I've sold my sport-utility vehicle.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Stephen B Hanauer.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Mesalamine has a well-established role in the management of ulcerative colitis. However, its role in the management of Crohn's disease (CD) is less clear. Studies evaluating its therapeutic value in CD have produced both positive and negative results. Meta-analyses have not clarified the situation, possibly because they have combined studies of different design. This debate critically examines the evidence for and against the use of mesalamine in CD.
BACKGROUND: The aminosalicylates remain foundation therapy for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. Pro-drug 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA; mesalamine) formulations have been developed to prevent 5-ASA from the proximal absorption and release of mesalamine, to decrease inflammation, and to improve colonic absorption. Clinically, pro-drugs such as olsalazine have been associated with dose-dependent diarrhea, which was likely secondary to ileal secretion induced by the azo linkages, in 17% of patients. The present study tested the hypothesis that the use of all compounds with azo linkages leads to increased secretion. METHODS: Intestinal tissue was randomly assigned to serve as controls or to receive brush border addition of equimolar concentrations of the compounds, and the change in short-circuit current was measured. RESULTS: Mesalamine did not induce secretion at any dose. Mean equivalent doses (0.1 to 10 mM) of balsalazide (range, 6.3 +/- 1.5 to 16.7 +/- 1.3 microA/cm2), olsalazine (range, 2.0 +/- 1.0 to 7.0 +/- 2.1 microA/cm2), and sulfasalazine (3.2 +/- 1.1 to 6.2 +/- 1.5 microA/cm2) significantly stimulated (P < 0.001) secretion. The values for the effective dose that is half the maximal dose for secretion induced by sulfasalazine, olsalazine, and balsalazide were 0.4, 0.7, and 0.9 mM, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to demonstrate that the use of pro-drugs with azo bonds leads to increased ileal secretion at equimolar concentrations of 5-ASA. Physicians should use caution when providing higher doses of the pro-drug forms of 5-ASA to their patients, as this could lead to increased diarrhea.
Successful clinical trials in inflammatory bowel disease are based on precise definitions of study populations, standardized and well-defined interventions, reliable indices of disease activity, and clearly stipulated outcome measures. Interpretation of research results is often complicated by the differentiation of goals of therapy (remission induction and maintenance, quality of life) and the multitude of patient subsets. Choosing the correct patient subtype to enroll in a clinical trial is critical to the results of a study, its conclusions, and its applicability to the clinical setting. Validated, easy-to-use disease activity indices allow interpretation of results across trials. The use of biomarkers as surrogate clinical endpoints provides reproducibility, ease of statistical handling as a continuous variable, and consistent measurement of response to treatment. Despite these potential advantages, biomarkers of disease activity lack specificity and will need to be validated against clinically meaningful outcomes. Careful subject selection, standardization of disease activity indices, and precise outcome measurement are the keys to continued improvement of the inflammatory bowel disease research process.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Preliminary data have shown that delayed release oral mesalamine (Asacol) dosed at 4.8 g/day provided additional efficacy benefit compared to 1.6 g/day in patients with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis. Additionally, Asacol dosed at 2.4 g/day has been proved to be more effective than 1.6 g/day. Whether 4.8 g/day of mesalamine (dosed with an investigational 800 mg tablet) is more effective than Asacol 2.4 g/day (dosed with a 400 mg tablet) in patients with moderately active ulcerative colitis is unknown. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial (ASCEND II) was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of 4.8 g/day of mesalamine in adults with active ulcerative colitis. Three hundred eighty-six patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis were randomized for treatment with mesalamine 2.4 g/day (400 mg tablet) or 4.8 g/day (800 mg tablet) for 6 wk. The primary efficacy population was 268 patients with moderately active ulcerative colitis treated with 2.4 g/day (n = 139) or 4.8 g/day (n = 129). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in each treatment group that achieved overall improvement ("treatment success," defined as either complete remission or a clinical response to therapy) from baseline at week 6. RESULTS: Seventy-two percent of patients receiving 4.8 g/day of mesalamine for moderate ulcerative colitis (89/124 patients) achieved treatment success at week 6, compared with 59% of those who received 2.4 g/day (77/130 patients) (p= 0.036). Both regimens were well tolerated. Adverse events and clinically significant changes in laboratory results were similar in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with moderately active ulcerative colitis treated with 4.8 g/day of mesalamine (800 mg tablet) are significantly more likely to achieve overall improvement at 6 wk compared to patients treated with 2.4 g/day.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral budesonide for maintenance of remission in patients with mild to moderately active Crohn's disease (CD) of the ileum and/or ascending colon. METHODS: Four double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with identical protocols were combined according to a predetermined analysis plan. Three hundred eighty patients with CD in medically induced remission (CD activity index [CDAI]< or =150) were randomized to receive oral budesonide 3 mg, 6 mg, or placebo daily for 12 months. The primary outcome measure was time to relapse (increase in CDAI of 60 points above baseline and >150). RESULTS: The median time to relapse was 268, 170, and 154 days for budesonide 6 mg, budesonide 3 mg, and placebo groups, respectively (p= 0.0072). The frequency of adverse events and glucocorticosteroid side effects were similar in all groups. CONCLUSION: Budesonide 6 mg/day is effective for prolonging time to relapse and for significantly reducing rates of relapse at 3 and 6 months but not 12 months in patients with CD in medically induced remission.