Biomedical subjects
S R Kovac
Publications and source records attributed to S R Kovac.
Vaginal hysterectomy combined with liposuction.
Liposuction of the body has been safely combined with vaginal hysterectomy under certain guidelines. Morbidity and length of hospital stay were compared in 50 patients in whom vaginal hysterectomy was the sole procedure performed, with 50 patients in whom vaginal hysterectomy was combined with liposuction at the patient's request. These patients were enrolled in an experimental protocol to evaluate the safety of combining these two procedures. A statistical analysis showed no significant differences in the two groups, indicating that liposuction can be safely combined with uncomplicated vaginal hysterectomy.
Postoperative epidural analgesia. After vaginal hysterectomy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Hysterectomy. A comparative statistical study of abdominal vs. vaginal approaches.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Intramyometrial coring as an adjunct to vaginal hysterectomy.
A retrospective review of 902 hysterectomies, 727 (80.6%) performed vaginally and 175 (19.4%) abdominally, is presented. The technique of intramyometrial coring was used in 76% of the vaginal hysterectomy group. Surgical indications, length of surgery, length of hospital stay, and complications are analyzed. The evidence presented suggests that intramyometrial coring may be used for the vaginal removal of many uteri for which abdominal hysterectomy has been traditionally the procedure of choice. The clinical findings confirm that vaginal hysterectomies with intramyometrial coring are associated with lower morbidity and a significant decrease in length of hospitalization.
Abdominal versus vaginal hysterectomy: a statistical model for determining physician decision making and patient outcome.
To identify the effects of preoperative assessment and physician practice style on the outcomes of hysterectomy, the authors conducted a small-area analysis of 640 women under-going abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy in a St. Louis, Missouri, hospital. Of these patients, excluding outliers, 115 met the conditions for inclusion in the study. Hysterectomies were performed by the abdominal route in 55 (47.8%) and by the vaginal route in 60 (52.2%) of the 115 patients. A total of 29 physicians performed the hysterectomies. Of these 29, 15 (51.7%) were predisposed toward the abdominal approach, 13 (44.8%) had no appreciable predisposition, and one (3.5%) was predisposed toward the vaginal procedure. Path analysis revealed that physician decision making about the type of hysterectomy procedure performed was primarily influenced by practice style (predisposition) and variables related to physician preoperative assessments (uterine size and uterine mobility), some of which are prone to inaccuracy. Factors that traditionally determine operative approach (such as obesity) did not always act in the expected direction. Furthermore, the decision to perform hysterectomy vaginally had positive outcomes for both cost and length of hospital stay. Shorter hospital stays were associated with physician factors that included selection of the vaginal route, training site, predisposition toward the vaginal procedure, and preoperative assessment of uterine size. Length of hospital stay and duration of surgery were the strongest predictors of cost. Other factors being equal, the mean cost of a vaginal procedure is $224 less than that of an abdominal hysterectomy. Establishing the vaginal approach as the recommended procedure for this specific population should result in cost reductions and shorter hospital stays without negatively impacting quality of care.