[Endoscopic capsule: present and future].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal↗
Biomedical subjects
S Sáinz
Publications and source records attributed to S Sáinz.
Endoscopic ligation compared with combined treatment with nadolol and isosorbide mononitrate to prevent recurrent variceal bleeding.
BACKGROUND: After an episode of acute bleeding from esophageal varices, patients are at high risk for recurrent bleeding and death. We compared two treatments to prevent recurrent bleeding--endoscopic ligation and combined medical therapy with nadolol and isosorbide mononitrate. METHODS: We randomly assigned 144 patients with cirrhosis who were hospitalized with esophageal variceal bleeding to receive treatment with endoscopic ligation (72 patients) or the combined medical therapy (72 patients). Sessions of ligation were repeated every two to three weeks until the varices were eradicated. The initial dose of nadolol was 80 mg orally once daily, with adjustment according to the resting heart rate; isosorbide mononitrate was given in increasing doses, beginning at 20 mg once a day at bed time and rising over the course of one week to 40 mg orally twice a day, unless side effects occurred. The primary end points were recurrent bleeding, complications, and death. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 21 months. A total of 35 patients in the ligation group and 24 in the medication group had recurrent bleeding. The probability of recurrence was lower in the medication group, both for all episodes related to portal hypertension (P=0.04) and for recurrent variceal bleeding (P=0.04). There were major complications in nine patients treated with ligation (seven had bleeding esophageal ulcers and two had aspiration pneumonia) and two treated with medication (both had bradycardia and dyspnea) (P=0.05). Thirty patients in the ligation group died, as did 23 patients in the medication group (P=0.52). The probability of recurrent bleeding was lower for patients with a hemodynamic response to therapy, defined as a decrease in the hepatic venous pressure gradient of more than 20 percent from the base-line value or to less than 12 mm Hg (18 percent, vs. 54 percent in patients with no hemodynamic response at one year; P<0.001), and the probability of survival was higher (94 percent vs. 78 percent at one year, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Combined therapy with nadolol and isosorbide mononitrate is more effective than endoscopic ligation for the prevention of recurrent bleeding and is associated with a lower rate of major complications. A hemodynamic response to treatment is associated with a better long-term prognosis.
Actuarial Analysis↗
Somatostatin alone or combined with emergency sclerotherapy in the treatment of acute esophageal variceal bleeding: a prospective randomized trial.
Recent trials have shown that somatostatin (SMT) is as effective as sclerotherapy in the treatment of acute variceal bleeding and that the combination of both treatments is more effective than sclerotherapy alone. To assess whether the addition of sclerotherapy improves the efficacy of SMT alone, all patients admitted to our unit with gastrointestinal bleeding and with suspected cirrhosis received a continuous infusion of SMT (250 micrograms/h). Endoscopy was performed between 1 and 5 hours later, and patients with esophageal variceal bleeding were randomized to receive or not to receive sclerotherapy. In both groups, SMT infusion was continued for 5 days. Fifty patient admissions were allocated to each group. Therapeutic failure occurred in 21 cases of the SMT group and in 7 cases of the combined-therapy group (P =.002). Failure to control the acute episode occurred in 24% vs. 8% (P =.03) and early rebleeding in 24% vs. 7% (P =.03), respectively. Transfusional requirements were significantly higher in the SMT group, while the incidence of complications was lower (8% vs. 24%; P =.029). In the multivariate analysis, the presence of shock at admission and active bleeding during endoscopy were the variables that better predicted the failure of therapy with SMT alone. Mortality at 6 weeks was similar. These data demonstrate that the addition of sclerotherapy significantly improves the efficacy of SMT alone for the treatment of acute variceal bleeding, although it also increases the rate of complications. Patients with shock and those with active bleeding are more likely to benefit from this combined therapy.
Acute Disease↗
[Gastric metastasis of breast carcinoma].
Although distal dissemination from breast cancer is commonly found in bones, lungs, liver and brain, others less common sites have been occasionally reported. A 60 year-old woman with long standing disseminated breast cancer disease was admitted to our hospital with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. At endoscopy, an abnormal area was seen in the lesser curvature of the stomach. Invasion of the gastric wall by metastases from carcinoma of the breast was diagnosed in the biopsy. No further treatment was warranted and the patient died soon thereafter. Gastric metastases are primarily located in the submucosa and muscular layers of the stomach. Lack of mucosal involvement suggests a blood-borne spread. Although our patient had no progesterone receptors in the primary breast tumor, previous studies have suggested that the presence of receptors may facilitate gastrointestinal spread. Gastric metastases from extraintestinal cancers may be asymptomatic, and are usually late events in the progression of the disease.
Adenocarcinoma↗
Nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate compared with sclerotherapy for the prevention of variceal rebleeding.
