Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S W Lagakos

Publications and source records attributed to S W Lagakos.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Efficiency comparisons of rank and permutation tests based on summary statistics computed from repeated measures data.

A popular method of using repeated measures data to compare treatment groups in a clinical trial is to summarize each individual's outcomes with a scalar summary statistic, and then to perform a two-group comparison of the resulting statistics using a rank or permutation test. Many different types of summary statistics are used in practice, including discrete and continuous functions of the underlying repeated measures data. When the repeated measures processes of the comparison groups differ by a location shift at each time point, the asymptotic relative efficiency of (continuous) summary statistics that are linear functions of the repeated measures has been determined and used to compare tests in this class. However, little is known about the non-null behaviour of discrete summary statistics, about continuous summary statistics when the groups differ in more complex ways than location shifts or where the summary statistics are not linear functions of the repeated measures. Indeed, even simple distributional structures on the repeated measures variables can lead to complex differences between the distribution of common summary statistics of the comparison groups. The presence of left censoring of the repeated measures, which can arise when these are laboratory markers with lower limits of detection, further complicates the distribution of, and hence the ability to compare, summary statistics. This paper uses recent theoretical results for the non-null behaviour of rank and permutation tests to examine the asymptotic relative efficiencies of several popular summary statistics, both discrete and continuous, under a variety of common settings. We assume a flexible linear growth curve model to describe the repeated measures responses and focus on the types of settings that commonly arise in HIV/AIDS and other diseases.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed2001

Estimation of the timing of perinatal transmission of HIV.

Knowledge of the timing of perinatal transmission of HIV would be valuable for the determination and evaluation of preventive treatments and would shed light on the mechanism of transmission. Estimation of the distribution of the time of perinatal transmission is difficult, however, because tests of infection status can only be undertaken after birth. DNA and RNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays and HIV culture have been the most commonly used diagnostic tests for perinatal HIV infection. Such tests have high sensitivity and specificity, except when they are given shortly after infection. In this paper we use the time-dependent sensitivity of these diagnostic tests to make nonparametric and semiparametric inferences about the distribution of the time of perinatal HIV transmission as well as the cumulative probability of perinatal transmission. The methods are illustrated with data from a clinical trial conducted by the AIDS Clinical Trials group.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed2000

Randomized study of saquinavir with ritonavir or nelfinavir together with delavirdine, adefovir, or both in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults with virologic failure on indinavir: AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 359.

This study compared antiretroviral activity among 6 "salvage" therapy regimens. The study was a prospective, randomized, 2x3 factorial, multicenter study of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group. The study enrolled 277 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients naive to nonnucleoside analogues who had taken indinavir >6 months. The patients had 2000-200,000 HIV RNA copies/mL. Patients received saquinavir with ritonavir or nelfinavir together with delavirdine and/or adefovir and were followed for safety and antiretroviral response between baseline and week 16. At week 16, 30% (77/254) of patients had </=500 HIV RNA copies/mL. Virologic response did not differ significantly between pooled ritonavir and nelfinavir groups (28% vs. 33%; P=.50) or between pooled delavirdine and delavirdine/adefovir groups (40% vs. 33%; P=.42). Pooled delavirdine groups had a greater virologic response rate than did adefovir groups (40% vs. 18%; P=.002). Overall, one-third of patients who experienced virologic failure on an indinavir-containing regimen suppressed virus load levels while they were taking a new salvage regimen.

Adenine↗
PubMed2000

Should data and safety monitoring boards share confidential interim data?

