Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Sanjay Saini

Publications and source records attributed to Sanjay Saini.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Multi-detector row CT: principles and practice for abdominal applications.

Abdominal imaging with multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) can be performed during short breath holds. On 16-channel multi-detector row CT scanners, the effective detector row thickness, depending on the manufacturer, is typically 1.0-1.5 mm, which results in a beam collimation of 16-24 mm. At a gantry rotation speed of 0.5 second and a pitch of 1, the table travel speed will be 32-48 mm/sec. At a smaller effective detector row thickness and a narrower beam collimation, a slightly higher pitch may be needed to obtain short-breath-hold CT scans. Typically, transverse scans are viewed at a reconstructed section thickness of 3-5 mm, with thinner sections used for CT angiography and whenever off-axial reformations are obtained. The radiologic technique should be optimized according to the transverse section thickness used for interpretation, and the contrast material administration protocol should be optimized according to the clinical problem, with the scanning triggered for enhancement of a target organ.

Contrast Media↗
PubMed2004

Autoimmune pancreatitis: imaging features.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine imaging findings in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients (25 male and four female; mean age, 56 years; range, 15-82 years) with histopathologic diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis were examined. Data were reviewed by two radiologists in consensus. Imaging findings for review included those from helical computed tomography (CT), 25 patients; magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), four patients; endoscopic ultrasonography (US), 21 patients; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), 19 patients; and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, one patient. Images were analyzed for appearances of pancreas, biliary and pancreatic ducts, and other findings, such as peripancreatic inflammation, encasement of vessels, mass effect, pancreatic calcification, peripancreatic nodes, and peripancreatic fluid collection. Follow-up images were available in nine patients. Serologic markers such as serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and antinuclear antibody levels were available in 12 patients. RESULTS: CT showed diffuse (n = 14) and focal (n = 7) enlargement of pancreas. Seven patients had minimal peripancreatic stranding, with lack of vascular encasement, calcification, or peripancreatic fluid collection. Nine patients had enlarged peripancreatic lymph nodes. MR imaging showed focal (n = 2) and diffuse (n = 2) enlargement with rimlike enhancement in one. MRCP revealed pancreatic duct strictures in two and sclerosing cholangitis-like appearance in one. Endoscopic US showed diffuse enlargement of pancreas with altered echotexture in 13 patients and focal mass in the head in six. ERCP showed stricture of distal common bile duct in 12 patients, irregular narrowing of intrahepatic ducts in six, diffuse irregular narrowing of pancreatic duct in nine, and focal stricture of proximal pancreatic duct in six. Serologic markers showed increased IgG and antinuclear antibody levels in seven of 12 patients. At follow-up, CT abnormalities and common bile duct strictures resolved after steroid therapy in three patients. CONCLUSION: Features that suggest autoimmune pancreatitis include focal or diffuse pancreatic enlargement, with minimal peripancreatic inflammation and absence of vascular encasement or calcification at CT and endoscopic US, and diffuse irregular narrowing of main pancreatic duct, with associated multiple biliary strictures at ERCP.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Intraoperative US in patients undergoing surgery for liver neoplasms: comparison with MR imaging.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare intraoperative ultrasonography (US) and preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with contrast material enhancement for the depiction of liver lesions in patients undergoing hepatic resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A radiologist (D.V.S.) and a surgeon (K.K.T.) retrospectively identified 79 patients (36 female and 43 male patients; age range, 10-78 years; mean age, 57 years) who had undergone surgical resection for primary liver tumor or metastasis and had also undergone preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging within 6 weeks before surgery. MR imaging was performed with a 1.5-T system. Dedicated intraoperative US of the liver was performed or supervised by a gastrointestinal radiologist using a 7.5-MHz linear-array transducer, after adequate hepatic mobilization by the surgeon. Histopathologic evaluation of the 159 resected hepatic lesions served as the reference standard. The lesion distribution included colon cancer metastasis (n = 122), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 23), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 6), cavernous hemangioma (n = 4), focal nodular hyperplasia (n = 2), hamartoma (n = 1), and metastatic embryonal sarcoma (n = 1). RESULTS: Of 159 lesions, 138 (86.7%) were identified at both MR imaging and intraoperative US. Twelve additional lesions (7.5%) in 10 patients were detected only at intraoperative US (eight metastases, one hepatocellular carcinoma, one cholangiocarcinoma, one hemangioma, and one biliary hamartoma). Both modalities failed to depict nine lesions (5.6%) (four metastases, four hepatocellular carcinomas, and one cholangiocarcinoma). The sensitivities of MR imaging and intraoperative US for liver lesion depiction were 86.7% and 94.3%, respectively. Surgical management was altered on the basis of the intraoperative US findings in only three of 10 patients (4%). CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced MR imaging is as sensitive as intraoperative US in depicting liver lesions before hepatic resection.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization.

