Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Sarah D Isaacs

Publications and source records attributed to Sarah D Isaacs.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Pooled genome linkage scan of aggressive prostate cancer: results from the International Consortium for Prostate Cancer Genetics.

While it is widely appreciated that prostate cancers vary substantially in their propensity to progress to a life-threatening stage, the molecular events responsible for this progression have not been identified. Understanding these molecular mechanisms could provide important prognostic information relevant to more effective clinical management of this heterogeneous cancer. Hence, through genetic linkage analyses, we examined the hypothesis that the tendency to develop aggressive prostate cancer may have an important genetic component. Starting with 1,233 familial prostate cancer families with genome scan data available from the International Consortium for Prostate Cancer Genetics, we selected those that had at least three members with the phenotype of clinically aggressive prostate cancer, as defined by either high tumor grade and/or stage, resulting in 166 pedigrees (13%). Genome-wide linkage data were then pooled to perform a combined linkage analysis for these families. Linkage signals reaching a suggestive level of significance were found on chromosomes 6p22.3 (LOD = 3.0), 11q14.1-14.3 (LOD = 2.4), and 20p11.21-q11.21 (LOD = 2.5). For chromosome 11, stronger evidence of linkage (LOD = 3.3) was observed among pedigrees with an average at diagnosis of 65 years or younger. Other chromosomes that showed evidence for heterogeneity in linkage across strata were chromosome 7, with the strongest linkage signal among pedigrees without male-to-male disease transmission (7q21.11, LOD = 4.1), and chromosome 21, with the strongest linkage signal among pedigrees that had African American ancestry (21q22.13-22.3; LOD = 3.2). Our findings suggest several regions that may contain genes which, when mutated, predispose men to develop a more aggressive prostate cancer phenotype. This provides a basis for attempts to identify these genes, with potential clinical utility for men with aggressive prostate cancer and their relatives.

Black or African American↗

Germline ATBF1 mutations and prostate cancer risk.

BACKGROUND: ATBF1 has been recently identified as a candidate prostate tumor suppressor gene. In addition to more unique mutations, two somatic mutations (shortening of a polypyrimidine tract [Poly(T)n] and a deletion beginning at codon 3381 (3381del)) were each observed in multiple prostate cancer samples and both appear to have an impact on ATBF1 gene function and expression. METHODS: We assayed two recurrent sequence variants in germline DNA from prostate cancer cases and controls, and examined whether carriers of these variants are at increased risk for prostate cancer. RESULTS: We found Poly(T)n variants in both normal and matched tumor DNA samples from multiple patients, indicating a germline origin in each case. Genotyping germline DNA samples indicated that 3381del was significantly associated with prostate cancer risk among sporadic cases (P = 0.03), but not among men with hereditary disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that the germline 3381del allele may influence prostate cancer susceptibility.

Alleles↗

Germ-line mutation of NKX3.1 cosegregates with hereditary prostate cancer and alters the homeodomain structure and function.

NKX3.1, a gene mapped to 8p21, is a member of the NK class of homeodomain proteins and is expressed primarily in the prostate. NKX3.1 exerts a growth-suppressive and differentiating effect on prostate epithelial cells. Because of its known functions and its location within a chromosomal region where evidence for prostate cancer linkage and somatic loss of heterozygosity is found, we hypothesize that sequence variants in the NKX3.1 gene increase prostate cancer risk. To address this, we first resequenced the NKX3.1 gene in 159 probands of hereditary prostate cancer families recruited at Johns Hopkins Hospital; each family has at least three first-degree relatives affected with prostate cancer. Twenty-one germ-line variants were identified in this analysis, including one previously described common nonsynonymous change (R52C), two novel rare nonsynonymous changes (A17T and T164A), and a novel common 18-bp deletion in the promoter. Overall, the germ-line variants were significantly linked to prostate cancer, with a peak heterogeneity logarithm of odds of 2.04 (P = 0.002) at the NKX3.1 gene. The rare nonsynonymous change, T164A, located in the homeobox domain of the gene, segregated with prostate cancer in a family with three affected brothers and one unaffected brother. Importantly, nuclear magnetic resonance solution structure analysis and circular dichroism studies showed this specific mutation to affect the stability of the homeodomain of the NKX3.1 protein and decreased binding to its cognate DNA recognition sequence. These results suggest that germ-line sequence variants in NKX3.1 may play a role in susceptibility to hereditary prostate cancer and underscore a role for NKX3.1 as a prostate cancer gatekeeper.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Two-locus genome-wide linkage scan for prostate cancer susceptibility genes with an interaction effect.

