Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Redman

Publications and source records attributed to S Redman.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Evaluating the effectiveness of advocacy training for breast cancer advocates in Australia.

There is growing trend in health care for patients and consumers to have an active voice in all decisions related to their care. The purpose of the current study was to assess the effectiveness of an advocacy training programme for breast cancer consumers in Australia. The participants included 51 women who attended a 3-day advocacy training programme in three different states across Australia. Participants completed a pre- and post-questionnaire at 6 months follow-up to assess their involvement in breast cancer advocacy activities and organizations. Findings revealed a significant increase in participants' involvement in serving as a member of a board or committee, working on clinical trials recruitment issues, working on patient resources, and involvement in breast cancer advocacy groups after completing the training programme. However, no change was found in other key advocacy areas, such as, lobbying for change or reviewing research protocols. Implications for future advocacy training programmes and research were discussed.

Australia↗
PubMed2001

Differences in repair responses between immature and mature cartilage.

Cartilage has a poor reparative capacity although it is unclear as to what extent this may be dependent on age or maturation. In the current study, the cellular responses of chondrocytes to experimental wounding in vitro using embryonic, immature, and mature cartilage have been compared. In all cases, the response was consistent (a combination of cell death that included apoptosis and proliferation). The speed of response varied in terms of cell death with embryonic cartilage showing the most rapid response and mature cartilage showing the slowest response. Intrinsic repair as assessed by the ability to heal the lesion was not detected in any of the culture systems used. It was concluded that the poor repair potential of cartilage is not maturation dependent in the systems studied.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Investigating breast symptoms in primary care: enhancing concordance with current best advice.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether a targeted intervention could improve primary care practitioners' concordance with guidelines regarding management of women with breast symptoms. One hundred and twelve practitioners from randomly selected areas around Australia prospectively audited their investigations for each woman with a new breast symptom over two 12-week periods, before and five months after the release of national guidelines. Between the two audits, doctors received feedback on practice in relation to peers and attended one seminar in their local areas led by specialists from the Royal Australasian College of Physicians and the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. For five recommendations, there were statistically significant improvements at the second audit in line with standard Investigation of a New Breast Symptom (INBS) guidelines. All these were for investigations of breast lumps. At first audit, there were seven recommendations where practitioners were already managing more than 80% of women in accordance with the INBS, and where there were no statistically significant increases in concordance at second audit. Another six recommendations had lower concordance with the recommendations prior to the release of the guidelines and did not significantly improve at second audit. These tended to be for less-common presentations and where clinical findings were not consistent with other test results. We concluded that a targeted intervention improved physician concordance with current best advice for investigating women who present with new breast symptoms in a primary care setting. Further educational programs are needed to improve investigations for rarer symptoms, and to enhance physicians' confidence in the results of their clinical examinations.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

The development and evaluation of an incontinence screening questionnaire for female primary care.

Although there is a high prevalence of leaking urine among Australian women, there are currently no standardized procedures for screening patients for incontinence in the primary care setting (known in Australia as general practice). In response to this, an incontinence screening questionnaire (ISQ) was developed and evaluated for use in general practice. Eighty-nine women completed an original compilation of 33 items that asked about situations associated with leaking urine, avoidance of leakage, and concern about leakage. Each item was assessed according to its acceptability for the population of female general practice patients, discriminative value, and test-retest reliability. These patients also underwent an objective test of incontinence, the 48-hour pad test, so that the screening items could be validated against an objective classification of incontinence. The study included women who had bladder control problems and those who did not. Eight items on the ISQ were shown to be acceptable to patients, discriminative, reliable, and valid indicators of objective incontinence. Five items were capable of predicting almost 70% of patients who showed objective leakage of urine and misclassified fewer than 15% of these patients. Those five items were selected for inclusion in the (refined) ISQ.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed2000

Early discharge following breast surgery: assessing care, support, and informational needs of women with early breast cancer in Australia.

BACKGROUND: The overall aims of the present study were to identify differences among women with early breast cancer who were discharged early from the hospital (within 48 h) and those who remained for routine admission in relation to demographic variables, informational needs, supportive needs, complications and satisfaction with care. METHODS: A random sample of 544 women diagnosed with early breast cancer was recruited to participate in a telephone survey via State and Territory cancer registries. RESULTS: Findings revealed little significant difference among women participating in early discharge and routine care in relation to demographics variables, informational needs, complication and satisfaction with care. Women participating in early discharge, however, were significantly less likely to be seen by a specialist breast care nurse or a volunteer with breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Prior to establishing early discharge as routine care, it is essential to establish clear health policy relating to early discharge and adequate follow-up services for women with breast cancer.

Aftercare↗
PubMed2000

Process measures in an antenatal smoking cessation trial: another part of the picture.

