Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Søren Kold

Publications and source records attributed to Søren Kold.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Bone compaction enhances implant fixation in a canine gap model.

A new bone preparation technique, compaction, has increased fixation of implants inserted with exact-fit or press-fit to bone. Furthermore, a demonstrated spring-back effect of compacted bone might be of potential value in reducing the initial gaps that often exist between clinical inserted implants and bone. However, it is unknown whether the compression and breakage of trabeculae during the compaction procedure results in impaired gap-healing of compacted bone. Therefore, we compared compaction with conventional drilling in a canine gap model. Grit-blasted titanium implants (diameter 6 mm) were bilaterally inserted into cavities initially expanded to 8 mm diameters in the proximal humeri. Each dog served as its own control; thus, one humerus had the implant cavity prepared with compaction, the other with drilling. Eight dogs were euthanized after 2 weeks, and 7 dogs after 4 weeks. Humeri from additional 7 dogs represented time 0. At time 0 a spring-back effect of compacted bone was demonstrated as cavities, initially expanded to 8 mm by compaction, were reduced to a median cavity diameter of 6.6 mm. In contrast, cavities initially expanded to 8 mm by drilling, had a median cavity diameter of 8.0 mm at time 0. Compaction significantly increased all push-out parameters at 2 weeks. Compaction significantly increased peri-implant bone density at 0 and 2 weeks, and bone implant contact at 2 and 4 weeks. The faster mechanical and histological fixation with compaction indicates that the beneficial effect of reduced gap size, as compacted bone springs back, is not eliminated by an impaired gap-healing of compacted bone.

Animals↗

Bone compaction enhances fixation of hydroxyapatite-coated implants in a canine gap model.

Primary cementless joint replacement depends partly on the ability of bone to heal into those areas of an inserted implant where a gap to surrounding bone initially exists. A new bone preparation technique, compaction, has enhanced gap-healing around grit-blasted implants without osteo-conductive properties. However, hydroxyapatite (HA) porous-coated implants with osteo-conductive properties are often inserted clinically to enhance gap healing and implant fixation. It is unknown whether the osteo-conductive properties of HA porous-coated implants might overwhelm the beneficial effects of compaction on gap healing. Therefore, we compared the compaction technique with the conventional bone-removing technique, drilling, using HA porous-coated implants in a canine gap model. HA porous-coated titanium implants were bilaterally inserted into oversized cavities of the proximal humeri of seven dogs. Each dog served as its own control. Thus, one humerus had the implant cavity prepared with compaction, the other with drilling. Two weeks after surgery push-out test and histomorphometry was performed. Compaction significantly increased ultimate shear strength, energy absorption, apparent shear stiffness, bone implant contact, and peri-implant bone density. The results of this study suggest that compaction may enhance gap healing when osteo-conductive HA porous coated implants are inserted in joint replacements.

Absorbable Implants↗

Importance of pre-clinical testing exemplified by femoral fractures in vitro with new bone preparation technique.

BACKGROUND: A new bone preparation technique, using smooth tamps for bone compaction, has increased crucial initial implant stability. However, preparing the femur with bulky smooth tamps, which from size to size increases the same amount in anterior to posterior as in lateral to medial dimensions, has increased the risk of a femoral fracture. This study examined whether compaction also involved an increased femoral fracture risk when using newly developed smooth tamps with a slim anterior to posterior dimension. METHODS: One femur in each pair of 10 cadaver femurs was prepared by the compaction technique using cylindrical reamers and smooth tamps. The contralateral femur was conventionally prepared with conical reamers and toothed rasps. The tamps and rasps differed in design as a proximal lateral tip was only present on the smooth tamps. Using a standardized test protocol, the instruments were driven into the femoral canal in controlled manner by a drop tower. FINDINGS: At maximum test conditions, five of 10 femurs in the compaction group had fractured, as compared with no fractures in the rasping group. All fractures were longitudinal fissures in the greater trochanter, and these fissures were associated with the extended proximal lateral tip of the tamps. INTERPRETATION: Since the lateral fractures in the compaction group were associated with the extended proximal lateral tip of the tamps, it seems that fracture rates are influenced by instrumentation design. Therefore adequate pre-clinical evaluation is warranted prior to the introduction of new implantation techniques.

Aged↗

Fixation of revision implants is improved by a surgical technique to crack the sclerotic bone rim.