Prostate cancer represents a significant worldwide public health burden. Epidemiological and genetic epidemiological studies have consistently provided data supporting the existence of inherited prostate cancer susceptibility genes. Segregation analyses of prostate cancer suggest that a multigene model may best explain familial clustering of this disease. Therefore, modeling gene-gene interactions in linkage analysis may improve the power to detect chromosomal regions harboring these disease susceptibility genes. In this study, we systematically screened for prostate cancer linkage by modeling two-locus gene-gene interactions for all possible pairs of loci across the genome in 426 prostate cancer families from Johns Hopkins Hospital, University of Michigan, University of Umeå, and University of Tampere. We found suggestive evidence for an epistatic interaction for six sets of loci (target chromosome-wide/reference marker-specific P< or =0.0001). Evidence for these interactions was found in two independent subsets from within the 426 families. While the validity of these results requires confirmation from independent studies and the identification of the specific genes underlying this linkage evidence, our approach of systematically assessing gene-gene interactions across the entire genome represents a promising alternative approach for gene identification for prostate cancer.

Aged↗

Genome-wide screen for prostate cancer susceptibility genes in men with clinically significant disease.

BACKGROUND: One of the difficulties confronting genetic studies of prostate cancer is the complex and heterogeneous etiology. Given the high population frequency of lesions meeting the histological definition of prostate cancer, a significant portion of men with a positive family history may be diagnosed due to increased surveillance and associated higher likelihood of biopsy. Over diagnosis decreases power to detect genes that increase susceptibility to a clinically significant prostate cancer. METHODS: We re-evaluated all 623 men with prostate cancer in our 188 hereditary prostate cancer families and identified a subset of 244 men with more aggressive disease based upon meeting at least one of the following clinical and/or pathologic criteria: tumor grade Gleason score > or = 7, tumor stage T2c or higher, pretreatment PSA > or = 20 ng/ml, rising PSA after treatment, evidence of metastasis, or death from prostate cancer. RESULTS: Genome-wide screens were re-performed by defining men as affected only if they met the criteria for clinically significant disease. The new analyses identified stronger evidence for linkage in Xq27-28 and 22q, as well as several novel loci, including 3p and 9p. CONCLUSIONS: Although, these results need to be confirmed in independent studies, our approach represents an important step to overcome the impact of over diagnosis in genetic studies of prostate cancer. Larger studies that incorporate this approach are needed.

Family Health↗

A combined genomewide linkage scan of 1,233 families for prostate cancer-susceptibility genes conducted by the international consortium for prostate cancer genetics.

Evidence of the existence of major prostate cancer (PC)-susceptibility genes has been provided by multiple segregation analyses. Although genomewide screens have been performed in over a dozen independent studies, few chromosomal regions have been consistently identified as regions of interest. One of the major difficulties is genetic heterogeneity, possibly due to multiple, incompletely penetrant PC-susceptibility genes. In this study, we explored two approaches to overcome this difficulty, in an analysis of a large number of families with PC in the International Consortium for Prostate Cancer Genetics (ICPCG). One approach was to combine linkage data from a total of 1,233 families to increase the statistical power for detecting linkage. Using parametric (dominant and recessive) and nonparametric analyses, we identified five regions with "suggestive" linkage (LOD score >1.86): 5q12, 8p21, 15q11, 17q21, and 22q12. The second approach was to focus on subsets of families that are more likely to segregate highly penetrant mutations, including families with large numbers of affected individuals or early age at diagnosis. Stronger evidence of linkage in several regions was identified, including a "significant" linkage at 22q12, with a LOD score of 3.57, and five suggestive linkages (1q25, 8q13, 13q14, 16p13, and 17q21) in 269 families with at least five affected members. In addition, four additional suggestive linkages (3p24, 5q35, 11q22, and Xq12) were found in 606 families with mean age at diagnosis of < or = 65 years. Although it is difficult to determine the true statistical significance of these findings, a conservative interpretation of these results would be that if major PC-susceptibility genes do exist, they are most likely located in the regions generating suggestive or significant linkage signals in this large study.

Aged↗

Evidence for a general cancer susceptibility locus at 3p24 in families with hereditary prostate cancer.