Recent technologic advances have markedly enhanced the clinical applications of computed tomography (CT). While the benefits of CT exceed the harmful effects of radiation exposure in patients, increasing radiation doses to the population have raised a compelling case for reduction of radiation exposure from CT. Strategies for radiation dose reduction are difficult to devise, however, because of a lack of guidelines regarding CT examination and scanning techniques. Various methods and strategies based on individual patient attributes and CT technology have been explored for dose optimization. It is the purpose of this review article to outline basic principles of CT radiation exposure and emphasize the need for CT radiation dose optimization based on modification of scanning parameters and application of recent technologic innovations.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Application of rational practice and technical advances for optimizing radiation dose for chest CT.

Though clinical benefits of CT exceed the adverse effects of radiation, the increasing use of CT has raised a compelling case for reducing radiation exposure. This controversy has been compounded by the sheer magnitude of CT examinations being performed annually, alleged overuse, and inappropriate selection of optimum scanning parameters, all of which expose the patient population to increased radiation exposure. Recommended clinical strategies for radiation dose optimization include optimization of scanning parameters and creating awareness and adopting guidelines for legitimate indications for CT scanning to avoid overuse and hence, the associated over-exposure. Whereas technological advances have increased the applications of the modality, it is also assisting in development of promising techniques to reduce associated radiation exposure, while maintaining "optimum image quality" needed to make a confident diagnosis. The present pictorial essay describes the fundamentals of CT radiation exposure and need for CT radiation dose reduction on the basis of documented scanning practices and technological advances.

Humans↗
PubMed2004

Radiation from "extra" images acquired with abdominal and/or pelvic CT: effect of automatic tube current modulation.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine the number and usefulness of images acquired beyond the intended anatomic area of interest with abdominal and/or pelvic computed tomography (CT) and to assess the effect of automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) on associated radiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Superior and inferior levels at routine abdominal and/or pelvic CT were defined as the dome of the diaphragm and the inferior margin of the pubic symphysis, respectively. Records of 106 consecutive examinations (male-to-female ratio, 45:61; age range, 21-86 years) performed from June 1 to June 30, 2003, were reviewed to determine the number of "extra" images. Sixty-two abdominal and/or pelvic CT examinations performed concurrently with chest or thigh CT or for trauma were not included in the 106. Abdominal and/or pelvic CT was performed with either ATCM (n = 44) or manual selection of tube current (n = 62). CT parameters recorded for each extra image included tube current, peak kilovoltage, and gantry rotation time. Mean and median tube current-time products were calculated for extra images. Extra images were analyzed for pathologic findings. Statistical analysis was performed with the Student t test. RESULTS: Extra images were acquired above the dome of the diaphragm in 103 (97%) of 106 examinations and below the pubic symphysis in 100 (94%) of 106. A total of 1,280 extra images were acquired in 106 examinations (mean, 12 images per examination). Nineteen additional findings were observed on extra images. With ATCM, mean tube current-time product was 74.5 and 120.6 mAs for extra images acquired above the diaphragm and below the pubic symphysis, respectively; with manual selection, mean tube current-time products were 167.5 and 168.3 mAs (P <.05). CONCLUSION: Most extra images acquired at abdominal and/or pelvic CT contributed no additional information. With ATCM, the radiation dose was reduced by a mean of 56% (median, 72%) for extra images above the diaphragm and 29% (median, 36%) for images below the pubic symphysis, compared with dose levels with manual selection.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Comparison of Z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique with fixed tube current CT scanning of abdomen and pelvis.