Consider the following situation: Two clinical trials are underway, closely related in terms of the interventions being compared and the target populations. In preparing for a planned interim analysis, the statistician for trial 1 finds that the results support a recommendation to stop the trial early. Should the statistician ask the investigators for trial 2 to make interim results of their trial available to the data and safety monitoring board (DSMB) for trial 1? If so, in what form? Would the answers change if the trial 1 results showed a strong but not convincing trend? What is the obligation of the trial 2 investigators to respond to such a request? What role do the two DSMBs have, either in initiating a request or in agreeing to respond to it? In this article, we examine this situation in some detail, having faced it occasionally in our own experience with clinical trials and DSMBs. The chief argument in favor of sharing data is that data from trial 2 are obviously relevant to the question being addressed by trial 1 and therefore ought to be available to those who must interpret the results from that trial. On the other hand, there are several reasons for not sharing interim data. For example, sharing is incompatible with the independence of the trials; the time for synthesizing evidence from both trials is after the two teams of investigators have presented the full analysis and interpretation of their separate trials. For this and other conceptual and practical reasons we conclude that it is better, in most cases, for DSMBs to consider only information that has already been made public in some form.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed2000

Covariate analysis of viral eradication studies.

An important issue arising in therapeutic studies of hepatitis C and HIV is the identification of and adjustment for covariates associated with viral eradication and resistance. Analyses of such data are complicated by the fact that eradication is an occult event that is not directly observable, resulting in unique types of censored observations that do not arise in other competing risks settings. This paper proposes a semiparametric regression model to assess the association between multiple covariates and the eradication/resistance processes. The proposed methods are based on a piecewise proportional hazards model that allows parameters to vary between observation times. We illustrate the methods with data from recent hepatitis C clinical trials.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2000

The one-sample problem from eradication studies of chronic viral infections.

In studies of chronic viral infections, the objective is to estimate probabilities of developing viral eradication and resistance. Complications arise as the laboratory methods used to assess eradication status result in unusual types of censored observations. This paper proposes nonparametric methods for the one-sample analysis of viral eradication/resistance data. We show that the unconstrained nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator of the subdistributions of eradication and resistance are obtainable in closed form. In small samples, these estimators may be inadmissible; thus, we also present an algorithm for obtaining the constrained MLEs based on an isotonic regression of the unconstrained MLEs. Estimators of several functionals of the eradication and resistance subdistributions are also developed and discussed. The methods are illustrated with results from recent hepatitis C clinical trials.

Biometry↗
PubMed1997

Use of the Wei-Lin-Weissfeld method for the analysis of a recurring and a terminating event.

We consider application of the Wei-Lin-Weissfeld (WLW) method for multiple failure time data when analysing a disease process consisting of a recurring outcome, such as clinical progression, and a terminating outcome, such as death. In order to adapt WLW for this situation, 'events' must be specified that define multiple failure times and whether these are censored. Various choices of events are possible, and each corresponds to inferences about a different aspect of the underlying disease process. Definitions which regard the terminating outcome as a censor of the recurring outcome focus on specific cause-specific hazard functions, while event definitions which make no distinction between a recurring and terminating outcome focus on hazard functions of the induced failure times. Some event definitions require strong statistical assumptions to yield valid inferences and are not recommended. The application of WLW for recurring/terminating processes is illustrated with the results of two recently conducted clinical trials in persons with HIV.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1995

A comparison of immediate with deferred zidovudine therapy for asymptomatic HIV-infected adults with CD4 cell counts of 500 or more per cubic millimeter. AIDS Clinical Trials Group.

BACKGROUND: The clinical benefits of zidovudine remain unproved in patients with asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection when CD4 cell counts exceed 500 per cubic millimeter. We compared zidovudine therapy given immediately with deferred therapy in such subjects. METHODS: Beginning in 1987, subjects with asymptomatic HIV infection and 500 or more CD4 cells per cubic millimeter were randomly assigned to receive placebo or zidovudine (either 500 or 1500 mg per day, starting immediately). In 1989, the study was modified so that open-label treatment with 500 mg of zidovudine per day (deferred therapy) was offered when CD4 cell counts fell below 500 per cubic millimeter. The study end points included overall survival, survival free of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), toxic effects, and changes in CD4 cell counts. RESULTS: There were 1637 subjects who could be evaluated: 547 in the deferred-therapy group, 549 in the group receiving 500 mg of zidovudine immediately, and 541 in the 1500-mg group. The subjects were followed for up to 6.5 years (group medians, 4.8, 4.8, and 4.9, respectively). There was no significant difference in AIDS-free survival in the deferred-therapy group as compared with the low-dose or high-dose groups (81 cases of progression to AIDS or death vs. 81 and 74, respectively; P = 0.95 and P = 0.13) or in overall survival (51 deaths vs. 47 and 46; P = 0.25 and P = 0.16). The decline in CD4 cells was slower in both immediate-therapy groups than in the deferred-therapy group (P < 0.001 for both). Adverse effects were uncommon, and before the study modification their incidence was similar among the treatment groups, but severe anemia and granulocytopenia were more frequent in the 1500-mg group than in the deferred-therapy group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In asymptomatic, HIV-infected adults with 500 or more CD4 cells per cubic millimeter, treatment with zidovudine slows the decline in the CD4 cell count but does not significantly prolong either AIDS-free or overall survival. These results do not encourage the routine use of zidovudine monotherapy in this population.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1994

