Pseudotumor of the knee in a kidney-pancreas transplant patient.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to S Rozenberg.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
UNLABELLED: Low back pain (LBP)-related disability involves patients with chronic outcome. OBJECTIVE: To identify the factors predictive of chronic evolution of acute LBP and to develop a predictive clinical index. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective investigation of 2487 employed patients referred for their first consultation with acute LBP (less than eight days). Chronic evolution defined by persistence of symptoms, unchanged or worse, at seven weeks. A predictive index was developed according to a logistic regression model. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-five patients (6.2%) were considered to have unchanged or worsened LBP at the time of final evaluation, which was carried out on average 42 +/- 15 days after the initial visit, and were thus regarded as having a chronic outcome. When comparing patients with chronic outcome and the others, there were 25 elementary characteristics for which the degree of significance of the bilateral test was less than 0.01. They were introduced into a logistic regression model. Five parameters appeared to be related to chronic outcome: characteristics of current episode (isolated acute low back pain, acute exacerbation of chronic low back pain, sciatica), two daily living activity items, duration of certificate to remain off work and taking part in a sport. They were used to develop an easily applied index providing identification, as of the initial consultation, of the risk of chronic evolution. CONCLUSION: The early recognition of patients with LBP with high risk of chronic outcome can be achieved with an easily applied clinical index.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: The present report assesses, among Belgian gynecologists, the effect of age and bone mineral density on osteoporosis prescription strategy in postmenopausal women. METHODS: Charts of postmenopausal women were summarized. We constructed cases by modifying some parameters. Ten years of age were added or subtracted to the real age of the patient. The bone mineral density (BMD) result was also modified (three levels: normal BMD, osteopenia, osteoporosis). A total of 612 cases were constructed. Twelve cases were sent out of these 612 files to every Belgian gynecologist (n = 1010). For each chart the gynecologists were asked whether they would treat the patient with HRT. They were also asked whether they would prescribe other therapies than HRT and if so, which ones. RESULTS: The chance to have an osteoporosis prevention or treatment prescribed increased when BMD decreased (respectively 57.4% for normal BMD, 73.1% for osteopenia cases and 89.4% for osteoporosis cases; P < 0.001). HRT was the most frequently prescribed medication (67% of the cases), but its prescription rate does not reflect only osteoporosis prevention. Nevertheless, for similar cases with osteopenia, the HRT prescription rate increased by a factor 1.25 and for similar cases with osteoporosis, HRT prescription rate increased by a factor 1.39. Calcium was the 2nd most frequent prescribed regimen. It was prescribed in 17% of the cases. A 3.4-fold increase for osteopenia cases and 7.6-fold increase for osteoporosis cases was observed, compared to women with normal BMD. When calcium was prescribed, it was in association with HRT in 64% of the osteopenia cases and in 76% of osteoporosis cases. Other drugs were less often prescribed. For the "younger age group", that is, with a mean age of 55 years, a prescription rate of 82.9% for any osteoporosis regimen was reached, whereas in the age group that was 10 years older a 20% lower prescription rate was reached (62.6%, P < 0.001). This was mostly due to a decrease in HRT prescription. CONCLUSIONS: Prescription of medication known to reduce osteoporosis occurred more often in cases with low BMD. In the older patients with osteoporosis, gynecologists prescribed HRT less frequently. This was not compensated by a higher prescription rate of other medication.
Campaigns to increase 'awareness' of osteoporosis have been organized. The aim of this study was to assess how Belgian women who benefit from superior conditions favoring 'awareness' perceive osteoporosis as being an important disease. A survey sent to the private home of all the women working in a university hospital in Brussels (n = 1154). From a list of 13 diseases the women were asked to rank, by order of importance, the five which they found to be the most important for a woman of their age. They were also asked about visits to physicians, and screening procedures. The response rate was 55.4%. A high uptake of medical visits and screening procedures was reported: 89% of the women had seen a general practitioner or a gynecologist and 81.6% had undergone at least one gynecologic examination during the previous year. Three times more women had ever undergone mammography than a bone mineral density (BMD) measurement. Overall, 18.1% reported having had a BMD measurement in the past. In women over 50 years, 61% reported having had a BMD measurement and 92.7% having had a mammogram. Osteoporosis was ranked among the five most important diseases by 19.4% of women before the age of 50 years and by 39.3% after that age, far behind breast cancer (respectively 86.3% and 77.7%) and uterine cancer (respectively 74.2% and 58.0%). Thus even among a population of women who benefit from superior conditions for information and screening, the perception of osteoporosis remains low, as does the uptake of osteoporosis screening.
