Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Shigeru Tsukagoshi

Publications and source records attributed to Shigeru Tsukagoshi.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

[Globalization of clinical trials].

Based on reviews of the Japanese clinical trial situation in lung cancer, gastric cancer, prostate cancer and breast cancer, it was clear that much progress has been made in short time. There are considerable differences between Japan and the West and also differences between clinical areas in Japan. For regulatory purposes bridging studies have become increasingly important. Use of identical protocols are required for effective bridging. Participations in global phase III trials is the best way of achieving registration in Japan. For successful global trials in Japan it is important to include Japanese investigators in the preparation of the protocol and to recognise the challenges facing such a project. Clinical practice in diagnosis and treatment have many differences, thus it is recommended to have clear and detailed information in the protocol. Hard end points like survival are important since they are not biased by cultural differences. There are clear difficulties with HE or QOL outcomes. The emergence of focus on evidence based medicine is also happening in Japan and will help to harmonize documentation across the world. For large adjuvant or prevention cancer global trials are essential. To facilitate global studies further development of infrastructure is necessary in Japan. Use of electronic data capture web based communication etc. will help overcome communication difficulties. Other improvements that will make Japanese participation in global trials easier and better include establishment of clinical trial centre at each hospital, introduction of trial coordinators or study nurses and an improved collaboration with company staff. A critical issue that also need addressing is agreement of centre target recruitment. We need to introduce a new flexible system in Japan if participation in global trial is to be optimised. If we can address these issues Japanese investigators and collaborative groups should be able to initiate and lead global trials in the future.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2002

[Globalization of anti-cancer therapies].

Based on short reviews of lung, gastric, colorectal, prostate, breast and ovarian cancer, there remain significant differences between Japan and the West in the therapeutic regimen for most cancers. Some of the differences are due to differences in stage of disease at diagnosis or historical factors affecting availability of products. In both Japan and the West, there are initiatives to prepare treatment guidelines based on published data. For Japan this initiative is limited by the lack of Japanese clinical trial data or even safety data. When guidelines are prepared from international data, many of the products have limited indications in Japan and therefore not reimbursed. Availability of the most appropriate therapies to Japanese patients will depend on a facilitation of clinical trials in both primary and additional indications. However, the experience in other countries is that, even where data and registration approval are available, guidelines are hard to agree and are not uniformly accepted by prescribers. The ICH E5 guideline on the use of bridging studies to interpolate Western data to Japanese regulatory dossiers provides an opportunity to accelerate availability of new medicines to Japanese prescribers and patients. The use of bridging studies has so far been limited for anti-cancer therapies. Where relevant pharmacodynamic endpoints can be measured, (e.g. aromatase inhibition) there can increase confidence in bridging. The newer types of agent which act to stabilise disease rather than tumour shrinkage present a special problem. In some cases surrogate markers can be valuable but in each case they need to be validated. As globalization continues, an alternative approach is to include a significant cohort of Japanese patients in Japanese patients but this depends on sufficient similarity in the patient population and background therapy. The most significant limitation to either large outcome studies in Japan or for Japanese centers to join international trials has been the environment for conduct of clinical trials. There have been some recent improvements and further progress is expected so that Japanese doctors can play a full role in the evaluation of new therapies.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2002

[Clinical usefulness of ondansetron injection in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy].

Before and after launch of 5-HT3, antagonist, necessary dose and duration of chemotherapy were compared between the patients who were confirmed to have undergone chemotherapy before the launch of 5-HT3 antagonist (retrospective group) and the ones currently using ondansetron (OND) for chemotherapy-induced emesis (prospective group). Clinical usefulness of OND was evaluated through survey on quality of life (QOL) to patients and questionnaires to physicians, nurses & patients. Necessary dose of chemotherapy was evaluated by investigating actual dose of cisplatin (CDDP). As the result, necessary dose of CDDP was confirmed to be different between retrospective and prospective groups. The influence on the actual CDDP dose was observed with or without use of G-CSF or by recommended dose of CDDP, while no influence by 5-HT3 antagonist was observed. For necessary duration of chemotherapy, significant difference was not observed between retrospective or prospective groups. On the other hand, actual CDDP dose or necessary duration of chemotherapy were confirmed to be greatly affected by chemotherapy-induced adverse events such as blood disorder (e.g. bone marrow suppression) or renal disorder, rather than chemotherapy-induced emesis. As the result of QOL survey to patients and other questionnaires to medical staff & patients, the fact of chemotherapy-induced emesis to lower the patient's QOL as well as the importance of emetic control was confirmed. It was also confirmed that the workload of nurses or other medical staff has lessened since the launch of 5-HT3 antagonists.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

[Brief overview on the studies of monoclonal antibody].