PURPOSE: To compare image quality, diagnostic acceptability, and radiation exposure associated with 16-section multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) examinations of abdomen and pelvis performed with z-axis modulation technique of automatic tube current modulation and with manual selection of fixed tube current. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two consecutive subjects (mean age, 60 years; age range, 19-84 years; male-to-female ratio, 35:27) underwent follow-up CT of abdomen and pelvis with use of a 16-section multi-detector row scanner and z-axis modulation technique (10.5-12.0-HU noise index, 10-380 mA). Scanning parameters included 140 kVp, 0.5-1.0-second gantry rotation time, 0.938:1 beam pitch, and 5-mm reconstructed section thickness. For each subject, images obtained with z-axis modulation were compared with previous images obtained with fixed tube current (200-300 mA) and with other parameters identical. Images were compared for noise and diagnostic acceptability by two subspecialty radiologists using a five-point scale (1, unacceptable; 3, acceptable; 5, excellent) at five levels: upper liver at diaphragm, porta hepatis, right kidney hilum, iliac crest, and upper margin of acetabulum. Tube current and gantry rotation time used for acquisitions at these levels were recorded. Data were analyzed with parametric and nonparametric statistical tests. RESULTS: Although no significant differences were found (P =.34), images acquired with z-axis modulation at the levels of the upper liver (diaphragm) and acetabulum had a higher noise and lower diagnostic quality, compared with images acquired with fixed tube current. Compared with fixed tube current, z-axis modulation resulted in tube current-time product reduction in 54 (87%) of 62 examinations (mean reduction, 71.2 mAs) and increase in eight (13%) (mean increase, 17.0 mAs). CONCLUSION: Compared with manually selected fixed tube current, z-axis automatic tube current modulation resulted in reduced tube current-time product and similar image noise and diagnostic acceptability at CT of abdomen and pelvis.

Abdominal Neoplasms↗
PubMed2004

Detection and characterization of lesions on low-radiation-dose abdominal CT images postprocessed with noise reduction filters.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of noise reduction filters on detection and characterization of lesions on low-radiation-dose abdominal computed tomographic (CT) images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Low-dose CT images of abdominal lesions in 19 consecutive patients (11 women, eight men; age range, 32-78 years) were obtained at reduced tube currents (120-144 mAs). These baseline low-dose CT images were postprocessed with six noise reduction filters; the resulting postprocessed images were then randomly assorted with baseline images. Three radiologists performed independent evaluation of randomized images for presence, number, margins, attenuation, conspicuity, calcification, and enhancement of lesions, as well as image noise. Side-by-side comparison of baseline images with postprocessed images was performed by using a five-point scale for assessing lesion conspicuity and margins, image noise, beam hardening, and diagnostic acceptability. Quantitative noise and contrast-to-noise ratio were obtained for all liver lesions. Statistical analysis was performed by using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, Student t test, and kappa test of agreement. RESULTS: Significant reduction of noise was observed in images postprocessed with filter F compared with the noise in baseline nonfiltered images (P =.004). Although the number of lesions seen on baseline images and that seen on postprocessed images were identical, lesions were less conspicuous on postprocessed images than on baseline images. A decrease in quantitative image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio for liver lesions was noted with all noise reduction filters. There was good interobserver agreement (kappa = 0.7). CONCLUSION: Although the use of currently available noise reduction filters improves image noise and ameliorates beam-hardening artifacts at low-dose CT, such filters are limited by a compromise in lesion conspicuity and appearance in comparison with lesion conspicuity and appearance on baseline low-dose CT images.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Sixteen-detector row CT of abdomen and pelvis: study for optimization of Z-axis modulation technique performed in 153 patients.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine the optimal noise indexes required to obtain diagnostically acceptable computed tomographic (CT) images of the abdomen and pelvis with z-axis modulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-five patients underwent 16-section multi-detector row CT of the abdomen and pelvis with z-axis modulation at noise indexes of 10.5, 11.0, 11.5, and 12.0 HU with 10-380 mA. Subsequently, 58 patients were scanned at noise indexes of 12.5 and 15.0 HU with 75-380 mA. The weights of all subjects were recorded, and transverse and anteroposterior diameters were measured. The CT images were evaluated for abnormalities and graded for image quality in terms of noise and diagnostic acceptability by using a five-point scale. Objective noise in the liver parenchyma was measured, and the tube current was recorded at each section in all 153 patients. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the appropriate noise index and to assess the effect of patient weight and abdominal diameters on image noise and diagnostic acceptability at different noise indexes. Tube current-time products (in milliampere seconds) at various noise indexes were compared with those at CT previously performed without z-axis modulation. RESULTS: No significant difference in subjective image noise or diagnostic acceptability was found at noise indexes of 10.5-15.0 HU (P =.14), and objective noise was significantly inferior only at a noise index of 15.0 HU (P =.009). Compared with CT scanning at a 10.5-HU noise index, CT scanning at 12.5- and 15.0-HU noise indexes yielded, respectively, 10.0% and 41.3% reductions in radiation exposure. Patient weight and abdominal diameters affected subjective image quality. CONCLUSION: Use of a 15.0-HU noise index at 75-380 mA results in acceptable subjective image noise and diagnostic acceptability but significantly greater objective image noise at routine abdominal-pelvic CT. For greater image quality demands, a noise index of 12.5 HU results in acceptable image quality and a 19.6% reduction in radiation exposure.