INTRODUCTION: Among the gastrointestinal adverse effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and corticoids are mentioned complications of colonic diverticular disease. However, very few studies have described their consequences in rheumatoid arthritis. EXEGESIS: We report on seven patients who were admitted in our department between 1984 and 1997. All patients received corticoids and another antirheumatic drug (gold salts, hydroxychloroquine, immunosuppressive drugs); treatment also included NSAID in four cases. Two patients had a necrotizing vasculitis accompanying rheumatoid arthritis. Intestinal accompanying diseases were the following: one diverticulitis, three colonic perforations with pelviperitonitis, one colovesical fistula, one pelvic abscess, and one diverticular hemorrhage. All patients underwent surgery with positive results. CONCLUSION: Combination of the four following symptoms: fever, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and hemorrhage, can uncover a complication of colónic diverticular disease occurring in the course of rheumatoid arthritis. It should be investigated, even if no history of diverculosis may be evidenced.
OBJECTIVE: Several randomized trials have suggested recently that epidural steroid injections may not be a valid treatment in common low back pain and sciatica. To clarify this issue, we conducted a critical appraisal of relevant randomized trials published up to 1997. Attention was directed to methodological quality, results, and clinical implications. METHOD: A Medline search identified 13 trials published between 1966 and 1997. Trial methodology was evaluated using a 100-point grid based on four groups of items, namely study population, therapeutic intervention, evaluation method, and data presentation and analysis. RESULTS: Methodology quality scores ranged from 12 to 84 and were unrelated to the results of epidural steroid therapy. Five trials demonstrated greater pain relief within the first month in the steroid group as compared to the control group. Eight trials found no measurable benefits. Obstacles to meaningful comparisons across studies included differences in the patient populations, steroid used, volume injected, and number of injections. None of the published studies used the injection modalities that are standard practice in France. CONCLUSION: Whether epidural steroids are effective in common low back pain and sciatica cannot be determined based on our review.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: Adult Still's disease (ASD) is a rare chronic polyarthritis, usually treated with corticosteroid therapy. Because some patients become dependent on high dose prednisone or are refractory to that treatment, and because adverse events are frequent with corticosteroid, we evaluated the efficacy of low dose methotrexate (MTX) as a second-line drug. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 26 patients with ASD treated with low dose MTX because their disease was either resistant to or dependent on corticosteroids. RESULTS: The group included 13 women and 13 men, with a mean age of 32.6 years at onset of ASD. Mean disease duration at the beginning of MTX treatment was 59.9 mo (range 7 to 444). Evaluation took place at the maximum followup, which averaged 48.9 mo (range 8 to 136). The mean dose of MTX was 11.5+/-3.6 mg/week (range 7.5 to 17.5). Twenty-three patients responded to MTX; 18 had complete remission. No difference was seen between patients with or without extraarticular manifestations. Leukocyte and neutrophil counts and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were significantly reduced (p = 0.0001). Daily prednisone intake decreased by 69% (21.5 mg) (p = 0.0001). Eleven patients were able to stop taking corticosteroids. One patient with AA amyloidosis renal failure died of neutropenia: this was the only serious adverse event. CONCLUSION: MTX is an effective second-line treatment of ASD that does not respond to prednisone. It allows significant reduction of corticosteroid doses, which is beneficial to these patients, who have frequent and numerous corticosteroid related adverse events.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of avocado/soybean unsaponifiables (ASU) in the treatment of patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip, as well as the potential residual effects of ASU after stopping treatment, to determine whether ASU might be a symptomatic slow-acting drug for the treatment of OA. METHODS: One hundred sixty-four patients with regular, painful, primary OA of the knee (n = 114) or hip (n = 50) entered a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial with a 6-month treatment period and a 2-month posttreatment followup. A 15-day washout period for nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) preceded the study. Efficacy was judged according to 1) Lequesne's functional index (LFI) and 2) pain on Huskisson's visual analog scale (VAS; 100-mm scale), intake of NSAIDs/analgesics, and overall disability score (by 100-mm VAS). RESULTS: Eighty-five patients received ASU; 79 received placebo. One hundred forty-four patients were evaluable at month 6 (75 taking ASU; 69 taking placebo). The mean +/- SEM LFI score decreased from 9.7 +/- 0.3 to 6.8 +/- 0.4 in the ASU group and from 9.4 +/- 0.3 to 8.9 +/- 0.4 in the placebo group (P < 0.001 for intergroup difference at month 6). Pain decreased from 56.1 +/- 1.6 mm to 35.3 +/- 2.3 in the ASU group and from 56.1 +/- 1.8 mm to 45.7 +/- 2.6 in the placebo group (P = 0.003 at month 6). NSAID consumption was slightly lower in the ASU group. Fewer patients in the ASU group required NSAIDs (48%, versus 63% in the placebo group; P = 0.054). The success rate was 39% in the ASU group and 18% in the placebo group. Overall functional disability was significantly reduced in the ASU group. Improvement appeared more marked in patients with hip OA. A residual effect was observed at month 8. Tolerance was good to excellent for most patients. CONCLUSION: ASU treatment showed significant symptomatic efficacy over placebo in the treatment of OA, acting from month 2 and showing a persistent effect after the end of treatment.