BACKGROUND: Patients who have bleeding from esophageal varices are at high risk for rebleeding and death. We compared the efficacy and safety of endoscopic sclerotherapy with the efficacy and safety of nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate for the prevention of variceal rebleeding. METHODS: Eighty-six hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and bleeding from esophageal varices diagnosed by endoscopy were randomly assigned to treatment with repeated sclerotherapy (43 patients) or nadolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate (43 patients). The primary outcomes were rebleeding, death, and complications. The hepatic venous pressure gradient was measured at base line and after three months. RESULTS: Base-line data were similar in the two groups, and the median follow-up was 18 months in both. Eleven patients in the medication group and 23 in the sclerotherapy group had rebleeding. The actuarial probability of remaining free of rebleeding was higher in the medication group for all episodes related to portal hypertension (P = 0.001) and variceal rebleeding (P = 0.002). Four patients in the medication group and nine in the sclerotherapy group died (P = 0.07 for the difference in the actuarial probability of survival). Seven patients in the medication group and 16 in the sclerotherapy group had treatment-related complications (P = 0.03). Thirty-one patients in the medication group underwent two hemodynamic studies; 1 of the 13 patients with more than a 20 percent decrease in the hepatic venous pressure gradient had rebleeding, as compared with 8 of the 18 with smaller decreases in the pressure gradient (P = 0.04) for the actuarial probability of rebleeding at two years). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with sclerotherapy, nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate significantly decreased the risk of rebleeding from esophageal varices.
Actuarial Analysis↗
Omeprazole versus ranitidine as adjunct therapy to endoscopic injection in actively bleeding ulcers: a prospective and randomized study.
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Although high rates of initial hemostasis can be achieved with endoscopic injection therapy in actively bleeding ulcers, the incidence of rebleeding is not negligible. Optimal conditions for clotting may require achieving deep and sustained acid inhibition to avoid the deleterious effect of acid and pepsin secretions on the hemostatic process. The aim of this study was to assess whether omeprazole could improve the efficacy of ranitidine as an adjunct treatment in endoscopic injection therapy to avoid rebleeding. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients with active arterial bleeding from a peptic ulcer disclosed at emergency endoscopy were included in this prospective trial. All patients received injections of 1:10,000 adrenaline. Subsequently, they were randomized to receive either intravenous omeprazole (n = 45), with an initial dose of 80 mg followed by 40 mg every eight hours for four days and thereafter with oral administration; or ranitidine (n = 41), 50 mg every six hours for 12 to 24 hours and thereafter with oral administration. RESULTS: The two groups were well matched in terms of clinical and endoscopic data. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with regard to: further bleeding (29% in both groups), need for emergency surgery (20% in the omeprazole group vs. 22% in the ranitidine group), transfusion requirements (2.4 +/- 2.2 vs. 2.2 +/- 2.1 units), length of hospital stay (14.1 +/- 13.9 vs. 15.3 +/- 15.4 days), or mortality (7% vs. 2%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that omeprazole does not improve the efficacy of ranitidine after endoscopic injection therapy in patients with an active arterial bleeding ulcer.
Adult↗
[Nadolol as an adjuvant to sclerotherapy of esophageal varices for prevention of recurrent hemorrhaging].
AIM: to assess whether nadolol could improve the results of sclerotherapy in the prevention of varices rebleeding. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: prospective study in which patients with cirrhosis and Child-Pugh's class A or B and with their first hemorrhage from esophageal varices, diagnosed by emergency endoscopy, were included. After initial control of bleeding with emergency sclerotherapy, the patients were randomized into two groups to receive long-term variceal sclerotherapy either alone (group 1) or plus nadolol (group 2). Sclerotherapy was performed by intravariceal injection of 5% ethanolamine at days 0, 4 10, 30 and then monthly until eradication of varices. Nadolol was administered during the whole follow-up in a dose to reduce resting pulse rate by 25% (mean final dose: 82 +/- 31 mg/d). PATIENTS: During a two year period (1989-1991), 40 patients with cirrhosis (from alcohol abuse in 48%), were included. 18 patients were allocated in group 1 and 22 in group 2. RESULTS: Both groups were well-matched for clinical, biological and endoscopic data. Follow-up was similar in both (24.3 +/- 10.6 months in group 1 vs 27.3 +/- 9.8 in group 2). Nine patients in group 1 (50%) and 13 in group 2 (59%) rebled during the follow-up, with a total number of 14 and 22 rebleeding episodes respectively (p = NS). There were no differences between the two groups when considering rebleeding index, transfusional requirements per rebleeding episode and the cumulative percentage of patients free from rebleeding. Severe complications attributable to treatment were observed in 22% of patients in group 1 and in 27% in group 2 (p = NS). Two patients died in each group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing long-term sclerotherapy for prevention of variceal rebleeding, nadolol confers no additional benefit.
Adult↗
Prediction of therapeutic failure in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer treated with endoscopic injection.
