Biomedical subjects

Sarah E Medland

Publications and source records attributed to Sarah E Medland.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Robust inference and correlates from genetic associations with personality.

Personality traits describe stable differences in how people think, feel and behave, and how they interact with and experience their social and physical environments1,2. Many questions remain unanswered about associations between DNA and personality traits, such as their robustness, their generalizability and the biological and social pathways through which they act. Here we meta-analyse data across 46 cohorts comprising 611,037 to 1.14 million participants with European-like and African-like genomes for genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of the Big Five personality traits (extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism and openness to experience), and data from up to 50,725 participants for within-family GWAS. We identify 1,260 lead genetic variants associated with personality, including 824 novel variants3. Common genetic variants explain a moderate 4.8-9.3% of the variance in measures of each trait, and 9.3-13.3% among instruments with typical measurement reliability. Genetic associations with personality are highly consistent but not identical across geography, reporter (self versus close other), age group and measurement instrument, and we find minimal spousal assortment for personality in recent history. In contrast to many other social and behavioural traits4,5, within-family GWAS and polygenic index analyses indicate that genetic associations with personality are minimally confounded by the shared family environment. Polygenic prediction, genetic correlation and Mendelian randomization analyses indicate that personality traits have widespread, potentially causal associations with consequential behaviours and life outcomes. Overall, we find that the genetic architecture of personality is robustly generalizable, minimally confounded and widely relevant to human experience.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

Unravelling sex differences in the genetic architecture of anxiety.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety disorders show striking sex differences in prevalence, symptoms, and clinical characteristics, shaping how they manifest and are experienced. METHODS: Here, we report the first sex-specific meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of anxiety, leveraging two of the largest biobank datasets, UK Biobank and All of Us, comprising 85,042 female cases with 196,789 controls and 36,732 male cases with 136,924 controls. Functional annotation, sex-specific polygenic scores (PGS), and genetic correlations were performed to assess genetic differences and functional implications. RESULTS: In females, 21 lead SNPs were significantly associated with anxiety, compared to five in males. Although the genetic correlation between sexes was high, it was significantly different from one, indicating partially distinct genetic architectures. In addition, both the SNP-based observed and liability-scale heritabilities (assuming a 2:1 female-to-male prevalence ratio) were significantly higher in females. Gene-based tests and functional prioritization identified different genes associated with anxiety in females and males. Moreover, genetic correlation analyses revealed stronger associations of female anxiety with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and body mass index (BMI), whereas male anxiety showed stronger correlations with waist-hip-ratio-adjusted BMI. CONCLUSIONS: While the overall genetic architecture of anxiety is largely shared, our findings reveal distinct sex-specific genetic associations and correlations, highlighting the value of analyzing the sexes separately to uncover genetic signals that may be masked in sex-combined samples.

Female↗

PubMed2025

Genome-wide association meta-regression identifies stem cell lineage orchestration as a key driver of acne risk.

Over 85% of the population experience acne at some point in their lives, with its severity spanning a quantitative spectrum, from mild, transient outbreaks to more persistent, severe forms of the condition. Moderate to severe disease poses a substantial global burden arising from both the physical and psychological impacts of this highly visible condition. The analytical approach taken in this study aimed to address the impact of variation in the dichotomisation of acne case control status, driven by ascertainment and study design, on effect size estimates across independent genetic association studies of acne. Through a fixed intercept meta-regression framework, we combined evidence genome-wide for association with acne across studies in which case-control status had been ascertained in different settings, allowing for different severity threshold definitions. Across a combined sample of 73,997 cases and 1,103,940 controls of European, South Asian and African American ancestry we identify genetic variation at 165 genomic loci that influence acne risk. There is evidence for both shared and ancestry specific components to the genetic susceptibility to acne and for sex differences in the magnitude of effect of risk alleles at three loci. We observe that common genetic variation explains 13.4% of acne heritability on the liability scale. Consistent with the hypothesis that genetic risk primarily operates at the level of individual pilosebaceous units, a polygenic score derived from this case-control study of acne susceptibility is associated with both self-reported and clinically assessed acne severity in adolescence, further strengthening the link between genetic risk and disease severity. Prioritisation of causal genes at the identified acne risk loci, provides genetic validation of the targets of established and emerging acne therapies, including retinoid treatments. The identified acne risk loci are enriched for genes encoding downstream effectors of RXRA signalling, including SOX9 and components of the WNT and p53 pathways. Illustrating that the control of stem cell lineage plasticity and cellular fate are important mechanisms through which genetic variation influences acne susceptibility within the pilosebaceous unit.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2021

1q21.1 distal copy number variants are associated with cerebral and cognitive alterations in humans.

Low-frequency 1q21.1 distal deletion and duplication copy number variant (CNV) carriers are predisposed to multiple neurodevelopmental disorders, including schizophrenia, autism and intellectual disability. Human carriers display a high prevalence of micro- and macrocephaly in deletion and duplication carriers, respectively. The underlying brain structural diversity remains largely unknown. We systematically called CNVs in 38 cohorts from the large-scale ENIGMA-CNV collaboration and the UK Biobank and identified 28 1q21.1 distal deletion and 22 duplication carriers and 37,088 non-carriers (48% male) derived from 15 distinct magnetic resonance imaging scanner sites. With standardized methods, we compared subcortical and cortical brain measures (all) and cognitive performance (UK Biobank only) between carrier groups also testing for mediation of brain structure on cognition. We identified positive dosage effects of copy number on intracranial volume (ICV) and total cortical surface area, with the largest effects in frontal and cingulate cortices, and negative dosage effects on caudate and hippocampal volumes. The carriers displayed distinct cognitive deficit profiles in cognitive tasks from the UK Biobank with intermediate decreases in duplication carriers and somewhat larger in deletion carriers-the latter potentially mediated by ICV or cortical surface area. These results shed light on pathobiological mechanisms of neurodevelopmental disorders, by demonstrating gene dose effect on specific brain structures and effect on cognitive function.

Brain↗