Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Sandra M Brown

Publications and source records attributed to Sandra M Brown.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Effective corneal refractive diameter as a function of the object tangent angle in visual space.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the currently accepted method of selecting a minimum optical zone diameter for laser refractive surgery that is equal to or slightly greater than the dark-adapted pupil diameter provides a sufficient diameter of corneal surface to focus light arising from objects in the paracentral and peripheral visual field. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA. METHODS: An optical model of the anterior segment was developed to calculate the effective corneal refractive diameter (ECRD), which is the diameter of the area of cornea that refracts all incident light rays arising from an object through the physical pupil (PP). This model incorporates the patient variables of central anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal curvature (K(c)), and the diameter of the apparent entrance pupil (EP). The model was expanded to incorporate distant objects off the line of sight (LOS), described by their angular displacement from the fixation object in visual space (the object tangent angle delta(ob)). Results were calculated for the 360 meridian degree visual field (ie, for all objects in visual space perceptually displaced from the fixation object by angle delta(ob)). The effect of the prolate nature of the cornea was also investigated. RESULTS: The ECRD expanded rapidly as a function of PP and delta(ob) but was minimally influenced by K(c). Beyond a critical object tangent angle delta(c), light rays striking the corneal vertex were not refracted through the PP, and the ECRD became an annular surface centered on the corneal vertex. The delta(c) was not a function of K, but increased as the PP increased and decreased as the ACD increased. The prolate nature of the cornea had little influence on the ECRD, even for very peripheral light rays. CONCLUSIONS: The ECRD expands rapidly when considering distant objects only slightly displaced from the LOS. A patient treated with an optical zone equal to or slightly greater than the dark-adapted pupil diameter may experience vision quality loss for paracentral and midperipheral objects even under conditions of ambient indoor lighting.

Cornea↗
PubMed2005

ROP in New York State.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Current Procedural Terminology↗
PubMed2005

Topical apraclonidine in the diagnosis of suspected Horner syndrome.

Topical cocaine is used to confirm the clinical diagnosis of ocular sympathetic denervation, or Horner Syndrome (HS). Cocaine blocks re-uptake of norepinephrine (NE) by sympathetic nerve terminals in the iris dilator muscle, transiently increasing its concentration in the synaptic junction. Norepinephrine activates alpha1 receptors in the iris dilator to cause pupil dilation. In HS, cocaine fails to dilate the affected pupil as much as the unaffected pupil, but its indirect action makes it a weak dilator, and the test can give equivocal results. Cocaine is also a controlled substance and therefore difficult to obtain. A practical and reliable alternative to cocaine is apraclonidine, an ocular hypotensive agent that has a weak direct action on alpha1 receptors and therefore minimal to no clinical effect on the pupils of normal eyes. Patients with HS have denervation supersensitivity of the alpha1 receptors in the iris stroma of the affected eye, making the pupil dilator responsive to apraclonidine. In patients with HS, reversal of anisocoria occurs after bilateral instillation of apraclonidine 1% or 0.5%. Two cases that demonstrate this effect are reported. Apraclonidine should be considered a candidate to replace cocaine in the pharmacologic diagnosis of HS if a gold-standard comparison study confirms these results.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2004

The effect of daily use of brimonidine tartrate on the dark-adapted pupil diameter.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of daily brimonidine tartrate 0.15% on the dark-adapted pupil diameter. DESIGN: Observational case series. METHOD: Ten normal volunteers administered brimonidine to their right eyes once daily. Four to six hours later, infrared pupil photographs were taken after dark adaptation. Measurements were performed at baseline; on treatment days 1, 5, 11, and 18; and on washout days 1 and 2. RESULTS: One subject had no response. The nine responding subjects showed an average maximum antimydriatic effect of -1.63 mm (range, -0.57 mm--2.30 mm); all subjects experienced tachyphylaxis. Five subjects showed rebound mydriasis (mean maximum rebound +0.87 mm larger than baseline; range 0.50 mm-1.22 mm). The untreated pupil also responded, showing antimydriasis (two subjects), rebound mydriasis (two subjects), or paradoxical direct mydriasis (one subject). CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily use of brimonidine tartrate to prevent dark-induced pupil dilation can lead to tachyphylaxis and rebound mydriasis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Day to day variability of the dark-adapted pupil diameter.

