis suggests that all four ORFs may be required for the initiation block. The ability of the phage to modify two aspects of the host cell cycle presumably reflects a stratagem that provides the phage with an advantage for lysogeny or lytic growth.

Bacterial Proteins↗

PubMed2002

The P1 plasmid in action: time-lapse photomicroscopy reveals some unexpected aspects of plasmid partition.

The prophage of bacteriophage P1 is a low copy number plasmid in Escherichia coli and is segregated to daughter cells by an active partition system. The dynamics of the partition process have now been successfully followed by time-lapse photomicroscopy. The process appears to be fundamentally different from that previously inferred from statistical analysis of fixed cells. A focus containing several plasmid copies is captured at the cell center. Immediately before cell division, the copies eject bi-directionally along the long axis of the cell. Cell division traps one or more plasmid copies in each daughter cell. These copies are free to move, associate, and disassociate. Later, they are captured to the new cell center to re-start the cycle. Studies with mutants suggest that the ability to segregate accurately at a very late stage in the cell cycle is dependent on a novel ability of the plasmid to control cell division. Should segregation be delayed, cell division is also delayed until segregation is successfully completed.

Bacteriophage P1↗

PubMed2002

The P1 plasmid is segregated to daughter cells by a 'capture and ejection' mechanism coordinated with Escherichia coli cell division.

The fate of the P1 plasmid of Escherichia coli was followed by time-lapse photomicroscopy. A GFP-ParB fusion marked the plasmid during partition (segregation) to daughter cells at slow growth rate. The process differs from that previously inferred from statistical analysis of fixed cells. A focus of plasmid copies is captured at the cell centre. Immediately before cell division, the copies eject bidirectionally along the long axis of the cell. Cell division traps one or more plasmid copies in each daughter. They are not directed to a prescribed position but are free to move, associate and disassociate. Later, they are captured to the new cell centre to restart the cycle. A null P1 par mutant associates to form a focus, but it is neither captured nor ejected. A dominant negative ParB protein forms a plasmid focus that attaches to the cell centre but never ejects. It remains captive at the centre and blocks host cell division. The cells elongate. Eventually the intact focus is pushed to one side and the cells divide simultaneously in several places at the same time. This suggests that the wild-type plasmid imposes a regulatory node on the host cell cycle, preventing cell division until its own segregation is completed.

Bacterial Proteins↗

PubMed2002

The segregation of the Escherichia coli origin and terminus of replication.

Escherichia coli chromosome replication forks are tethered to the cell centre. Two opposing models describe how the chromosomes segregate. In the extrusion-capture model, newly replicated DNA is fed bi-directionally from the forks toward the cell poles, forming new chromosomes in each cell half. Starting with the origins, chromosomal regions segregate away from their sisters progressively as they are replicated. The termini segregate last. In the sister chromosome cohesion model, replication produces sister chromosomes that are paired along much of their length. The origins and most other chromosomal regions remain paired until late in the replication cycle, and all segregate together. We use a combination of microscopy and flow cytometry to determine the relationship of origin and terminus segregation to the cell cycle. Origin segregation frequently follows closely after initiation, in strong support of the extrusion-capture model. The spatial disposition of the origin and terminus sequences also fits this model. Terminus segregation occurs extremely late in the cell cycle as the daughter cells separate. As the septum begins to invaginate, the termini of the completed sister chromosomes are transiently held apart at the cell centre, on opposite sides of the cell. This may facilitate the resolution of topological linkages between the chromosomes.

Base Sequence↗

PubMed2002

Transcriptional interference by a complex formed at the centromere-like partition site of plasmid P1.

The partition site, parS, promotes accurate segregation of the replicated P1 plasmid to daughter cells when the P1-encoded ParA and ParB proteins are supplied. The parS site was inserted into the Escherichia coli chromosome between the promoter and the structural gene for beta-galactosidase, lacZ. There was little interference with lacZ expression when ParA and ParB were supplied in trans. However, when a mutant ParA protein, ParAM314I, was supplied along with ParB, expression of lacZ was shut down. ParAM314I, ParB, and parS appear to form a nucleoprotein complex that blocks transcription. Mutations in parA and parB that relieved the parAM314I-dependent block were found. In addition, new mutations which impose the block were selected. Five of the latter mapped to parA and one to parB; all had a propagation-defective phenotype (Par(PD)) similar to that of parAM314I. Thus, whereas a null par mutant P1 plasmid segregates its DNA randomly, these mutants prevent even random distribution of the plasmid. We propose that ParA protein normally interacts transiently with the ParB-parS complex for partition to proceed but that the mutations block ParA dissociation. This "permanent" ParA-ParB-parS complex acts as a transcription block. Consistent with this hypothesis, we found that three of the seven blocking mutations lie within regions of ParA and ParB that are known to interact with each other. When the transcription block is imposed, regional silencing of nearby genes occurs. However, the requirement for ParA and a mutant parA or parB allele distinguishes the transcription block from the regional ParB-dependent gene silencing previously described.

Bacterial Proteins↗