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The role of the aminosalicylates for induction therapy of mild moderate ulcerative colitis and as maintenance treatment has been substantiated by a large series of controlled clinical trials and confirmatory meta-analyses. Both sulfasalazine and newer derivatives are effective in preventing relapses. It remains to be determined whether certain high-risk groups of patients may benefit from higher doses of mesalamine induction or maintenance therapy. Mesalamine derivatives are also of benefit in the treatment of Crohn's disease. Sulfasalazine is likely not effective in the maintenance of Crohn's disease, although other mesalamine formulations continue to show some prophylactic activity after mesalamine induced remissions and for patients with disease of the ileum who have undergone surgical resection.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of the efficacy results from 3 placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trials of slow-release mesalamine (Pentasa) for the acute treatment of mild to moderate Crohn's disease. METHODS: Three trials fulfilled the selection criteria (double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized studies in adult patients treated with Pentasa 4 g/day for active Crohn's disease). The efficacy and safety was evaluated in these trials by using the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) as the primary efficacy variable. The study duration was 16 weeks in all 3 trials. The total numbers of patients were 304 in the Pentasa 4-g/day treatment groups and 311 in the placebo groups. A meta-analysis was performed based on the study reports. RESULTS: For the intent-to-treat patients in the Pentasa groups, the overall mean reduction of the CDAI from baseline to the final visit was -63 points. The corresponding CDAI change in the placebo groups was -45 points; the net difference was -18 points. Compared with placebo, the 4-g/day dose of Pentasa was associated with a statistically significant overall improvement in the CDAI from baseline to the final visit (P = 0.04). When the meta-analysis was restricted to protocol correct patients, the effect of Pentasa became more pronounced (overall mean reduction of -83 CDAI points; P = 0.02, compared with placebo). Contrary to the consistent effects with Pentasa, the trial-specific reductions of the CDAI with placebo differed significantly between the trials. CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis of 3 large, double-blind, randomized studies in the treatment of active Crohn's disease confirms that Pentasa 4 g/day is superior to placebo in reducing the CDAI but the clinical significance of the magnitude of this difference is not clear.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The effect of different treatment regimens on antibody responses to infliximab and their clinical significance was examined by using data from ACCENT I. METHODS: Patients with Crohn's disease (n = 573) received 5 mg/kg infliximab (week 0) and then were randomly assigned to blinded infusions at weeks 2 and 6 and every 8 weeks until week 46 of placebo (group I), 5 mg/kg infliximab (group II), or 5 mg/kg infliximab at weeks 2 and 6, followed by 10 mg/kg thereafter (group III). At week 14 or later, patients losing response could cross over to episodic infliximab treatment increased by 5 mg/kg. Samples for antibody determination were collected before the first infusion and at weeks 14, 22, 54, 62, 72, and, if applicable, before and after crossover. RESULTS: Through week 72, antibodies to infliximab were detected in 30%, 10%, and 7% of groups I, II, and III, respectively (P < 0.0001). Patients receiving immunomodulators had a lower incidence of antibodies compared with patients receiving infliximab alone (10% and 18%, respectively; P = 0.02). Antibodies were associated with a 12% absolute increase in infusion reactions but no increase in serious infusion reactions or serum sickness-like reactions. In the overall population, similar proportions of antibody-positive and antibody-negative patients achieved clinical response (64% and 62%, respectively; P = NS) or clinical remission (41% and 39%, respectively; P = NS) at week 54. Notably, 86% of patients responded to retreatment, and 63% were in clinical response at week 54; however, fewer antibody-positive group I patients attained clinical remission (31%) compared with those who were antibody negative (37%) or antibody inconclusive (54%) (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced antibody formation and greater clinical benefit were observed with an induction regimen followed by maintenance treatment compared with a single dose followed by episodic retreatment in Crohn's disease patients treated with infliximab.
Evidence is accumulating that both genetic and environmental factors contribute to ulcerative colitis. The most consistent genetic associations have been shown for the MHC locus HLA Class II alleles, but the interleukin-1 family of genes and the multidrug resistance gene MDR1 have also been implicated as genetic susceptibility factors for the development of disease. In addition, there is a relationship between ulcerative colitis and bacterial flora, with an increased number of adherent Bacteroides spp. and Enterobacteriaceae spp. present in inflamed bowel segments. Conversely, cigarette smoking and appendectomy have both been shown to protect against the development of ulcerative colitis. Despite our improved understanding of the genetics and inflammatory mechanisms that underpin this disease, however, the etiology and pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis remain undefined. The diagnosis of ulcerative colitis is being aided by recent advances in diagnostic strategies, including the detection of fecal and serologic markers and the use of wireless capsule endoscopy, but, in the absence of a pathognomonic marker, the definition of this disease remains based on well-established clinical, endoscopic and histologic criteria. In particular, it is difficult to discriminate ulcerative colitis from other forms of colitis, including Crohn's disease, and there seems to be a growing overlap of pathophysiologic processes between ulcerative colitis and post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome. Patients who remain indeterminate between ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease also continue to be a diagnostic challenge.
