Unusual response of ventricular tachycardia to thiopental sodium.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to S S Jain.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A 17-item questionnaire was designed to determine how physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) training directors assess their residents' clinical competency. A response rate of 83% (62/75) was obtained. Seventy-nine percent (49/62) have a written resident supervision policy, and 73% (45/62) have a written resident probation policy. Ninety-four percent (58/62) believe that their system of evaluating residents' clinical competency is effective, although many commented that it could be improved. 76% (47/62) of the residency training directors made the final decision regarding residents' clinical competency. Fifty-two percent (32/62) have a departmental written examination, and 23% (14/62) have formal oral examinations. Eighteen percent (11/62) use an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), 8% (5/62) use standardized patients and 3% (2/62) use videotaped patient encounters. Forty percent (25/62) use medical record audits. Fifty percent of the programs have rated at least one resident unsatisfactory during a clinical rotation in the past 3 yr, and 11% (7/62) have reported to the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation that the overall clinical evaluation of one resident was unsatisfactory in the past 3 yr. Forty-seven percent (29/62) of the programs have asked at least one resident to leave their program in the past 3 yr. The OSCE is emerging as the state-of-the-art method for assessing clinical skills, although it is expensive. The measurement of clinical competency is important in the certification and recertification process, and our specialty needs better methods to assess these performance skills.
Postoperative assessment of amputation wound healing remains largely subjective in nature, being based on the physician's clinical judgement. These considerations significantly impact on the rehabilitation course, as premature prosthetic fitting may result in wound breakdown. Alternatively, delayed healing may result in prolonged hospital length of stay. Few attempts have been made to correlate objective parameters of limb perfusion with amputation wound healing or prosthetic fitting outcome during the rehabilitation phase of treatment. A pilot study was conducted, in which the transcutaneous oxygen monitor, a noninvasive device measuring transcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen (tcpO2), was applied to the stumps of 11 consecutive above-or below-knee amputees admitted for rehabilitation after amputation. All patients were tested within 1 wk of admission and 45 days of amputation. The treatment team was blinded as to the test results. A direct correlation was observed between wound healing outcome and tcpO2 results (Fisher's exact test [FET], P = 0.03), and no patient with a tcpO2 of < or 15 mm Hg healed during their rehabilitation stay (FET, P = 0.006). TcpO2 of < or = 15 mm Hg was significantly correlated with prolonged length of stay (Point Biserial Correlation Coefficient [rpbi], = -0.835; P = 0.01), delayed prosthetic fitting (rpbi = 0.742; p = 0.01), and poorer wound healing at admission (rpbi = 0.932; P = 0.001). Postoperative tcpO2 measurement may have use in objectively identifying patients at greater risk of delayed wound healing and prosthetic fitting, although further study is warranted.
To understand better how career choices are made by physiatrists, a 16-item, 7-page questionnaire was sent to all 1994 graduating physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) resident physicians in the United States. Of the 343 senior residents, 202 completed the questionnaire for a response rate of 59%. The questionnaire focused on the following areas: timing of the decision to enter PM&R; and how the medical school curriculum, certain groups of people, and certain specific factors influenced their choices. There were 130 factors modeled after the American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) annual medical student questionnaire that the recipients were asked to grade on a numerical scale: 1 = unimportant to 5 = very important. Of the graduating residents, 60.1% (119/198) made the decision to enter PM&R in their 3rd or 4th yr of medical school, 13.1% (26/198) in the first 2 yr, and 11.1% (22/198) after starting another residency. The five factors ranked most important in the decision were (mean rank score): sufficient time/flexibility for family obligations (4.60); opportunity to make a difference in peoples lives (4.57); interest in helping people (4.55); types of patient problems encountered (4.50); and consistency with personality (4.49). We also obtained the AAMC's 1993 annual data on medical students choosing PM&R. Their top five factors were the same as those listed by the graduating residents, but in a slightly different rank order. Profiles have also been derived on those graduating PM&R residents who chose an academic career (n = 68) v nonacademic (n = 133) and fellowship (n = 34) v nonfellowship (n = 163).
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
To evaluate physiatrist career satisfaction and current practice patterns, a 15-page survey was mailed randomly to 400 fellow members of the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The 208 questionnaires (52%) returned revealed respondents' level of satisfaction with career choice, current practice, relationships with other physicians, their own residency training, and problems experienced that impede their practice. Factor analysis identified six areas of satisfaction: time demands, organizational support, current practice, current specialty, profession, and training. Problems with work consisted of four factors: external intrusions into practice, having to deal with non-rehabilitation problems, dealing with PM&R problems, and insufficient time for patients. Results showed that 75% of physiatrists were satisfied with their practice/profession. Satisfaction with current practice was greater with fewer external intrusions into practice, a larger percentage of income from traditional non-managed payment sources (including Medicaid), and less competition. Changes in health care, such as managed care, competition, and increased external regulations, appear to interfere with current practice. Variation in satisfaction was not significantly correlated with size of community, variation in rates of payment denials, workloads of greater than 50 hours per week, and a number of other factors that one might expect to affect satisfaction. Physiatrists had made many changes in their practice in response to the changes in the health care environment but had not cut care for indigent patients. Needs for greater residency training in outpatient clinics, physicians' offices, managed care, and long-term care settings were expressed. This is the first comprehensive published report on physiatric satisfaction in a changing health care environment. Further research in some of the areas will be required.