There have been many basic and clinical reports of monoclonal antibody therapies of cancer, but most of them were in the phase I or early phase II. However, from these experiences, monoclonal antibody therapies have changed considerably using chimera or humanized antibodies. Recent reports on monoclonal therapies indicated the clinical usefulness in cancer treatment, opening a new era of biological therapies. Since there are no similar issues to cover so widely monoclonal antibody, this special issue will be useful for understanding the progress of monoclonal therapies.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

[Preface-importance of supportive therapies against adverse drug reactions in cancer treatment].

Importance of this special articles on the prevention and management of various adverse drug reactions was described. Among various adverse reactions, cardiac, lung and neuro-toxicities in cancer chemotherapy and the means to prevent or manage such adverse reactions were mainly reviewed. In addition, this special issue include special supportive therapies in cancer treatment at home, importance of QOL in cancer therapy and future prospect on the management of adverse drug reactions.

Anaphylaxis↗
PubMed2002

[A new LH-RH agonist for treatment of prostate cancer, 3-month controlled-release formulation of goserelin acetate (Zoladex LA 10.8 mg depot)--outline of pre-clinical and clinical studies].

Goserelin acetate is a LH-RH agonist developed by AstraZeneca (formerly ICI, UK), and has been used clinically for the treatment of prostate cancer as a 4-week controlled-release formulation (Zoladex 3.6 mg depot). Recently, a new drug (Zoladex LA 10.8 mg depot) with 3-month controlled-release formulation was developed and became commercially available in Japan. In the randomized comparative phase III studies carried out with global bases, single administration of the new drug yielded almost equivalent anti-testosterone effect and the same serum level of the previous 3.6 mg depot formulation in 3-times continuous administration. In these studies, adverse drug reactions, which were mainly due to pharmacological effects of the new drug and minimal, were found in 52.6% (41/78) compared with 54.8% (46/84) with the previous 3.6 mg depot formulation. In the phase III studies, there were no significant differences in average serum testosterone levels between the two formulations at 12 and 13 weeks after administration. In the Japanese late phase II study with untreated patients, castration effect was observed in all 20 cases entered in the trial. In 20 cases in which treatment was switched from 3.6 mg depot to the new formulation, there were no significant changes in serum testosterone levels at castration level of the untreated patients, 90% (18/20) responded to the treatment, and normalization of PSA level was found in 75.0% (15/20). The adverse drug reactions were mainly increased triglyceride level and hot flushes. In the retrospective evaluation of untreated patients in this trial and the post-marketing clinical trial data for 3.6 mg depot, it was concluded that the new drug had almost the same efficacy and safety profile as 3.6 mg depot in Japanese people. These results indicate that Zoladex LA 10.8 mg depot has the same efficacy and safety as 3.6 mg depot with administration every three months, the burden of injection of LH-RH agonist can be reduced. This new medication can be considered a new standard for treatment of prostate cancer.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

[Post launch studies].

Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) is a growing concept in Japan as it is elsewhere. Central to improving the use of EBM is generation of data through well conducted controlled clinical studies. There are many problems associated with conduct of clinical studies after launch in Japan, and many initiatives are ongoing to improve the situation. Development of Clinical Research Coordinators (CRO) and central Data Management centers are key to improving the quality of clinical research in Japan. Currently Japan has an undeveloped legal system with regard to post-launch trials and off-label use of registered drugs. There is no reimbursement for off-label and various restrictions imposed on the recipients of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare's (MHLW) funds. Maybe the biggest problem is the high cost of post-marketing studies sponsored by pharmaceutical manufacturers. A high quality system to support post launch clinical studies need a solid financial base. There is a need for a suitable review system for investigator initiated multi-centre studies, as the current IRB system is not sufficient. There are also challenges regarding the differences, perceived or real, in treatment practice and available registrations in Japan and in the West, causing problems in choosing suitable comparators and study designs. At the present time it is not clear whether investigator initiated trials will be acceptable for registration purposes in Japan. The agreed first priority is to build a suitable and strong infrastructure within the academic community to support researchers to investigate important questions with or without pharmaceutical company support. Despite all these issues, several groundbreaking projects are under way throughout Japan, in many different areas and by different collaborative groups, some with government support. In fact, researcher-initiated clinical trials achieved a rapid growth in Japan in the past year.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