Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

Shai Carmi

Publications and source records attributed to Shai Carmi.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PEStimate: predicting offspring disease risk after polygenic embryo screening.

MOTIVATION: Polygenic embryo screening (PES) is a new, controversial technology, whereby human in vitro fertilization embryos are screened for their genetic risk of complex, polygenic diseases. PES aims to reduce the disease burden in offspring by prioritizing the selection of low-risk embryos. However, given that polygenic diseases are usually late-onset, PES outcomes must be estimated by epidemiological modeling. The liability threshold model has been previously used to predict outcomes. However, predictions rely on complex sets of equations, some of which require numerical integration or simulation. Further, previous models failed to account for the possibility that the selected embryo will not be born. RESULTS: Here, we present PEStimate, a freely available online app for predicting PES outcomes when screening for a single disease. PEStimate predicts the offspring risk with and without PES, as well as generates plots of the risk reduction versus key parameters. Users can adjust the number of available embryos, the live birth rate, the disease prevalence, the accuracy of the genetic risk predictor, the embryo selection method, the genetic risk of parents, and the disease status of parents, siblings, uncles/aunts, and grandparents of the embryos. Our model includes, for the first time, the possibility of embryo implantation failure, showing that risk reductions have been previously overestimated. PEStimate provides geneticists, healthcare professionals, patients, and other stakeholders with a necessary tool for examining the impact of PES and weighing its potential benefits against possible personal and societal harms. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: PEStimate: https://polygenicembryo.shinyapps.io/pestimate. Source code: https://github.com/Lirazk/PEStimate.

Humans

Eugenics and polygenic embryo screening: Public, clinician, and patient perceptions of conditions versus traits.

PURPOSE: Polygenic embryo screening (PES) estimates an embryo's genetic chances of developing complex conditions (eg, cancer) and traits (eg, height). Stakeholders have raised concerns that PES promotes eugenic practices and ideology. METHODS: We surveyed a nationally representative sample of the US public on approval of screening embryos for 12 conditions and 12 traits and examined the association between disapproval and concern about eugenics. We also conducted semistructured interviews with US-based reproductive endocrinology and infertility specialists and patients undergoing in vitro fertilization on their perspectives toward PES. RESULTS: Among the US public (n = 1423), disapproval of screening embryos for traits has a stronger association with concern that PES promotes eugenics than disapproval of screening embryos for conditions. Interviews with reproductive endocrinology and infertility specialists (n = 27) and patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (n = 26) suggest that perceptions of PES as eugenic were more common when discussing screening and selecting for or against traits versus selecting against conditions. CONCLUSION: Results suggest PES for traits is more frequently associated with eugenics and perceived often as unacceptable, whereas PES for conditions is perceived sometimes as acceptable. Future research should explore whether the distinction between conditions and traits is meaningful in the definition of eugenics and/or approval of genomics-based embryo selection and how that influences clinical practices and policy.

Humans