Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Steven J Berberich

Publications and source records attributed to Steven J Berberich.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Effects of brief cutaneous JP-8 jet fuel exposures on time course of gene expression in the epidermis.

The jet fuel jet propulsion fuel 8 (JP-8) has been shown to cause an inflammatory response in the skin, which is characterized histologically by erythema, edema, and hyperplasia. Studies in laboratory animal skin and cultured keratinocytes have identified a variety of changes in protein levels related to inflammation, oxidative damage, apoptosis, and cellular growth. Most of these studies have focused on prolonged exposures and subsequent effects. In an attempt to understand the earliest responses of the skin to JP-8, we have investigated changes in gene expression in the epidermis for up to 8 h after a 1-h cutaneous exposure in rats. After exposure, we separated the epidermis from the rest of the skin with a cryotome and isolated total mRNA. Gene expression was studied with microarray techniques, and changes from sham treatments were analyzed and characterized. We found consistent twofold increases in gene expression of 27 transcripts at 1, 4, and 8 h after the beginning of the 1-h exposure that were related primarily to structural proteins, cell signaling, inflammatory mediators, growth factors, and enzymes. Analysis of pathways changed showed that several signaling pathways were increased at 1 h and that the most significant changes at 8 h were in metabolic pathways, many of which were downregulated. These results confirm and expand many of the previous molecular studies with JP-8. Based on the 1-h changes in gene expression, we hypothesize that the trigger of the JP-8-induced, epidermal stress response is a physical disruption of osmotic, oxidative, and membrane stability which activates gene expression in the signaling pathways and results in the inflammatory, apoptotic, and growth responses that have been previously identified.

Administration, Cutaneous↗

Altered gene expression induced by ionizing radiation and glycolytic inhibitor 2-deoxy-glucose in a human glioma cell line: implications for radio sensitization.

The glycolytic inhibitor 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) has been shown to enhance the cell death induced by radiation and other DNA damaging agents selectively in cells with high rates of glycolysis, like cancer cells. While energy linked modification of DNA and cellular repair processes have been suggested as possible mechanisms of sensitization, other effects such as global stress response cannot be excluded. In this pilot study, we have investigated the effect of 2-DG and radiation on the transcriptome in an attempt to elucidate how 2-DG impacts gene expression in undamaged verses irradiation (IR) damaged cells using a human malignant glioma cell line, U-87. Exponentially growing U-87 cells were exposed to various combinations of 2-DG and X-rays and total RNA was isolated four hours after exposure. Gene expression changes were elucidated using Affymetrix GeneChips. As expected, U-87 cells treated with 2-DG showed activation of several endoplasmic reticulum stress response genes. Selective RT-PCR and Western blotting confirmed these gene alterations. Given that glucose deprivation leads to p53 activation and 2-DG led to activation of p53 response genes in our present study (e.g., PMAIP1 and GADD45A), we examined the impact of transient p53 knockdown and observed that induction of PMAIP1 and GADD45A appear to be via p53-independent mechanisms. The majority of gene alterations seen with IR-treatment alone were consistent with previous reports. While most gene alterations seen with 2-DG and IR dual treatment were confirmed in the gene profiles seen with individual (2-DG or IR) treatments, several genes appeared differentially regulated between IR and 2-DG (e.g., DUSP8, IL8, GADD45B). Additionally, gene expression patterns suggested alterations in cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, and cytokine signaling pathways. Taken together, this study provides new insights into how the transcriptome of tumor cells are likely to be affected by a combined stress caused by IR and 2-DG.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗

MdmX inhibits ARF mediated Mdm2 sumoylation.

Mdm2, by virtue of an intrinsic E3 ubiquitin ligase activity, is capable of autoubiquitination and the ubiquitination of the p53 tumor suppressor protein. Additionally, Hdm2 has been reported to undergo a p14ARF-dependent sumoylation with concurrent Hdm2 stabilization. In this present work, we report that MdmX can undergo ARF-mediated sumoylation similar to that reported for Mdm2. When coexpressed, MdmX overexpression results in a dose-dependent inhibition of Mdm2 sumoylation and a concurrent increase in Mdm2 ubiquitination. This switch from Mdm2 sumoylation to Mdm2 ubiquitination may explain the destablization of Mdm2 previously observed in cells overexpressing both ARF and MdmX. Given that MdmX can heterodimerize with Mdm2 and separately associate with ARF we employed a series of MdmX mutants to examine how MdmX blocks Mdm2 sumoylation. A MdmX miniprotein capable of binding to ARF, but not p53 or Mdm2 was able to competitively inhibit Mdm2 sumoylation and reverse ARF mediated activation of p53 transactivation. Taken together, these results demonstrate that MdmX can affect post-translational modification and stability of Mdm2 and p53 activity through interaction with ARF.

Blotting, Western↗

MdmX represses E2F1 transactivation.

Based on knockout mouse studies, Mdm2 and MdmX have been identified as critical regulators of the p53 tumor suppressor protein, at least during early development. While many of the functions attributed to Mdm2 and MdmX involve p53 and overexpression of each gene appears to have oncogenic activities, a number of studies have suggested that each protein also possesses p53-independent functions. While examining the effect of Mdm2 overexpression on E2F1 transactivation we uncovered a novel MdmX function, the ability to inhibit E2F1 transactivation in a p53 and Mdm2 independent manner. Using a series of MdmX deletion mutants the central region of MdmX, amino acids 128-444 appears to possess the repressive domain. While an in vivo association of MdmX with either E2F1 or DP1 was not observed, a slight reduction in DP1 and an increased cytoplasmic localization of E2F1 were seen in cells overexpressing MdmX. These results suggest that elevated MdmX expression may repress E2F1-regulated genes like p14ARF and thus represent another regulatory mechanism in the Rb-p53 signaling pathway.

