Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Shai Danziger

Publications and source records attributed to Shai Danziger.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Selection for action and selection for awareness: evidence from hemispatial neglect.

In bedside testing of patients with hemispatial neglect, we have found that extinction for contralesional stimuli is less when the contralesional and ipsilesional items are different on the dimension to be reported relative to when they are the same. Importantly, a study that investigated this observation found that similarity on visual features that are not necessary for response does not impact the amount of extinction. These findings suggest that response requirements may determine what stimuli will and what stimuli will not gain access to awareness. In a related study, we found that extinction of contralesional stimuli was not determined by perceptual similarity of the ipsilesional and contralesional items but by whether they shared the same semantics (e.g., ONE + 1 ) or the same response (e.g., ONE = WON). Here, we report a single case study in which extinction was determined by whether the competing items shared the same response, regardless of whether they shared or differed in their visual features or semantics. When asked to read the item in each field, there was equivalent extinction in the conditions (ONE + ONE) and (ONE + 1) but less extinction in the condition (ONE + TWO). By contrast, when asked to count the number of characters in each field, there was more extinction in the condition (ONE + TWO) than (ONE + 1). When asked to categorize each item as either a word or digit, the degree of extinction was determined both by whether the items shared the same semantics and by whether they required the same response. The results are consistent with a biased competition model in which competition for selection is resolved flexibly depending on response requirements. Furthermore, the data provide evidence that unattended stimuli are processed to the level of response.

Aged, 80 and over↗

Response to visual threat following damage to the pulvinar.

We present a unique case demonstrating contributions of the pulvinar in response to visual threat. Substantial evidence demonstrates that the amygdala contributes to the emotion of fear and the response to threat. Traditionally, two routes to amygdala activation have been distinguished: a "slow cortical" route through visual and association cortex and a "fast subcortical" route through the thalamus. The pulvinar nucleus of the thalamus is well connected to the amygdala, suggesting that pulvinar damage might interfere with amygdala activation and response to threat. We tested this possibility in patient SM, who suffered complete loss of the left pulvinar. We measured interference from threatening images on goal-directed behavior. In SM's ipsilesional field, threatening images slowed responses more than pleasant images did. This interference decreased rapidly over time. In contrast, in SM's contralesional field, interference from threatening images was initially absent and then increased rather than decreased over time. Processing through the pulvinar therefore plays a significant role in generating response to visual threat. We suggest that, with disruption of the subcortical route to the amygdala, briefly presented images were not fully processed for threat. The reemergence of interference over time may reflect contributions of a slower route.

Amygdala↗

Parietal lobe lesions disrupt saccadic remapping of inhibitory location tagging.

Maintaining a coherent percept of the visual scene while eye position continuously changes requires that saccades be accompanied by remapping of the visual environment. We studied saccadic remapping in patients with unilateral lesions in the intraparietal sulcus and healthy controls, using inhibition of return (IOR)-an inhibitory tag that enables efficient visual search. In healthy controls, IOR was found at both retinal and environmental locations of the cue, indicating that the inhibitory tag had been remapped into environmental coordinates. In contrast, right parietal patients demonstrated IOR only at the retinal location of the cue, indicating that the intraparietal sulcus is involved in remapping of the environment after eye movements to afford a stable, environmentally based reference frame. Note that patients did not show environmental IOR in either visual field. These results also suggest that this region may be the neural substrate for encoding inhibitory spatial tags in an environmentally based reference frame.

Adult↗

Contributions of the human pulvinar to linking vision and action.

In 3 patients with unilateral pulvinar lesions, we tested the pulvinar's role in selective attention processing. Each patient completed four variants of a flanker interference task in which they reported the color of a square of a specified size while ignoring an irrelevant flanker that appeared either contralesionally or ipsilesionally to the target. The main finding was that when target location was not known and target and flanker were associated with competing responses, reaction times to contralesional targets were longer than those to ipsilesional targets. Our findings suggest that pulvinar damage produces a contralesional deficit in response competition.

Attention↗

Visual detection is gated by attending for action: evidence from hemispatial neglect.

We report observations in patients with visual extinction demonstrating that detection of visual events is gated by attention at the level of processing at which a stimulus is selected for action. In one experiment, three patients reported the identity of numerical words and digits presented either in the ipsilesional field, the contralesional field, or both fields. On the critical bilateral trials, extinction was greater when the competing items shared the same meaning and response, regardless of whether the items were visually different (e.g., ONE + 1), or identical (e.g., 1 + 1). A fourth patient was tested in a second experiment in which the competing items on bilateral trials were either different (e.g., ONE + TWO), identical (e.g., ONE + ONE) or homophones that were visually and semantically different but shared the same response (e.g., ONE + WON). Homophones and identical items caused similar extinction with less extinction occurring on different item trials.

Aged↗

Deficits in spatial coding and feature binding following damage to spatiotopic maps in the human pulvinar.

We report a patient with unilateral damage to the rostral part of the pulvinar who was impaired in localizing stimuli in the inferior visual field contralateral to the lesion and who made errors in the binding of shape and color in that quadrant. The findings demonstrate the importance of the pulvinar in spatial coding and provide support for the function of the thalamus in binding of features. They also provide evidence for a homology between the visual field maps of the inferior and lateral subdivisions of the pulvinar in monkeys and in humans, such that the inferior visual field is represented in the rostral part of the nucleus.

Brain Injuries↗

The effects of endogenous attention and stimulus onsets on encoding target location.

The effects of endogenously attended and non-attended stimulus onsets on spatial stimulus encoding of a target wereexplored in a Simon task. In each experiment participants madespeeded left or right key-press responses to the colour of a target that followed a cueing display consisting of several shapes. The target appeared within some shapes and not others. The target's spatial code as measured by a Simon task was its location relative to possible target positions and relative to the centre of the display. Target location was not coded relative to the positions of onset shapes that could not contain a target. These spatial coding effects were found at cue-target intervals of 50, 300, and 1000 ms. The data indicate that target location is defined relative to the distribution of endogenous attention and reference frames aligned with the centre of the display and that the spatial code assigned to a target is not affected when attention is shifted in the target's direction.

Adult↗

Stroop interference effects in partially colored Stroop words.

In the Stroop task word reading is thought to be automatic since it runs without intentional monitoring and is difficult to avoid. This view has recently been challenged by observations that Stroop interference is reduced when only part of the Stroop word is colored. In this study we asked whether the extent of Stroop interference varies with the position of the colored letter(s). We observed that Stroop interference was smallest when the first letter(s) were colored and largest when either the last letter(s) or whole word were colored. On these findings we suggest that colored and noncolored parts of partially colored words are processed separately and differently, and that selection of the color dimension for explicit report entails inhibition of the to-be-ignored colored letters.

Humans↗