A daily ingestion of 1000 to 1500 mg elemental calcium associated with vitamin D supplement is presently considered to be the adequate and least expensive therapy for senile osteoporosis. There exists only scarce data about calcium absorption with available calcium salts in elderly patients. We have compared the digestive absorption of calcium (Ca) citrate in soluble and solid form and calcium gluconolactate-carbonate in 15 young and 20 elderly, healthy women using the oral calcium loading test. The subjects were divided into two groups. In the first group, the absorption of solid Ca citrate (1000 mg Ca element) was compared to the absorption of Ca gluconolactate-carbonate (1000 mg Ca element) both in young (n = 7) and elderly women (n = 10). In the second group, the absorption of soluble Ca citrate (1000 mg Ca element) was compared to the absorption of Ca gluconolactate-carbonate (1000 mg Ca element) in young (n = 8) and elderly (n = 10) women. In the preload phase, basal calciuria was increased in elderly women (p < 0.01) although basal calcemia was similar in young and elderly women. After oral administration of the calcium salts, an increase in plasma Ca was observed in both groups which was greater for soluble Ca citrate and Ca gluconolactate than for solid Ca citrate. In young women, the increase in plasma calcium was significantly higher with soluble Ca citrate compared to Ca gluconolactate (p < 0.05). In elderly women, the postload calciuria was significantly higher for soluble Ca citrate (p < 0.05) and Ca gluconolactate (p < 0.05) compared to solid Ca citrate. A similar pattern was observed in young women, although it was not significant. In conclusion, an oral load of 1000 mg soluble Ca citrate and Ca gluconolactate-carbonate induces significant biochemical changes suggesting a better digestive absorption compared to Ca citrate in solid form, both in young and elderly women. We did not observe different response, between young and old patients.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate quantitatively the effectiveness and clinical relevance of various parameters of electrical stimulation used to relieve acute and chronic pain and to further knowledge of the mechanisms that may underlie the physiologic response produced by the transcutaneous application of each type of current. DESIGN: A nociceptive flexion reflex (RIII reflex) elicited in the lower limb by electrical stimulation of the sural nerve at the ankle was studied before, during, and after application of the following conditioning stimuli: (1) non-noxious transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)--low-intensity (2mA), short-duration (0.1 msec), and high-frequency (100Hz) rectangular pulses (TENS1); (2) noxious TENS--high-intensity (20mA), long-duration (2 msec), and low-frequency (3Hz) rectangular pulses (TENS2); (3) noxious piezo-electric current (PEC)--high-voltage, low-charge, low-intensity, and low-frequency rectangular pulses delivered by a piezo-electric ceramic device (PECs1); (4) a sham PEC situation in which the piezo-electric device did not produce any electric current (Sham PEC). Each conditioning stimulus (TENS1, TENS2, PECs1, Sham PEC) was applied for a 2-minute period either segmentally on the sural nerve itself or heterotopically on the skin overlying the first interosseous space of the contralateral hand. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four healthy volunteers (14 women, 10 men, 19 to 52 years of age), who were briefed and familiarized with the experimental procedure. During the experimental sessions, subjects were prone in bed to ensure muscular relaxation. MEASURES: Value of the nociceptive RIII reflex before, during, and after application of conditioning stimuli in the four procedures described above. This reflex was selected because it has been shown to be an objective and physiologic correlate of pain. RESULTS: Non-noxious TENS1 stimulation applied segmentally produced inhibitions of the RIII reflex only during the 2-minute conditioning period. When given segmentally, the noxious TENS2 stimulation produced a facilitatory effect during the 2 minutes of application, followed by significant inhibitory after-effects. The administration of TENS2 heterotopically resulted in inhibitions of the RIII reflex both during and after the 2-minute conditioning period. Application of PECs1, whether segmentally or heterotopically, produced powerful and long-lasting inhibitory after-effects, especially with the heterotopic paradigm. These effects were associated with long-lasting local changes to the skin of the neurogenic inflammation type, which were well tolerated by all subjects. Application of Sham PEC did not result in significant modification of either the RIII reflex or the skin. CONCLUSIONS: These data are discussed in terms of possible spinal and supraspinal mechanisms involving inhibitory descending controls and underline the potential clinical use of PECs1 in the treatment of pain.
