Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Stan Gielen

Publications and source records attributed to Stan Gielen.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Catching oriented objects.

We have investigated how participants match the orientation of a line, which moves on a vertical screen towards the subject. On its path to the participant, the line could disappear at several positions. Participants were instructed to put a bar on a predefined interception point on the screen, such that the bar touched the screen with the same orientation as the moving line at the very moment when the line passed through the interception point or (in case of line disappearance) when the hidden line would pass through the interception point (like in catching). Participants made significant errors for oblique orientations, but not for vertical and horizontal orientations of the moving line. These errors were small or absent when the moving line was visible all the way along its path on the screen. However, these errors became larger when the line disappeared farther away from the interception point. In the second experiment we tested whether these errors could be related to errors in visual perception of line orientation. The results demonstrate that errors in matching of the bar do not correspond to the last perceived orientation of the line, but rather to the perceived orientation of the moving line near the beginning of the movement path. This corresponds to earlier observations that participants shortly track a moving target and then make a saccadic eye movement to the interception point.

Hand Strength↗

Visual and haptic matching of perceived orientations of lines.

In this study we investigated the perception and production of line orientations in a vertical plane. Previous studies have shown that systematic errors are made when participants have to match oblique orientations visually and haptically. Differences in the setup for visual and haptic matching did not allow for a quantitative comparison of the errors. To investigate whether matching errors are the same for different modalities, we asked participants to match a visually presented orientation visually, haptically with visual feedback, and haptically without visual feedback. The matching errors were the same in all three matching conditions. Horizontal and vertical orientations were matched correctly, but systematic errors were made for the oblique orientations. The errors depended on the viewing position from which the stimuli were seen, and on the distance of the stimulus from the observer.

Feedback, Psychological↗

Task-Dependent Learning of Attention.

In this article, we propose a neural network model for selective covert visual attention. This model can learn to focus its attention on important features depending on the task to be fulfilled by gating the flow of information from the lower to the higher levels of the visual system. The model is kept as simple as possible, but it is still capable of reproducing attentional behavior observed in psychological experiments. Computer simulations demonstrate that (1) it can learn categories to reduce reaction time without a decrease in performance, (2) the model reveals a performance similar to that of humans in feature and conjunction search, and (3) its learning dynamics are comparable with those of humans. Copyright 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Journal Article↗