Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Thorne

Publications and source records attributed to S Thorne.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1984

Strengthening family 'interference'.

This paper examines the phenomenon of family 'interference' in the health care of a sick member from a new angle. The 'interfering' behaviours are located within the context of the family's evolving relationships with health care providers. The authors argue that the behaviours are an understandable product of the family's disillusionment and dissatisfaction with their health care relationships. As such, these interfering behaviours represent the family's most productive means of positively influencing their sick member's experience with illness. In addition, they set the stage for negotiation to take place between the family and health care providers which leads to mutually satisfying care. When interference is appreciated within the context of health care relationships, it becomes obvious that some of our traditional nursing responses are counterproductive. This paper offers suggestions for making interference work, as well as theoretical questions to the nursing practitioner.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1977

Some practical results of the London Medical Group conference on iatrogenic disease.

Although many conferences stimulate a great deal of discussion and practical interest at the time, not so many are followed up to try and estimate what, if any, practical results followed the meeting. This the authors of this study have done. (In Britain the 'medical groups' are voluntary groupings of students at medical schools who meet to discuss ethical problems related to their profession). Sixty-five participants (not all of them students) in the conference on iatrogenic disease replied to the questionnaire, and from the answers it was clear that not only the attitudes of those responding had in some cases been changed but in some positive action had resulted, for example, in the matter of prescribing. This analysis may provide an answer to those who criticize conferences as being a waste of time and money, because much more than could be evaluated from the responses to this survey must have affected all the participants.

Congresses as Topic↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Deconstructing the gender neutrality of chronic illness and disability.

Although a great deal has been written in the fields of women's health and disability/chronic illness, there is surprisingly little cross-fertilization. The dominant narrative within society orients us toward a view of chronic illness and disability that is gender neutral and devoid of social context. Examination of the ways in which chronic illness and disability are differently experienced by men and women creates a foundation upon which the implications of the dominant narrative can be explored. In this analysis, the authors find clinical, sociopolitical, and theoretical implications that derive from the traditional reluctance to consider the intersection of these fields of study. They conclude with recommendations for broadening our vision, correcting the omissions within our knowledge, and rethinking our part in contributing to inequities within society.

Attitude to Health↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The tyranny of feminist methodology in women's health research.

Awareness of the insufficient degree to which mainstream research has created useful knowledge about women's health has drawn many researchers to feminist methodologies. Such approaches tend to privilege qualitative designs, emancipatory objectives, and cooperative strategies. They challenge the notions of expert power, the appropriation of voice, and ownership of the research products. By uncovering the extent to which power inequities are embedded in our research traditions, including such issues as who conducts research, which questions are studied, and how they are studied, feminist critique can be a powerful tool toward stronger research with more socially relevant findings. However, taken to extremes, feminist methodological requirements can immobilize and discourage active inquiry. In this paper, we articulate major directives of a feminist stance, explain the extremes at which they become problematic, and propose responsive options for women's health researchers. We intend such analysis to overcome divisiveness and promote inclusiveness without sacrificing excellence in research and action.

Female↗