Seth I Berger | Search PubMed

PubMed2026

Sequencing approaches in hereditary cancer testing: strengths, limitations and future directions.

Over the past three decades, Hereditary Cancer Testing (HCT) has evolved from single gene assays into multigene panel testing (MGPT), which allows for the screening of all known hereditary cancer genes in a single assay. MGPT is currently the standard approach for clinical HCT. However, with decreasing sequencing costs and increased instrument throughput, the scalability of exome sequencing (ES) and genome sequencing (GS) for HCT indications is becoming more viable. These methods provide broader insights into the coding exons and/or the entire genome, respectively. ES/GS data can also be reanalyzed to identify variants in novel genes that were not characterized at the time of initial testing, or to support research efforts aimed at uncovering additional associations between germline variants and cancer predisposition. Additionally, the emerging use of long-read sequencing (LRS) is noteworthy, enabling improved variant detection compared to short-read sequencing, especially for complex/structural variants and variation in difficult-to-sequence or paralogous regions in genes such as PMS2. This has the potential to increase the accuracy of HCT, reduce the turnaround time, find previously unidentifiable cancer risk variants, and ultimately increase the diagnostic yield. This article provides a comprehensive summary of the sequencing approaches used in HCT, discussing their strengths and limitations. We also highlight the added value of complementing DNA-only testing with RNA and tumor sequencing. Furthermore, we explore LRS-based approaches and discuss opportunities for their implementation in routine genetic testing for hereditary cancer.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Genome sequencing reveals the impact of pseudoexons in rare genetic disease.

PURPOSE: Advancements in sequencing technologies have significantly improved clinical genetic testing; yet, the diagnostic yield remains around 30% to 40%. Emerging technologies are now being deployed to address the remaining diagnostic gap. METHODS: We tested whether short-read genome sequencing could increase the diagnostic yield in individuals enrolled into the UCI-GREGoR research study, who had suspected Mendelian conditions and prior inconclusive testing. Two other collaborative research cohorts, focused on aortopathy and dilated cardiomyopathy, consisted of individuals who were undiagnosed but had not undergone harmonized prior testing. RESULTS: We sequenced 353 families (754 participants) and found a molecular diagnosis in 54 (15.3%) of them. Of these diagnoses, 55.5% were previously missed because the causative variants were in regions not originally interrogated. In 5 cases, they were deep intronic variants, all of which led to abnormal splicing and pseudoexons, as directly shown by RNA sequencing. All 5 of these variants had inconclusive spliceAI scores. In 26% of newly diagnosed cases, the causal variant could have been detected by exome sequencing reanalysis. CONCLUSION: Genome sequencing can overcome limitations of clinical genetic testing, such as the inability to call intronic variants. Our findings highlight pseudoexons as a common mechanism via which deep intronic variants cause Mendelian disease.

Humans↗