To identify genes that generally increase the risk of cancer, we performed a systematic search throughout the genome in 188 families primarily ascertained for prostate cancer but which also included individuals with other cancers. We observed significant evidence for linkage between susceptibility to all cancers and markers at 3p24, with a peak HLOD of 3.08 (P=0.0002). Compared to families with less than three other cancers and prostate cancer only, evidence for linkage at this region was stronger among families with at least three other cancers. This is the first reported example of a genome-wide search for general cancer susceptibility genes among hereditary prostate cancer families.

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 3↗

A germline DNA polymorphism enhances alternative splicing of the KLF6 tumor suppressor gene and is associated with increased prostate cancer risk.

Prostate cancer is a leading and increasingly prevalent cause of cancer death in men. Whereas family history of disease is one of the strongest prostate cancer risk factors and suggests a hereditary component, the predisposing genetic factors remain unknown. We first showed that KLF6 is a tumor suppressor somatically inactivated in prostate cancer and since then, its functional loss has been further established in prostate cancer cell lines and other human cancers. Wild-type KLF6, but not patient-derived mutants, suppresses cell growth through p53-independent transactivation of p21. Here we show that a germline KLF6 single nucleotide polymorphism, confirmed in a tri-institutional study of 3,411 men, is significantly associated with an increased relative risk of prostate cancer in men, regardless of family history of disease. This prostate cancer-associated allele generates a novel functional SRp40 DNA binding site and increases transcription of three alternatively spliced KLF6 isoforms. The KLF6 variant proteins KLF6-SV1 and KLF6-SV2 are mislocalized to the cytoplasm, antagonize wtKLF6 function, leading to decreased p21 expression and increased cell growth, and are up-regulated in tumor versus normal prostatic tissue. Thus, these results are the first to identify a novel mechanism of self-encoded tumor suppressor gene inactivation and link a relatively common single nucleotide polymorphism to both regulation of alternative splicing and an increased risk in a major human cancer.

Alleles↗

Mutational analysis of PINX1 in hereditary prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Telomerase activity is increased in most tumors. PinX1 has recently been identified as a critical component in regulating telomerase activity. The PinX1 gene is located within chromosomal region 8p22-23, a region associated with LOH and potentially linked to increased prostate cancer risk. METHODS: PINX1 was re-sequenced in 159 hereditary prostate cancer (HPC) probands. Four non-synonymous coding variants were genotyped in 159 HPC families. RESULTS: Thirty-nine polymorphisms were identified in the HPC screening panel. Ten coding polymorphisms were identified, seven (Gln50His, Leu91Met, Gln206His, Arg215Ile, Thr220Ala, Ser254Cys, and Glu414Ala) of which were non-synonymous. The most common variants Thr220Ala and Ser254Cys were not significantly over-transmitted from affected parent to affected offspring. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, we conclude that PINX1 is not a major factor for HPC risk.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗

Combined genome-wide scan for prostate cancer susceptibility genes.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer represents a substantial public health burden worldwide. It is the second leading cause of cancer death among men in the United States. A family history of the disease is among the most well-established risk factors for prostate cancer. Efforts to localize prostate cancer susceptibility alleles by using genetic linkage analysis methods have been hindered by genetic heterogeneity, incomplete penetrance, disease phenocopies, and the lack of DNA samples from parents of individuals with late-onset prostate cancer. METHODS: We performed a combined genome-wide linkage analysis among 426 families from four existing hereditary prostate cancer (HPC) study populations to systematically search for prostate cancer susceptibility genes. To decrease the degree of locus heterogeneity, we analyzed subsets of families with similar clinical and demographic characteristics. Nonparametric multipoint linkage was the primary method of analysis. Results are presented as allele-sharing logarithm of the odds (LOD) scores, and all reported P values are two-sided. RESULTS: The strongest evidence for prostate cancer linkage was found at chromosome region 17q22 (nonparametric multipoint Kong and Cox allele-sharing LOD score = 3.16 at marker D17S787; P =.00007). Stratified analyses revealed several additional chromosomal regions that are likely to segregate prostate cancer susceptibility genes among specific subsets of HPC families, including 15q11 among families with late-onset disease (allele-sharing LOD = 5.57 at marker D15S128; P<.00001) and 4q35 among families with four or more affected family members (allele-sharing LOD = 3.10 at marker D4S1615; P =.00008). CONCLUSION: Fine mapping studies to facilitate identification of prostate cancer susceptibility genes in these linked regions are warranted.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗

Interaction effect of PTEN and CDKN1B chromosomal regions on prostate cancer linkage.