The duration of zidovudine benefit in persons with asymptomatic HIV infection. Prolonged evaluation of protocol 019 of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the durability of zidovudine-induced delay in clinical progression of asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease and to assess the relationship between this effect and the entry CD4+ cell count. DESIGN AND INTERVENTIONS: Extended follow-up data from subjects participating in protocol 019 of the AIDS [acquired immunodeficiency syndrome] Clinical Trials Group were examined. Subjects were offered a total daily dose of 500 mg of open-label zidovudine after the unblinding of the original randomized trial in 1989. Original treatment groups included placebo, 500 mg of zidovudine, or 1500 mg of zidovudine daily in divided doses. Three distinct analyses were conducted to assess the duration of zidovudine's effect on progression to AIDS or death: (1) analysis of all follow-up information from all subjects, (2) analysis of all subjects but with follow-up of original placebo-assigned subjects censored at the time open-label zidovudine was initiated, and (3) analysis of the effect of initiating zidovudine in subjects initially assigned to receive placebo. SETTING: University-based and university-affiliated AIDS research clinics participating in AIDS Clinical Trials Group protocol 019. PATIENTS: A total of 1565 asymptomatic HIV-infected subjects with entry CD4+ cell counts less than 0.50 x 10(9)/L (500/microL). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Time to progression to AIDS or death. RESULTS: During follow-up of up to 4.5 years (mean, 2.6 years), 232 subjects progressed to AIDS or died. In each of the three analyses described herein, zidovudine was associated with a significant (P = .008, .004, .007) decrease in the risk of such progression. However, each of these analyses also indicated a decreasing placebo:zidovudine relative risk with duration of use (P = .002, .08, .04), suggesting a nonpermanent effect. The duration of benefit appeared to be related to entry CD4+ cell count, with greater benefit in those with higher counts at entry. No significant differences in survival were found between those originally randomized to zidovudine or placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Zidovudine at 500 mg/d caused a significant delay in progression to AIDS or death, but its earlier use in asymptomatic disease was not associated with an additional prolongation of survival compared with delayed initiation. The delay in progression diminished over time especially in subjects with entry CD4+ cell counts less than 0.30 x 10(9)/L (300/microL). Treatment strategies that alter drug regimens before the loss of zidovudine benefit should be explored.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1994

Estimation of the infection time and latency distribution of AIDS with doubly censored data.

We consider the nonparametric estimation of the time to infection with HIV and the latency period between infection and the onset of AIDS in data where both the events of infection and AIDS are not directly observed. The methods use self-consistency equations that are more easily and quickly solvable than the nonparametric estimators proposed by De Gruttola and Lagakos (1989, Biometrics 45, 1-11). The techniques are illustrated with data on hemophiliacs who became infected through contamination of the blood factor they were given to control their hemophilia.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1993

