Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

Shoma Tamori

Publications and source records attributed to Shoma Tamori.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Mutual Information-based Prognostic Biomarker Discovery in Cancer Genomics: Conceptual Framework and Representative Applications of MI-POG.

Mutual information (MI)-based approaches have increasingly been applied to cancer genomics; however, their use for genome-wide prognostic biomarker discovery remains relatively underexplored. The present article summarizes the conceptual workflow of Mutual Information-based Prognostic Omics Gene (MI-POG) based on previously published applications in breast cancer, lower-grade glioma, and other cancer datasets. The framework consists of clinical endpoint discretization, genome-wide MI-based screening, candidate ranking, and downstream validation using conventional survival-analysis approaches. Previous MI-POG applications identified solute carrier family 20 member 1 (SLC20A1) as a prognostic biomarker in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Elevated SLC20A1 expression was associated with unfavorable survival outcomes and was independently validated in the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) cohort. Methodological analyses demonstrated how survival endpoints can be integrated into an information-theoretic framework through fixed-time outcome discretization, enabling model-independent assessment of molecular-clinical dependencies. Applications across multiple cancer datasets suggested the potential applicability of the framework across biologically distinct tumor types, although further validation will be required to establish its robustness and generalizability. In conclusion, MI-POG can be formalized as an information-theoretic framework for genome-wide identification of prognostic biomarkers by quantifying molecular-clinical dependencies using mutual information. Representative applications from previously published studies suggest that MI-POG may complement conventional survival-analysis approaches and provide a useful strategy for biomarker discovery, although additional benchmarking and prospective validation will be required.

Humans

High p62 and ALDH1A3 Reduce the Effectiveness of Endocrine Therapy in Luminal B Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: High expression of p62 and ALDH1A3 indicates a poor clinical outcome in luminal B breast cancer, and p62 is involved in the progression of ALDH1-positive luminal B breast cancer stem cells. However, the association between endocrine therapy and high p62 and ALDH1A3 expression, in luminal B breast cancer remains unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two datasets with gene expression and clinical data for patients with primary breast cancer (METABRIC, n=2,509; The Cancer Genome Atlas, n=1,084) were downloaded and statistically analyzed. To evaluate the association between the p62 and ALDH1A3 expression levels and endocrine therapy, including tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitor, in patients with luminal B breast cancer, disease-specific survival was examined using Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: Patients with p62 high ALDH1A3 high luminal B breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy exhibited a poor prognosis. Moreover, patients with p62 high ALDH1A3 high luminal B breast cancer treated with tamoxifen showed a trend towards a poor prognosis, but those treated with aromatase inhibitors showed a significantly poor prognosis. These results suggest that endocrine therapy, especially aromatase inhibitors, exhibits a reduced effectiveness against p62 high ALDH1A3 high luminal B tumors. CONCLUSION: p62 and ALDH1A3 could be used together as a prognostic biomarker for predicting the efficacy of endocrine therapy for luminal B breast cancer.

ALDH1A3

PKCζ, CTNNBIP1 and ALDH1A3 Expression in Luminal B Breast Cancer Indicates Decreased Hormone Therapy Effectiveness.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The role of catenin β interacting protein 1 (CTNNBIP1), a negative regulator of the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, in luminal A and B breast cancer stem cells treated with hormone therapy is unknown. This study investigated the relationship between CTNNBIP1 and aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family member A3 (ALDH1A3) expression and its impact on disease-specific survival in luminal A and B breast cancer. Given that high protein kinase ζ (PKCζ) expression, together with elevated CTNNBIP1 or ALDH1A3, is linked to poor prognosis in luminal B tumors, we also examined their combined influence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gene expression and clinical data from the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC; n=2,509) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. Findings were validated with The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer Atlas (TCGA; n=1,084). RESULTS: CTNNBIP1 high ALDH1A3 high indicated a poor prognosis in patients with luminal B breast cancer treated with hormone therapy in the METABRIC dataset and aromatase inhibitors as hormone therapy in the TCGA data set, suggesting that high CTNNBIP1 and ALDH1A3 expression contributed to decreased effectiveness of hormone therapy in patients with luminal B breast cancer. PKC ζ high CTNNBIP1 high ALDH1A3 high was associated with a poor prognosis in patients with luminal B breast cancer treated with hormone therapy and aromatase inhibitors, suggesting that high PKC ζ , CTNNBIP1 and ALDH1A3 expression contributed to decreased effectiveness of hormone therapy in patients with luminal B breast cancer. CONCLUSION: PKC ζ and CTNNBIP1 may be involved in the progression of ALDH1A3-positive luminal B breast cancer. In luminal B breast cancer, PKC ζ , CTNNBIP1 and ALDH1A3 could serve as molecular drug targets and prognostic biomarkers to predict the effectiveness of hormone therapy.

ALDH1A3