The tumor suppressor functions of PTEN and CDKN1B have been extensively characterized. Recent data from mouse models suggest that, for some organs, the combined action of both PTEN and CDKN1B has a stronger tumor suppressor function than each alone; for the prostate, heterozygous knockout of both genes leads to 100% penetrance for prostate cancer. To assess whether such an interaction contributes to an increased risk of prostate cancer in humans, we performed a series of epistatic PTEN and CDKN1B interaction analyses in a collection of 188 high-risk hereditary prostate cancer families. Two different analytical approaches were performed; a nonparametric linkage (NPL) regression analysis that simultaneously models allele sharing at these two regions in all families, and an ordered subset analysis (OSA) that assesses linkage evidence at a target region in a subset of families based on the magnitude of allele sharing at the reference region. The strongest evidence of interaction effect was observed at 10q23-24 and 12p11-13 from both the NPL regression analysis (P = 0.0002) in all families and the OSA analyses in subsets of families. A LOD-delta of 3.15 (P = 0.01) was observed at 10q23-24 among 54 families with the highest NPL scores at 12p11-13, and a LOD-delta of 2.63 (P = 0.02) was observed at 12p11-13 among 34 families with the highest NPL scores at 10q23-24. The evidence for the interaction was stronger when using additional fine-mapping markers in the PTEN (10q23) and CDKN1B (12p13) regions. Our data are consistent with epistatic interactions between the PTEN and CDKN1B genes affecting risk for prostate cancer and demonstrate the utility of modeling epistatic effects in linkage analysis to detect susceptibility genes of complex diseases.

Aged↗

A polymorphism in the CDKN1B gene is associated with increased risk of hereditary prostate cancer.

The loss of cell cycle control is believed to be an important mechanism in the promotion of carcinogenesis. CDKN1B (p27) belongs to the Cip/Kip family and functions as an important cell cycle gatekeeper. Several lines of evidence from clinical studies and laboratory experiments demonstrate that CDKN1B is an important tumor suppressor gene in prostate cancer etiology. In addition, a case-control study has shown that the 326T/G (V109G) polymorphism in CDKN1B is associated with advanced prostate cancer. In light of the evidence for linkage between the chromosomal location of the CDKN1B gene (12p13) and prostate cancer susceptibility in several hereditary prostate cancer (HPC) populations, we hypothesized that sequence variants of CDKN1B play a role in HPC. To test this hypothesis, we first resequenced this gene in 96 HPC probands to identify germ-line mutations and sequence variants. We then genotyped the identified sequence variants among all family members of 188 HPC families and tested for their cosegregation with prostate cancer. In total, 10 sequence variants were identified, including three nonsynonymous changes. A family-based test, which is free from the effects of population stratification, revealed a significant association between single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) -79C/T and prostate cancer (with a nominal P of 0.0005). The C allele of -79C/T was overtransmitted from parents to their affected offspring. Evidence for this association was primarily contributed by affected offspring whose age at diagnosis was <65 years. Together with the previous association study in a sporadic prostate cancer population, our new findings additionally suggest that germ-line variants of this gene play a role in prostate cancer susceptibility.

Aged↗

Identification of a prostate cancer susceptibility locus on chromosome 7q11-21 in Jewish families.

Results from over a dozen prostate cancer susceptibility genome-wide scans, encompassing some 1,500 hereditary prostate cancer families, indicate that prostate cancer is an extremely heterogeneous disease with multiple loci contributing to overall susceptibility. In an attempt to reduce locus heterogeneity, we performed a genomewide linkage scan for prostate cancer susceptibility genes with 36 Jewish families, which represent a stratification of hereditary prostate cancer families with potentially increased locus homogeneity. The 36 Jewish families represent a combined dataset of 17 Jewish families from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center-based Prostate Cancer Genetic Research Study dataset and 19 Ashkenazi Jewish families collected at Johns Hopkins University. All available family members, including 94 affected men, were genotyped at markers distributed across the genome with an average interval of <10 centimorgans. Nonparametric multipoint linkage analyses were the primary approach, although parametric analyses were performed as well. Our strongest signal was a significant linkage peak at 7q11-21, with a nonparametric linkage (NPL) score of 3.01 (P = 0.0013). Simulations indicated that this corresponds to a genomewide empirical P = 0.006. All other regions had NPL P values >/=0.02. After genotyping additional markers within the 7q11-21 peak, the NPL score increased to 3.35 (P = 0.0004) at D7S634 with an allele-sharing logarithm of odds of 3.12 (P = 0.00007). These studies highlight the utility of analyzing defined sets of families with a common origin for reducing locus heterogeneity problems associated with studying complex traits.