CD4+ lymphocytes are an incomplete surrogate marker for clinical progression in persons with asymptomatic HIV infection taking zidovudine.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which lymphocytes, particularly those with the CD4 surface antigen, are a surrogate marker for the development of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in persons with asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. DESIGN: Analysis of data from the AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 019, a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial. SETTING: University-based referral centers. PATIENTS: Asymptomatic HIV-infected patients with 500 or fewer CD4+ cells/mm3 at baseline who were given placebo (350 patients) or one of two daily doses of zidovudine (725 patients). MEASUREMENTS: Baseline and interim measurements of CD4+ and other leukocytes were assessed. Patients were followed for progression to AIDS. RESULTS: Patients' lymphocyte levels were correlated with progression to AIDS (P < 0.001; relative risk for each depletion of 50 CD4+ cells/mm3, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.53 to 2.01); however, only a small portion (0% to 37%) of the effect of zidovudine on this progression was statistically explained by its effect on CD4+ lymphocyte levels. A substantial portion of zidovudine's effect on delaying progression to AIDS that was independent of the levels of these markers occurred within the first 16 weeks of therapy. In patients who had not progressed to AIDS by week 16, most of the subsequent zidovudine effect in reducing the risk for progression could be explained by its effect on net CD4+ percent (percentage of CD4+ lymphocytes among all leukocytes) for the first 16 weeks of therapy. CONCLUSION: Levels of CD4+ lymphocytes are an incomplete surrogate marker for progression to AIDS, and the association is especially weak during the first 16 weeks of zidovudine therapy.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1993

Surrogate markers in AIDS clinical trials: conceptual basis, validation, and uncertainties.

The identification of surrogate markers for clinical end points has important implications for the conduct of AIDS clinical trials, the approval of drugs for the treatment of infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and the management of HIV infection. In this paper, the concept of a surrogate marker and the properties of an ideal marker are discussed. The steps required for the empirical verification of a potential marker are then addressed, and current information on surrogate markers for AIDS is reviewed. Studies conducted to date indicate that the effects of a new drug on numbers of CD4 lymphocytes account only partly for its ultimate impact on the clinical progression of HIV infection. Consequently, the potential benefits of early approval of a drug based on its effect on CD4 lymphocytes must be weighed against the uncertainty about its ability to actually delay clinical progression.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1993

Size and power of two-sample tests of repeated measures data.

One method of using repeated measures data to compare treatment groups in a clinical trial is to summarize each subject's outcomes with a single summary statistic, and then perform a distribution-free comparison based on the resulting statistics. We examine extensions of this approach and conditions under which they retain proper size in the presence of missing data. The asymptotic relative efficiencies of several summary statistic tests are calculated to show which perform best in a variety of situations. The techniques are illustrated using data from an AIDS clinical trial.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1993

Analyzing doubly censored data with covariates, with application to AIDS.

This paper proposes a method for incorporating covariate information in the analysis of survival data when both the time of the originating event and the failure event can be right- or interval-censored. This method generalizes the one-sample estimation results of De Gruttola and Lagakos (1989, Biometrics 45, 1-11) by allowing the distribution of time between the two events to be a function of covariates under a proportional hazards model. Estimates for the model coefficients, as well as the underlying distributions, are obtained by an iterative fitting procedure based on Turnbull's (1976, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 38, 290-295) self-consistency algorithm in combination with the Newton-Raphson algorithm. The method is illustrated with data from a study of hemophiliacs infected with the human immunodeficiency virus.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1992

A controlled trial comparing continued zidovudine with didanosine in human immunodeficiency virus infection. The NIAID AIDS Clinical Trials Group.

