Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S R Achem

Publications and source records attributed to S R Achem.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Successful oesophageal pH monitoring with a catheter-free system.

BACKGROUND: Traditional catheter-based oesophageal pH testing is limited by patient discomfort and the tendency for patients to alter their diet and activities during the study. A catheter-free pH monitoring system (Bravo) designed to avoid these problems has recently become available, but the advantages and limitations of this device have not been fully explored. AIM: To report our initial experience with this new technology. METHODS: The records of consecutive patients undergoing Bravo pH monitoring were reviewed. The squamo-columnar junction was localized endoscopically and the pH capsule was placed 6 cm above this junction. All patients were re-endoscoped immediately following placement to document mucosal attachment. Patients were monitored for 24-48 h and then returned the radiotelemetry recording device. Data were subsequently downloaded to a personal computer. RESULTS: Sixty studies were performed over an 11-month period. In seven of the 60 (12%), the probe did not attach properly, but in six of these a replacement probe was prepared and deployed without difficulty. In one case, the probe could not be attached after two attempts and the procedure was abandoned. During one procedure, the probe was attached to the mucosa at a point 9 cm from the squamo-columnar junction, but a positive test result was obtained. In two cases, the data were not initially retrievable from the recorder, but in one case the manufacturer was able to retrieve the data overnight. Finally, two patients were away from the data recorder for extended periods, resulting in a loss of data, in two cases, but there was sufficient information for interpretation in both studies. Therefore, adequate diagnostic data were obtained in 58 of the 60 (97%) studies. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter-free pH testing is a major advance in patient convenience and comfort. The technical difficulties associated with this new technology are minimal and appear to be no more frequent than those seen with catheter-based systems.

Adult↗

Review article: supra-oesophageal manifestations of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and the role of night-time gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been associated with a variety of supra-oesophageal symptoms, including asthma, laryngitis, hoarseness, chronic cough, frequent throat clearing and globus pharyngeus. GERD may be overlooked as the underlying mechanism for these symptoms because typical GERD symptoms may be absent, despite abnormal oesophageal acid exposure. Two basic mechanisms linking GERD with laryngeal symptoms have been proposed: direct contact of gastric acid with the upper airway, in some cases due to micro-aspiration, and a vagovagal reflex triggered by acidification of the distal portion of the oesophagus. Gastro-oesophageal reflux (GER) during sleep is believed to be an important mechanism for the development of supra-oesophageal complications of GERD, such as asthma and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Several physiological changes during sleep, including prolonged oesophageal acid contact time, decreased upper oesophageal sphincter pressure, increased gastric acid secretion, decreased salivation, decreased swallowing and a decrease in conscious perception of acid, render an individual more susceptible to reflux-induced injury. Supra-oesophageal symptoms often improve in response to aggressive acid-suppressive therapy. However, many unanswered questions remain regarding the appropriate approach to diagnosis and treatment of patients with GERD-related supra-oesophageal symptoms. In this article we review the relationship between supra-oesophageal symptoms and GERD and, where possible, highlight the evidence supporting the role of night-time reflux as a contributing factor to these symptoms.

Asthma↗

Lichen planus involving the esophagus.

Lichen planus is a common mucocutaneus disorder that rarely involves the esophagus. We report two challenging cases presenting with recurrent dysphagia originally suspected due to gastroesophageal reflux. Subsequent evaluation revealed peculiar endoscopic findings of desquamative esophagitis leading to the diagnosis of lichen planus of the esophagus. This disorder should be considered in middle age or elderly women presenting with unexplained dysphagia or odynophagia. In this paper we review the available literature on the subject and summarize every case reported to date.

Aged↗

Rationale for surgical therapy of Barrett esophagus.

Barrett esophagus has malignant potential and seems to be an acquired abnormality. It is associated with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease and represents its severest form. The literature comparing medical treatment with antireflux surgery was reviewed. Questions regarding the advantages of surgery, who should undergo surgery, whether surgery can change the course of Barrett esophagus, the change in cancer risk, who needs surveillance, and cost-effectiveness were addressed. The incidence of developing Barrett cancer was 1 in 145 patient-years in reviewing 2032 patient-years of medical therapy compared with 1 in 294 patient-years in reviewing 4122 patient-years after surgery. Median follow-up time in the 2 groups was 2.7 years in the medically treated patients and 4.0 years in the surgically treated patients. Surveillance of Barrett esophagus is required irrespective of treatment. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery was found to be cost-effective after 7 years. Although these data do not prove that surgery is superior to medical treatment in the prevention of cancer related to Barrett esophagus, we found a tendency for surgery to be better than medical therapy to prevent the development and progression of Barrett carcinoma.

Barrett Esophagus↗

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia in adults.

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia is rarely seen in adults. A review of the literature is presented, and 2 additional cases of Morgagni and Bochdalek hernias are presented. They were both repaired with the laparoscopic approach.

Adult↗

Recent developments in chest pain of undetermined origin.