Data on provider and patient compliance can be crucial in understanding the degree of a health education program's effectiveness, as well as in identifying areas where the program requires modification. However, such data are rarely systematically reported in randomized trials. This report assesses the degree to which doctors and midwives complied with intervention protocols in a hospital antenatal smoking cessation trial, and also examines the program's acceptability to patients. Provider compliance was assessed principally via consultation audiotapes and provider-completed checklists. The audiotape analysis identified substantial compliance problems. For example, in relation to six specific smoking-related pregnancy risks, the proportions of Experimental Women informed about each individual risk ranged from 26 to 38% and the proportions receiving counselling items ranged from 52 to 79%. Doctors only informed a minority of Experimental Women of the increased risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (28%) and of the presence of toxic chemicals in tobacco (21%). Comparison of compliance data from audiotapes and provider checklists revealed there was no significant agreement in three of four cases tested. Experimental Patients completed questionnaires to assess recall of smoking advice and to rate 12 program features. Of specific Experimental Program elements, the videotape (85%) received the highest level of positive patient ratings and the lottery (42%) the lowest. The process evaluation indicated that the Experimental Program needed some modification to increase its suitability for routine application. The findings also support the value of including an objective measure of provider compliance.

Female↗
PubMed2000

Reliability and validity of women's recall of mammographic screening.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability and validity of self-reported attendance for mammographic screening. METHODS: To assess reliability of recall of attendance for a screening mammogram, 100 women selected at random were interviewed twice (approximately one week apart). To assess validity, 127 women who reported having a mammogram within the national breast screening program (BreastScreen Australia) consented to having their reports verified by the national program. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability for the question "Have you ever had a mammogram?" was perfect (agreement 100%, kappa 1). Validity was also high. About one-quarter of women (24.4%) recalled the exact date of their last mammogram and a further third (39.4%) correctly reported the month in which the mammogram was done. Almost all (91.3%) women reported the mammogram date accurately to within 12 months of the recorded date. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that Australian women provide reliable and valid information in relation to mammographic screening attendance. IMPLICATIONS: Self-reported data about attendance for mammographic screening are likely to provide reliable and valid estimates for research and health services evaluation purposes.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Perceptions of screening mammography among women aged 40-49.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to survey women aged 40 to 49 to determine their perceptions of the benefits and the downsides of screening mammography for women in this age group, and the degree of support for targeting women aged 40 to 49 in the national BreastScreen program. METHOD: Telephone interviews were used in a two-stage survey of 200 women aged 40 to 49 from across Australia in 1997. Information that outlined some of the evidence for costs and effectiveness of screening in this age group was sent to the women after the first survey. RESULTS: Women saw both benefits and downsides of mammography screening in this age group. Although the proportion of women reporting downsides increased from (39%) to (69%), after reading the information most women (62%) still thought the benefits outweigh the downsides of offering a screening program to women aged 40-49 and the majority (66%) supported the notion of government funding for this. Most women agreed that women aged 40 to 49 have to be informed about all the advantages and disadvantages of screening before making a decision to attend. CONCLUSION: If women aged 40-49 were to be actively recruited to a government screening program, an information campaign should be undertaken that outlines the benefits and downsides of screening mammography to foster informed participation. IMPLICATIONS: Community views are a helpful contribution to debates about policy when existing data are ambiguous.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Knowledge and perceptions about breast cancer incidence, fatality and risk among Australian women.

OBJECTIVE: Breast cancer is the most common fatal cancer among Australian women. This study aimed to provide an accurate national picture of women's understanding of breast cancer incidence, fatality and risk. METHOD: A telephone survey explored the knowledge and perceptions of a sample of 2,935 Australian women in relation to breast cancer incidence, fatality, risk factors, risk perception and level of concern. RESULTS: Australian women were well aware of breast cancer in general terms, however, there were major aspects of incidence and risk which were poorly understood. Only 5% of women nominated age as a risk factor, and only one-third were able to make an approximately correct estimate of the incidence of breast cancer in Australia. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Recommendations for future information campaigns include targeting understanding of lifetime risk of developing breast cancer, age as a risk factor, survival from breast cancer and the need to separately address the perceptions of older versus younger women.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Surgeons' opinions about the NHMRC clinical practice guidelines for the management of early breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the opinions of surgeons about the NHMRC clinical practice guidelines for the management of early breast cancer (the Guidelines) and their views about and use of the accompanying Consumer's guide. DESIGN: Cross-sectional telephone survey. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Surgeons throughout Australia who manage breast cancer, designated as "breast" or "general" (members or non-members of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons' Section of Breast Surgery) and "urban" or "rural". RESULTS: Among 150 respondents (64% response rate) more than 80% of surgeons reported having read all or most of the Guidelines and believed they were useful in improving women's management and wellbeing, easy to understand, evidence-based, a good summary of recent evidence, and that they would assist agreement between women and healthcare providers. Surgeons agreed with most of the recommendations in the Guidelines, but 26% disagreed that "women should ideally be treated by a specialist who treats a large number of similar patients and who has access to the full range of treatment options in a multidisciplinary setting". In terms of medicolegal implications, 41% believed that the Guidelines would protect clinicians, while, of the 37% of surgeons who believed that they would expose doctors to increased problems, significantly more breast than general surgeons believed this (50% v. 19%; P < 0.001). Only 37% of surgeons routinely gave the Consumer's guide to all or more than half their patients. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons are generally positive about the Guidelines, but certain issues should be addressed if they are to be optimally implemented, including confusion about the medicolegal implications, perceived difficulties with providing multidisciplinary care and poor use of the Consumer's guide.

