Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Sharon Crane Siegel

Publications and source records attributed to Sharon Crane Siegel.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Using chemomechanically assisted diamond bur cutting for improved efficiency.

BACKGROUND: Surface active agents added to handpiece coolants enhance bur cutting rates, or CRs, through chemomechanical effects, or CMEs. The authors evaluate the effect of CMEs on long-term cutting by diamond burs. METHODS: The authors tested medium-grit diamonds in a high-speed handpiece under a 147.5-gram load at 350,000 revolutions per minute, with 22 milliliters per minute coolant flow consisting of distilled water or a 1:10 mouthwash/water mixture. Repeated 6-millimeter-long edge cuts were made through machinable glass ceramic bars until the CR (determined as the time to transect the bars) had decreased by more than 75 percent. The authors used six burs for each coolant and analyzed the data via one-way analysis of variance with post hoc Scheffé tests. RESULTS: CRs with water irrigation continuously decreased with the number of cuts and declined by 87 percent over eight cuts. The authors found faster CRs with CMEs; after 12 cuts, the CR was still close to 40 percent of the initial CR, compared with only 13 percent of the initial CR for water irrigation after eight cuts. These differences between CME-enhanced CRs and those found with water irrigation were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Diluted alcohol- and glycerol-based mouthwash/water mixtures significantly enhanced the CRs of diamond burs and prolonged their service life by more than 50 percent compared with water irrigation alone. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Dentists can increase bur CRs and extend bur cutting life by as much as 200 percent through the addition of diluted alcohol and glycerol mouthwash to the handpiece coolant.

Ceramics↗

Cast articulation accuracy using rigid cast stabilization.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the positional accuracy of casts articulated on a semi-adjustable articulator, with and without rigid cast stabilization using either laboratory plaster or mounting plaster. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A reference articulation of melamine casts in maximum articulation was established and recorded in the horizontal and vertical dimensions using a verification device. The same casts were subsequently remounted 24 times using either laboratory plaster or mounting plaster. Half of the articulations from each group were stabilized using detachable mounting rods and sticky wax, and half were hand-articulated without stabilization, for a total of 6 articulations in each of 4 test groups. The resulting spatial positions established on the articulator were compared to the initial reference position on the verification device grid. Means and standard deviations of the absolute values of the horizontal and vertical displacement for each group were determined separately and compared using a one-way anaylsis of variance. Significant differences (p <0.05) were identified using Tukey's honestly significant difference multiple comparison test. RESULTS: Mean vertical mandibular cast displacement ranged from 0.26 +/-0.21mm for stabilized casts mounted with laboratory plaster to 1.58 +/-0.32 mm for unstabilized casts mounted with mounting plaster. For each mounting material, significantly less vertical displacement (p <0.001) was observed with the mandibular cast stabilized before mounting. The cast mounted with laboratory plaster exhibited horizontal displacement (0.87 +/-0.29 mm) that was significantly greater than the remaining groups (p <0.001), which did not differ from each other. CONCLUSIONS: Rigid stabilization of the mandibular to maxillary cast during mounting with laboratory and mounting plaster improved articulation accuracy.

Analysis of Variance↗