Abdomen↗
PubMed2004

CT density measurements for characterization of adrenal tumors ex vivo: variability among three CT scanners.

OBJECTIVE: Many studies have suggested that Hounsfield measurements on unenhanced CT can reliably differentiate adrenal adenomas from nonadenomas using a scanner-independent threshold level. The purpose of this study was to determine whether establishment of a scanner-independent threshold for differentiation of adenomas from nonadenomas is technically feasible. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surgically resected adrenal tumor specimens (total, seven; adenomas, three; nonadenomas, four; size range, 17-76 mm), were placed in an anthropomorphic phantom. Lesion specimens were scanned with one MDCT and two single-detector scanners. Scanning protocols for all three scanners included variations in kilovoltage (140, 120, and 80 [Somatom Plus 4, Somatom VolumeZoom] or 100 [Tomoscan AV] kVp) and slice thickness. Hounsfield measurements were performed on exactly matched slices using regions of interest of a constant size. RESULTS: The difference in lesion Hounsfield measurements among scanning protocols with 140, 120, and 100/80 kVp was up to 6.2 H for the adenoma group and up to 3.8 H for the nonadenoma group. The comparison of the Tomoscan AV and the Somatom Plus 4 scanners showed a mean difference of 2.6 H at 120 kVp and of 4.6 H at 140 kVp. The differences between the Tomoscan AV and Somatom VolumeZoom scanners were 1.7 and 3.6 H for 120 and 140 kVp, respectively. Between the two Somatom scanners, the divergence was 2.9 and 3.3 H for the two kilovoltage settings. Differentiation between adenomas and nonadenomas was better at lower kilovoltage. Slice thickness did not affect the CT density measurements significantly. CONCLUSION: Significant differences in CT density measurements of adrenal tumors may occur when different CT scanners or imaging protocols are used. The dependence of measurements on scanner type and scanning technique makes the recommendation of a universal, scanner- and protocol-independent threshold problematic.