This multicenter randomized, double-blind, controlled study was performed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of chondroitin sulfate (CS, Condrosulf, IBSA, Lugano, CH) 1200 mg/day oral gel vs CS 3 x 400 mg/day capsules vs placebo, in patients with mono or bilateral knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren and Lawrence radiographic score grade I to III). A total of 127 patients, 40 of whom were treated with CS 1200 mg/day, 43 with CS 3 x 400 mg/day and 44 with placebo, were included in the statistical analysis of this 3-month treatment study. In the CS groups, Lequesne's Index and spontaneous joint pain (VAS) showed a significant reduction of clinical symptoms (P < 0.01 for both parameters), while only a slight reduction was observed in the placebo group (P = ns for Lequesne's Index and P < 0.05 for VAS). The physician's and patient's overall efficacy assessments were significantly in favour of the CS groups (P < 0.01). The treatment carried out with the three formulations was very well tolerated. In conclusion, these results indicate that CS favours the improvement of the subjective symptoms, improving the joint mobility. An additional consideration is that the efficacy of 1200 mg CS as a single daily dose does not differ from that of 3 x 400 mg daily doses of CS for all the clinical parameters taken into consideration.
Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) influences many aspects of health: climacteric symptoms, osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, breast and endometrial cancer, thrombosis and emboli, and Alzheimer's disease. A decision to use HRT may depend on a woman's individual views of the menopausal transition, the postmenopause and its consequences. It is therefore useful that the health provider inquiries about and discusses these issues in a cultural and family context. Health providers and patients should be thoroughly informed about the symptoms associated with hormonal deprivation, the associated risks of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease, and the potential of HRT to prevent these afflictions. Recent studies suggest that HRT might be particularly beneficial in women who have an increased risk for cardiovascular disease (because of left ventricular hypertrophy, diabetes mellitus, hypertension or hypercholesterolaemia, or because they smoke) or osteoporosis. In women who are undecided about HRT, a low bone mineral density measurement might help convince them to start using, or to continue using, HRT. There is also a need to discuss with the patient the effect of HRT on cancer risk. In most instances, women can be reassured about the risk of endometrial cancer. The risk of breast cancer should be carefully considered and discussed with each patient before beginning HRT. In most cases, HRT should not be withheld because of fears about breast cancer, because the protective effects of HRT against cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis outweigh the possible increased risk of breast cancer. When HRT is prescribed, individual regiments should be discussed with the patient, who must be warned of the possible adverse effects. In older women, HRT can be started at half the normal dosage and tolerability assessed before increasing the dosage further.
OBJECTIVES: To translate and to validate the metrological properties of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire, an instrument designed to evaluate the impact of low back pain on four aspects of patients' lives: daily activities, work and leisure activities, anxiety/depression and social interest. METHODS: The Dallas Pain Questionnaire, originally in English, was translated into French. The metrological properties of the French version were investigated in a cohort of 59 patients with chronic low back pain due to degenerative disk disease. Duration of the pain was between three and 24 months. Treatment consisted of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and/or analgesics, local corticosteroid injections and a plaster lumbar corset. Patients were evaluated at baseline, after ten days (under the same treatment), and at completion of the treatment. RESULTS: Results were reproducible for all four areas of the questionnaire (CCI > 0.75). Internal structural validity was satisfactory for the four areas (Cronbach alpha test = 0.89 to 0.91). At baseline, the pain score on a visual analog scale was significantly correlated with the Dallas scores for daily activities, anxiety/depression and social interest (external structural validity). The daily activities, work/leisure and anxiety/depression scores were sensitive to change (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.003, respectively), whereas the social interest score was not (P = 0.11). CONCLUSION: The French version of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire is valid, reproducible, and sensitive to change in chronic low back pain patients.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
In an economic analysis one has not only to consider costs induced by hormonal substitution therapy (HRT) but also its impact health. Different therapy costs will be considered and related to potential benefits on health. HRT decreases the incidence of symptoms of the menopause, the risk of osteoporosis and perhaps the incidence of coronary hearth disease and the risk of Alzheimer disease but probably increases the incidence of breast cancer. For a majority of women, the favorable impact seems to dominate, increasing their life expectancy.