Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Scott M Grundy

Publications and source records attributed to Scott M Grundy.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Effects of adding fenofibrate (200 mg/day) to simvastatin (10 mg/day) in patients with combined hyperlipidemia and metabolic syndrome.

Combined hyperlipidemia predisposes subjects to coronary heart disease. Two lipid abnormalities--increased cholesterol and atherogenic dyslipidemia--are potential targets of lipid-lowering therapy. Successful management of both may require combined drug therapy. Statins are effective low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol-lowering drugs. For atherogenic dyslipidemia (high triglycerides, small LDL, and low high-density lipoprotein [HDL]), fibrates are potentially beneficial. The present study was designed to examine the safety and efficacy of a combination of low-dose simvastatin and fenofibrate in the treatment of combined hyperlipidemia. It was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with a crossover design. Three randomized phases were employed (double placebo, simvastatin 10 mg/day and placebo, and simvastatin 10 mg/day plus fenofibrate 200 mg/day). Each phase lasted 3 months, and in the last week of each phase, measurements were made of plasma lipids, lipoprotein cholesterol, plasma apolipoproteins B, C-II, and C-III and LDL speciation on 3 consecutive days. Simvastatin therapy decreased total cholesterol by 27%, non-HDL cholesterol by 30%, total apolipoprotein B by 31%, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) + intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL) cholesterol by 37%, VLDL + IDL apolipoprotein B by 14%, LDL cholesterol by 28%, and LDL apolipoprotein B by 21%. The addition of fenofibrate caused an additional decrease in VLDL + IDL cholesterol and VLDL + IDL apolipoprotein B by 36% and 32%, respectively. Simvastatin alone caused a small increase in the ratio of large-to-small LDL, whereas the addition of fenofibrate to simvastatin therapy caused a marked increase in the ratio of large-to-small LDL species. Simvastatin alone produced a small (6%) and insignificant increase in HDL cholesterol concentrations. When fenofibrate was added to simvastatin therapy, HDL cholesterol increased significantly by 23%. No significant side effects were observed with either simvastatin alone or with combined drug therapy. Therefore, a combination of simvastatin 10 mg/day and fenofibrate 200 mg/day appears to be effective and safe for the treatment of atherogenic dyslipidemia in combined hyperlipidemia.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Free fatty acid metabolism during fenofibrate treatment of the metabolic syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine whether fenofibrate modifies the metabolism of nonesterified (free) fatty acids as a component of its triglyceride-lowering action in male patients with the metabolic syndrome. DESIGN: In a placebo-controlled trial lasting 16 weeks, patients were randomly assigned to fenofibrate (200 mg/d) or placebo for 8 weeks. They were then crossed over to placebo or treatment with fenofibrate for another 8 weeks. METHODS: Thirteen adult men had clinical characteristics of the metabolic syndrome that included atherogenic dyslipidemia, hypertension, elevated fasting glucose levels, or central obesity or a combination of these. They had measurements of plasma lipid and lipoprotein levels, postheparin lipase activities, and fasting concentrations and turnover rates of nonesterified fatty acids, as well as oral glucose tolerance testing with insulin and nonesterified fatty acid measurements. Levels of apolipoprotein C-II, C-III, and B were also measured, along with levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in lipoprotein species. RESULTS: Fenofibrate therapy did not change plasma concentrations and turnover rates of nonesterified fatty acids. For fasting nonesterified fatty acids, the values (mean +/- SD) for placebo versus fenofibrate were 446 +/- 31 micromol/L versus 493 +/- 71 micromol/L, respectively (not significant); nonesterified fatty acid turnover rates were 336 +/- 36 micromol/min versus 334 +/- 42 micromol/min for placebo versus fenofibrate, respectively. Moreover, no changes were noted in fasting or postprandial levels of plasma glucose and insulin. Despite this lack of change, fenofibrate therapy reduced the plasma levels of triglyceride by 30% (305 +/- 143 mg/dL versus 206 +/- 90 mg/dL for placebo versus fenofibrate, respectively; P <.045), with a similar reduction in cholesterol levels of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. Large low-density lipoprotein species were increased and small low-density lipoprotein species were decreased by fenofibrate therapy. Levels of apolipoprotein C-III were reduced significantly (P <.03), as were ratios of postheparin hepatic lipase to lipoprotein lipase (P <.05). CONCLUSION: Fenofibrate therapy markedly reduced plasma triglyceride levels. However, it did not lower concentrations or turnover rates of nonesterified fatty acids, nor did it change glucose or insulin responses to an oral glucose challenge. These findings indicate that fenofibrate modifies fatty acid metabolism either in the liver or in triglyceride-rich lipoproteins but not in adipose tissue. Multiple mechanisms are likely involved as a consequence of the action of fenofibrate to activate peroxisomal-proliferator-activated receptor alpha.