Adult↗

Genome-wide scan for prostate cancer susceptibility genes in the Johns Hopkins hereditary prostate cancer families.

BACKGROUND: Although the subject of intensive study, the genetic influences responsible for familial clustering of prostate cancer remain largely unidentified. Genome-wide scans for linkage in prostate cancer families can be used to systematically search for genes capable of affecting risk for the disease. METHODS: All available family members from 188 families, each having at least three first-degree relatives affected with prostate cancer, were genotyped at 406 markers distributed across the genome at average intervals of less than 10 cM. Genotype data was analyzed using primarily a non-parametric, multipoint approach, although parametric analyses were performed as well. RESULTS: The strongest evidence for linkage was observed at D4S1615, at 4q21 (LOD of 2.8, P = 0.0002). Two other regions had LOD scores over 2.0: at 9q34 (marker D9S1826, LOD = 2.17, P = 0.0008) and at 2q23 (marker D2S151, LOD = 2.03, P = 0.001). An additional 12 regions had LOD scores over 1.0, including markers at 1q24-25 and 7q22 having scores >1.6. Stratifying the linkage results by age of diagnosis indicated that the linkages to chromosomes 2 and 4 were strongest in families with early and late ages of diagnosis, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data implicate several new loci as harboring prostate cancer susceptibility genes, and provide confirmatory evidence of linkage at several loci identified previously in other genome-wide scans, including the three regions (4q21, 9q34, and 2q23) with strongest evidence for prostate cancer linkage. These data also emphasize the need to combine linkage data from large numbers of prostate cancer families in efforts to effectively address the extensive heterogeneity that characterizes genetic aspects of this disease.

Aged↗

Polymorphisms in the CYP1A1 gene are associated with prostate cancer risk.

CYP1A1 is likely to play an important role in the etiology of CaP through its function in activating environmental procarcinogens and catalyzing the oxidative metabolites of estrogens. To test the hypothesis that genetic polymorphisms in the CYP1A1 gene may be associated with the risk for CaP, we compared the allele, genotype and haplotype frequencies of 3 SNPs (3801T>C, 2455A>G and 2453C>A) of CYP1A1 among 159 HPC probands, 245 sporadic CaP cases and 222 unaffected men. Two SNPs (3801T>C and 2455A>G) were each individually associated with CaP risk when the allele and genotype frequencies were compared between CaP patients and unaffected controls. Furthermore, a combined SNP analysis using a haplotype approach revealed an even stronger association in Caucasians. Specifically, 4 major haplotypes (T-A-C, C-A-C, C-G-C and T-A-A) accounted for 99.8% of all observed haplotypes. These 4 haplotypes correspond to the previously described nomenclature (CYP1A1*1A, CYP1A1*2A, CYP1A1*2B and CYP1A1*4). The frequencies of these 4 haplotypes were significantly different among CaP patients and controls. The haplotype T-A-C (CYP1A1*1A) was significantly associated with increased risk for CaP, and the haplotype C-A-C (CYP1A1*2A) was significantly associated with decreased risk for CaP. These findings suggest that genetic polymorphisms in CYP1A1 may modify the risk for CaP.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗

Evaluation of DLC1 as a prostate cancer susceptibility gene: mutation screen and association study.

