Biomedical subjects

Stephen R Arnott

Publications and source records attributed to Stephen R Arnott.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Distorting visual space with sound.

Attentional repulsion is described as the perceived displacement of a vernier stimulus in a direction that is opposite to a brief peripheral visual cue (Suzuki & Cavanagh, 1997). Here, we demonstrate that visual repulsion can also be elicited using lateralized sounds. Given that repulsion is believed to be occurring in early retinotopic visual areas, these results raise the possibility that the location of a sound could directly influence the pattern of activity as early as primary visual cortex.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2005

The functional organization of auditory working memory as revealed by fMRI.

Spatial and nonspatial auditory tasks preferentially recruit dorsal and ventral brain areas, respectively. However, the extent to which these auditory differences reflect specific aspects of mental processing has not been directly studied. In the present functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment, participants encoded and maintained either the location or the identity of a sound for a delay period of several seconds and then subsequently compared that information with a second sound. Relative to sound localization, sound identification was associated with greater hemodynamic activity in the left rostral superior temporal gyrus. In contrast, localizing sounds recruited greater activity in the parietal cortex, posterior temporal lobe, and superior frontal sulcus. The identification differences were most prominent during the early stage of the trial, whereas the location differences were most evident during the late (i.e., comparison) stage. Accordingly, our results suggest that auditory spatial and identity dissociations as revealed by functional imaging may be dependent to some degree on the type of processing being carried out. In addition, dorsolateral prefrontal and lateral superior parietal areas showed greater activity during the comparison as opposed to the earlier stage of the trial, regardless of the type of auditory task, consistent with results from visual working memory studies.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Assessing the auditory dual-pathway model in humans.

Evidence from anatomical and neurophysiological studies in nonhuman primates suggests a dual-pathway model of auditory processing wherein sound identity and sound location information are segregated along ventral and dorsal streams, respectively. The present meta-analysis reviewed evidence from auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) studies to determine the reliability of this model in humans. Activation coordinates from 11 "spatial" studies (i.e., listeners made localization judgements on sounds that could occur at two or more perceptually different positions) and 27 "nonspatial" studies (i.e., listeners completed nonspatial tasks involving sounds presented from the same location) were entered into the analysis. All but one of the spatial studies reported activation within the inferior parietal lobule as opposed to only 41% of the nonspatial studies. In addition, 55% of spatial studies reported activity around the superior frontal sulcus as opposed to only 7% of the nonspatial studies. In comparison, inferior frontal activity (Brodmann's areas 45 and 47) was reported in only 9% of the spatial studies, but in 56% of the nonspatial studies. Finally, almost all temporal lobe activity observed during spatial tasks was confined to posterior areas, whereas nonspatial activity was distributed throughout the temporal lobe. These results support an auditory dual-pathway model in humans in which nonspatial sound information (e.g., sound identity) is processed primarily along the ventral stream whereas sound location is processed along the dorsal stream and areas posterior to primary auditory cortex.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Stepping out of the spotlight: MMN attenuation as a function of distance from the attended location.

In this report we present neurophysiological evidence that spatial separation between attended and unattended sound sources influences a listener's ability to register changes in sounds presented outside the focus of attention. Standard and deviant stimuli were presented at three azimuth locations. Participants were asked to press a key whenever they heard a deviant at a designated location. Mismatch negativity waves were generated for deviants at the attended location and were attenuated for deviants occurring 30 degrees away from the attended location. Mismatch negativities were not observed at distances of 60 degrees or more. The results are consistent with a spotlight model of auditory attention in which the processing of stimuli outside the attentional focus is attenuated as a function of increasing distance from the focus.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2002

Effects of perceptual context on event-related brain potentials during auditory spatial attention.

The effects of auditory spatial attention on event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were examined in situations that promoted stream segregation. Short and long noise bursts were presented at three azimuth locations and listeners were asked to respond to the longer sounds occurring at either the right- or left-most location. In the baseline condition, the three sound sources were evenly spaced apart. In the distractor clustering conditions, middle and far sounds were clustered. In the attended clustering conditions, middle and attended sounds were clustered. ERP indices of attention, isolated as negative difference (Nd) waves, were greater over the hemisphere contralateral to the attended location. Nd waves were also larger when the middle sounds were moved toward the far distractors, consistent with an object-based gradient of auditory attention in which higher order information provided by the perceptual context influences selective processing.

Acoustic Stimulation↗