Adipose Tissue↗
PubMed2003

Hyperhomocysteinemia in Asian Indians living in the United States.

Hyperhomocysteinemia has been reported in Asian Indians (people from Indian subcontinent) to be related to relatively low plasma levels of folate and vitamin B-12. However, a true ethnic-related characteristic has not been excluded. This study was done to determine whether Asian Indians have high plasma homocysteine compared with Caucasians in the United States in the era of folate fortification, and whether low vitamin B-12 or insulin resistance may account for possible interethnic differences in plasma homocysteine. A total of 227 Asian Indians (131 males and 96 females) and 155 Caucasians (66 males and 89 females) completed a questionnaire for medical, family, and personal history. They had height, weight, and blood pressure measured and fasting blood drawn for routine chemistry, TSH, plasma homocysteine, vitamin B-12, and folate. Oral glucose tolerance test and vitamin B-6 was measured in a subgroup of 66 Asian Indians (47 males and 19 females) and 63 Caucasians (33 males and 30 females). Asian Indians were found to have significantly higher plasma homocysteine than Caucasians (median of 12.6 and 8.0 micro mol/liter, P < 0.0001, respectively) and lower plasma concentrations of B-6 (median 49 vs. 70 nmol/liter; P = 0.05, respectively). Plasma folate was relatively high and similar in both ethnic groups. Plasma vitamin B-12 was significantly lower in Asian Indians than Caucasians (median of 204 vs. 320 pmol/liter, P < 0.0001, respectively). Vitamin B-12 correlated significantly with plasma homocysteine. When vitamin B-12 was between 150 and 379 pmol/liter, the regression curve between vitamin B-12 and homocysteine had significantly different slope in the two ethnic groups (P value < 0.05) and Asian Indians had significantly higher homocysteine for any level of vitamin B-12. Although insulin resistance, measured as insulin area under the curve by oral glucose tolerance test was higher in Asian Indians and correlated significantly with homocysteine, it did not explain inter-ethnic differences in plasma homocysteine in a multivariate analysis. We conclude that Asian Indians living in the United States have significant elevation of plasma homocysteine concentrations despite normal plasma folate. Lower plasma concentrations of vitamin B-12 and lower insulin sensitivity may contribute to this finding but only partially explained the ethnic-related hyperhomocysteinemia of the Asian Indians.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Elevated plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentrations in Asian Indians living in the United States.

Proinflammatory state may contribute to the excessive prevalence of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease observed in populations originating from the Indian subcontinent (Asian Indians). This study was conducted to evaluate whether nondiabetic Asian Indian men living in the United States manifest a proinflammatory state when compared with Caucasians of similar age and body fat content. We also compared the relationships between plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), a marker of low-grade inflammation, and various parameters of body composition and fat distribution and insulin sensitivity in Asian Indians and Caucasians. For this purpose, plasma hs-CRP, oral glucose tolerance test, and anthropometric measurements were conducted in 82 Asian Indian men and 55 Caucasian men of similar age. The two groups had similar body fat content and truncal skinfolds thickness. Asian Indians had higher insulin areas under the curve during oral glucose tolerance tests, indicating a greater insulin resistance. Asian Indians also manifested a significant elevation of plasma hs-CRP. We conclude that young, overtly healthy Asian Indian men have both greater insulin resistance and higher hs-CRP levels than do Caucasians. This difference cannot be explained by greater adiposity in Asian Indians and suggests that many Asian Indians have an underlying proinflammatory state that may contribute to their increased risk for both type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

Adipose Tissue↗
PubMed2003

Efficacy and safety of plant stanols and sterols in the management of blood cholesterol levels.

