Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Staffan Arnér

Publications and source records attributed to Staffan Arnér.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Breakthrough pain in malignant and non-malignant diseases: a review of prevalence, characteristics and mechanisms.

Breakthrough pain or transient worsening of pain in patients with an ongoing steady pain is a well known feature in cancer pain patients, but it is also seen in non-malignant pain conditions with involvement of nerves, muscles, bones or viscera. Continuous and intermittent pain seems to be a general feature of these different pain conditions, and this raises the possibility of one or several common mechanisms underlying breakthrough pain in malignant and non-malignant disorders. Although the mechanisms of spontaneous ongoing pain and intermittent flares of pain (BTP) may be difficult to separate, we suggest that peripheral and/or central sensitization (hyperexcitability) may play a major role in many causes of BTP. Mechanical stimuli (e.g. micro-fractures) changes in chemical environments and release of tumour growth factors may initiate sensitization both peripherally and centrally. It is suggested that sensitization could be the common denominator of BTP in malignant and non-malignant pain.

Humans↗
PubMed2004

Existential pain--an entity, a provocation, or a challenge?

"Existential pain" is a widely used but ill-defined concept. Therefore the aim of this study was to let hospital chaplains (n=173), physicians in palliative care (n=115), and pain specialists (n=113) respond to the question: "How would you define the concept existential pain?" A combined qualitative and quantitative content analysis of the answers was conducted. In many cases, existential pain was described as suffering with no clear connection to physical pain. Chaplains stressed significantly more often the guilt issues, as well as various religious questions (P<0.001). Palliative physicians (actually seeing dying persons) stressed more often existential pain as being related to annihilation and impending separation (P<0.01), while pain specialists (seeing chronic patients) more often emphasized that "living is painful" (P<0.01). Thirty-two percent (32%) of the physicians stated that existential suffering can be expressed as physical pain and provided many case histories. Thus, "existential pain" is mostly used as a metaphor for suffering, but also is seen as a clinically important factor that may reinforce existing physical pain or even be the primary cause of pain, in good agreement with the current definition of pain disorder or somatization disorder.

Caregivers↗
PubMed2003

Pain questionnaires in the analysis of long lasting (chronic) pain conditions.

A study on mainly non-cancer-related pain patients was performed concerning clinical patient data used for pain history-taking and diagnosis. More than 2100 consecutive patients referred to the anaesthetic branch of the Multidisciplinary Pain Centre (MPC) were evaluated at the first visit. The use of a paper questionnaire, including a pain-drawing and pain intensity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), was analysed. In a substudy of more than 290 consecutive patients, data from a computerised questionnaire and database was analysed. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30) (version 2.0) was used for recording of the Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) score. The substudy also included the summarized mechanism-based evaluation of the patients at the first visit, judged by a specialist in pain medicine. The patients' GHS/QoL score was low. The most important pain mechanisms, were nociceptive and peripheral neurogenic. The clinical use of these tools for patient evaluation and for the choice of treatment is suggested. Information technology may be used for analysis of descriptive, evaluative, predictive and prognostic data in pain patients. It can also be used as a tool for clinical pain research towards a mechanism-based evaluation. Evaluation of patient quality of life and function is suitable for outcome research.

Aged↗
PubMed1991

Intravenous phentolamine test: diagnostic and prognostic use in reflex sympathetic dystrophy.

In some patients, ongoing and evoked neurogenic pain is relieved by pharmacological or destructive block of the sympathetic innervation of the affected part. In others, sympatholysis is ineffective. The present report shows that these two groups of patients can be distinguished by a safe and simple diagnostic test. Individuals in whom the pain was transiently relieved by intravenous phentolamine (Regitine) were very likely to respond favourably to subsequent sympatholytic treatment with i.v. regional guanethidine. Individuals in whom the phentolamine test was negative did not enjoy pain relief from this type of sympatholysis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Prolonged relief of neuralgia after regional anesthetic blocks. A call for further experimental and systematic clinical studies.

Thirty-eight consecutive patients with neuralgia after peripheral nerve injury were treated with one or two series of peripheral local anesthetic blocks. All patients experienced an initial total relief of ongoing pain for 4-12 h. Evoked pain (hyperalgesia or allodynia), which occurred in 17 patients, was blocked simultaneously with the spontaneous pain. In 18 patients the analgesia outlasted the conduction block and there was a period of complete pain relief of 12-48 h in 13 patients and of 2-6 days in the other 5. In 8 patients there was a second phase of analgesia of 4 h to 6 days duration occurring within 12 h of pain recurrence. Thus, mono- or biphasic prolonged complete analgesia occurred in 25 out of 38 patients. A prolonged analgesia may be the result of a central action of the local anesthetic at the spinal level after intra-axonal incorporation and centripetal axoplasmic transport. To test this hypothesis, an experimental study with [3H]lidocaine was performed in 6 rats. The radioactive local anesthetic was injected into one hind limb foot with the other side serving as a control. Tissue samples from the peripheral nerve, nerve root and the lumbosacral spinal cord segment were analyzed for radioactivity using a scintillation counter technique at various time intervals after the [3H]lidocaine injection. There was a low grade of activity in all samples and no difference between the test side and the control side. Thus these experiments provided no evidence in support of this hypothesis. Various alternative peripheral and central mechanisms are discussed. Further studies specifically directed to these alternatives and with longitudinal controls are prompted.

Adolescent↗