BACKGROUND: A 34-year-old gravid woman with a history of ileal Crohn's disease presented at 30 weeks' gestation with a 2-week history of fever and right upper quadrant pain. An intra-abdominal abscess was suspected. Ultrasound and MRI failed to demonstrate the suspected abscess. Owing to ongoing pain and fever, the risk to the fetus of a CT scan were discussed with the patient, obstetricians and radiologists, with considerable debate about the possibility of other explanations for her symptoms. Ultimately, a CT scan revealed marked thickening of the distal ileum and confirmed diagnosis of an abscess in continuity with the inflamed bowel. INVESTIGATIONS: Ultrasound, MRI, CT scan, urinalysis, urine culture and liver function tests. DIAGNOSIS: Crohn's disease flare complicated by an intra-abdominal abscess. MANAGEMENT: Antibiotics (ceftizoxime, metronidazole and amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium), parenteral nutrition and ileocecectomy.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: This analysis of Crohn's disease patients treated with infliximab in ACCENT I compared episodic and scheduled treatment strategies under conditions that simulate clinical practice. METHODS: After 5 mg/kg infliximab at week 0, 573 patients were randomized to infusions at weeks 2 and 6 and every 8 weeks until week 46 of placebo (episodic), infliximab 5 mg/kg at weeks 2 and 6 followed by 5 mg/kg (5 mg/kg scheduled) every 8 weeks, or infliximab 5 mg/kg at weeks 2 and 6 followed by 10 mg/kg (10 mg/kg scheduled) every 8 weeks. At or after week 14, treatment could be given with a dose of infliximab 5 mg/kg higher upon loss of response. RESULTS: The efficacy of scheduled infliximab therapy was better than episodic treatment. Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores were consistently significantly better in the 10 mg/kg scheduled maintenance group from weeks 10 to 54, and response and remission rates (combined scheduled) were significantly higher from weeks 10 to 30. A greater proportion of patients achieved complete mucosal healing at week 54 (P = 0.041). A lower proportion developed antibodies to infliximab in the scheduled groups than in the episodic group (9% [5 mg/kg], 6% [10 mg/kg], 28% [episodic], respectively). Scheduled strategy patients had fewer Crohn's disease-related hospitalizations (P = 0.014) and surgeries (P = 0.01) than episodic strategy patients. CONCLUSIONS: The scheduled infliximab groups, particularly the 10 mg/kg group, had better CDAI and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) responses than those in the episodic group. Both scheduled groups had fewer hospitalizations, higher rates of mucosal healing, and fewer developed antibodies than those in the episodic group, with no increase in side effects.
There continue to be evolutionary changes in the management of ulcerative colitis despite the fact that, aside from a variety of aminosalicylate formulations, no new therapies have been approved over the past few decades. Nevertheless, debates continue regarding the optimization of treatment with aminosalicylates and the short- and long-term benefits of immunomodulation in ulcerative colitis. This article focuses on the most recent clinical studies pertaining to the management of ulcerative colitis and explores both the advances and controversies pertaining to aminosalicylate therapy, corticosteroids, cyclosporine, and the purine antimetabolites. Novel therapeutic approaches--including preliminary experience with biological therapies directed at tumor necrosis factor and other cytokines, adhesion molecules, growth factors, and probiotics--will be reviewed. Recent data regarding potential chemoprevention in long-standing ulcerative colitis and management of postoperative complications and pouchitis will also be discussed.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: No therapy has been shown to reliably prevent the evolution of postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease. The aim of the current trial was to compare 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) and mesalamine with placebo for the prevention of clinical, endoscopic, and radiographic recurrence of Crohn's disease after resection and ileocolic anastomosis. METHODS: Five centers randomized 131 patients to receive 6-MP (50 mg), mesalamine (3 g), or placebo daily in a double-blind, double-dummy trial. Patients had clinical assessments at 7 weeks and then every 3 months; colonoscopy at 6, 12, and 24 months; and small bowel series at 12 and 24 months. End points were clinical, endoscopic, and radiographic recurrence rates at 24 months. RESULTS: Clinical recurrence rates (intent to treat) by life-table analysis at 24 months were 50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34%-68%), 58% (95% CI, 41%-75%), and 77% (95% CI, 61%-91%) in patients receiving 6-MP, mesalamine, and placebo, respectively. Endoscopic recurrence rates were 43% (95% CI, 28%-63%), 63% (95% CI, 47%-79%), and 64% (95% CI, 46%-81%), and radiographic recurrence rates were 33% (95% CI, 19%-54%), 46% (95% CI, 29%-66%), and 49% (95% CI, 30%-72%), respectively. 6-MP was more effective than placebo ( P < 0.05) at preventing clinical and endoscopic recurrence over 2 years. Patient withdrawals resulted in 69% of the study population evaluable for the clinical recurrence end point. CONCLUSIONS: 6-MP, 50 mg daily, was more effective than placebo at preventing postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease and should be considered as a maintenance therapy after ileocolic resection.