Revision joint replacement has poorer outcomes compared with primary joint replacement, and these poor outcomes have been associated with poorer fixation. We investigated a surgical technique done during the revision operation to improve access from the marrow space to the implant interface by locally cracking the sclerotic bone rim that forms during aseptic loosening. Sixteen implants were inserted bilaterally by distal femur articulation of the knee joint of eight dogs, using our controlled experimental model that replicates the revision setting (sclerotic bone rim, dense fibrous tissue, macrophages, elevated cytokines) by pistoning a loaded 6.0-mm implant 500 microm into the distal femur with particulate PE. At 8 weeks, one of two revision procedures was done. Both revision procedures included complete removal of the membrane, scraping, lavaging, and inserting a revision plasma-spray Ti implant. The crack revision procedure also used a splined tool to circumferentially locally perforate the sclerotic bone rim before insertion of an identical revision implant. Superior fixation was achieved with the cracking procedure in this experimental model. Revision implants inserted with the rim cracking procedure had a significantly higher pushout strength (fivefold median increase) and energy to failure (sixfold median increase), compared with the control revision procedure. Additional evaluation is needed of local perforation of sclerotic bone rim as a simple bone-sparing means to improve revision implant fixation and thereby increase revision implant longevity.

Animals↗

Bone compaction enhances fixation of weightbearing titanium implants.

Implant stability is crucial for implant survival. A new surgical technique, compaction, has increased in vitro implant stability and in vivo fixation of nonweightbearing implants. However, the in vivo effects of compaction on weightbearing implants are unknown. As implants inserted clinically are weightbearing, the effects of compaction on weightbearing implants were examined. The hypothesis was that compaction would increase implant fixation compared with conventional drilling. Porous-coated titanium implants were inserted bilaterally into the weightbearing portion of the femoral condyles of dogs. In each dog, one knee had the implant cavity prepared with drilling, and the other knee was prepared with compaction. Eight dogs were euthanized after 2 weeks, and eight dogs were euthanized after 4 weeks. Femoral condyles from an additional eight dogs represented Time 0. Compacted specimens had higher bone-implant contact and periimplant bone density at 0 and 2 weeks, but not at 4 weeks. A biphasic response of compaction was found with a pushout test, as compaction increased ultimate shear strength and energy absorption at 0 and 4 weeks, but not at 2 weeks. This biphasic response indicates that compaction enhances implant fixation by mechanical and biological mechanisms. Therefore, compaction might have potential value in total joint replacement in the future.

Animals↗

Compacted cancellous bone has a spring-back effect.

A new surgical technique, compaction, has been shown to improve implant fixation. It has been speculated that the enhanced implant fixation with compaction could be due to a spring-back effect of compacted bone. However, such an effect has yet to be shown. Therefore we investigated in a canine model whether implant cavities prepared with compaction had spring back. Before killing the animals, we used one of two surgical techniques to make implant cavities of identical dimensions in both lateral femoral condyles of 7 dogs. One side had the implant cavity prepared with compaction, the other side with drilling. The cavities were left empty in vivo for 10 minutes before the dogs were killed. Postoperative micro-CT scanning showed that the diameters of the compacted cavities were significantly smaller than those of the drilled cavities, although they had had identical dimensions initially. Thus we found a spring-back effect of compacted bone, which may be important for increasing implant fixation by reducing initial gaps between the implant and bone.

Animals↗

Femoral fracture risk in hip arthroplasty: smooth versus toothed instruments.

Compaction of cancellous bone with smooth tamps in total hip arthroplasty has been shown to improve initial implant fixation. It is not known, however, whether this improved fixation occurs at the expense of an increased risk of intraoperative femoral fracture. The current authors explore this issue by comparing the risk of fracture in 10 pairs of femurs prepared with either smooth tamps or conventional toothed broaches. Using one pass for each size, smooth tamps were advanced incrementally into one femur of each pair and toothed broaches were advanced incrementally into the contralateral femur. A controlled impulse, representative of a typical impact during surgery, was applied to the instruments by a drop tower (mean starting force, 3017 N). When the instruments no longer advanced distally, the applied force was increased incrementally. Instrument sizes were increased until a femoral fracture was observed or the impact exceeded 8000 N without causing a femoral fracture. At preoperative templated size, significantly more femurs that had tamps had fractured (eight of 10), compared with femurs that had broaches (two of 10). Smooth tamps therefore increased the risk of intraoperative femoral fracture in vitro in this particular implant design developed for cemented fixation of the femoral component.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