BACKGROUND: Although zidovudine is effective in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, its efficacy may decline with prolonged use. Didanosine is another inhibitor of HIV reverse transcriptase. We evaluated the effectiveness of changing anti-HIV treatment from zidovudine to didanosine. METHODS: This multicenter, double-blind study involved 913 patients who had tolerated zidovudine for at least 16 weeks. The patients had the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), AIDS-related complex with less than or equal to 300 CD4 cells per cubic milliliter, or asymptomatic HIV infection with less than or equal to 200 CD4 cells per cubic milliliter. They were randomly assigned to receive 600 mg per day of zidovudine, 750 mg per day of didanosine, or 500 mg per day of didanosine. RESULTS: There were significantly fewer new AIDS-defining events and deaths among the 298 subjects assigned to 500 mg per day of didanosine than among the subjects who continued to receive zidovudine (relative risk, 1.39; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.06 to 1.82; P = 0.015). With 750 mg of didanosine, there was no clear benefit over zidovudine (relative risk, 1.10; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.86 to 1.42). The efficacy of didanosine was unrelated to the duration of previous zidovudine treatment. In the two didanosine groups, there were improvements in the number of CD4 cells (P less than 0.001 for both groups) and in p24 antigen levels (P = 0.03 in the 500-mg group; P = 0.005 in the 750-mg group), as compared with the zidovudine group. CONCLUSIONS: Changing treatment from zidovudine to 500 mg per day of didanosine appears to slow the progression of HIV disease.

AIDS-Related Complex↗
PubMed1992

Cage allocation designs for rodent carcinogenicity experiments.

Cage allocation designs for rodent carcinogenicity experiments are discussed and presented with the goal of avoiding dosage group biases related to cage location. Considerations in selecting a cage design are first discussed in general terms. Specific designs are presented for use in experiments involving three, four, and five dose groups and with one, four, and five rodents per cage. Priorities for balancing treatment groups include horizontal position on shelf and shelf of rack, nearest neighbor balance, and male-female balance. It is proposed that these balance criteria be considered together with practical issues, such as the ability to accurately conform to a design and to determine a sensible and efficient design for each experiment.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Toxic effects of zidovudine in asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals with CD4+ cell counts of 0.50 x 10(9)/L or less. Detailed and updated results from protocol 019 of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group.

BACKGROUND: Protocol 019 of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group is a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of zidovudine (3'-azido-3'-deoxythymidine; formerly AZT) in human immunodeficiency virus-infected asymptomatic individuals. The initial results in the stratum of subjects entering with CD4+ cell counts of 0.50 x 10(9)/L or less have been reported, but without a detailed analysis of toxic effects. METHODS: This detailed and updated report analyzes the toxic effects that occurred in 1567 subjects (91% men; 89% white) in this stratum of protocol 019 who received placebo (494 subjects), a 500-mg daily dose of zidovudine (544 subjects), or a 1500-mg daily dose of zidovudine (529 subjects). Hematologic, hepatic, and renal effects and patient-reported symptoms and clinical signs were monitored. RESULTS: Severe anemia (hemoglobin level, < 80 g/L) was associated with both the 500-mg zidovudine group and the 1500-mg group compared with placebo. The estimated 18-month risks of severe anemia were 0.4%, 2.0%, and 9.7% for the placebo, 500-mg zidovudine, and 1500-mg zidovudine groups, respectively. Predictive baseline measures were lower hemoglobin level in the 1500-mg group and the two zidovudine groups combined and lower platelet count in the 500-mg zidovudine group. The risk of a first severe anemia developing was greatest in months 3 through 8 of treatment. Of the 44 subjects with severe anemia in the zidovudine groups, 18 (41%) progressed from mild anemia (hemoglobin level, 95 to 109 g/L) to severe anemia on consecutive visits (usually 2 to 4 weeks apart). Severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count, < 750 x 10(6)/L) did not occur significantly more often in the 500-mg zidovudine group but did in the 1500-mg zidovudine group. Moderate neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count, < 1300 x 10(6)/L) did develop significantly more often in the 500-mg zidovudine group (165 subjects) than in the placebo group (71 subjects). Mild (or worse) elevations of bilirubin levels were uncommon but occurred more often with zidovudine. Severe nausea (and/or vomiting) was rare (2.8% of subjects) but was associated with zidovudine. Milder patient-reported events were common, and a number were associated with zidovudine. CONCLUSION: Zidovudine at the 500-mg/d dosage appears to be tolerable in many patients with asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus infection and CD4+ cell counts of 0.50 x 10(9)/L or less. Increased clinical surveillance for anemia may be warranted in certain patients.

Anemia↗