Clinical competency is poorly measured by knowledge-based written examinations. A five-station, four-interstation objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) has been developed in consultation with the National Board of Medical Examiners as a pilot study to standardize assessment methods that serve to evaluate the clinical competency of senior physical medicine and rehabilitation residents. Various stations demonstrating musculoskeletal and neurologic conditions commonly encountered in physiatric practice were included, incorporating the use of standardized patients into the OSCE format. This is a descriptive study of individual stations-evaluated history-taking, physical examination, and communication skills, whereas the interstations measured the residents' ability to write therapy and prosthetic/orthotic prescriptions, as well as interpret x-ray and electrodiagnostic data. The OSCE program development including case background, principal tasks, time allotment, evaluation objectives, performance criteria, therapeutic plan, standardized patients case descriptions, and assessment checklists as well as the training procedure is discussed. Additionally, cost analysis and scheduling issues are reviewed. This information should aid other training programs or consortiums in developing similar clinical evaluation tools.
To examine the literature on chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), especially as it relates to cognitive deficits and exercise, more than 200 articles related to CFS were selected from computer-based research as well as pertinent articles noted in the references of individual articles. All were relevant articles on CFS, although articles in a foreign language were excluded. CFS is a controversial diagnosis of exclusion, but certain subgroups do appear to exist. It may represent multiple diseases or multiple stages of the same disease. Although cognitive deficits are commonly reported, the measured impairments are relatively subtle and are in the area of complex information processing speed, or efficiency. Magnetic resonance imaging, single-photon emission computer tomography, and neuroendocrine studies present preliminary evidence suggestive of the cerebral involvement primarily in the white matter. The weakness and fatigue may be the result of alterations in the central nervous system, not in the peripheral muscles. However, it is hard to separate the documented weakness and endurance deficits from deconditioning. Autonomic symptoms such as orthostatic intolerance and a predisposition to neurally mediated syncope may be explained by cardiovascular deconditioning, a postviral idiopathic autonomic neuropathy, or both. The review points out the need for more carefully designed studies of CFS that focus on the relationship between neuropathology, psychopathology and neuropsychologic functioning. The role of exercise as a stimulus for exacerbation or in treatment needs to be further studied using clear diagnostic criteria as well as control groups that carefully match the activity level.
Since the last report, two additional objective structured clinical examinations (PGY-2, PGY-3, and PGY-4, as well as incoming PGY-2) have been administered. As a result, our curriculum has been modified to strengthen physical examination skills, including specific workshops. Interrater reliability of evaluators has been tested for the first time to verify reliability, and refinements have been made in the standardized checklist grading system. The interrater grading of history-taking had good reliability (0.73-0.96), as did neurological and spine physical examination (0.84-0.88). The interrater grading reliability of small and large joint examination was more problematic (0.46-0.62) because of examiners' inability to have full visibility, evaluator's fatigue, and confusing evaluation scoring descriptions. We now use a two-point grading scale (correct or incorrect) for history but continue a three-point scale (correct, partially correct, or incorrect) for physical examination. The examination schedule is being modified to add more encounters, give time for trainee feedback, and further refinement of grading expectations for a more efficient and reliable scoring system.
Decision makers at the federal and state level are considering, and some states have enacted, a reduction in total United States residency positions, a shift in emphasis from specialist to generalist training, a need for programs to join together in training consortia to determine local residency position allocation strategy, a reduction in funding of international medical graduates, and a reduction in funding beyond the first certificate or a total of five years. A 5-page, 24-item questionnaire was sent to all physiatry residency training directors. The objective was to discern a descriptive database of physiatry training programs and how their institutions might respond to cuts in graduate medical education funding. Fifty-eight (73%) of the questionnaires were returned. Most training directors believe that their primary mission is to train general physiatrists and, to a much lesser extent, to train subspecialty or research fellows. Directors were asked how they might handle reductions in house staff such as using physician extenders, shifting clinical workload to faculty, hiring additional faculty, and funding physiatry residents from practice plans and endowments. Physiatry has had little experience (29%; 17/58) with voluntary graduate medical education consortiums, but most (67%; 34/58) seem to feel that if a consortium system is mandated, they would favor a local or regional over a national body because they do not believe the specialty has a strong enough national stature. The major barriers to a consortium for graduate medical education allocation were governance, academic, fiscal, bureaucratic, and competition.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A survey was conducted to evaluate the physiatric research fellowship training. A 22-item questionnaire was sent to the 42 identified physiatrists who had completed at least a 1-yr research fellowship. Twenty-nine of these individuals (69%) responded. The physiatrists, all of whom have completed their research fellowships, uniformly cited competent faculty research mentors as being critical, even if they were not in the same department. Having protected research time as well as a research didactic program and journal club were highly rated issues. The trainees preferred a 2-yr fellowship that also stressed initiation of their own research, grant writing and management experience, and first authorship on research papers. We conclude that the majority of the research fellows agree on what are important issues with respect to their training.
Evidence-based medicine is regarded by many as the new paradigm in medical practice. Sixty-seven medical school faculty and trainees in a physical medicine and rehabilitation department were surveyed with regard to training and competence in the use of evidence-based medicine techniques. The majority of subjects in the present study supported the use of evidence-based medicine techniques, although a number of the respondents indicated that they lacked adequate training or competence in their use. It is suggested that medical schools and physiatry residency programs provide a greater emphasis on training in evidence-based medicine. Recommendations are provided that individuals can use to develop a systematic strategy to keep up with the rapidly expanding medical literature.
The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) has been the focus of a lot debate with respect to reliability and validity. Much of the controversy surrounding these components lies in a lack of comparison with a "gold standard." Further work is needed to improve the evaluation of clinical skills to the point that a gold standard can truly be said to exist.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.