Academies and Institutes↗
PubMed1998

Elderly patients with heart failure: a study of satisfaction with care and quality of life.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of patient satisfaction with care, patient quality of life, the relationship between these measures and hospital readmission rates, and patient outcomes. METHODOLOGY: A prospective cohort study was conducted of all patients aged 60 years and over admitted to the John Hunter and Mater Hospitals, in the Hunter Area, in whom congestive heart failure contributed to the need for hospital admission. Patients recruited into the main study were then asked to complete a questionnaire on discharge from hospital. Patients were asked to complete the satisfaction questionnaire on discharge because this would reflect the patients' satisfaction with the overall stay. To provide a baseline quality-of-life score, patients were asked to complete a questionnaire 2 weeks after discharge. FINDINGS: Overall scores on the satisfaction questionnaire were high, indicating that the patients were very satisfied with their care. There were six questions in which 17-35% of patients indicated some degree of dissatisfaction, four related to patient knowledge. No difference in satisfaction was found between patients who had or did not have a readmission. Quality-of-life results showed that patients who had a readmission had a significantly lower quality-of-life score at 12 month follow up (P=0.007) than those without a readmission. CONCLUSION: This finding has supported our hypothesis that a higher level of quality of life would be related to fewer readmissions.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Print material as a public health education tool.

Despite the widespread use of print materials in public health education, little is known about the costs and processes involved in developing these materials and their effectiveness in practice. We examined a sample of printed health education materials, using interviews and checklists. The most cost-effective processes for developing materials were not being used and the effectiveness of materials was rarely evaluated.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗
PubMed1998

Should women take part in clinical trials in breast cancer? Issues and some solutions.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to consider the issues for women related to participation in clinical trials that evaluate the management of breast cancer and provide some recommendations for future initiatives to address the identified areas of concern. METHODS: The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) National Breast Cancer Centre hosted an international workshop to address the question "Clinical Trials in Breast Cancer: Should Women Take Part?" We also reviewed the literature on informed participation in clinical trials that was identified in a broadly based search that covered Medline, PsycLIT, and HealthPlan from 1986 to 1996. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: When women are asked to participate in a clinical trial, they are faced with a number of questions and dilemmas. These include issues related to the conduct and ethical considerations of the trial; the effect of participation or nonparticipation on treatment; the roles of the doctor as clinician and as researcher; the process of informed consent; the timing of the request for participation; and the benefits and costs of participation. A number of steps are identified that could help women decide whether to participate in clinical trials. These include provision of community information about clinical trials; establishment of independent brokers and registers for clinical trials; consumer review of information and protocols and involvement in trials; review of the role of ethics committees; collection of data about the proportion of women currently recruited to clinical trials, their reasons for participating or declining, and their views about the process of recruitment and participation; models for optimal practice in recruiting women to clinical trials and encouraging ongoing participation in trials; evidence-based communication skills training for clinicians to teach skills to inform women adequately of clinical trial participation; and auspicing and promotion of trials by an independent agency.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1997

Mammographic screening: results from the 1996 National Breast Health Survey.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the extent of women's knowledge of mammographic screening, particularly in relation to the national screening program, BreastScreen Australia, and to estimate the proportion of women who are participating in screening both within and outside BreastScreen Australia. DESIGN AND SETTING: Validated prospective telephone survey of women aged 30-69 years selected at random from across Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 2935 women with no previous breast cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: The adjusted response rate was 64%. Almost 90% of women had heard of the national program; only 1% correctly stated that screening is for asymptomatic women. 60% correctly identified the current recommended age of starting screening is about 50 years of age; 26% thought screening should begin at about 40 years of age. Approximately 60% correctly reported that the recommended screening interval is every two years; 27% thought screening should be done annually. 55% reported ever having had a mammogram, and 37% reported having had at least one screening mammogram. Among women in the target age group (50-69 years) about 70% reported ever having had a screening mammogram, and about 50% reported having had a screening mammogram within the national program in the last two years. Among women aged 40-49 years, 29% reported ever having had a screening mammogram, and 22% reported having been screened in the last two years. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of the national screening program is high, but some women do not know the purpose of screening, the target age group and the recommended screening interval. Compliance with screening is good among women in the target age group; many women in their 40s are also participating in screening.

Adult↗