Adenoma↗
PubMed2004

Comparison of image quality between conventional and low-dose nonenhanced head CT.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Increasing use of CT for evaluating neurologic disease may expose patients to considerable levels of ionizing radiation. We compared the image quality of low-mAs head CT scans with that of conventional nonenhanced scans. METHODS: Conventional head CT scans were obtained in 20 patients (all >65 years with history of non-CNS malignancy) by using a multidetector technique: 170 mA and 1-second scanning time (ie, 170 mAs), 140 kVp, table speed of 7.5 mm per rotation, pitch of 0.75, section thickness of 5 mm, and field of view of 25 mm. A limited volume helical data acquisition covering four 5-mm-thick images was obtained by using 90 mAs but otherwise the same parameters. Three neuroradiologists visually rated the resulting images for quality in a blinded comparison. Representative 1- to 4-mm(2) regions of interest were chosen in gray matter and white matter locations. Conspicuity and the contrast-to-noise ratio were analyzed. Statistical comparisons were done by using the Student t test. RESULTS: Mean gray matter conspicuity was not significantly different between the 170- and 90-mAs groups (0.39 +/- 0.19 vs 0.41 +/- 0.03, P =.32). Mean gray matter contrast-to-noise ratio was approximately 22% higher with 170 mAs than with 90 mAs (1.77 +/- 0.52 vs 1.39 +/- 0.38, P =.005). All 90-mAs images were rated as having slightly greater image noise than the 170-mAs scans but with sufficient perceived resolution. CONCLUSION: Although 90-mAs head CT images were moderately noisier than 170-mAs images, they were rated as having acceptable diagnostic quality.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Can noise reduction filters improve low-radiation-dose chest CT images? Pilot study.

Effect of noise reduction filters on chest computed tomographic (CT) images acquired with 50% radiation dose reduction was evaluated. Two sets of images were acquired with multi-detector row CT at standard (220-280 mA) and 50% reduced (110-140 mA) tube current at the level of the carina. After postprocessing with six noise reduction filters, images were compared with baseline standard-dose images for noise, sharpness, and contrast in lungs, mediastinum, and chest wall. Quantitative image noise was measured in descending thoracic aorta. Modulation transfer functions were calculated from CT images of 50-microm wire. Noise reduction filters reduced image noise on low-radiation-dose chest CT images, with some compromise in image sharpness and contrast assessed qualitatively, and slightly altered modulation transfer function at higher spatial frequencies.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Low-dose CT of the abdomen: evaluation of image improvement with use of noise reduction filters pilot study.

A prospective assessment of improvement in image quality at low-radiation-dose computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen by using noise reduction filters was performed. CT images acquired at standard and 50% reduced tube current were processed with six noise reduction filters and evaluated by three radiologists for image noise, sharpness, contrast, and overall image quality in terms of abdominal organ depiction. Quantitative image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio were measured. Baseline low-dose CT images were significantly worse than standard-dose CT images (P <.05). A statistically significant reduction of noise in low-dose images processed with three filters was noted. In conclusion, use of noise reduction filters decreased image noise at low-dose CT.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Multislice CT: update on radiation and screening.

With ever-expanding applications, increasing availability, and accessibility of CT scanners, concerns have been raised about radiation exposure associated with CT scanning. Global statistics and projections suggest increasing use of CT scanning and its contribution to radiation exposure is a cause for concern. Several strategies based on modulation of scanning parameters and technologic improvisations have been developed in an effort to reduce associated radiation dose. This article discusses the basis for rising concern regarding radiation dose associated with CT scanning. The fundamentals of CT dose estimation are described along with strategies that aim to reduce radiation dose associated with CT scanning based on patient characteristics, study indications, and technological innovations.

Humans↗
PubMed2003

Evaluation of simethicone-coated cellulose as a negative oral contrast agent for abdominal CT.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Because of the increased clinical use of computed tomography (CT) for imaging the abdominal vasculature and urinary tract, there is a need for negative contrast agents. The authors undertook this study to assess the suitability of simethicone-coated cellulose (SCC), which is approved for use as an oral contrast agent in sonography, for use as a negative oral contrast agent in abdominal CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study involved 40 adult patients scheduled to undergo abdominal CT for the evaluation of hematuria. Prior to scanning, 20 subjects received 800 mL of SCC and 20 received 800 mL of water as an oral contrast agent. Imaging was performed with a multi-detector row helical scanner in two phases, according to the abdominal CT protocol used for hematuria evaluation at the authors' institution. The first, "early" phase began an average of 15 minutes after the ingestion of contrast material; the second, "late" phase began an average of 45 minutes after the ingestion of contrast material. Blinded analysis was performed by three abdominal radiologists separately, using a three-point scale (0 = poor, 1 = acceptable, 2 = excellent) to assess the effectiveness of SCC for marking the proximal, middle, and distal small bowel. Average scores for enhancement with SCC and with water were obtained and compared. Statistical analysis was performed with a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: SCC was assigned higher mean scores than water for enhancement in each segment of the bowel, both on early-phase images (0.8-1.35 for SCC vs 0.6-1.1 for water) and on late-phase images (1.1-1.4 vs 0.81-0.96). Bowel marking with SCC, particularly in the jejunum and ileum, also was rated better than that with water in a high percentage of patients. The differences between the scores for water and for SCC, however, were not statistically significant (P > .05). CONCLUSION: SCC is effective as a negative oral contrast agent for small bowel marking at CT.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