A gene or genes on chromosome 8p22-23 have been implicated in prostate carcinogenesis by the observation of frequent deletions of this region in prostate cancer cells. More recently, two genetic linkage studies in hereditary prostate cancer (HPC) families suggest that germline variation in a gene in this region may influence prostate cancer susceptibility as well. DLC1 (deleted in liver cancer), a gene in this interval, has been proposed as a candidate tumor suppressor gene because of its homology (86% similarity) with rat p122 RhoGAP, which catalyzes the conversion of active GTP-bound rho complex to the inactive GDP-bound form, and thus suppresses Ras-mediated oncogenic transformation. A missense mutation and three intronic insertions/deletions in 126 primary colorectal tumors have been previously identified. However, there are no reports of DLC1 mutation screening in prostate tumors or in germ line DNA of prostate cancer patients. In this study, we report the results of the first mutation screen and association study of DLC1 in genomic DNA samples from hereditary and sporadic prostate cancer patients. The PCR products in the 5' UTR, all 14 exons, exon-intron junctions, and 3' UTR were directly sequenced in 159 HPC probands. Eight exonic nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified, only one of which resulted in an amino acid change. Twenty-three other SNPs were identified in intronic regions. Seven informative SNPs that spanned the complete DLC1 gene were genotyped in an additional 249 sporadic cases and 222 unaffected controls. No significant difference in the allele and genotype frequencies were observed among HPC probands, sporadic cases, and unaffected controls. These results suggest that DLC1 is unlikely to play an important role in prostate cancer susceptibility.

GTPase-Activating Proteins↗

Evaluation of SRD5A2 sequence variants in susceptibility to hereditary and sporadic prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The 5 alpha-reductase type II (SRD5A2) catalyzes the conversion of testosterone into the more potent androgen, dihydrotestosterone (DHT), and is thus believed to be the key enzyme for the control of intracellular DHT level in the prostate. Several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the SRD5A2 gene have been found to alter enzymatic activities and were associated with prostate cancer risk or clinical features in several case-control studies. However, the role of SRD5A2 sequence variants in the susceptibility to hereditary prostate cancer (HPC) has not been evaluated to date. METHODS: Three SNPs in the SRD5A2 gene (A49T, V89L, and C682G) and two microsatellite markers near SRD5A2 were genotyped in 159 HPC families to assess their linkage to prostate cancer. In addition, the three SNPs were also genotyped in 245 sporadic cases and 222 unaffected controls to assess their association with hereditary and sporadic prostate cancer. RESULTS: Weak evidence for linkage in the SRD5A2 chromosomal region was observed in the 159 HPC families (HLOD = 0.87, P = 0.04). Stronger evidence for linkage was observed in Caucasian families (HLOD = 1.10, P = 0.02). When stratified by the SNP A49T, no significant evidence for linkage was observed in families with or without the "T" allele. Similarly, family-based association tests failed to observe significant over-transmission of any risk alleles of SNPs A49T, V89L, and C682G to affected offspring. Finally, no significant differences in the distributions of SNPs A49T, V89L, and C682G were found among the HPC probands, sporadic cases, and controls. CONCLUSIONS: Polymorphisms of SRD5A2 are unlikely to significantly increase susceptibility to hereditary or sporadic prostate cancer in the study populations.

Aged↗

Familial aggregation of bothersome benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate familial aggregation and the mode of inheritance of bothersome benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: During an extension of the North American Finasteride Trial, 301 of 895 patients and 158 spousal controls completed a family history questionnaire. Segregation analysis was performed to examine the mode of inheritance in first-degree relatives of the 301 probands. RESULTS: The lifetime cumulative probability of bothersome BPH was similar in relatives of those with BPH (0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28 to 0.44) and spousal controls (0.36; 95% CI 0.22 to 0.56), but the age of onset was significantly earlier in relatives of cases than controls (P = 0.001). Fathers of those with BPH had a significantly elevated risk of bothersome BPH (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.1; 95% CI 1.2 to 3.8) and brothers had a significantly elevated risk of both bothersome BPH (OR 3.5; 95% CI 1.7 to 7.3) and transurethral resection of the prostate (OR 3.6; 95% CI 1.4 to 8.8). After adjusting for family size, the risk of bothersome BPH increased approximately twofold with each additional affected first-degree relative (0 relatives, OR 1.0; 1 relative, OR 1.7; 2 relatives, OR 4.7). Segregation analysis suggested a rare autosomal codominant allele (frequency 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm previous findings that family history and early age of onset are associated with an increased risk of BPH and that the most likely mode of inheritance is autosomal dominant or codominant. Bothersome BPH appears to have a weaker genetic component than more restrictive definitions of hereditary BPH. Thus, linkage studies are more likely to be successful if they focus on stricter definitions of hereditary BPH (eg, early onset, large volume, strong family history) rather than symptomatic or clinical BPH.

Adult↗