Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Woodhams

Publications and source records attributed to S Woodhams.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

The role of transarterial embolization in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To review the role of transarterial renal embolization in our unit, assessing the indications, tolerability and efficacy of this technique for treating renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients undergoing transarterial embolization between 1991 and 1999 were identified and 25 case notes analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: Most patients (14 of 25) presented with less advanced (stage I-III) RCC who were unable or unwilling to undergo radical surgery; the remainder (11) presented with advanced (stage IV) disease. The embolizing agent was ethanol, usually combined with stainless steel coils (85% of cases). Procedural pain and fever was controlled successfully. The median hospital stay associated with the procedure was 4 days. At the time of analysis six of 11 stage IV and 11 of 14 stage I-III patients were alive (median follow-up 27 and 39 months, respectively). Symptoms from the primary tumour were well controlled. Overall, 17 of 25 (68%) of patients reported no problems while three (12%) required brief hospital admission for treatment of persistent haematuria. Fourteen patients were subsequently re-staged; the primary tumour in two had increased, in seven remained unchanged and in five it decreased. No patients without metastases developed them and metastases in two patients regressed. CONCLUSION: Transarterial embolization is associated with minimal morbidity and complications, and subsequent symptom control is good. The effect of palliative embolization on RCC progression is unknown and requires prospective investigation. Presently, there is no role for cytoreductive embolization; it should be included as a treatment option in clinical trials evaluating such options in patients with metastatic RCC.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

One year's clinical experience with unenhanced spiral computed tomography for the assessment of acute loin pain suggestive of renal colic.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of unenhanced spiral computed tomography (CT) as the primary investigation of choice for suspected acute renal colic in clinical urological practice. Patients and Methods Between 1 August 1997 and 31 July 1998, all patients attending a hospital accident and emergency department with acute loin pain suggestive of renal colic underwent a physical examination, urine analysis, plain abdominal radiography (if clinically indicated) and unenhanced spiral CT. The effective radiation dose and financial cost of unenhanced spiral CT and standard three-film emergency intravenous urography (IVU) were calculated. RESULTS: In all, 116 patients were assessed, 63 of whom had calculi and related secondary phenomena of obstruction identified on unenhanced spiral CT. There were two false-positive and one false-negative result. An alternative urinary tract diagnosis was made in four patients, including two with renal cell carcinoma and one ureteric transitional cell carcinoma. Causes other than in the urinary tract were diagnosed in three patients, i.e. two with ovarian cyst and one with sigmoid diverticulitis. The effective radiation dose of unenhanced spiral CT was 4.7 mSv and that for three-film IVU was 1.5 mSv. The costs of both IVU and unenhanced spiral CT were identical. CONCLUSIONS: Unenhanced spiral CT allows a rapid, contrast-medium-free, anatomically accurate diagnosis of urinary tract calculi and in the present series had a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 97%. CT provided an alternative diagnosis in 6% of patients. These advantages must be weighed against the threefold greater radiation dose of unenhanced spiral CT than with three-film IVU, and in practice the requirement for a radiologist to interpret routine axial scans.

Adult↗