Samuel H Payne | Search PubMed

PubMed2026

AI proteomics: from protein identification to virtual cells.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming scientific research, including proteomics. In this Perspective, we highlight key mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics areas where AI is driving innovation, ranging from protein identification to building AI virtual cells. These include improving peptide and protein identification and quantification; characterizing protein-protein interactions and protein complexes; advancing spatial and perturbation proteomics; integrating multi-omics data; and, ultimately, enabling AI virtual cells. Finally, we call for global collaboration among data producers, data consumers and other stakeholders to establish an AI-friendly ecosystem for MS-based proteomics, laying the foundation for transformative advancements in proteomics driven by AI.

Proteomics↗

PubMed2025

Improved Detection of Differentially Abundant Proteins through FDR-Control of Peptide-Identity-Propagation.

The goal of proteomics is to identify and quantify peptides and proteins within a biological sample. Almost all algorithms for the identification of peptides in LC-MS/MS data employ two steps: peptide/spectrum matching and peptide-identity-propagation (PIP), also known as match-between-runs. PIP can routinely account for up to 40% of all results, with that proportion rising as high as 75% in single-cell proteomics. Unlike peptide identities derived through peptide/spectrum matches, for which error estimation has been strictly enforced for decades, peptide identities derived through PIP have not historically been subject to statistical evaluation. As an indispensable component of label-free quantification, PIP needs a statistically rigorous method for estimating its false-discovery rate (FDR). We present a method for FDR control of PIP, called PIP-ECHO, and devise a rigorous protocol for evaluating FDR control of any PIP method. Using three different benchmark data sets, we evaluate PIP-ECHO alongside the PIP procedures implemented by FlashLFQ, IonQuant, and MaxQuant. These analyses show that only PIP-ECHO can accurately control the FDR of PIP at 1% across all data sets. When analyzing a spike-in data set, PIP-ECHO increases both the accuracy and sensitivity of differential expression analysis, yielding substantially more differentially abundant proteins than either MaxQuant or IonQuant.

Proteomics↗