The syndrome of angina-like pain with normal epicardial coronary vessels is a very common and expensive clinical problem. Patients suffering from this condition frequently present a diagnostic challenge. Cardiac and musculoskeletal disorders must be excluded prior to identifying the esophagus as the source of pain. The term "chest pain of undetermined origin" (UCP) has been proposed to refer to this condition. Esophageal dysmotility was previously considered a major source for chest pain; however, recent studies indicate that esophageal reflux is the most common cause of esophageal pain. Two controlled trials of acid suppressive agents in patients with chest pain have shown that omeprazole provides effective pain relief for the majority of these individuals. Visceral hyperalgesia and psychologic disturbances are also commonly noted in patients with UCP. Much remains to be learned about the etiology of visceral hyperalgesia and the precise role of psychologic abnormalities in these patients. Until further information is available, treatment with imipramine or trazodone has been shown to offer effective relief of chest pain for subgroups of patients with UCP. Psychologic intervention is also valuable in the management of some patients. Studies of other therapeutic regimens continue to be conducted.

Angina Pectoris↗

Accurate placement of the esophageal pH electrode for 24-hour pH monitoring using a combined pH/manometry probe.

OBJECTIVE: Accurate placement of a pH electrode requires manometric localization of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Combined manometry/pH devices using water-perfused tubes attached to pH catheters and the use of an electronic "LES locator" have been reported. We investigated whether accurate placement of pH probes can be achieved using such a probe, and whether this may reduce the need for the performance of the usual stepwise pull-back manometry. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients (15 men, 15 women; median age, 56 yr; interquartile range, 42-68 yr) referred for manometry and pH testing were included in the study. The localization of the LES was determined with standard esophageal manometry. After that, a second 3-mm pH electrode with an internal perfusion port was passed into the stomach. Using this catheter, a single stepwise pull-through manometry was performed and the LES position was noted. LES location, mean pressure, and length obtained with standard manometry were compared to data from the combined pH/manometry catheter. Additionally the time necessary to perform each of the procedures was noted and the patient's discomfort caused by the catheter was evaluated using a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: The LES location with the pH/manometry probe was proximal to that with standard manometry in 19 patients (63%), the same in nine patients (30%), and distal in two patients (7%). The differences were <2 cm in 29 of 30 (97%) patients. The LES location with the pH/manometry probe required a median of 6.5 min (interquartile range: 3.5-8.5 min) versus a median of 21.5 min (interquartile range: 14.5-26.5 min) for standard manometry (p < 0.0001). In addition, LES evaluation using the combined pH/manometry probe provided accurate data on the resting pressure, as well as overall and intraabdominal length of the LES. All patients tolerated the combination probe better than the standard manometry probe (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Placement of the esophageal electrode for 24-h esophageal pH monitoring using a combined pH/manometry probe is accurate. The technique is simple, time-saving, and convenient for the patients. Because it is possible to accurately evaluate the LES using this technique, it may even replace conventional manometry before pH probe placement.

Adult↗

Manometry of the upper esophageal sphincter and pharynx is not useful in unselected patients referred for esophageal testing.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether routinely performing upper esophageal sphincter/pharyngeal (UES/P) manometry in patients referred for esophageal testing alters clinical practice. METHODS: Clinical history along with radiography and manometry studies were reviewed in 470 patients referred for manometry. A total of 435 (92.6%) were found to have adequate evaluation of the UES/P and were included in the study. RESULTS: Of 435 studies, 80 (17.7%) had one or more UES/P abnormalities. Indications for these 80 studies were dysphagia in 30 cases (37.5%), chest pain in 26 (32.5%), both in four (5.0%), and other in 20 (25%). There were 85 manometric abnormalities in the 80 studies: hypertensive UES in 16 cases (18.8%), incomplete UES relaxation in 38 (44.7%), hypertensive pharynx in seven (8.2%), hypotensive pharynx in 15 (17.6%), and abnormal coordination in nine (10.6%). A total of 41 patients had a barium study, which was normal in 11 cases (26%), confirmed the problem in 16 (40%), and suggested another problem in 14 (34%). In 17 patients (21%), there was clinical suspicion for an oropharyngeal disorder before manometry, whereas in 58 cases it was an unexpected finding. Of the 58 patients with an unexpected finding, therapy based on this finding was offered in six (three esophageal dilations, two dietary changes, and one swallowing therapy). If patients with concomitant esophageal body disorders are excluded, in only three patients an unexpected UES finding led to change in management. CONCLUSIONS: An unexpected UES/P finding resulted in a change in therapy in only six of the manometries. Barium esophagogram was diagnostic of the oropharyngeal abnormality in nearly two-thirds of the patients in whom it was clinically suspected. These data, along with limited therapeutic options, suggest limited usefulness for routine UES/P manometry.