Endoscopic injection therapy was performed in a consecutive series of 233 patients admitted for a bleeding peptic ulcer with active arterial hemorrhage or a nonbleeding visible vessel disclosed at emergency endoscopy. Further bleeding occurred in 57 cases (24.5%). The present study was conducted to evaluate whether any clinical or endoscopic features could identify the patients at high risk of therapeutic failure. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that failure was significantly related to: (1) the ulcer location on the posterior wall (P = 0.004) or superior wall (P = 0.003) of the duodenal bulb, (2) the ulcer size (P = 0.011), and (3) the existence of associated diseases (P = 0.012). The validity of the prediction rule based on these factors was evaluated by receiver-operating characteristic curves and was confirmed and prospectively validated in an independent sample of 81 patients with a bleeding peptic ulcer treated by endoscopic injection. We conclude that once the initial control of bleeding has been achieved by injection therapy, the present prediction rule can be used to identify candidates for alternative treatment.
Duodenal Ulcer↗
Endoscopic injection therapy of bleeding ulcer: a prospective and randomized comparison of adrenaline alone or with polidocanol.
In a prospective randomized trial involving 63 patients with bleeding peptic ulcer, we assessed whether the addition of 1% polidocanol improved the results achieved by 1/10(4) adrenaline alone for injection therapy. The inclusion criterion was the presence of active arterial bleeding or a nonbleeding visible vessel at emergency endoscopy. Thirty patients were treated with 1/10(4) adrenaline (group A) and 33 with adrenaline plus 1% polidocanol (group B). Initial hemostasis was achieved in 97% of cases in both groups and permanent hemostasis in 87% patients in group A and in 76% in group B (p = NS). Mortality was 6% in group A and 3% in group B. There were no differences between the two groups regarding requirements for emergency surgery, the number of transfusions, or the length of hospital stay. One patient in group B had a perforation. No other relevant complications were noted. In conclusion, combined therapy does not improve the results achieved with adrenaline alone.
Epinephrine↗
[Evaluation of two commercial kits for detection of Helicobacter pylori specific antibodies in patients undergoing gastroscopy. A seroprevalence study in an asymptomatic population].
BACKGROUND: We evaluate two different commercially available kits for detecting specific antibodies against Helicobacter pylori in a group of 48 patients with gastrointestinal symptoms that underwent an endoscopic procedure. We also study the seroprevalence of anti-H. pylori antibodies in asimptomatic individuals from our area. METHODS: Microbiologic and pathologic studies were performed in 48 gastric biopsies, in relation with antibodies detection using ELISA (Pylori stat test, Whittaker) and latex particles agglutination (Pyloriset, Orion). We also used ELISA tests for determining the seroprevalence of H. pylori antibodies in 139 asimptomatic individuals. RESULTS: Ninety-four percent of patients with peptic ulcer disease and 81% of patients without peptic ulcer disease but complaining of dyspepsia were infected by H. pylori. None of the patients with normal gastric mucosae was found to be infected. Sensitivity and specificity of ELISA test were 100% and 73%. Latex test sensitivity and specificity were 46% and 82%. The seroprevalence of antibodies among healthy individuals in our area increases with age (19% among children under 9 years of age) and reaches a peak at 40-49 years of age (84%), with a mean value of 60% in all ages' groups. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high correlation between Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric mucosa alterations. The ELISA test is best correlated with other laboratory data used for defining infection. The seroprevalence of H. pylori antibodies is also high, and therefore we recommend that the use of serologic diagnostic test must be highly selective.
Adolescent↗
[Comparative study of the diagnostic efficacy of percutaneous transcutaneous cholangiography and echography in the patient with cholestasis].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adult↗
Value of second-look endoscopy after injection therapy for bleeding peptic ulcer: a prospective and randomized trial.
A prospective and randomized trial involving 104 patients was performed to assess whether second-look endoscopy could improve the efficacy of injection therapy for bleeding ulcers. The inclusion criteria were the presence of active arterial bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel at emergency endoscopy. All the patients received emergency injection of 1:10,000 adrenaline and were subsequently randomized (52 patients in each group) according to whether or not they would receive a second elective endoscopy within the first 24 hours with repeated injection if a visible vessel was still identified. Both groups were well matched for clinical and endoscopic data. A tendency towards better results was noted in the group that received a second-look endoscopy; the two groups were compared in regard to further bleeding (21% versus 29%, 95% confidence interval of the difference = -24.3 to 8.5), need for emergency surgery (8% versus 15%, 95% confidence interval of the difference = -19.9 to 4.5), transfusion requirements (1.7 +/- 1.9 versus 2.5 +/- 2.5 units, 95% confidence interval of the difference = -1.6 to 0.07), length of hospital stay (9.3 +/- 8.6 versus 11.8 +/- 10.8 days, 95% confidence interval of the difference = -6.2 to 1.4), and mortality rate (2% versus 4%). Although these trends did not achieve statistical significance, a type II error cannot be ruled out. However, according to our results, several hundred patients would be required to demonstrate statistically these relatively small differences.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Emergencies↗