Samra Waheed | Search PubMed

PubMed2003

Update on customized excimer ablations: recent developments reported in 2002.

Customized corneal ablation is an exciting frontier in refractive surgery that incorporates wavefront technology to detect and correct higher order aberrations in addition to spherocylindrical refractive errors. The goal is to achieve super normal vision in terms of acuity and contrast. As the concept of wavefront customized ablations is still new, there are a number of aspects of its clinical application that need analysis and understanding. Numerous reports have appeared in the literature during the past year that address the developments, concerns, and limitations of wavefront technology and custom ablation. We have attempted to summarize and discuss the significant reports in this current review. Our focus is on the optical and physiologic limits of wavefront customized correction, including the effect of accommodation, aging, and flap creation on the aberration profile. In addition, we also present the laser technology requirements, and clinical outcomes of customized excimer ablations that are reported to date.

Cornea↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Flap-induced and laser-induced ocular aberrations in a two-step LASIK procedure.

PURPOSE: To identify aberrations created by making a laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap and treating the refractive error with laser ablation at a later date. METHODS: Twenty-two eyes (11 patients) underwent a two-step LASIK procedure with the Alcon LADAR-Vision laser (Alcon Laboratories, Ft Worth, Tex). In the first step, a flap was created, and 1 month later the flap was lifted and laser ablation performed. Aberrations were measured with the LADARWave wavefront measurement device preoperatively, after making the flap (1 day, 1 week, 1 month) and after laser treatment (1 week and 3 months). Two different microkeratomes were used (Moria M2 [Moria; Antony, France] and SKBM [Alcon]). With the SKBM, all flap hinges were nasal; with the Moria M2, the flap hinge was randomly selected as superior in one eye and nasal in the other. RESULTS: A slight hyperopic shift was seen in the manifest and wavefront refractions at 1 week and 1 month after flap creation for the Moria M2, but not for the SKBM. Statistically significant change in manifest sphere with the Moria M2 showed a mean shift at 1 month of +0.50 +/- 0.08 diopters (D) whereas the SKBM showed no mean shift, but less reproducibility, +0.06 +/- 0.17 D. Higher order aberrations after flap creation were statistically significantly higher for all except coma with both microkeratomes, but with no predictable trends observed. Although higher in magnitude, post flap aberrations were less than one quarter the increase noted in post laser aberrations, except for "other terms." CONCLUSIONS: Creating a LASIK flap induces changes in lower and higher order ocular aberrations. The change in lower order terms is microkeratome dependent. Higher order aberrations increase to a much larger degree after laser than after flap, making a two-step procedure unnecessary in conventional LASIK.

Adult↗