Barium↗

Selection of patients for laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

Since the first laparoscopic fundoplication was performed, the frequency of antireflux surgery has increased rapidly with some centers now having an experience of about 1,000 procedures. The question arises whether this increase is due to a change in indications for the surgical treatment of gastrointestinal reflux disease (GERD) despite the simultaneous appearance of powerful antisecretory medications. Adequate knowledge of the pathophysiology of GERD is necessary in order to establish selection criteria for patients suitable for laparoscopic antireflux surgery. In this article, we review the epidemiology and pathophysiology, and provide a rationale for medical and surgical treatment. We also offer an approach to patient selection for antireflux surgery.

Animals↗

Endoscopy-negative gastroesophageal reflux disease. The hypersensitive esophagus.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the mos common disorders of the gastrointestinal tract. Patients with GERD symptoms may exhibit a spectrum of endoscopic findings ranging from normal endoscopy (EGD negative) to severe ulcerative esophagitis. Recent evidence indicates that a large proportion of patients with GERD have normal endoscopy. The use of 24-hour ambulatory pH testing in the evaluation of symptomatic patients with EGD negative GERD allows further classification of these subjects into groups. Patients who have abnormal acid exposure and a positive symptom index constitute one group and patients who have normal acid contact time but record a convincing relationship between their symptoms and acid reflux on the pH analysis--positive symptom index--form another group. The latter group has been suggested to have a hypersensitive esophagus or "functional heartburn." This article reviews the prevalence, clinical features, origin of patient's symptoms, natural history, and treatment of patients with EGD negative GERD.

Esophagoscopy↗

Does progesterone fluctuation across the menstrual cycle predispose to gastroesophageal reflux?

OBJECTIVE: Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) occurs in 30-50% of all pregnancies. The progressive rise in plasma progesterone has been suggested as a possible mediator of GER during pregnancy. It is not known whether progesterone, at physiological concentrations, has an effect on acid contact time. We sought to evaluate the relationship between progesterone concentrations, lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP), and acid contact time across the normal menstrual cycle. METHODS: LESP, 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring, and serum progesterone levels were determined in 19 healthy women known to have normal menstrual cycles. All tests were performed during the follicular phase (days 2-7) and the luteal phase (days 22-28) of one or two consecutive menstrual cycles. RESULTS: Despite marked oscillations in progesterone levels between the follicular phase (0.37 +/- 0.3 ng/ml) and luteal phase (4.64 +/- 2.92 ng/ml) we observed no significant differences in LESP (29.82 +/- 9.49 vs 30.45 +/- 8.56 mm Hg) or 24-h ambulatory pH levels (pH < 4) in total time (3.04 +/- 0.3% vs 3.18 +/- 2.51%), upright time (4.41 +/- 3.54% vs 4.18 +/- 3.36%), or supine time (0.77 +/- 1.32% vs 1.42 +/- 2.18%). CONCLUSIONS: The fluctuations in progesterone levels across the normal menstrual cycle have no significant impact on LESP and 24-h ambulatory pH parameters. Progesterone, at physiological concentrations, does not predispose to GER in healthy menstruating women.

Acids↗

The watermelon stomach: clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment.

The watermelon stomach syndrome is an increasingly recognized cause of persistent acute or occult gastrointestinal bleeding, typically in elderly women. This disorder often presents with severe iron deficiency anemia, and a variety of associated conditions including autoimmune disease, cirrhosis, achlorhydria, and hypochlorhydria. Diagnosis is made by the characteristic endoscopic appearance of visible linear watermelon-like vascular stripes in the antrum. Histology confirms the vascular nature of this disorder, showing dilated and thrombosed capillaries in the lamina propria, associated with reactive fibromuscular hyperplasia. The optimum treatment of choice is not known. Several treatment options, including surgical antrectomy, and endoscopic photocoagulation with Nd:Yag laser, heater probe therapy, and bipolar electrocautery, have yielded excellent results. Pharmacological agents have also been used to treat selected numbers of patients, most of which comprise a small number of case reports.

Adult↗

Effects of omeprazole versus placebo in treatment of noncardiac chest pain and gastroesophageal reflux.

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) occurs in 22-66% of patients with noncardiac chest pain (NCCP). Although open-label investigations have shown beneficial effects of antireflux therapy in NCCP, no double-blind, prospective, placebo-controlled studies have been conducted. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of omeprazole compared to placebo in a prospective, double-blind, randomized trial of patients with NCCP and GER. Thirty-six consecutive patients with NCCP and GER documented by 24-hr ambulatory pH testing entered this study. The subjects were randomized to omeprazole, 20 mg by mouth twice a day (17 patients), or placebo (19 patients) for eight weeks. Patients on omeprazole obtained significantly more improvement in the fraction of chest pain days (P = 0.006) and severity (P = 0.032) when compared to placebo. More patients in the omeprazole group reported improvement in individual daily pain scores (81% vs 44%, P = 0.03) and individual severity scores (81% vs 50%, P = 0.057). Thirteen (81%) of the subjects in the treatment arm reported overall symptomatic improvement versus one (6%) in the placebo group (P = 0.001). The results of this study indicate that acid suppression with omeprazole effectively improves chest pain in patients with NCCP and GER.

Chest Pain↗