Blotting, Western↗

Overexpression of Mdm2 and MdmX fusion proteins alters p53 mediated transactivation, ubiquitination, and degradation.

Mdm2 and MdmX function as cellular regulators of the p53 tumor suppressor protein. Mdm2, a p53 inducible protein, negatively regulates p53 by inhibiting p53 transcriptional activity and promoting ubiquitin mediated proteasome degradation. The Mdm2 ring finger domain has been shown to possess E3 ligase activity and to be a necessary domain for targeting p53 degradation. MdmX, a p53 binding protein sharing a high degree of structural homology with Mdm2, has emerged as another negative regulator of the p53 tumor suppressor. MdmX has also been shown to block p53 transactivation but unlike Mdm2 cannot induce p53 degradation. Since MdmX also possesses a ring finger domain that allows MdmX to associate with Mdm2, this study focused on elucidating how the ring and zinc fingers of these two proteins affected p53 function. We have generated a series of fusion proteins between Mdm2 and MdmX by swapping the ring finger domains with or without the zinc finger domains and examined how these fusions regulated p53 induced transactivation, ubiquitination, and degradation. All fusions inhibited the transcriptional activity of p53. In the absence of Mdm2, none of the fusion proteins could trigger p53 ubiquitination or degradation. However, in a cell line with endogenous Hdm2, Mdm2:X fusions containing the ring finger domain with or without the zinc finger domain demonstrated p53 ubiquitination presumably through stabilization of Hdm2. Additionally, an Mdm2:XZFRF fusion also degraded p53 when endogenous Hdm2 was present. Results from immunofluorescence studies suggest that p53 is colocalized to the cytoplasm when coexpressed with a Mdm2:X fusion (Mdm2:XZFRF) and that this fusion is capable of stabilizing endogenous Hdm2. Since none of the fusions triggered p53 ubiquitination in cells lacking Mdm2, these results indicate that the E3 ligase domain within the ring finger of Mdm2 when part of MdmX and the MdmX ring finger fused to Mdm2 were not sufficient to trigger p53 ubiquitination, in vivo.

Animals↗

MdmX inhibits Smad transactivation.

Mdm2 overexpression confers a growth promoting activity upon cells primarily by downregulating the p53 tumor suppressor protein. Nevertheless, Mdm2 deregulation has also been implicated in inhibiting TGF-beta growth repression in a p53 independent manner. Our goal in this study was to examine whether overexpression of Mdm2 or MdmX, a Mdm2-related protein, could affect Smad-induced transactivation. As downstream signaling elements of the TGF-beta pathway, Smads represent one potential target for Mdm2 and MdmX. Here we show that MdmX but not Mdm2 is capable of inhibiting Smad induced transactivation. Based on deletion mutant analysis, MdmX inhibition of Smad transactivation was independent of the p53 and Mdm2 interaction domains, yet required amino acid residues 128-444. Using TGF-beta sensitive HepG2 cells, MdmX overexpression was shown to inhibit TGF-beta induced Smad transactivation. Additionally, mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) lacking p53 and MdmX showed enhanced Smad transactivation when compared to MEFs lacking either p53 or p53 and Mdm2. Interestingly, the inhibition of Smad transactivation by MdmX could be reversed by p300, a functional co-activator of Smads and a necessary factor for Mdm2 nuclear export and did not result from altered Smad localization. In vitro studies demonstrate that MdmX binds to p300 as well as Smad3 and Smad4. Taken together, these results suggest that inhibition of Smad-induced transactivation by MdmX occurs by altering Smad interaction with its coactivator p300.

Animals↗

Mdm2 inhibition of p53 induces E2F1 transactivation via p21.

The transcription factor E2F1 functions as a key regulator for both cell-cycle progression and apoptosis. Mdm2, a major cellular regulator of the p53 tumor suppressor protein, is also closely involved in cell cycle and apoptosis. In addition to regulation of p53, Mdm2 has been reported to stimulate E2F1 transactivation by a mechanism that remains unclear. Here we examined how overexpression of Mdm2 alters E2F1/DP1 transactivation. Using a set of cell lines with differing p53 and Rb status we determined that Mdm2 induction of E2F1 transactivation was p53-dependent, resulting from release of repression by p53. While Mdm2 association with p53 was required to increase E2F1 transactivation, Mdm2 mediated degradation of p53 was not. p53 repression of E2F1 transactivation required a functional DNA binding and transactivation domain. Consistent with Mdm2 activation of E2F1 via an inhibition of p53 transactivation we demonstrate a concomitant reduction in p21 protein levels with Mdm2 overexpression. Furthermore, E2F1 repression by an Rb-phosphorylation mutant could not be reversed by Mdm2 overexpression. Mdm2 was also unable to enhance E2F1 transactivation in Mouse embryo fibroblasts lacking p21. Taken together, these results suggest that Mdm2 activation of E2F1 occurs through the repression of p53-dependent transcription of p21, a p53-target gene and cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor.

Apoptosis↗