Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Steven G Silverberg

Publications and source records attributed to Steven G Silverberg.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Comparison of human papillomavirus genotypes, sexual, and reproductive risk factors of cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma: Northeastern United States.

OBJECTIVE: Although human papillomavirus causes essentially all cervical carcinoma, cofactors may differ by cancer histologic type. We examined human papillomavirus genotypes and sexual and reproductive risk factors for cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred twenty-four women with adenocarcinoma, 139 women with squamous cell carcinoma, and 307 control subjects participated in this case-control study. Logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate odds ratios and CIs. RESULTS: Human papillomavirus 18 was associated most strongly with adenocarcinoma (odds ratio, 105; 95% CI, 23-487). Human papillomavirus 16 was associated most strongly with squamous cell carcinoma (odds ratio, 30; 95% CI, 12-77). More than three lifetime sexual partners was a risk factor for adenocarcinoma (odds ratio, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-4.0) and squamous cell carcinoma (odds ratio, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.6-5.9). Even being pregnant was associated inversely with adenocarcinoma (odds ratio, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.8). Five or more pregnancies was associated with squamous cell carcinoma (odds ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 0.9-5.4). CONCLUSION: The relative importance of human papillomavirus genotypes 16 and 18 and the reproductive co-factor differences suggest distinct causes for cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

Proposal of a new scoring scheme for the diagnosis of noninvasive endocervical glandular lesions.

The differential diagnosis of endocervical glandular lesions can be very difficult, and the interobserver agreement on borderline cases can be low. We are proposing a new scoring system to aid in the reproducibility of the diagnosis of noninvasive endocervical glandular lesions. The total of 67 diagnostically difficult cases were independently reviewed by five pathologists. After the completion of the first round review, a consensus diagnosis was reached for each lesion by all participants. This consensus diagnosis was used as the reference diagnosis. According to the consensus, the lesions included 21 benign/reactive conditions, 7 endocervical glandular dysplasias, and 39 adenocarcinomas in situ. During the second round review, all cases were assessed using the new scoring scheme, according to which separate scores from 0 to 3 were given to each lesion for: 1) nuclear atypia, 2) stratification, and 3) sum of mitoses/apoptoses (counted in the two most active glands, and the average number used). These three scores were then added to result in the total score (0-3 = benign; 4-5 = endocervical glandular dysplasia; 6-9 = adenocarcinoma in situ). Complete agreement between all observers in the first round review was seen in 35 of 67 cases (52.2%), kappa = 0.565. This agreement improved in the second round with the use of the scoring scheme: 52 of 67 cases (77.6%), kappa = 0.705. If the benign and endocervical glandular dysplasia diagnostic categories were combined, the overall agreement in the second round review would be 63 of 67 cases (94%), meaning that the scheme affords accurate distinction between adenocarcinoma in situ and lesser lesions. We propose applying this new scoring scheme to the diagnosis of noninvasive endocervical glandular lesions to improve interobserver agreement. The use of this scheme will result in more consistency of data in series from different institutions and will allow uniformity on the issue of adenocarcinoma in situ precursor lesions.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

Symposium part 3: Should pathologists diagnose endocervical preneoplastic lesions "less than" adenocarcinoma in situ?: Point.

The insufficient state of knowledge concerning the biology of endocervical glandular lesions is compounded by the lack of universal diagnostic criteria for recognizing endocervical glandular dysplasia. This study addressed the issue of diagnostic reproducibility of noninvasive endocervical glandular lesions and tested the proposed new scoring scheme designed to improve this reproducibility. We have shown that the application of this scheme has significantly improved interobserver agreement in all diagnostic categories. Moreover, the results of this study lend support to the recommendation not to diagnose endocervical glandular dysplasia in the clinical setting, although this category can be still reliably separated out for research purposes. Application of our scoring scheme will bring uniformity to the diagnosis of noninvasive endocervical glandular lesions and allow the study of a precursor to endocervical adenocarcinoma

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

Mitotic activity and apoptosis in endocervical glandular lesions.

To evaluate the significance of mitotic activity and apoptosis in the differential diagnosis of endocervical glandular lesions, we examined the frequency of mitoses and apoptosis in 89 endocervical glandular lesions from 78 patients, which consisted of benign reactive changes (7 cases), lobular or diffuse laminar endocervical glandular hyperplasia (4), microglandular hyperplasia (3), tunnel clusters (7), nabothian cysts (2), mesonephric remnants (3), tubal metaplasia (3), endocervical glandular dysplasias (including atypical tubal metaplasia) (EGD) (7), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) (31), microinvasive adenocarcinoma (7), frankly invasive adenocarcinoma (12), and minimal deviation adenocarcinoma (3). Mitotic index (MI; mitotic figures per 1000 cells) was significantly higher in AIS, microinvasive adenocarcinoma, and frankly invasive adenocarcinoma than any other lesions examined. Microinvasive adenocarcinoma showed the highest MI. Apoptosis was detected consistently and frequently in AIS, microinvasive adenocarcinoma, and frankly invasive adenocarcinoma. AIS showed the highest apoptotic index (AI; apoptoses per 1000 cells). Frequent apoptotic bodies and mitotic figures are a common feature of endocervical glandular malignancies (except for minimal deviation adenocarcinoma) and are an important feature that can facilitate their differentiation from benign and borderline lesions. High MI in microinvasive adenocarcinoma might aid the distinction of microinvasive adenocarcinoma from AIS. Although both MI and AI of EGD were between those of benign reactive changes and of AIS, MI and AI alone are not sufficient to differentiate EGD from benign reactive changes. MI and AI are not helpful in the differential diagnosis between minimal deviation adenocarcinoma and its benign mimics.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

Immunohistochemical staining in the distinction between primary endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinomas: another viewpoint.

Several studies have reported on the use of antibodies to monoclonal carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and vimentin (VIM) to distinguish between adenocarcinomas of endometrial (EM) and endocervical (EC) origin, with variably enthusiastic results. It is still unclear whether site of origin or pathway of differentiation (endometrioid [em] versus mucinous [m]) is more important in predicting immunohistochemical differences. In the present study, paraffin blocks from adenocarcinomas of known origin were retrieved and immunostained with monoclonal antibodies to VIM and CEA, as well as cytokeratins (CK) 4, 18, and 20, estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PR). Positivity was scored on a scale from 0 to 12, with emphasis on the pattern of differentiation (tumors with mixed patterns received separate scores for the em and m foci). Mean CEA scores for emEM (n = 27), mEM (17), mEC (10), and emEC (6) were 0.4, 0.9, 5.1, and 1.2, respectively. VIM scores were 6.9, 1.3, 0, 4.4; ER, 5.7, 4.2, 0, 1.6; PR, 7.6, 2.8, 0.1, 6.0; CK4, 9.2, 4.4, 8.5, 10.6; CK18, 6.4, 3.4, 5.5, 8.4; CK20, 0.7, 0, 0.5, 0.4. Both site and differentiation influenced these results, with the latter more important for VIM and PR, the former for ER, both for CEA (only mEC was frequently strongly positive), and neither for the CKs studied. No one stain or combination reliably distinguished endometrial from endocervical origin. The only immunostaining pattern that might identify a site of origin with more accuracy than hematoxylin & eosin evaluation alone is the combination of high VIM and ER scores in an endometrioid carcinoma, suggesting with about 95% accuracy in this series an endometrial origin of the tumor.

Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous↗