Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Séverine Chambeyron

Publications and source records attributed to Séverine Chambeyron.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Nuclear re-organisation of the Hoxb complex during mouse embryonic development.

The spatial and temporal co-linear expression of Hox genes during development is an exquisite example of programmed gene expression. The precise mechanisms underpinning this are not known. Analysis of Hoxb chromatin structure and nuclear organisation, during the differentiation of murine ES cells, has lent support to the idea that there is a progressive 'opening' of chromatin structure propagated through Hox clusters from 3'to 5', which contributes to the sequential activation of gene expression. Here, we show that similar events occur in vivo in at least two stages of development. The first changes in chromatin structure and nuclear organisation were detected during gastrulation in the Hoxb1-expressing posterior primitive streak region: Hoxb chromatin was decondensed and the Hoxb1 locus looped out from its chromosome territory, in contrast to non-expressing Hoxb9, which remained within the chromosome territory. At E9.5, when differential Hox expression along the anteroposterior axis is being established, we found concomitant changes in the organisation of Hoxb. Hoxb organisation differed between regions of the neural tube that had never expressed Hoxb [rhombomeres (r) 1 and 2], strongly expressed Hoxb1 but not b9 (r4), had downregulated Hoxb1 (r5), expressed Hoxb9 but not Hoxb1 (spinal cord), and expressed both genes (tail bud). We conclude that Hoxb chromatin decondensation and nuclear re-organisation is regulated in different parts of the developing embryo, and at different developmental stages. The differential nuclear organisation of Hoxb along the anteroposterior axis of the developing neural tube is coherent with co-linear Hox gene expression. In early development nuclear re-organisation is coupled to Hoxb expression, but does not anticipate it.

Animals↗

Chromatin decondensation and nuclear reorganization of the HoxB locus upon induction of transcription.

The colinearity of genes in Hox clusters suggests a role for chromosome structure in gene regulation. We reveal programmed changes in chromatin structure and nuclear organization upon induction of Hoxb expression by retinoic acid. There is an early increase in the histone modifications that are marks of active chromatin at both the early expressed gene Hoxb1, and also at Hoxb9 that is not expressed until much later. There is also a visible decondensation of the chromatin between Hoxb1 and Hoxb9 at this early stage. However, a further change in higher-order chromatin structure, looping out of genes from the chromosome territory, occurs in synchrony with the execution of the gene expression program. We suggest that higher-order chromatin structure regulates the expression of the HoxB cluster at several levels. Locus-wide changes in chromatin structure (histone modification and chromatin decondensation) may establish a transcriptionally poised state but are not sufficient for the temporal program of gene expression. The choreographed looping out of decondensed chromatin from chromosome territories may then allow for activation of high levels of transcription from the sequence of genes along the cluster.

Animals↗

Does looping and clustering in the nucleus regulate gene expression?

There has been considerable interest in the way that chromatin is spatially organised within the cell nucleus and how that may relate to gene expression and its control. New molecular techniques have identified looped chromatin domains at the mammalian beta-globin and the Drosophila hsp70 loci. Looped domains may insulate chromatin from the influence of neighbouring domains, and the bases of loops may also act to concentrate proteins locally within the nucleus. The spatial clustering of sequences from the Drosophila bithorax complex, located in trans, has also been demonstrated. An emerging theme is that bringing DNA and proteins together within a defined sub-region of the nuclear volume facilitates both the activation and the repression of gene expression. Nuclear compartments may also be involved in the post-translational modification of proteins by sumoylation and ubiquitylation.

Animals↗

Gene silencing triggered by non-LTR retrotransposons in the female germline of Drosophila melanogaster.

Several studies have recently shown that the activity of some eukaryotic transposable elements is sensitive to the presence of homologous transgenes, suggesting the involvement of homology-dependent gene-silencing mechanisms in their regulation. Here we provide data indicating that two non-LTR retrotransposons of Drosophila melanogaster are themselves natural triggers of homology-dependent gene silencing. We show that, in the female germline of D. melanogaster, fragments from the R1 or from the I retrotransposons can mediate silencing of chimeric transcription units into which they are inserted. This silencing is probably mediated by sequence identity with endogenous copies of the retrotransposons because it does not occur with a fragment from the divergent R1 elements of Bombyx mori, and, when a fragment of I is used, it occurs only in females containing functional copies of the I element. This silencing is not accompanied by cosuppression of the endogenous gene homologous to the chimeric transcription unit, which contrasts to some other silencing mechanisms in Drosophila. These observations suggest that in the female germline of D. melanogaster the R1 and I retrotransposons may self-regulate their own activity and their copy number by triggering homology-dependent gene silencing.

Animals↗

Chimeric RNA transposition intermediates of the I factor produce precise retrotransposed copies.

I elements in Drosophila melanogaster are non-long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons of particular interest because high levels of transposition can be induced by appropriate crosses. They use a full-length RNA transposition intermediate as a template for reverse transcription. Detailed molecular characterization of this intermediate is rendered difficult because of the many transcripts produced by defective elements. The use of an active I element marked with a sequence encoding the HA epitope solves this problem. We used an RNA circularization procedure followed by RT-PCR to analyze the transcripts produced by actively transposing tagged I elements. Most start at the 5' end at the second nucleotide of the I element and all are polyadenylated at a site located in genomic sequences downstream of the 3' end. One of the tagged I elements, inserted in locus 88A, produces chimeric transcripts that carry sequences from both 5'- and 3'-flanking genomic DNA. We show that synthesis of these chimeric transcripts is controlled by the I element itself. Analysis of full-length transposed copies of this element shows that the extra sequences at the 5' and 3' ends are not integrated during retrotransposition. This suggests that initiation and arrest of reverse transcription during retrotransposition are precise processes.

3' Flanking Region↗

Tandem UAA repeats at the 3'-end of the transcript are essential for the precise initiation of reverse transcription of the I factor in Drosophila melanogaster.

Non-long terminal repeat retrotransposons, widespread among eukaryotic genomes, transpose by reverse transcription of an RNA intermediate. Some of them, like L1 in the human, terminate at the 3'-end with a poly(dA) stretch whereas others, like the I factor in Drosophila melanogaster, have instead a short sequence repeated in tandem. This suggests different requirements for the initiation of reverse transcription. Here, we have used an RNA circularization/reverse transcription-PCR technique to analyze the 5'- and 3'-ends of the full-length transcripts produced by the I factor at the time of active retrotransposition. These transcripts are capped and polyadenylated similar to conventional messenger RNAs. We have analyzed the 3'-ends of transcripts and transposed copies produced by I elements mutated at the 3'-ends. Transcripts devoid of tandem UAA repeats, although capable of building the components of the retrotransposition machinery, are inefficiently used as retrotransposition intermediates. Such transcripts produce rare new integrated copies issued from the inaccurate initiation of reverse transcription near the 3'-end of the element. The tandem UAA repeats at the 3'-end of the transcripts of I are required for the efficient and precise initiation of reverse transcription. This strong specificity of the I factor reverse transcriptase for its own transcript has implications for the impact of I factor retrotransposition on the host genome.

Animals↗