Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Serdar Dursun

Publications and source records attributed to Serdar Dursun.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Validation of the Investigator's Assessment Questionnaire, a new clinical tool for relative assessment of response to antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.

The success of long-term therapy in schizophrenia is contingent upon real-world effectiveness or improvements in several domains, including efficacy, safety and tolerability. This report describes the Investigator's Assessment Questionnaire (IAQ), a new 10-item instrument designed to assess relative effectiveness (efficacy, safety and tolerability) of antipsychotic medications in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. To measure content validity, 300 psychiatrists rated the importance of the IAQ items. Efficacy (i.e., positive and negative symptoms) was considered most important, but importance scores relative to the mean ranged only from 0.87 to 1.18, suggesting similar importance of the items. Cronbach's coefficient alpha values showed that the items were internally consistent. Factor analyses indicated that all IAQ items belong to a single domain. Data from the US Broad Effectiveness Trial of Aripiprazole were used for construct validation. Total IAQ score correlated significantly with time to treatment discontinuation (r=-0.50), Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) score (r=0.76) and medication preference of patients (r=0.71) or caregivers (r=0.70). A one-unit decrease in IAQ score corresponded to an additional 1.35 days in the study and a decrease in CGI-I of 0.21 units. These results provide initial validation of the IAQ as a tool for evaluating antipsychotic response in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

Adolescent↗

Evaluation of a behavioural weight management programme for patients with severe mental illness: 3 year results.

Excess weight is a common problem in the general population and in those with severe mental illness and is associated with a range of adverse consequences. The evidence base for managing excess weight in those with severe psychiatric illness is small. We report the outcome of a weight management programme provided in a community mental health centre. The programme consisted of group sessions, held weekly and lasting one hour. Participants self-referred and attended as many sessions as they wished. Sessions included weighing, feedback from participants and education on a range of issues including healthy eating and exercise. Over a 3-year period 70 patients, predominantly with schizophrenia, attended the programme. Length of follow-up ranged from 2 weeks to 3 years. Data for all 70 patients was evaluated. The mean BMI at entry to the programme was 32.5 kg/m2. The mean number of sessions attended was 34. Patients achieved a mean weight loss of 4.97 kg. The mean BMI at last attendance was 30.7 kg/m2. Weight loss correlated with number of sessions attended (p = 0.0001). This study demonstrates the long-term value of a weight management programme at 3 years and supports the hypothesis that weight loss can be achieved using a simple behavioural intervention in motivated psychiatric patients.

Humans↗

Noradrenergic and serotonergic neuroendocrine responses in prepubertal, peripubertal, and postpubertal rats pretreated with desipramine and sertraline.

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether developmental status of neurotransmitter systems may affect response to antidepressant treatment. This study investigated whether younger animals, compared with mature animals, showed the same neuroendocrine response to challenge drug probes when pretreated with a serotonergic or noradrenergic antidepressant. METHOD: Prepubertal, pubertal, and adult rats were pretreated with low- or high-dose sertraline or desipramine for 14 days. Animals were then challenged with a noradrenergic probe (clonidine for desipramine-treated animals) or a serotonergic probe (fenfluramine for sertraline-treated animals). The neurohormonal response of growth hormone to the clonidine challenge and prolactin to the fenfluramine challenge was then measured. RESULTS: In animals challenged with fenfluramine, the postpubertal control group showed a significantly higher prolactin response to fenfluramine than postpubertal animals pretreated with low- or high-dose sertraline. No differences were found in the pubertal or prepubertal group. In animals challenged with clonidine, there was a significant age by treatment interaction effect for the prepubertal group pretreated with high doses of desipramine (less growth hormone secretion) but not for the peri- or postpubertal groups. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate neurodevelopmental factors may play a role in the functional physiology of neurotransmitter systems, which in turn may affect response to psychotropics.

Animals↗

Optimizing antidepressant treatment: efficacy and tolerability.

It has been suggested that dual-action antidepressants acting on both serotonin and noradrenaline pathways in the brain may offer superior therapeutic benefit over classical antidepressants, particularly in severe depression. Directly acting dual-action antidepressant drugs include venlafaxine and milnacipran. In addition, mirtazapine and nefazodone, may indirectly potentiate serotonergic and noradrenergic transmission, although evidence that they do indeed do so in vivo is limited. Meta-analysis of clinical trials suggests that venlafaxine has a more rapid onset of action than selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and the same may also be true for milnacipran and mirtazapine. Efficacy, both in terms of extent of antidepressant effect and in the proportion of patients responding, is probably superior to that of SSRIs, at least for venlafaxine and milnacipran. In terms of tolerability, all dual-action drugs clearly appear to be better tolerated than tricyclic antidepressants. Mirtazapine and nefazodone have specific side-effect profiles as a result of their antagonist action at biogenic amine and other receptors. Milnacipran, and to a lesser extent venlafaxine, are slightly better tolerated than SSRIs.

Antidepressive Agents↗