PURPOSE: To determine the individual variability of the dark-adapted pupil diameter over 2 testing sessions using a standardized dark-adaptation protocol. SETTING: Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA. METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort study, 40 volunteers with no history of ocular disease, surgery, or injury other than requirement for refractive correction were included. The right eye was tested. A standardized dark-adaptation protocol was used that controlled for accommodation and patient alertness. Infrared, still digital photographs were taken after 5 and 10 minutes of dark adaptation and analyzed independently by 2 investigators using digital-image software. Two test sessions were performed 1 to 7 days apart. Lifestyle factors such as sleep, diet, and exercise were not controlled. RESULTS: The mean subject age was 31.5 years (range 20 to 49 years). There were 20 men; 27 subjects wore correction for myopia, and 13 wore no correction. The mean interval between test sessions was 2 days (range 1 to 7 days). The mean difference and 95% confidence intervals for pupil diameter difference between sessions were as follows: 5-minute readings, +0.032 mm (-0.030 to +0.094); 10-minute readings, -0.006 mm (-0.059 to +0.047); mean of 5- and 10-minute readings, +0.013 mm (-0.038 to +0.064). Using the paired t test, the pupil diameter did not differ significantly between sessions in 5-minute dark adaptation (P =.2980), 10-minute dark adaptation (P =.8263), or the mean (P =.6049). CONCLUSION: Using a consistent dark-adaptation protocol that controlled for alertness, individuals aged 20 to 49 years showed no significant variation in dark-adapted pupil diameter when tested twice in 1 week.

Accommodation, Ocular↗
PubMed2004

Normal values for a clinical test of letter-recognition contrast thresholds.

PURPOSE: To investigate the contrast thresholds (CTs) in normal subjects using a high-luminance, letter-recognition task under clinically relevant testing conditions. SETTING: Texas Tech University Health Sciences System, Lubbock, Texas, USA. METHODS: Sixty normal subjects aged 20 to 49 years with a best corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better in both eyes participated. M & S Technologies software was used to display black-on-white Sloan letters at contrast levels of 25%, 20%, 15%, 12%, and 10% through 1% in 1% decrements. The effects of age, sex, optotype size, eye dominance, ambient illumination level (bright = 625 - 630 lux; dim = <3 lux), and direction of approach to threshold were analyzed using a multivariate, ordinary, least-squares analysis. RESULTS: Age and sex did not influence CTs. Ascending versus descending testing was not statistically significant (P>.5). The effects of room illumination and eye dominance were significant (P<.01). Significant differences were found between 20/30 and 20/50, 20/30 and 20/70, and 20/50 and 20/70 optotype sizes (P<.01 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: A commercially available, computer-based test of CTs was easy to administer and apparently easy for inexperienced subjects to perform. The results suggest criteria for detecting visual problems concerned with familiar but complex spatial-image shapes. This information might be used to assess the effects of treatments such as laser refractive surgery on recognition contrast. Further study is warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Horizontal versus vertical dark-adapted pupil diameters in normal individuals.

PURPOSE: To determine the distribution of the difference between the horizontal and vertical dark-adapted entrance pupil diameters (PDs) in normal individuals. SETTING: Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA. METHODS: In this observational cohort study, high-magnification infrared pupil photography was performed of the right eye of 26 normal volunteers from 20 to 47 years of age. The horizontal and vertical PDs were measured using commercially available digital-image software, taking into account the effect of photographic parallax. RESULTS: In 24 subjects (85%), the vertical PD was larger than the horizontal PD; in 8 subjects (31%), it was 0.30 mm to 0.50 mm larger. In 2 subjects, the horizontal diameter was slightly larger but the difference was <0.10 mm. The mean horizontal to vertical PD ratio was 0.97. CONCLUSIONS: In this study population, the vertical PD was larger than the horizontal PD in most subjects. Although the difference was a fraction of the total PD, it may be important for laser refractive surgery planning and preoperative risk counseling of some patients.

Adult↗