Hepatic MR imaging with ferumoxides: multicenter study of safety and effectiveness of direct injection protocol.

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and effectiveness of an undiluted direct injection of ferumoxides with those of a diluted slow infusion of ferumoxides during 30 minutes in patients with known liver lesions or in those suspected of having them. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred thirty-three patients at 16 institutions were randomized to receive either an undiluted direct injection of 0.56 mg of iron per kilogram of body weight of ferumoxides administered during 2 minutes (2 mL/min) or a diluted slow infusion administered during 30 minutes. Safety was assessed with monitoring for adverse events and laboratory tests. For sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy analysis, two independent blinded observers identified and classified lesions as benign or malignant with precontrast images and with pre- and postcontrast images combined. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in adverse events in the group with direct injection compared with those in the group with infusion (21 [18%] of 114 patients vs 19 [17%] of 112 patients, respectively). No serious adverse events were observed. The most common adverse events in the group with direct injection versus the group with infusion were headache (five [4%] of 114 vs three [3%] of 112, respectively) and back pain (five [4%] of 114 vs three [3%] of 112, respectively). Overall, in 68 (62%) of 109 patients with direct injection and 71 (66%) of 108 patients with infusion, additional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging information was obtained after ferumoxides administration (P =.67). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the diagnosis of malignancy were significantly improved by adding images obtained after ferumoxides administration to the images obtained before contrast agent administration (P <.05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: Direct injection of ferumoxides has safety and effectiveness profiles similar to those of slow infusion of the agent. Further findings indicate that the addition of ferumoxides increases the sensitivity and specificity of hepatic MR evaluation when compared with unenhanced MR imaging.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Evaluation of neck and body metastases to nodes with ferumoxtran 10-enhanced MR imaging: phase III safety and efficacy study.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of ferumoxtran 10-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for diagnosis of metastases to lymph nodes and the clinical usefulness of ferumoxtran 10 in nodal staging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-two patients were injected with ferumoxtran 10. Readers independently evaluated precontrast MR images by using node size criteria and subjective assessment of other imaging features. Ferumoxtran 10-enhanced MR images were evaluated alone and paired with precontrast images for comparison. The diagnostic performances of precontrast MR size criteria and postcontrast MR imaging were evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Lymph node signal intensity was correlated with histopathologic findings. MR imaging and histopathologic nodal stages were compared. RESULTS: Node-level sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of precontrast MR imaging were 54%, 82%, and 68%, respectively, with node size criterion alone; 91%, 51%, and 71%, respectively, with subjective reader assessment; 85%, 85%, and 85%, respectively, with postcontrast MR imaging alone; and 83%, 77%, and 80%, respectively, with paired pre- and postcontrast MR imaging. Compared with size criteria, subjective reader assessment had higher sensitivity but substantially lower specificity. Areas under the ROC curve for pre- and postcontrast MR imaging were 0.76 and 0.83, respectively. Nonmetastatic nodes had significantly lower signal intensity than metastatic nodes on postcontrast T2-weighted MR images (P <.001). Postcontrast nodal staging was significantly more accurate than precontrast nodal staging (P <.01). Headache, back pain, vasodilatation, and urticaria each occurred in 6% of patients. CONCLUSION: Ferumoxtran 10-enhanced MR imaging was safe and effective and facilitated improved diagnostic performance. Use of iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging increased the positive predictive value by 20% and the accuracy by 14% compared with reader assessment. Differentiating patients with no nodal metastatic involvement was more reliable with ferumoxtran 10-enhanced MR imaging than with precontrast MR imaging.

Adolescent↗