Foods with plant stanol or sterol esters lower serum cholesterol levels. We summarize the deliberations of 32 experts on the efficacy and safety of sterols and stanols. A meta-analysis of 41 trials showed that intake of 2 g/d of stanols or sterols reduced low-density lipoprotein (LDL) by 10%; higher intakes added little. Efficacy is similar for sterols and stanols, but the food form may substantially affect LDL reduction. Effects are additive with diet or drug interventions: eating foods low in saturated fat and cholesterol and high in stanols or sterols can reduce LDL by 20%; adding sterols or stanols to statin medication is more effective than doubling the statin dose. A meta-analysis of 10 to 15 trials per vitamin showed that plasma levels of vitamins A and D are not affected by stanols or sterols. Alpha carotene, lycopene, and vitamin E levels remained stable relative to their carrier molecule, LDL. Beta carotene levels declined, but adverse health outcomes were not expected. Sterol-enriched foods increased plasma sterol levels, and workshop participants discussed whether this would increase risk, in view of the marked increase of atherosclerosis in patients with homozygous phytosterolemia. This risk is believed to be largely hypothetical, and any increase due to the small increase in plasma plant sterols may be more than offset by the decrease in plasma LDL. There are insufficient data to suggest that plant stanols or sterols either prevent or promote colon carcinogenesis. Safety of sterols and stanols is being monitored by follow-up of samples from the general population; however, the power of such studies to pick up infrequent increases in common diseases, if any exist, is limited. A trial with clinical outcomes probably would not answer remaining questions about infrequent adverse effects. Trials with surrogate end points such as intima-media thickness might corroborate the expected efficacy in reducing atherosclerosis. However, present evidence is sufficient to promote use of sterols and stanols for lowering LDL cholesterol levels in persons at increased risk for coronary heart disease.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Diet composition and the metabolic syndrome: what is the optimal fat intake?

Two cholesterol-raising fatty acids in the diet, saturated fatty acids and trans fatty acids, increase the serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration. This fact justifies the recommendation of a reduced intake of cholesterol-raising fatty acids. Emerging data suggest that diets higher in unsaturated fatty acids, particularly monounsaturated fatty acids, have several advantages over high-carbohydrate intakes. This advantage appears to hold, particularly for populations having a high prevalence of insulin resistance, such as the US population. If the US public were to modify its eating habits in the direction of better weight control and more exercise, higher intakes of carbohydrate might be better tolerated. At the same time, the experience with the Mediterranean population reveals that in healthier populations, diets relatively high in unsaturated fatty acids are well tolerated and are associated with a low prevalence of both coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes.

Blood Glucose↗
PubMed2002

Approach to lipoprotein management in 2001 National Cholesterol Guidelines.

In 2001 the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) released its Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III report. This was an evidence-based report that upgraded cholesterol management guidelines. The update was made possible by a series of large, cholesterol-lowering clinical trials. These trials demonstrated strongly the efficacy and safety of cholesterol reduction in both primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD). The major recommendations of the report were several. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol continued to be identified as the major target of cholesterol-lowering therapy. However, more emphasis was given to HDL cholesterol and triglycerides as important targets for management. The concept of CHD risk equivalents was introduced. A CHD risk equivalent represents an absolute risk for future CHD events equal to that in persons with established CHD. Diabetes was identified as a CHD risk equivalent, requiring more intensive LDL-lowering therapy. Finally, the report placed more emphasis on the metabolic syndrome as a major, multiplex risk factor requiring increased clinical attention.

Cholesterol, LDL↗
PubMed2002

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of once-daily niacin for the treatment of dyslipidemia associated with type 2 diabetes: results of the assessment of diabetes control and evaluation of the efficacy of niaspan trial.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic dyslipidemia is characterized by high triglyceride levels; low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels; small, dense low-density lipoprotein particles; and high free fatty acid levels. Niacin reduces concentrations of triglyceride-rich and small low-density lipoprotein particles while increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. It also lowers levels of free fatty acids and lipoprotein(a). However, the use of niacin in patients with diabetes has been discouraged because high doses can worsen glycemic control. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of once-daily extended-release (ER) niacin in patients with diabetic dyslipidemia. METHODS: During a 16-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 148 patients were randomized to placebo (n = 49) or 1000 (n = 45) or 1500 mg/d (n = 52) of ER niacin. Sixty-nine patients (47%) were also receiving concomitant therapy with statins. RESULTS: Dose-dependent increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (+19% to +24% [P<.05] vs placebo for both niacin dosages) and reductions in triglyceride levels (-13% to -28% [P<.05] vs placebo for the 1500-mg ER niacin) were observed. Baseline and week 16 values for glycosylated hemoglobin levels were 7.13% and 7.11%, respectively, in the placebo group; 7.28% and 7.35%, respectively, in the 1000-mg ER niacin group (P=.16 vs placebo); and 7.2% and 7.5%, respectively, in the 1500-mg ER niacin group (P=.048 vs placebo). Four patients discontinued participation because of inadequate glucose control. Rates of adverse event rates other than flushing were similar for the niacin and placebo groups. Four patients discontinued participation owing to flushing (including 1 receiving placebo). No hepatotoxic effects or myopathy were observed. CONCLUSION: Low doses of ER niacin (1000 or 1500 mg/d) are a treatment option for dyslipidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Adult↗